Shit.
vidyakino faggots btfo
>handpick shills you know will be friendly and have an embargo until it opens for everybody else
>still only 74%
Can Sony do anything right?
>>71853599
>>71853494
>>71853599
>>71853619
hmmmm
>>71853494
>consensus barely hours after the reviews started coming in
are they really this desperate?
>>71853494
YES There is hope for a sequel! I so wanna see what they do with Zuul
>>71853678
Nice try m8.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/
>>71853761
click "top critics"
>>71853769
CLICK TOP CRITICS YOU FUCKING IDIOTS
Won't all professional 'critics' be keenly aware that if they're overly negative they risk being accused of sexism? I doubt any of them want to take that risk.
>>71853542
what a dick
>>71853824
Nah they'll just hedge their bets by saying the crew does their best with bad material.
>>71853664
>>71853799
haha it went from 46% to 60%
>>71853494
Well done white males, well done
HOWEVER
>it's real
>surprise hit of the year confirmed
>/v/eddit absolutely BTFO yet again
>manchildren strapped to the bed on literal suicide watch
Cry for me /tv/
>6.6
Meh. Paul Feig comedies usually score higher than that and aren't funny anyway.
>>71853872
no parrots fly in through their windows and squawk "SEXIST"
it is truly scary being a film critic with these monsters trying to silence us.
>>71853872
I don't have any examples, and I"m from r9k not pol.
The point is, feminists create a culture of threat of accusations, they create a culture where people are afraid to speak. There will be exceptions, but the threat of being lumped in with "sexists" is going to be a major motivator for any professional critic. That's just the reality.
It's like... how do you explain the hysterical culture around cases like Bill Cosby and Jian Ghomeshi? It's because feminists create a culture where to defend these guys, even though they've never been found guilty of a crime - and in Ghomeshi's case quite clearly exonerated... but nobody with any sort of status can actually argue on their behalf because of this threat culture of being labelled a "rape apologist" or whatever.
>>71853542
>le gamer gate boogeyman may may.
(You)
>>71853960
If you think his Spy movie isn't funny then someone is wrong with you
>>71853880
it'll drop
It is goes for 105 minutes on RT but another critic says 116 minutes... what is it.
>rated better than BvS
can I get a cup of kekuccino
>feminists giving a feminist movie good reviews
Shocking.
>>71853542
how will the goobers EVER recover???
>>71854067
It's not.
Melissa McCarthy is not funny.
>"This is how you do a female hero movie. You make it about four scientists. Well, three and a very capable subway attendant."
What did this reviewer mean by this?
http://weliveentertainment.com/welivefilm/ghostbusters-2016-review-fred-topel/
>>71854161
Hope it's a massive success t b h
>>71854228
Spy was an 8/10 flick for me. I never liked McCarthy but upon seeing Spy she was hilarious in that and so was Statham.
i think the movie is probably alright. Kristen wiig is funny. Can't say much for the other 3
GOOOBER
GATE
BLOWN OUT LADS
BRING BACK OLD /tv/ NOW
SEND THEM HOME
>>71854282
>"The ghosts may be CGI because that’s the way movies are made now"
I really wish a critic would go ahead and critisize how fake the ghosts look compared to the 1984 practical one instead of just accepting "yeah everything is cgi today oh well".
>>71853824
Nope, most of the professional (ie: top) critics are voting it negatively or lukewarm at best. It'll be the status-signaling bloggers that keep things positive (for their own safety).
>>71854354
I forgot to add that Paul Feig did use heaps of practicals in this movie - sadly the visual effects team did what the team did in 2011's The Thing with CGI'ing over the practicals
>>71854282
Kind of racist t b h.
>>71853872
Please don't call these /v/edditors /pol/
>>71853599
This is my reply. Congratulations. You got one.
>>71853599
>women taking over
good luck getting raped by muslims in ww3 lmao
>Not released in China
it won't make its budget back.
Mass suicide when?
>>71853494
Yes, yes, well done /v/, well done /v/...
HOWEVER
>>71853599
>We're taking over your politics
That's the only good thing about Islam, they'll put you fucking shits back in your place.
So when will we know it bombed?
>>71853799
>>71853777
>huuuurrr click top misogynists guise trust me xD
Die.
