ITT: The first time you ever questioned a special effect.
Pic related. The Mummy 2 was my first rented DVD and I was shocked to see how shit The Rock looked.
>>71892771
This looks fine to me.
space jam arm stretching
>>71892771
>>71892941
Yeah its pretty good and the movie only had a 30mil budget
>>71892941
trolled hard ;)
Every single scene from Attack of The Clones
The arms in RoboCop
>>71892365
Yes, and just imagine that was 2001 3d animation. Technology has greatly improved since then.
>>71892771
same
I questioned if it was real life
>>71893243
That wasn't high quality CGI when it came out.
>>71892365
the new Berserk anime has pretty shit CGI in case you haven't heard
>>71892365
It's only because that film's SFX were never finished.
>>71893412
No, but even then duplicating the subtleties of translucent human skin was nearly impossible.
>>71893072
Still the best Hulk ever filmed
>>71893734
ang lee adding feelings and shit.
Lawnmower Man
>>71892365
Jurassic Park. Dinos were supposed to have feathers.
>>71894674
Jesus, I forgot how bad the CGI on that film was..
>>71893734
mah nigga.
Ang Lee was so fucking based.
>>71894368
That can't be real
>>71894674
>>71893580
what video game is this?
More or less this was my earliest in bad practical effects
That one Bond film (Die Another Day?) where Pierce used a parachute to windsurf on a tidal wave to avoid the bad guys solar weapon
>>71894368
>tfw ywn watch the unfinished bootleg for the first time again
>>71894911
Heart of Darkness
>>71894956
thx anon
>>71894945
and CGI wise definitely Return of the Jedi
>>71894859
spawn was awful in general and that gives me nightmares.
