3>7>6>5>8>2>4>1
>>71728553
3 > 4 > 7 > 1 > 2 > 5 > 8
objectively
>>71728569
oops, 6 should go between 3 and 4
>>71728569
goblet isnt the second best and you forgot half blood prince.
olay goblet isnt the third best. no way is it better made than dh1 or ootp.
>>71728553
1 totally beats 2
What did all the other sixth graders from /v/ think when you told them?
>>71728606
it certrainly is. dh1 is debatable, but ootp is really meandering and is too much filler. snape's wors tmemory is butchered, too much focus on luna and romance. 4 had dragons and merpeople and shit. it kicked ass. yeah it was an action movie but at least shit was always happening. OOTP's one diamond point is the fight between dumbledore and voldemort.
>>71728661
I dont think so, not that I don't like 1. I like them all. You think Goblet is better or worse than both?
>>71728702
OOTP was a really good adaptation imo and it nailed its tone and had a great buildup and climax. Goblet had just as much romance. I think Goblet is the worst directed or maybe only slightly better than Colombus.
3 > 6 > 2 > 4 > 1 > 7 B > 7 A > 5
Biggest mistake WB ever made was not delaying Goblet so Alfonso would come back.
>>71728829
DH1 is one of the best, easily and its much better as a film than DH2
>>71728754
>OOTP was a really good adaptation imo
>cut the scene where harry and dumbledore talk to each other and harry sees dumbledore cry
>butchered snape's worst memory
>montages set to silly music
>grawp CGI
>no footage of quidditch or ron winning
it was okay but in terms of adaptations it was pretty off the mark
Dogshit>>>Harry Poter. Seriously it's one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a least the books were good though
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>71728842
>>71728829
but i agree....we will never get a single take second and third task.......
no way is goblet better than DH1 or OOTP tho. Ill give you its better than the first and the last heres my updated
3>7>6>2>4=5>1>8
>>71728855
yate adaptations centered around harry and then the gang in other aspects. it fit the film you cant include everything. i think its really solid as are all of yates but i like dh2 the least of his.
>>71728842
I prefer B to A but they were both decent. 5 for me starts at 60 % and ends at 3 with about a 90%
5 destroyed so many elements of what made OOTP charming to read but it wasn't a great book I suppose so it was never going to be a great movie.
>>71728925
it did the orwellian brazilian thing really good, the book had a lot to be cut though i think the film works and harrys development is one of the best
>>71728925
You can't honestly say Goblet is a better done film than OOTP or the Deathly Hallows. Don't take into account the books just the films as standalone or as an accompaniment. If we take into account the books Goblet is even worse because its a poor adaptation at best.
1 > 2 > 3 > lost interest and don't care
>>71729054
too bad for you the latter ones are the best
>>71728569
Anon are you me? I use this exact order obviously with 6 going between 3 and 4
>>71729054
you're not missing out lad
they get worse and worse
What is added in the extended versions of the first two films?
>>71728569
3 > 6 > 4 > 1 > 2 > 5 > 8 > 7
FTFY
>>71729311
shit taste 7 is great along with 6 bro. come on 3 6 7 are the best.
>>71729247
nah 5 6 7 were better than 4
>>71729258
just some little stuff but i like the extended versions
>there are people on this board that dont think order of the phoenix was the worst movie
You kidding me? it was all boring filler bullshit the only thing good about it was based umbridge
>>71729355
How the fuck is 7 any good?
It's literally 2 hours of them walking through a forest with upset Ron.
It was a cash grab and could have been the opening 30 minutes of 8.
>>71729355
>nah 5 6 7 were better than 4
nah they're all garbage after 3 and before 3, neet pleb
>>71728855
They should have cut Grawp entirely and replaced his scene with Quidditch.
Grawp was in the series for 10 minutes, not even to return for the final battle, complete waste of time.
...Are we listing Movie-Hermione by attractiveness?
Where Gryffindor geographically is?
>>71729384
my god can you be more fucking dull. it wasnt a cash grab the original print was 5.5 hours long for the deathly hallows. heyman didnt think they could even call it the deathly hallows and feature the hallows if they didnt split it up. 7 works as a standalone perfectly and as a penultimate entry it allows the story to breathe and the character shine. it got the tone right from the book and is very eerie in its portrayal of them on the run in a corrupt society.
>>71729437
Shit, i meant Hogwarts
She was at her prime in Chamber of Secrets, and slowly went down hill after that, now she looks like a tranny.
>>71729398
You're taste is shit. Yates and Cuarons were great. Half blood prince is one of the best as is deathly hallows part 1.
>>71729463
Scotland.
>>71729478
>Yates
Complete pleb fuck with no taste detected.
