That's fucking embarrassing
>>71860098
How the fuck can they have a consensus if they only have 45 reviews? This shit is obviously bought and paid for.
>>71860136
its also a libtard echo chamber website
>>71860098
Not as embarrassing as shilling for Fembusters.
>>71860196
this
DC fags, BTFO AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN...
>>71860209
The critic reviews sure, but how is the website itself liberal?
>Almost 4 months
>Still mad
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>71860136
>How the fuck can they have a consensus if they only have 45 reviews
Not to mention having one 5 days before the movie even drops.
Also, there's a huge disparity between this and the Top critics
>>71860098
>yfw you realize the DCucks are right about paid off reviews.
>>71860321
Is this Evans kino?
>>71860311
Jesus Christ this, you're pathetic OP. Just hang yourself already, clearly this is the only thing you have going for you.
Why do people even care about the critic score? The people score is always more accurate.
>>71860098
I'd be having a good look at the motives behind the people who own the parent companies of the companies that own that web site before i started talking to much shit...
>>71860399
Warner Bros. owns it.
>>71860136
>How the fuck can they have a consensus if they only have 45 reviews?
They have algorithms for this shit, at this point it's basically impossible for the rating to go rotten. It's a matter of probability.
>>71860345
>It's cherry.It's actually a red pill.
>45 reviews 5 days before the movie comes out
I guess the /pol/tards and DCcucks were right. /pol/ is always right, yadda yadda
>>71860311
that pic is more a highlight of the movie's failures than the audiences'
>>71860429
>>71860345
You're wayyyy behind the ball on how the internet is used to manipulate public opinion and information. Way, way behind. Everybody is. We have no idea how completely fucking phoney our whole window on the world is.
>>71860209
>libtard echo chamber
/pol/ please go away and stay go.
>>71860136
>This shit is obviously bought and paid for.
HAHAHHAHAHAHAhHAHAHAH
>>71860136
How fucking new are you to this medium you piece of shit tourist?
>>71860345
it's not about being paid. All those reviews are positive because the "critics" are pussies pandering to sjw crowd.
>>71860478
I don't get what you're implying with this picture.
>>71860482
Go outside, take a breath, calm down and get a life DC fag.
>>71860451
Not gonna happen jew
>>71860478
but reddit loves Whedonverse Avengers.
>>71860451
Other people can't read books, watch movies, play games, use computers, buy toys and be on the right side, the post.
I'm not gonna watch this shit, but seeing autists all over the internet cry about the rotten tomatoes conspiracy is gonna be great.
>>71860547
>Not gonna happen jew
/pol/ loves Jews now, go read the memo.
>DC fags losing their shit
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>71860515
DELETE THIS
>>71860587
is it because trump is loved by israel
>>71860098
critics will be labeled mysoginist racist nerds if they give a bad review
76% is still bad for early reviews
>>71860678
>76% is still bad for early reviews
How so?
>>71860098
Yeah, RT really has lost it as a source of objective evaluation. I never used it anyways
It probably is a concerted effort to raise the score, it isn't like that isn't what happened to the YouTube trailer dislikes.
>>71860678
you fags will make up any kind of dubious theory to back up your retarded conspiracies huh?
>>71860678
This. Want to review for the NYT? Huffpo? USA Today? All are left leaning with liberal management. Gotta please your bosses to keep your jobs.
>>71860696
You're asking a pleb that knows almost nothing about ratings, film and RT
The fact that he thinks the % is the score should tell you enough
>>71860696
they usually start very strong and go down from there, there are very few cases like Ant Man where the porcentage went up
>>71860672
>is it because trump is loved by israel
Because Trump loves Israel. He also promised to model his policies on the Jewish nation, even going as far as saying he will have racial profiling just like Israel does.
>>71860740
you know is true and I dont even like the original Ghostbusters but the new one looks like dogshit
>>71860793
who knew white supremacists and jewish supremacists were so alike?
besides everyone not stupid i mean.
>>71860712
>it isn't like that isn't what happened to the YouTube trailer dislikes
That was clearly a case of an organization spamming dislikes. It's the same thing that happened with the CoD trailer.
>>71860771
I never said it was a score you mongolid, is approval porcentage
>>71860824
ill trust the opinions of people who've actually seen the film over those who haven't.
>wanting to hate a film so much that you make up conspiracy theories as to why critics like it
>not pathetic as fuck
drink bleach.
>>71860862
you know is true
>>71860826
>who knew white supremacists and jewish supremacists were so alike?
Well it's basically the same ideology.
>>71860895
yes also melissa mccarthy did 9/11
>>71860862
>I'll trust stranger's opinions who are known for having biases themselves who have something to gain over anons who have nothing to gain or lose
I bet you think you're smart.
>these people are paid to say things, why wouldn't you believe them?
For fucks sake anon.
>>71861025
>>I'll trust stranger's opinions who are known for having biases themselves who have something to gain over anons who have nothing to gain or lose
>anons are incapable of having biases
the whole point of anonymity is you can say stupid shit without consequence.
the fact that i've spent some time arguing and shitposting against my own opinions makes me take everything you post for granted. I wont believe anons just because much less when they havent seen the actual fucking movie.
remember when this was the best horror movie of the year? oh right it was just a decent movie made by a woman
>>71861100
>see the movie!
Yah blew it faggot.
Mo
/tv/ completely BTFO
Has /tv/ ever been right about anything?
>>71861864
The reddit invasion >>71861131
>>71860490
this
>>71860098
>it's a fact most people are plebs
>still be confused when the majority of people enjoy inferior art
step up your game, OP
>>71860136
Uh... because 34 good reviews is 76 percent of the current 45 total.
This... this isn't difficult maths.
>>71862151
Well, fuck me, I didn't know there are only 45 critics in this country. Pretty sure it took a few days for Batman vs Superman to get a consensus.
Who here going to force the "Ghostbusters is kino" meme just for the butthurt?
>mfw
I don't think anyone directly comparing the two movies instead of using an aggregator would argue that Ghostbusters is a better movie than BvS
>>71862638
They are both shit, but Ballbusters is like diarrhea while you have the stomach flu.
>>71862683
What did you think of the Bill Murray cameo? I'm surprised he actually tried and did a great job
even better than his anderson roles
>>71860098
>50 literally who blogs giving it 100%
>actual critics are shitting on it, even including the feminist warriors at NYT and Slate
>>71862712
All I want for Christmas is a PSP(tm)
PSP(tm)
>>71862627
THE MEME NEVER DIES
>>71862723
>vanity fair called it shit
>muh buzzfeed
What happened to the 90% /tv/ btfo Reddit shitters?
>>71862767
just like the MCU
>Affleck's face when Civil War got a 90%
>>71860098
The new girlbusters trailers are looking funnier now that it's about to premier
It's going to be huge, advertising for it kicked up a notch reminding everyone it's going to open on friday.
>5 days!
>not 1
>not 2
>not 1 and half
5 days
>>71860450
wait, so we're SUPPOSED to think Ghostbusters 2016 is shit? what sort of end game is that, so they can make another "male" Ghostbusters, double dipping on the same IP. Or make it seem cool and edgy to take old ideas and race/gender wash them? The layers on this lasagna are too deep for me.
>>71860098
