Devin Faraci saw Ghostbusters.
https://twitter.com/devincf/status/751269814220431361
>>71777078
Baby men BTFO
>still mad that a guy said he didn't want to see a soulless reboot
What's his problem?
i hate that guy
>>71777184
>still mad that a guy said he didn't want to see a soulless reboot
That's what makes this whole situation hilarious.
>>71777078
Do people not understand differences in opinion? Just because one reviewer liked it doesn't mean James will. He clearly outlined what he thought was wrong with the movie and why he wont go see it based on the trailers.
I literally don't know who that is.
>>71777175
Baby men BTFO?
>>71777364
the weaponization of sexuality by the modern left fucking disgusts me
>>71777465
maybe he's not so bad lmao
James played the SJWS like tards 2bh
He intentionally used the non-review to promote his shit
>They're still mad some mid-tier YouTuber doesn't what to see it
Why?
Why are they so obsessed with James not seeing this ONE movie?
>>71777603
Because if people follow his example, their 'gurrrl power' promotion strategy has the opposite of the desired effect.
>>71777078
He shit on AVGN earlier and defends this movie like a shill, he's going to like it no matter what
>>71777364
they just start attacking his wife? what is wrong with these "tolerant" and "progressive" faggots?
>>71777364
Liberals are as bad as muslims holy shit.
>>71777709
then once reviews come out that are negative he's probably going to attack them as well.
>giving good reviews to a movie that if you dare to say anything negative about itś pretty much suicide
no fucking shit
>>71777603
When the self-proclaimed Angry Video Game Nerd speaks out against the movie that internet feminism has declared the Most Important Thing Ever, it's shooting fish in a barrel.
Thanks GG, even after your death you continue to make everything shittier.
>>71777553
played them like a DAMN FIDDLE
>>71778172
>gg boogeyman mention out of nowhere
You are pathetically obsessed with them. How are they relevant at all, bar the fact that years later, you still mad?
Reviewers don't make pay the bills or make 150+ million in budget back.
>>71778209
Sure I'm the first to explicitly mention the topic, but the subtext is obvious.
>>71778209
SJWs boogeyman, they'll be 90's year old and still crying and shitting themselves about gamergaters coming to get them.
After the embargo thing it's so obvious this movie is gonna get shitty reviews
>>71777078
Of course he's going to like it; he has literally spent hundreds of tweets defending it and claiming anyone who dislikes it is a misogynist. What his ego is just going to accept he made a complete fool of himself, it's simpler to just lie to yourself.
>>71778332
Lmao that's true
We have the very same thing with marveldrone who pretend to dislike BvS after seing the ultimate cut
>>71778172
The AVGN was never part of gamergate. If anything I am sure if he would've decided to say something about it he would be against it.
>>71778266
>>71778209
no it's just that the whole current self-righteous unified sjw everywhere thing was really made a lot stronger and more present by gamergate
>>71778476
No it wasn't.
Literally nothing changed.
Look Im sure AVGN has a following (never much cared for him but thats me). But what astounds me is how hes become a target to justify this blatant cashgrab. They are desperately grabbing at straws here for fuck sake. I didnt have much faith in this movie, but now I want it to do really poorly so everyone acting like a fucking PC idiot awkwardly tries to distance themselves from it.
>>71778476
Aside from assblasting the regressive left and calling out journalists like people always have, not much changed.
>gets proven time and again to be wrong
>gets it right with BvS
>suddenly that vindicates him for all the other times he was wrong and gives him untouchable credibility
nah fuck him and his shit taste
>>71777078
Who is this and why should I care?
Did anyone who complained about James actually watch the vid? It's the most placid thing in the world, as are many of the things James puts out when it's just him speaking.
>>71777450
The amount of straight butthurt that came from that is amazing...James didn't say "NOBODY SHOULD SEE THE NEW GHOSTBUSTERS." , he said "I don't want to see it so i'm not going to."
