>critics are eating it up
I'm one of the people who called this while everyone was like “lol they're gonna tear it a new one“, you owe me /tv/
Wow, that's surprising. I was expecting a 20 score at best.
Top Critics seem more harsh on it.
>>71860699
>everyone was like “lol they're gonna tear it a new one“
I thought they were all "critcs aren't allowed to badmouth feminist movies", which is also being proven wrong as a lot of the reviews are reasonably critical.
Basically both groups of /tv/s shitposters are wrong, the ones who said it would be a critical flop and the ones who said the Matriarchy would force it to have good reviews.
Wow, I guess I'm a #bunkerbuster now
Only the pleb critics who fear backlash are eating it up.
The Top Critics currently have it at 50%
This is hilarious
>/v/ babbies pretending they're /tv/
>/v/ babbies pretending they weren't waiting all fucking week for this to be rotten
>/v/ babbies ignoring this morning and their countdown to it being blown out by critics
>/v/ babbies are now crying check the top critics
Fucking
ADORABLE
It was inevitable, no one wants their name attached to a film that marks you as a sexist for hating it.
Let's see what the anonymity of the Box Office has to say about it
Waiting for when /tv/ is going to pretend they liked it all along.
No one gives a flying fuck about "top" critics except Reddit.
>>71860917
You're trying to tell me you weren't hyped to see 2016's funniest movie of the summer?
>>71860725
>false flagging
2 cents pajeet
>>71860875
>still triggered by gamergate
Will your ass ever stop hurting?
>>71860875
why are you spamming the same comment in every thread? that's lame
>>71861018
Not until we get our board back from the /v/ cancer.
>>71861083
Just to make sure lurkers know that it wasn't /tv/.
Eh, the reviews seem alright to me. The majority of people admit it's nowhere near the original's level of quality and even a lot of positive reviews say that it's flawed, has bad CGI, has misses in its comedy, etc.
Overall score is in the 60 range, which seems about right.
Nothing worth getting triggered over.
>>71860875
Ok I get that you hate /v/edditors, but what does that have to do with Ghostbusters?
Nonono it can't be good that's not what the narrative told me it must be feminist pandering!
>>71860875
go to bed. I dont play video games, Im just a normal male with a natural instinct on being sexist towards women.
>>71860699
Imagine being Arnold in that movie theater and having to be all like "damn, female ghostbusters, you fuckin' funny, all hilarious with your anti-male jokes and horrific CGI ghosts. I would totally watch a sequel, both my character and the real me." when all he really wants to do is rewatch ghostbusters.
>>71860699
I predicted 87% min score. Guess I was wrong, unless it goes up later.
>>71860875
>IF YOU ARE AGAINST FEMINISM YOU'RE FROM /v/
/r/ShitRedditSays pls go
>>71861115
>our board
The man that raped you got away with it.
>>71861115
Hi leddit
>>71860699
Are you the /tv/ as fuck dude?
>>71862761
>https://boards.fireden.net/_/search/filename/1445748104297/
JUST
>>71861934
Upboated my nigger friend!
I TOLD YOU SO /TV/ HAHAHAHAHAHA
>>71862813
>look Im not new!
>>71862813
>someone on /v/ posted the same image
Oh god no...
;.;
>>71862833
>it'll be 90%
>fag hasn't made a bomb yet
>76%
>48% top critics
>hahaha still btfo
How much blood is dripping from your ass right now?
>>71862852
>I'm a gamer
neck yourself
>>71862852
>same fn
>i-i-its someone else haha!
SEXIST /TV/ MANBABBIES BTFO
WE DID IT REDDIT
>>71860699
Stunned this got positive reviews
>>71862880
>>71862873
>IT'S GOTTA BE THE SAME PERSON, IT'S A CONSPIRACY
>ANYONE WHO DOESN'T LIKE KEKBUSTERS IS FROM /V/
Lmao the guy that raped you got away with it /r/ShitRedditSays
>>71862886
Hahahaha 48% top critics we win man babies your childhood is dead!!
Buying tickets to a movie and giving money to an international conglomerate is sticking it in your face gooobergagggers hahahahhaa!!!
le Reddit army crossing the don XD u lose babbymen
>>71862873
>>71862880
>I'M /TV/ AS FUCK
>I'M TOTALLY NOT FROM REDDIT YOU SEXIST MANBABBIES
LMAO
Well, I guess now comes the nu-wave of reboots staring ugly women making jokes at men's expense.
Congrats America, you got what you want.
>>71861513
Nothing offends a /v/edditor more than belling called /v/eddit.
You can call him anything, any insult, but if you call him reddit he will shriek and throw a hissy fit. He's been found out and he hates it, he doesn't even understand how it happened, he tried to fit in but failed.
The /v/edditor is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a redditor, memer, /b/, faggot, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him /v/eddit and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
WHEN WILL THESE FUCKING 4CHANNER RACIST SEXISTS FROM /V/ LEAVE OUR SUBRE- um er I mean BOARD?!?!
Wait, so you're telling me Paul Feig, famous director of good movies, made a good movie.
>the caught /v/ babby replied twice after being caught and is now in full damage control
I can't stop laughing
Why does /v/ get so upset when called out? No other board is like this
>>71862987
THIS
/TV/ SHOULD BE A SAFESPACE FOR RACIST PEDOPHILE MANCHILDREN
>>71862974
>ANYONE WHO HATES THE NEW GHOSTBUSTERS IS FROM /V/
Why is /r/ShitRedditSays so unbelievably butthurt?