>>71854842
Roughly a few days after the John Q Public gets a chance to watch the movie. 44 Reviewers is an extremely small control group meant by Sony to make the movie not seem like a steaming pile of shit when the general consensus thus far from people who weren't adequately compensated for having to sit through the dreck is that it's a load of tripe.
who gives a fuck about this fucking movie
just don't go see it and leave people like what they want jeez
>>71853777
>>71853799
woah wtf
based top critics acknowledging boyhood is one of the best films of the decade
>>71853494
>"Average review score 6.6/10"
So It's only a mediocre 66% in truth, huh?
What if the marketing people are behind all the hate so that people are inclined to watch how shitty it is?
>>71853494
Why do these posts always skip the ACTUAL score of 6.6 on that very listing?
>>71855044
It turns out BvS actually has a higher rating.
Why did no one ever tell me about this top critics magic?
Just gonna give a (((((You))))) to everyone here, because I know you need one too anon.
>>71855270
Fuck off /v/.
>>71855391
YOU GET A (YOU)
YOU GET A (YOU)
AND YOU GET A (YOU)
>>71853494
This is really disappointing. Probably the worst possible outcome. If it was fantastic, /tv/ would absolutely implode. If it was horrible, the SJW damage control would be amazing. It seems like it's just average, so it's going to be more of the same pointless back and forth shit we've seen for months.
|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
>>71855829
Ayup.
>>71855829
Oh my god dude stfu we don't care what you think.
>>71855902
You mean we don't care what (you) think
>>71854339
>nu male cuck calling BTFO when it isnt even out yet
>>71853494
The original had a garbage trailer as well and ended up being great.
Claiming its going to be shit before it even comes out is just silly
Manchildren on suicide watch. Chicken tendies and helium tanks sold off the shelves.
>>71853494
/tv/ confirmed for retards
again
>>71853494
Misogynists BTFO
>>71853494
wtf i love the new ghostbusters now
How long until /tv/ starts claiming they were always neutral on the movie and blames /v/ or reddit for all those hate threads?
It happened with Mad Max, it's going to happen again.
>>71853872
This has nothing to do with /pol/ you stupid fuck. You don't think feminists are above using mob tactics such as shaming a critic?
>>71856108
IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH POL YOU DUMB SCHMUCK!
>>71856063
The threads were being blamed on /v/ even before the score came out, /v/
>>71856211
And so it begins
>>71854533
Isn't that already going on? I haven't been raped in years and it wasn't a musli.
>>71856063
last time I was on /tv/ was when TFA was not even out yet and almost every thread on this fucking front page was "THEIR GONNA LET A NIGGER BE IN STAR WARS SEND HELP"
and now I'm seeing all these posts about how great it is....
guess they finally went back to pol? But are probably back because of this new agenda movie.
>>71854093
It's fake
>>71856315
So you're a tourist?
>>71856315
It was garbage.
>>71856315
To be fair, that's literally every board's MO.
Phase 1: hype
Phase 2: nitpicking
Phase 3: release
Phase 4: Did /_/ say it was going to be good? Pretend to hate it. Did /_/ say it was going to be bad? Pretend it's great.
Phase 5: Take up the opposite position a few months later and claim you always thought that way.
https://twitter.com/devincf/status/752267499643674624
>Suddenly remakes are considered kino
>Hollyschwitz remakes all your favorite movies into hot garbage
>People cheer while it happens
I blame Goobergobber
>>71856235
Nothing is beginning. It's a known fact you faggots dragged this shit in here to force your stupid ethics in journalism movement to the rest of this site.
>>71856063
The angry Mad Max threads were always from underage kids who were upset that they weren't allowed to go see an R rated movie. You noticed how when the first trailer from Comic Con came out we had a whole weekend of hype threads then when the flick came out all of a sudden there was hate. As soon as it could be pirated in a watchable version that all stopped.
>>71853494
That's surprisingly low. I was expecting across the board praise tbqh.
I hope the feminists can track down the rapist hate mongers who didn't give this a 10/10.
>>71856315
TFA is garbage and only redditors like that shit.
>>71856315
TPM is far superior to TFA.
>>71856520
>Suddenly
Remakes have been around since Hollywood was Hollywoodland.
>>71856503
Ray got a ghost blowjob so I'd say that's a pretty sweet position.