How fucking insecure is the liberal press that they got so fucking upset that a Ghostbusters fan said he didn't want to see the new movie....I honestly think Sony is paying people to drive social outrage as part of their marketing
>>71778496
>>71778534
a lot changed.
gamergate generated a ton of major media feedback, as opposed to the minor gaming culture articles you'd see on tiny shitrags like kotaku, which was predictably all against it. they were able to use that to smear basically everyone they don't like as a "white angry neckbeard virgin mra etc" on an even larger stage and make themselves look right by just being self-righteous.
the same stuff was going on before but gamergate really brought it into the mainstream
>>71777078
>Devin Faraci
>Has worked with the ScreenJunkies in the past
>Screen Junkies made videos to try and shill for Sony
They're being paid by Sony.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2634075/
>>71778601
>Expecting SJWs to do their homework
They live to be angry about something anon. They form groups about issues they pretend to support or understand and why you may ask? Because it makes them feel good about themselves. Fucking Marvel comics panders to these asshats and they dont even read nor buy comics
>>71778476
If anything Twitter made things worse, the pc gonne mad shit has been around for decades, but most of the drama now revolves around Twitter "controversies"
>>71778601
>Did anyone who complained about James actually watch the vid?
No. It all started because the studio pays for people to tweet about it to drum up enough buzz to generate articles and stuff. Its honestly not hard to do.
>>71777450
>Graham Linehan
Why did it have to be like this
>>71778670
twitter's the stage for it and its bite-sized polemic nature clearly doesn't help anything but gamer gate set the current stage for this shit just because of its magnitude and how it changed the argument.
the pro-quinn sjws or whatever were able to seize on the violent language and threats posted by idiots who didn't get it at all and make the whole thing about misogyny and men vs women, completely drowning out the complaints about journalism.
and that pattern's held fast for the past few years, so when ghostbusters was announced, anyone who criticized the movie on legitimate grounds (soulless remake, terrible trailers, blatant cash grab, forcing the original actors to participate) was dubbed a misogynist and ignored
>>71778547
>>gets it right with BvS
Fuck no.
>caring what a neckbeard SJW who got upset because the police killed a murdering madman has to say
You do realize that even if he disliked the movie he'd never admit to it since it would go against his presented world views?
>>71778775
>gamer gate set the current stage for this shit
created the current climate for this shit*
sorry
>>71777841
Guess you forgot about Patton Oswalt jokes after he mentioned liking the new Ghostbusters.
.5 sony credits have been deposited into your account
>>71778833
>Patton Oswalt
>"Saw Ghostbusters, its fun, its scary.."
>its scary
>ITS SCARY
>SCARY
If you're going to lie, at least put effort into it
>>71778614
They are trying to be loud enough about it so that normies think they must be right and go see it. It's 100% marketing, but from a different angle that aims to socially engineer the "proper" narrative surrounding this garbage movie. I hope they all off themselves when it flops.
I will agree that Patton was wrong about judging AVGN decision to not review the movie at all. AVGN didn't really give an opinion on the film so he is not judging the film before seeing it, he just doesn't want to see it.
That being said, the backlash against Oswalt was distasteful. I know this is the internet, but people need to have some common decency. Don't bring up the man's wife just because he criticize movie reviewer for refusing to review a movie. Just a bunch of whiny butthurt man children who wants to be edgy on the internet.
>>71777078
James has no idea who Devin is, and I'm sure he couldn't give less of a shit what the internet thinks of him.
>>71777078
>Fat feminist neckbeard liked a feminist movie
What are the odds i wonder?
>>71779245
do you see the people talking about avgn's wife neither side is blameless
>>71778931
Totally my point bro
>>71777364
>left wing numale calling someone else a limp dick
>>71777364
>virgin
THE NERD HAS A DWUGHTER DAMMIT.
DID THEY EVEN DID RESEARCH?
Daily Reminder: There is zero reason to get angry over the new Ghostbusters film if you are over the age of 13
/tv/:
Apologize.
