>68% with normal critics
>29% with top critics
What did they mean by this?
Saw it at Youtube HQ. The trailer was bad but the movie is a blast, everyone around me laughed hard all the time. Solid 9/10 and definitely the best comedy of this summer.
"Normal" critics can mean literally any person with a marginally popular blog about movies.
>>71840857
I thought there was an embargo until opening day?
>>71840915
>>71840857
>Normal critics = internet bloggers and YouTube shits. SJW defined and pandering to gain clicks and more studio access to big films early
>Top critics = Professional critics and journalists who are already established working for large publications that have no motive to gain access since they're position in the industry already grants them that.
I can't wait to eat from Based Armond
>>71841088
Armond will defend it.
>>71841088
they're = their. sorry (mostly to myself)
>>71841088
>based armond
>after that gay puff piece he wrote for bvs
Hello tasteless pleb. The only one that matters now is Richard Brody
>>71840915
This. Sony really knocked it out of the park with this one. Definitely deserves a 90+ score but of course the manbabies have to ruin it.
Have any of the positive reviews NOT brought up the "misogynist manchild" haters?
>Tomatometer Not Available...
lol
>>71841113
I don't care what his stance is, it will be entertaining either way. And if he does defend it, he'll at least back it up with thoughtful criticism, even if I don't agree with it.
At least it's not 27%
>>71840857
>normal critics
Writers in famous websites
Vox, Guardian, Saloon, Dicksucker.com
>top critics
People that are payed to review movies by neutral sources have reviewed over 1000 movies or more.
Remember when /v/ was utterly blown the fuck out in 2014
Hilarious how they're praising top critics now
>>71841129
You're foolish if you don't know about or understand that comics have always had sexual undertones, gay undertones and BDSM imagery from the beginning. The characters are literally drawn as naked human forms colored over with a costume.
>>71840915
>>71841137
No one is being paid to shill for GHOSTBUSTERS by the way. It's a Republican-funded lie and a pathetic attempt to smear her campaign.
>>71840857
It's already really low and it typically only gets worse, which is great since I want this movie to fail hard, but the reviews are cringy as fuck. They all, including the negative reviews, talk about le evil online men.
>>71841258
>nudity = sexual
not necessarily, spartans were painted fighting nude not so people would masturbate to it, but to emphasise how brave and strong they were.
>>71840915
I agree. Movie of the year. Thank you Amy and Sony, you really are leading the charge into the future of cinema!
>>71841139
Might as well bring a bit of bantz to the manchildren. Can't handle it?
>>71841242
That took 12 years to make you ignorant shit!
>>71841242
oh fuck off, Linklater is a great director.
Boyhood just managed to be as inoffensive as possible and his filmmaking style is hypnotically entertaining.
>>71841349
I know I'm just saying that plebs are plebs
>>71840857
Is that this exposes that most of the critics have been taking bribes or being bullied by Sony.
>>71841422
>rt
But I thought it was disney, /v/edditor
>>71841315
one exception does not prove your point. in most cases in modern society nudity=sexuality
>>71840857
If Sony was buying reviews, wouldn't they be buying reviews of the "top" critics?
Are we so Reddit now that we care about "top" critics?
>has higher than BvS
Well, as far as positive reactions go, Faraci's is rather level-headed and honest. That hitfix write up however is pure trolling.
>>71841486
Yes because BVS was worse than ghostbusters. I hate you all.
>>71841422
More like the blogtards like to virtue signal
Though I wouldn't be surprised if money changed hands
>32 reviews counted
That's less than half of the critics that are going to eventually review it. I can only see the score going down
top critics are actual critics, normal critics are shitty nerd culture blogs or youtubers
50% with top critics now
Got a feeling the "SJW" normal critics got their reviews out early
>>71841242
>12 years was 2 years ago
fuck
>>71841739
>Misogynists gand Gamer Goobers BTFO
I felt so empowered after this movie! Go womyn!
>>71841785
>boyhood is one of the greatest films of all time
I'm glad you agree, man baby
>>71841815
Trying to hard. You're just embarrassing yourself.
>>71841785
armond white said that most of the top critics still arean't even real film critics tho
>>71841728
The top critics are largely negative too, top critics are publications like entertainment weekly, vanity fair, etc. AKA what normies will read in doctors office and decide not to see it
>>71841478
What's the first score people see on the RT page?