>>71856601
>>71856583
Your opinion doesn't trump several others? I still saw those posts.
>>71853599
>>71856557
I started heaps of Mad Maxine: Feminist Road threads.
Loved the film, just like seeing feminists and shills get mad as fuck.
Actually saw it twice in the cinemas.
>>71853542
who could you when we have all of reality?
>>71853542
>gamergaters
This is /tv/, though
>>71853958
Shit reddit says pls get raped lmao
>>71856732
Then Ghostgaters.
>>71854339
Why does Reddit SJWs try this hard?
I hope you guys know that they only screened it for select critics.
>wrong about Mad Max
>wrong about TFA
>wrong about new Ghostbusters
Do Goobelygaters ever get sick of being wrong?
>>71855829
paul fieg a shit even with social prop on his side exactly like expected since the day of the sony leaks
>>71856315
its shit. there's a story about that. ill tell you some other time
>>71856063
mad max was shit. all cg. only actual stunts were pole cats. random screaming at the sky while all the people standing next to her disappear for her pointless screaming like anime.
>>71856818
lol my wife's boyfriend and I both agree.
What's wrong with it being good despite the trailers being bad? It's almost like some of you didn't hate it because of the terrible trailers like you claimed but really only hated it because the ghostbusters are women
Dont go see the new ghostbusters
No matter how shit the movie is, it will have a decent amount of positive reviews because of people wanting to push their political views. Same with negative.
I hope this shit bombs financially
>>71857111
China can't save it and early domestic tracking estimates weren't the best. However, these positive reviews might give it a second breath. I'm afraid casual audiences might be convinced to give the film a chance now. It's really up in the air at this point.
>>71856503
>faraci
>>71857209
I hate it that this shit bothers me so much.
I hope it does average-ly so both sides of this stupid argument are disappointed.
>>71857066
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwD2GgWKIrs
relevant 4 years ago, relevant today
>>71853664
>le top critics
>>71857286
Kind of understandable. Detractors might have been trolled into making this mess a financial success and might have opened the flood gates for similar debacles. Maybe Tom Rothman was right. Any publicity is good publicity.
So, if this movie bombs financially but succeeds critically, who can claim victory?
>>71857293
This
It's pathetic how much you guys care about the rt score
>>71857450
the feminists will forever brand feig as a misunderstood genius and a movie as a masterpiece underperforming purely because of a coordinated campaign of hatred and misogyny
>>71857450
Detractors, since at that point it would be clear that those defending the film are a vocal minority while the majority voted with their wallets and didn't go out to see it.
>>71857450
If it bombs it would mean that feminist pandering is not profitable.
curious if 1 or all of the girls are worried about the general premier? will 1 or all of them post something damaging about the movie (if it flop)?
or will they stand firm together saying that the 'man babies' were the fault in it's performance?
gotta wait for the numbers come monday.
>>71853494
Stephanie Zacharek (TIME) https://archive.is/ugEXd
>Why Ghostbusters Is the Must-See Movie of the Summer Season (https://archive.is/VtCm2)
>The misogynist outrage over the Ghostbusters remake has made it essential viewing
How likely was someone who wrote that to give the movie a negative review?
Barry Hertz (Globe and Mail) (https://archive.is/RqgzR)
>This reboot is a revelation – and it ain’t afraid of no misogynists
>Well, maybe not so much a mystery as just a dispiriting reminder that misogyny is alive and well on the Internet, where it can metastasize to gross extremes with zero justification. And for anyone eager to stand atop a pedestal to righteously proclaim that objections to a new Ghostbusters simply stem from a frustration with Hollywood exploiting adolescent nostalgia, well, where are all the virulent Internet campaigns against, say, the new Ninja Turtles series?
>No, it is easy to see what the Ghostbusters furor is really about: angry, bored, women-hating men expending otherwise untapped energy mining their own feelings of social inadequacy in a toxic bid for attention.