They're so incredibly obvious
>I'm /tv/ as fuck guise.
Yeah, sure you are.
>>71862988
His Spy movie was an almost masterpiece
While I'm pretty sure it's an unfunny cringefest, it probably isn't as bad as the trailers would indicate if this is the score. I don't think 76% of critics are totally in Sony's pocket. Maybe they have garbage taste, maybe some of them are virtue signalling but they're not all shills. I'm sure it sucks but it must not be the trainwreck we expected.
>>71863016
>>ANYONE WHO HATES THE NEW GHOSTBUSTERS IS FROM /V/
Where does it say that?
>>71863004
Hey /r/ShitReddit says.
The guy that raped you got away with it and is living a much better life than you right now
ayy lmao
>>71863043
The fact you keep spamming "/v/ BTFO" in every thread?
>>71863043
>dude weed lmao land
Actually don't even other replying.
>>71863016
They thought it'd score as high as fiegs other shit
It's nowhere close
>>71863043
>>71863004
I'm convinced it's the same autist who spams "hurr durr it's /v/" every thread
/v/ is more tightly regulated and moderated than /tv/, get over yourself
>>71863072
Where? >>71862974 is my first post in this thread
>>71863097
>"hurr durr it's /v/" every thread
Of course it's the same person.
Some assdamaged SJW from /r/ShitRedditSays that thinks he's "raiding" us.
Pathetic.
It's only making this board hate feminism more.
why is /tv/ going into melt down over this?
why does /tv/ even care about rt? like have you see and read what these critics say about movies
why would you put into trust into their opinions about anything?
this is literally trolls pretending to be triggered by other trolls
truly cancer
>>71863004
>/v/ going full blown victim complex now
>i-its not us! we're totally /tv/ c-check out banef or you
LMAO
>>71863077
These ghostbuster threads keep getting deleted because all anyone does is post memes at each other.
No one is actually discussing the film anymore because all these retards think that everything about it has already been discussed.
No more new material so time to go back to posting the same shit as always.
It's almost ironic that anyone here who is amused by this repetitive bullshit would claim to hate remakes just because they're remakes.
>>71863158
>I'M /TV/ A FUCK
>SEXIST RACIST 4CHAN MANBABBIES BTFO
Tell me about the /v/ boogeyman again /r/ShitRedditSays.
Any review saying it's good reeks of an attempt to not be labeled sexist
>he's still replying to me aka an actual /tv/ poster whilst he himself would just put on any boards badge for uplikes
Jesus fucking christ. This keeps getting funnier and funnier
>>71863252
Who are you quoting?
>aka an actual /tv/ poster
kek
Yes, we believe you reddit.
>>71863146
>>71863158
>sub 50 top critics
>haha t...v.. loses...!
>>71863286
Are you stepping up? We can make it happen, but you might end up going all the way back to when you were a /b/ baby and get intimidated by a name on the internet. It's up to you
>>71863359
Speak english please.
>>71863359
Why'd you delete you post in that other thread?
>>71863423
not him but which post was that
>>71863401
Whats wrong? Can you not prove you're /tv/ or something?
>>71863461
>prove you're /tv/
>>71863493
ya I didn't think so shitlord
people on /tv/ fight against sexism and bigotry.
Obviously YOU don't fit in here.
>>71863493
>he's a reddit
So my suspicions about you are correct. lmaoing @ your sensibilities
/tv/edditors are so ass pained from Ghostbusters16.
They really need to go back.
>eating it up
Fucking what? Friend, I used to be a film critic. Go look at the reviews. Their language is exactly the kind of unenthused, noncommittal filler that people use when they really want to feel a certain way about something, but simply don't. It's the pseudo-intellectual's equivalent of "Yeah, it was pretty great, I guess..." You should've known the reviews were going to look like this from the start. It was guaranteed lukewarm.
>>71860699
>90% want to see
5.1 on IMDb. Relax people.
>>71860972
So funny that Feig is laughing all the way to the bank.
>>71860875
>1297901310075.png
Man, you been here for awhile, but you still went and wrote such a fucking stupid post. Still acting like boards on one people, trying to act smug. Pretending like their isn't legit reason to fucking hate this movie just from the premise alone.
>>71863432
Same shit more or less but invoking oldfag status
>>71863692
shit most average movies can get at least a 7 on IMpleb it must be pretty bad
also this thread
>>71863732
I'm too lazy but can you make a compilation picture of all that guys posts? He uses the same file names.
>>71863547
>still nothing after countless breakneck speed replies
Always the same, no matter the year, no matter the board, no matter the defense
>>71863160
What else do you expect from a modern RT thread on /tv/?
Everyone knows all their good for is getting (You)s
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1289401/?ref_=nv_sr_1
>average rating 6.6 on rt
>this is including the shills
>>71860699
No one said it would be torn a new one, no one with sense anyways.
It was always going to get such a safe score, reflecting those who don't want to be caught in the shitstorm.
We'll see how it pans out as the rest of the reviews come in.
Im just going to boycott this movie
>>71863656
Sargon a shit.
>its a shit throwing contest episode
shut up.
>>71864780
You individually not wanting to purchase a thing isn't a boycott. A boycott is organized and massive.
>>71860875
this place really is cucked
