Best film?
>>71855576
Andrei Rublev.
>>71855903
mirror is imo.
hes the best ever
>>71856198
>hes the best ever
lol get some taste kid
>>71856224
he literally is, no one has elevated cinema as much as he did.
>>71856261
plenty have. Godard for one. much more so than tarshitsky
mirror > stalker > andrei rublev > nostalghia > solaris > ivans childhood > the sacrifice
>>71856224
Erm he clearly is. Name one better
>>71856308
godard
>>71856261
Griffith, Ford, Welles, Antonioni, Godard, Kurosawa all did far more than little Tarkovsky
>>71856287
>godard
now I know you are a massive pleb.
>>71856331
not that guy but godard isn't even a top 5 french director
seriously cmon, at least try
>>71856331
>Godard
Hes in my top3 but i feel the andreis films have a grander scope
>>71856198
Could you explain to me what The Mirror was about? I barely recall. Why was it good? Write something in detail, please.
Is Tarkovsky the original king of /tv/?
>>71856447
>>71856477
I didn't expect much more from Tarredditsky spammers.
Tarkovsky, Bergman, Tarr, Truffaut, Bresson, the list goes on...
get some original, it doesn't even have to be good, taste for once
>>71856447
>>71856477
Yet Godards influence to cinema was far bigger than Andrei's
>>71856513
What a bitch lmao.
>>71856666
QUADS CONFIRM
TARSHITSKY = BITCH
REDDITORS BTFO
>>71856514
People like you are the reason only capeshit gets posted. Directors aren't fashion statements.
>>71856712
yes, clearly you retards are so much better than capeshitters what with spamming the same director and such intelligent discussion as "hes the best ever"
>>71856514
>that list
>original
>names tark and then 2 of the french directors i was referencing ahead of godard, and 2 others who are commonly associated with tark for obvious reasons
literally what the fuck did he mean by this?
>>71856535
"no"
>>71856513
yes
>>71856509
its a meditation on life, specifically as a spiritual person with a russian/soviet background living in a semi-specific era.
>>71856799
I didn't say they were original you fucking retard. your ability to read is just as good as your ability to discern good cinema
>>71856799
You will seriously argue that Tarkovsky influenced cinema more than Godard? This is some top tier fangay shit
>>71856331
You sicken me
>>71856436
They might of been more influential in the development of the art form but none of them reached the artistic heights that tarkovsky did IMO
>>71857239
What the fuck does that even mean?
>>71857673
>things godardfags say
it means he was better at exploring and pushing the medium than your dumb meme director
>>71857963
Yes, the guy who made fiction films of "DUDE SLOW CINEMA WITH RELIGIOUS UNDERTONES" explored the medium more than the guy who pioneered the French new wave, made political documentaries, a rock documentary, numerous essay films, documentaries on cinema, genre films, self-reflective critiques, etc.
How about you watch more than three Godard films before spouing your retardation on the subject?
>>71858067
i bet you hate bresson too
>>71856513
>did he actually die not knowing he was a hack?
everytime
>>71858099
No. I actually don't hate any of the aforementioned directors except Truffaut. What I do hate is the obnoxious fanbase they've accumulated on /tv/ who don't know shit about film but insist on speaking like they do (by way of insulting directors they have little knowledge of). And they spam these one-liner threads of "best movie?", "based Tarkovsky [same fucking images of his published diary screen capped]" and so on. and when someone pushes them to expand on what they got out of his films the best they can muster is "uhhh it's about life... in uh Russia..."
>>71856287
Godard is a asshole. Makes one decent film and thinks he is the shit.
>>71856224
Kill yourself
>>71856198
He literally is the best
>>71858726
Really, that's the best you got? A strawman image of his fan base, pretending that we don't actually like his films?
Nobody does that with *any* director en masse on /TV/ and of course there have been great threads on Tarkovsky and his films; they're also ironically spurred usually by autists or plebs asserting that Tarks films are meaningless, boring, pretentious, and that we just pretend to like them or only like them for artificial and aesthetic reasons
>>71855576
Smokey and the Bandit.
>>71859572
Where the fuck did I say you don't actually like his films you fucking idiot? God almighty I fucking hate you illiterate asshats
>>71859618
>Ugh it's about life in Russia and stuff
>Implying we don't actually understand his films
>Implying there might not be anything to understand
>Implying that when we talk about our love for the films that it's superficial or meaningless
>>71856261
reminder
>>71859677
How the fuck am I implying you don't like his films you brain dead pleb? Here, I'll fucking tell you what I think you are, sans any vagueness: you're a bunch of illiterate high school morons who don't know shit about film and can't elaborate any opinions you hold because you're illiterate and don't know shit about film. Your threads are shit and I am happy to derail them every time.
>>71859726
>I feel intellectually threatened by strangers on the internet
>>71859792
no one feels intellectually threatened by IMDB-dwelling criterion shitters except the imaginary people in the mock situations you've concocted to validate your flimsy interest in film
BEST: Andrei Rublev
WORST: Solaris
FAVORITE: Nostalghia
OVERRATED: Stalker
UNDERRATED: The Sacrifice
>>71859726
Wait I'm not allowed to enjoy Criterion releases?
Why? They are a solid distributor.