Nigel M. Smith (Guardian) https://archive.is/fnImI
>Ghostbusters review: call off the trolls – Paul Feig's female reboot is a blast
Shockingly the guy that's been complaining about "haters" for months before seeing the movie thinks the haters were wrong.
https://twitter.com/nigelmfs/status/707580882022830080
>Can't wait - and screw the haters: New Ghostbusters trailer nods to controversy over race and gender
https://twitter.com/nigelmfs/status/732925646230282242
>F*ck the haters - this new #Ghostbusters trailer has me psyched:
https://twitter.com/nigelmfs/status/738816760489476096
>It doesn't need to - women & gays will make it a hit: #Ghostbusters targets male viewers w/ new NBA ads
Manohla Dargis (New York Times)(https://archive.is/HxVdi)
>Girls rule, women are funny, get over it.
>>71857694
Joshua Rothkopf (Time Out)(https://archive.is/RQMl8)
https://twitter.com/joshrothkopf/status/752197739052724225
>I actually think the #Ghostbusters concept works better as "nerd girls vs mansplainers" instead of "blue-collar schlubs vs the EPA."
Alison Willmore (Buzzfeed News)(https://archive.is/ZGY5E)
>Remaking this beloved film with women as leads is an act revolutionary enough to attract the ire of legions of Ghostbros insisting that the very concept will warp time and space to retroactively ruin their childhoods.
Robbie Collin Daily Telegraph(https://archive.is/H4seo)
Previous article:(https://archive.is/SNrRP)
>Forget the sexist naysayers, says Robbie Collin - if the first trailer is anything to go by, this all-female reboot will be every bit as fun as the 1984 original
https://twitter.com/robbiereviews/status/520216415832666113
>Yes yes but when is it MALE Ghostbusters Day?
Devin Faraci (Birth.Movies.Death) (https://archive.is/yxZAH)
One of his previous articles on it:
The Soft Sexism Of Hating On The New GHOSTBUSTERS (https://archive.is/nHCgQ)
On twitter:
http://archive.is/Yzykr
>@devincf If it's good, that's awesome. But this opinion that if anyone says the movie looks bad they are automatically sexist is crazy
>@BoustanuA it's not crazy. It's true.
>@devincf why?
>@BoustanuA I don't know why you're sexist. Probably because girls don't like you.
>>71854558
please never attempt to make OC again
>>71857450
>who can claim victory?
The people who hated it.
Because its lack of commercial success will guarantee a studio never tries this again
>>71854228
She doesn't really need to be. The movie is still pretty funny because other characters are funny and its a decent action flick too.
>>71857694
>>71857719
This is depressing on so many levels...
>>71856790
Moviegaters!
But seriously the bitch in charge of production who ruined the ghost busters wants to make a movie off of Gamergate and is already started pre-production of it.
Looks like /tv/ and /v/ are going to be friends in a bit.
>>71857694
>>71857719
Well there you have it folks.
Those people were never going to give the movie a bad review because it would have contradicted their agenda.
Looking forward to see more critic reviews poor in from people who didn't involve themselves in the drama
>>71856732
You can't stop us, were everywhere, expoct us
>>71856315
That's because the nigger got his shit kicked in and a Mary Sue suddenly appeared over his corpse in one of hell of a bait and switch.
Are there people who actually defend Rey?
>>71857836
And people who are against it existing aren't going to concede and admit its decent either. I mean it's probably honestly shit, but the bias was clearly going to be on both sides of the coin
>>71858229
>And people who are against it existing aren't going to concede and admit its decent either
The difference is the people you're talking about are largely nobodies on the internet, not reviewers looking to get their scores out ASAP
Hell if you look at RT right now you'll see 'All Critics' is around 76% but when you stitch to 'Top Critics' it drops to 46%. I can't think of any movie that has such a wild change,
Entertainingly enough, a lot of the "fresh" reviews are basically shitting on the movie for being bad, and then they just give it 4 stars because "well at least they tried"
>>71858359
In all honesty that's very patronizing
>>71854545
It will. It's "the" popcorn movie of 2016, the current year.
>>71858407
china doesn't like ghostsor women
>>71858394
The only way this movie could get a rating of 76% is if everything we've seen in trailers was the worst shit. And everything not shown is great.
I find that hard to believe.
>>71858605
Look at "Top Critics"
>>71858443
No, I mean it will get its money back. It's all virtue signalling.
>>71859060
>virtue signalling.
What do they mean by this? Seriously, what the fuck is "virtue signalling"?
>>71859289
Buying or purchasing something solely to espouse your personal values. See: reading "History of Time" by Hawking. Not everyone reads it or particularly cares, they just need to be SEEN consuming it.