>>71840857
>both better scores than BvS
Shame on you people for criticizing Bill Murray when he said it was good.
looks like its going to end up around 70%
>>71841902
Bill Murray is a pleb
>it's a /tv/ gets BTFO episode
>it's always a /tv/ gets BTFO episode
It's fucking over, gg no re
>>71840956
embargos get broken all the time
>>71842034
>>71842137
>videogames
You do know this is /tv/ not /v/eddit right?
>>71841874
Yeah, plus all the normal "critics" (bloggers) who wanted this movie to succeed probably rushed to give it a fresh review so people would see the early number and think the movie is worthwhile. Once the movie is actually released it should be under 50%
>>71841242
>Memehood
Go away, we don't want the ones of your kind in here.
>>71840944
i.e. Devin Faraci, whose review reads like a bitter 13 year old girl overly-praising some retarded shit in the hopes of gaining the attention of the boyfriend that dumped her.
It's incredibly pathetic how far he's going to defend this shit.
>>71841088
Armond will definitely defend it. He's contrarian as fuck.
>>71840857
>>71842206
Are you telling me you outsiders don't want authentic /tv/ here? This comes as no surprise from the low cineIQ posters
>>71842137
It's happening because people love jumping on the bandwagon without a single critical thought in their brain.
>Everyone is hating X
>They I will hate it to, so I fit in
>be normal critic
>post above average review of ghostbusters
>"plz help me with my failing career, plzzzzzzz"
>>71840857
>>71840915
XD LELELELE SO FUCKING
FUKKEN
U
K
K
E
N
EPIC
P
I
C
>le twidder screnshots what did he mean by this
WE
WUZ
KANGZ N SHIET
>le goldenface shit thread MEME i love it xP if you don't respond ur mum will dead tonight ^_^
OLOLOLOL LE #SJW #CuCK #NIGGERS #BLACKED #CAN'T #STUMP #GG #NYS #LE #ETHICS #IN #GAEMS #JURNO #XDXDXDXD
DELETE THIS
SIDES ARE LE GONE HOLY SHIT LE FUG BENIS LE TIPS LE TIPPY TIP TOP FEDORA WEEEWWW WEW XDD WEW LADDY UR MAD BROOOOO UR SOOOOO MAAAAAAADDDD LE IRONY IS LE BESTEST HUMOR XDD I LOV IRONY AND LE BIG BANG THEORY BAZINGA IT LE KILLS MY LELES I LOVE POOPY SHIT COCK I WANT A BLACK COCK
*unsheathes katana*
wellllllllll m’goodsir, I think u thought u had me beat, but wacht this !!!!
*charges up energy*
*goes super sainant*
*farts*
*raises paw*
hhmmmmmmmmm.......
I AM SIMPLY ERIC, ERIC SIMPLY…
LELELELELE MARVELFAGS WILL ENVER ENVER EVER NEVER HAVE LE KINO LIEK LE DC PISS ASS FART xD ME GUSTA LOS IRONYJUEGOS xD *tips fedora m'lady* LE FARTS IN UR HAND
:3
*LE FEMALE ANIME FACE OF CONDESCENSION
BEEEEELIEVE ITTTTT
MAY MAY MEME
JON SNOW DIES
TYRION DIES
STANNIS DIES
BLESZINSKI
BAZINGA
ZIMBABWE
SHARINGAN
BERMUDA
BELGIUM
ZABOOMAFOO
BAZOOPER
HULKHOGAN
UNDERTAKER
BOTSWANA
SORRY IF I POOPED
LOL U MAD BRAHS?
TOP KEK FRIENDS
TOP KEK HERE
TOP KEK THERE
TOP KEK TOP KEK IN UR MOM'S ASS
DESIGNATED
SHITTING
STREETS
POO IN LOO
BANE? HES A BIG GUY FOR YOU
>>71842174
I'm hoping this gets under ghostbusters 2s 50% rating
>>71842302
Actually he won't has hes against Paul Feigs politics
>>71842307
>>71842334
>>71842174
Just check out The Guardian and Devin Faraci's reviews. Falling over themselves to praise every single detail of the movie, while spending half their reviews attempting to shit on "man-babies".
>>71842334
Makes you think
>>71842159
I must have forgotten because of all the "damb goobers!" being posted in this thread
>>71841667
without even having seen the new GB, I can safely say that it's more functional than BvS
>>71842334
What do you think he meant by this?
>>71842598
paid shill trying to sabotage the thread
>70%
Not high enough to garner hype or positive owed of mouth to overcome the hate and shitty audience tracking.
Flop incoming.