>>71777364
How is calling someone a virgin even allowed as an insult? You're not less of a person just because you haven't had sex. It's virgin shaming.
>>71778882
Sonickels?
>>71779245
>>71779375
Not just his wife, they shit talked about James's disabled daughter too.
>>71779566
Only white cis hetero males are virgins and you can't shame a cis hetero white male.
The truth is that the SJWs are no different than those who they attack, in fact they are often more vicious.
Did feminism ruin liberal men?
Fuck, 10 years ago, liberal men at least liked funny anti pc movies and shit like that
>>71777078
>Devin Faraci
say no more
>>71779566
at a certain age it suggests to an inability to get close to people which points to other character flaws unfortunately
it's still ridiculous as an insult and is the same kind of sex shaming or whatever that sjws regularly decry as horrible
especially when they're saying it about married man with a daughter
>>71778931
It's only scary because he fears his wife could come back as a ghost and expose him for murdering her.
>>71778476
This seems like a go to statement for when someone is butthurt about gamergate but doesn't want everyone to make fun of him for being a feminist.
>>71777078
Even meme dubsguy confirms the movie is good
tv BTFO
>>71777078
It's gonna get a positive score on RT, I hope you guys realize that. No matter how bad/good it is. The critics have alredy made it political for themselves and now they have to defend it
>>71780089
not really if you read my other posts i think i clarify pretty well
i was really into it early on but it got to a whole clusterfuck that just ended up making sarkeesian and quinn twice as famous as they already were
sjws responded to the initial report of quinn being a literal prostitute with a ton of hate and vitriol. the gg side fired back and ended up making sjws look sympathetic to the broader media because they were able to moan about threats and insults
it just got out of hand and impossible to have any kind of discussion about it because it degraded to cries of misogyny and whore
>>71778643
Devin Faraci has publicly said that he refuses to work with Screen Junkies now though because they are owned by Defy Media who also owns the Escapist where they allowed gamergate discussion
>>71778931
On point bud, on point.
>>71777603
Because outside of bitching out old video games, the next big thing he's know for is having a massive hard on for ghostbusters, and his fanbase knows that.
So when you have someone like his say 'no, I'm not going to see it' that sends the message to all his followers, aka ticket sales, out the window.
Much more likely is that Sony approached him to shill the movie and he said fuck off, so they're using the people they did pay off to set an example of him to other would be youtubers.
Sony's using shill critics as last line of defense
>Devin Faraci
A piece of shit self-promoter trying to get his name on the Bluray case.
>>71778496
Someone doesn't know about the movie staring Zoe Quinn that's about her version of Gamergate (Where she is not a complete sociopath who ruined countless lives for her own benefit and false flagged herself to make her look like a victim of some grand conspiracy and GamerGate is basically how it was portrayed in Law and Order except this time, the girl wins because the internet fails to level up.
Oh, it's also funded by the broad who's producing this Ghostbuster atrocity. So you get how it will go.
>>71777078
>http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2015/08/05/fantastic-four-review-its-clobberin-time
he seems to be a good critic
>>71781546
Please tell me you're being sarcastic. I need confirmation.
>>71781439
Amy Pascal?
>>71781417
Is that real?
If that's real, then this guy has no taste in fucking ANYTHING.
>have review embargo until release day
>have select reviewers praise it through twitter
Fantastic 4 2: electric boogaloo
>>71781633
Yup, they commissioned Quinn to write her version of gamer gate which is coming out this fall and Pascal already wants to make a movie off it.
It's a shame their version of history will become the truth and allows evil to triumph because good men choose to do nothing.
>>71781674
Yes, it's real. It was linked here: >>71781546
>>71781546
>>71781546
>>71781812
What a faggot
>>71781727
Worry not senpai, it will flop like all of Pascal's sjw projects. Sony will get tired of her losing money and demote her ass (again kek).
All she is doing now is nothing more than a violent flicker of a dieing candle.
Based James Rolfe
>>71781674
It's real, he was one of the few defenders of the film.