>>71858641
What other films have had such a wide disparity between "all critics" and "top critics"?
>>71858407
>popcorn movie of 2016
>competing against obvious family gotos like Pets, Dory, and BFG
>and the usually fare of stoner/raunchy comedies and thrillers like Mike & Dave and The Purge
Surprisingly it's going to boil down to the same thing it fought so hard to break down,sexism.
The general public probably won't be lining up to watch an "SNL comedy" with 4 women leads, especially after they see it has mixed-poor reviews.
>>71859289
Doing/Buying something simply to show your virtues/morals/political correctness.
The bastard child of "some of my best friends are black!" and "vote with your wallet"
>BAAAAEWWW ONLY /v/ HATES FEMINISTS, EVERYONE ELSE LOVES US
We're being """""""""raided""""""""""" by /r/ShitRedditSays.
>>71856797
This.
They screen it to the trendy cool Youtube blogosphere group of critics that have already expressed approval for the movie. They give it good reviews, people change their mind and decide to see it, they realize it's shit, but the movie makes money.
>>71857545
That would just imply the majority is sexist
>>71859330
>wide disparity
>20%
>>71859445
Hello /v/eddit
Check that score again in a couple of weeks.
When actual people have seen it instead of people who get paid to give bad movies good reviews.
>open internet browser on cell phone
>home page is yahoo, sponsored by AT&T
>top story is review for new Ghostbusters
>"Review: New 'Ghostbusters' an unfunny mess"
I have a feeling that a lot more bad reviews are going to be getting put up soon.
>>71859561
Having trouble counting friend?
30% is a pretty huge disparity.
>>71859561
It is when the difference is being considered fresh or rotten.
>>71859615
i hope so
that makes it pure kino plebs don't understand
>>71859676
The only kino on your list is Drive, the rest are just mere cinema.
>>71856818
GamerGate has become nothing but a secondary tumor to the MRA and the Trump movements. They are the ones pulling the strings against all this female lead films.
The best part is that they are always wrong indeed.
>>71859869
J- Just like Brexit!
>>71859445
Reddit, /pol/ and cripplewheels also hate feminists. You should go back to one of those cesspools already.
"Average Rating: 6.6/10 "
Barely past average
>>71853880
And now it went from 60% to 50%
>>71856315
Trolls trolling trolls fucking newshit
Also
>works of fiction
>only a fool would believe
How fucking retarded is your ass?
Screening Anon here.
I told you kids that it was good.
>>71860195
lets wait for the B.O. resultsah'm keepin mah money
>>71860199
so confused, why everyone is shopping a RT page, when you can just see it on the website.
>>71860407
>shopping
No one's shopping anything
that's the real score
>>71860461
Mine says 74%, where ya from ?
>>71858359
Most of them are saying it's funny, just not groundbreaking the way the original was.
But you only have to be funny to be a good comedy.
>>71860508
Click "Top Critics". They're a different category than the 'average blog-poster' critic
>>71860508
Top Critics
Filters out all the literallywhos and gives you decent opinions
>>71858605
Trailers undersell movies all the time and one of them, I think the third one, was actually sort of funny.
>>71860533
oh cool, thats better, fuck this movie
>>71860533
>He fell for the Top Critics meme
All that does is count less critics by boosting the score to an extra 2%
Woopdeedoo
>>71856601
TPM was a kid's movie.
>>71860562
>Trailers undersell movies all the time
Not comedies.
Comedies usually end up suffering because the trailers over sell them an contain nearly all the funny parts
>>71854228
To be fair she played the straightman in that.
Statham was a great over the top version of his usual character.
>>71860603
Hell yes comedies, especially if they want the trailer rated E and the funny stuff is all PG13+.
>>71860629
This movie is PG
>>71859869
Goobergroot is just a boogeyman people blame when something doesn't go their way
i dont give a fuck about online ratings which are all bought and paid for
what is the box score numbers???
did it sell well or not
>>71860629
Well Ghostbusters isn't PG13
>>71860548
But just months(even weeks) ago you tasteless teenagers said RT doesn't matter at all
>>71853494
>Sony wanted to get the fem shill reviews out first to hold on to a "fresh" rating as long as they could
This is damage control with the use of feminist cancer shills
It will severely drop in a few days.
I'm just looking forward to the "Why everyone who didn't like Ghostbusters is a misogynist or has internalised misogyny" bullshit articles.
>>71860742
I didn't say that
You know lots of people post here sweetie? Anonymous isn't one persons name
Honestly pretty surprised at this development 2bh. The movie looks so bad based on the trailers and script that I was expecting a 20 at best.
Top Critics seem harsher on it.
>>71860788
So you agree that Boyhood and Fury Road are one of the best films of this decade?
I'm still not going to see it no matter how good it is because of the fucking terrible "go see the movie to show them misogynists" marketing gimmick.
>>71854161
(((Cohen)))
>>71853494
You see guys you were wrong again! Women CAN be funny and probably ARE funnier than men. I can't WAIT for Ocean's 11 female reboot!~<3
>>71860533
I get "Tomatometer Not Available..." on every movie.
>>71856818
Mad Max was actually a good movie with EQUALITY at the forefront.
If it was a feminist movie Max wouldn't even have touched any women, no women would have died and Max would have ended up being a beta lackey for Furiosa at the end of the movie.
The femicunts latched on the fact that one of the consultants was a feminist-a classical feminist, not some waste of time college cunt.
She spent her time giving psychological help to actual rape-victims in South Africa.
Her role was to consult the actors who played the harem concubines in how women who are constantly raped every day react to men.
Very few femicunts actually stepped outside their safe-space to watch the movie. If they did, they would have complained about MYSOGGYNEE throughout the running time.
TFA is the best thing we could have gotten short of time-traveling back to the 70s and bringing young Lucas back.
Rey is a Mary Sue of epic proportions, but I still think the movie was ok.
Ghostbusters is shit and the femicunts have backed the wrong camel this time.
>>71860848
Boyhood was definitely an.. interesting film. Undeserving of the pure hatred /tv/ gave it but it certainly didn't deserve the Oscar.
I enjoyed Fury Road
>>71860884
Forgot pic.
>>71860871
>t. average femenist
Looks like it's going down
>>71856315
It turned out that my based nigga Finn was actually the best bit.
>>71860928
I'm genuinely curious... why do you people find casual misogyny so appealing...? :/
>>71857694
>>71857719
I feel like you're looking a bit too hard in some of these (Manohla Dargis, for example) but there are definitely at least a few examples of people having confirmation bias or wanting the movie to be good.
>>71860938
>tabs
How elaborate.
>>71860898
Boyhood deserved best picture
CALLED IT
It was so obvious that it's gonna be praised for its 'omg strong womyn cast“, come on guys. Hollywood is only starting to get the sjw propaganda train rolling.
>>71860949
You can stop pretending now. I can almost see you giggling behind your screen
>>71860980
>Hollywood is only starting to get the sjw propaganda train rolling.
Whats the problem? You're posting on a film board not a movie one
You should be discussing art not imdb core trash
Picture very related, tourist
>>71860807
>judging a movie edited by brent white based on the script
>>71860922
Must be something wrong on your end. Current rating on mine is 76% all, 50% top critics
>>71860980
This isn't being panned but it's not really being "praised" either.
The butthurt that this movie not being shit is causing is pretty damn hilarious. I actually want to see it now
>>71860938
all dat false flag effort
>>71860980
Dozens of people CALLED IT, you dumb fuck.
Some of these reviews
>The best movie of the summer!
>RT stacking reviews with 1000 literally who blogs giving it 10/10
>actual critic score is...
The propaganda is real
>>71861007
Are these movies good?
/TV/ BTFO
Eh, the reviews seem alright to me. The majority of people admit it's nowhere near the original's level of quality and even a lot of positive reviews say that it's flawed, has bad CGI, has misses in its comedy, etc.
Overall score is in the 60's, which seems about right.
Nothing worth getting triggered over.
I wouldnt want to see a 3rd Ghostbusters movie regardless of who was in it. Its a horrible, lazy, unfunny looking movie and the fact that it stars 4 women has no bearing on it
>>71861099
Every single one except forPink Flamingo
>>71861124
>10/10 it's okay
>>71856949
Nigga why the fuck would you let your wife cheat on you?
>>71861097
Noticed this.
Pretty sad
The wrecklesseating guy has made another Ghostbusters video going into detail on how all the male characters are either idiots or assholes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmSX8AZMfrU
>>71860989
what bothers me is how these sort of femenists find their way here how the fuck do they do it?
>>71861168
Except they literally said 6/10 it's okay, which is the exact definition of 6/10
>>71861007
>unironically calling yourself a patrician
Faggots, calling yourself pretentious names doesn't make you a master of cinema.
>>71860956
>>71860980
Dude, she is totally bias, especially when Kate's performance gets reamed in other reviews
>>71861216
This guy seems triggered
>>71861216
I'm about as interested in watching this video as I am in watching this movie. Retarded betas making clickbait videos out of this trash movie aimed at /pol/acks and redditors can fuck right off.
>>71861097
Its been like this for years
How fucking new are you this film?
>>71861268
I'm pretty sure he was asked to go into more detail about this in the comments of his last video
>>71861097
That's how it is for every movie. I'm expecting it to even out at around 60%, which is admittedly higher than I was anticipating but not by much. The movie was not nearly as terrible as /tv/ claimed, it was just a poorer version of the original, and because almost everything about it is taken from the original it's also pretty forgettable. I can't think of any reason I'd rewatch the new Ghostbusters when I could watch the original instead.
>>71861273
Most films don't tent to have a 20% gap between top critics and all critics actually.
>>71859481
this. Real critics that have respected names cant be bought like the youtubers they have put up to this.
They alienated the first 'guy group' of fans that are in their 30's; and most women I know dont care for this movie. so who's left to pay to see this?
>>71859445
yes there was the same shit for two weeks in mad max
At least mad max didn't end with theron shooting a ghost mel gibson in the dick
>>71855369
The directors cut of BvS is a solid flick. Almost a movie.
Don't care what the RT meter says. I want to see if it bombs or not (personally I say no because Americans love McCarthy).
>>71861566
>because Americans love McCarthy
Actually her last film "The Boss" bombed. It came out only two months ago and it's been forgotten by the public.
>>71854318
>Spy was an 8/10 flick for me
Why would you even admit this anonymously
>>71861566
This will be the biggest flop of the summer. The bet way too hard that the fans would accept an all female cast. Ghostbusters is a male dominate franchise. They fucked up.
>>71861593
Her overall track record is pretty good. You might be right though, I never heard of 'The Boss'. Then again I've kinda blocked her out of my mind.
>>71861566
>Americans love McCarthy
Do they?
Out of everyone I've heard talking about GB people only seem to recognize Wiig
>>71861593
>Budget$29 million
>Box office$78 million
>bombed
no American likes McCarthy
Everyone loves the husky Black chick. she's hot and funny
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1289401/
IMDB rating - 5.1 / 10
>>71861566
My aunt loves her. My uncle rolls his eyes and deals with it when she drags him to the movies. 60+ year old women are the prime demo of this piece of shit.
>>71856601
>there are people itt that unironically have this opinion
>>71856315
Except Finn was best boy.
>>71861838
Yes that's me. I really think that not only is Phantom Menace better than the rest of the prequels but it is also better than ROTJ with https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jzZOgLH4KU
does it really matter?
I think it's fair to say that most of us won't see the film anyway.
>>71853494
>/tv/ lost again
Who could have imagined /tv/ being wrong, that never happened before
>>71861709
>He still thinks the studio gets the worldwide box office total
kek
>>71862072
>Domestic:$63,077,560
it is indeed a good movie, it's not a case of men who write material less risk-taking than love columns being intimidated and not wanting to be seen as wife-beaters even though they're virgins from the cultural class following the correct thinking in those circles.
>>71862244
ad fag here
they all want to be seen as a 2007 Vice guy. Like an "alpha cuck"
![thumb-74560-1000x755-42875883a2c6a99a2fe3c3d799b52dfcc90d77b60ef5bccfe3d81b3d39654dbf[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/s2Zum7L.jpg "thumb-74560-1000x755-42875883a2c6a99a2fe3c3d799b52dfcc90d77b60ef5bccfe3d81b3d39654dbf[1].jpg")
>>71853494
>marvelously cast
>pale somewhat in comparison
>somewhat
GEE I WONDER WHO'S BEHIND THIS REVIEW SUMMARY