>>71729466
my dick says otherwise......and hasnt stopped yet 3 4 5 6 7 my dick
>>71729503
Yea sure....keep telling yourself that. Half-Blood Prince and DH1 are perfect. I domt even really like DH2. But Idziak, Delbonell and Serra along with Yates and Hooper and Desplat and the cast did a great job
>>71729460
Then why was the book shorter than Order of the Phoenix?
They somehow did that in one movie.
Less source material ≠ Movie that needs two parts
>>71729555
i dont know if youre retarded but DH1 is a separate film that works on its own and better than DH2. there was plenty of material before the big battle to make a film and ending with dobbys climax after the entire film is about comraderie and fighting against odds was dome very well its a great midpoint. think about making a film. ootp had no midpoint to break up into two films and this is evident in that they did it all and got the message across in the film even though it was the shortest film it was the biggest book with the most fat
>>71729549
t. an utter tasteless plebeian
>>71729611
I would bet my entire life savings that you think ESB is the best Star Wars movie.
>>71729611
>>71729555
to add theres more of a reason to split up goblet into two than order. they did order fine and got the message and the messages across better than the book. less isnt always more order of the pheonix part 1 sounds like it ends terribly and is pretty underwhelming
>>71729634
You keep saying plebian.....nice arguments. 6 7 were fantastic go read some reviews if you cant see it.
>>71729683
Get some taste.
>>71729636
What if I told you that I actually like Star Wars and ROTJ more..I don't think the series is fantastic btw
>>71729710
I do have some, PLEB
Philosopher's Stone
Flick 8
Movie 8
Film 7
Cinema 7
Kino 6
Chamber of Secrets
Flick 9
Movie 7
Film 8
Cinema 8
Kino 7
Prisoner of Azkaban
Flick 8
Movie 9
Film 9
Cinema 10
Kino 10
Goblet of Fire
Flick 10
Movie 9
Film 7
Cinema 6
Kino 7
Order of the Phoenix
Flick 7
Movie 9
Film 8
Cinema 8
Kino 8
Half-Blood Prince
Flick 10
Movie 10
Film 10
Cinema 10
Kino 10
Deathly Hallows Part 1
Flick 9
Movie 9
Film 9
Cinema 10
Kino 10
Deathly Hallows Part 2
Flick 10
Movie 10
Film 8
Cinema
Kino 8
>>71729733
>I do have some
Yeah pleb fucking taste and no cinema IQ
>>71729849
wow were you actually autistic enough to write all of that?
do you agree?
>>71729877
>"Why is /tv/ the worst moderated board on 4chan and when will the mods there get fired?"
What did you mean by this?
>>71728697
you know that HP is almost 20 years old, right?
>>71729877
GoF is too high. DH2 is too high.
OOTP to low DH1 too low HBP a little low
7.2>2>3>1>6>5>7.1>4
R8 h8
>>71729898
as you can see by the audience scores GoF is lower than critics OOTP and DH1 are higher than critics
>>71729877
the first 3 were great, peaking with the 3rd.
it all went downhill from there, 4 was awful and probably the worst one, then again I only watched DH1-2 like once and I remember them being pretty shit too
>>71729916
Theres no reason to like DH2 that much and Yates others that little because they are arguable better.
>>71729935
4 is easily the worst but the others are even better on rewatches. You should do them in order you wont think they are badly done after Goblet of Fire, theres a reason Yates stayed on.
>>71729895
so it's for children of all ages?
>>71729961
t. film can't possibly be a different medium or anything, things like the Shining dont exist
>>71729986
both versions of the shining are trash though. also 80s action trash is for children too and it's almost 30 years
Its funny how some people dont realize the direction the series took was taken because the studio dealt with Cuaron who injected something different into the series. Had it not been well recieved they wouldnt have felt comfortable going with Yates.
>>71730032
as far as horror films go its not trash
>>71730032
the filming techniques for most of the potter films were impressive, its a big series but they did it right
>>71730032
>The Shining is trash
fuck off contrarian pleb
I've seen a lot of these threads and it always surprises me, people like all of them differently in different orders. Not that its surprising people have different tastes, but its a testament to how good the series is. They are all highly regarded
>>71729434
no but my OP somehow does that as well.
>>71730054
>as far as horror films go its not trash
yes it is. if you want a film that does similar shit but does it well, watch The Haunting(60s). it's actually creepy, and actually has interesting characters
who's your favourite shining character. the kid who can't act, the weepy pathetic woman who never does anything, or the overblown caricature that is Jack Nicholson?
>>71730140
go back to imdb and take op with you
>>71730223
i dont like the shining because of the characters i like it because of kubricks directing most of all. i dont think its one of his best tho
>>71730201
well now you need to make that list with pictures
>>71728553
3>7>6>4>1>2>5>>>>>>>8
>>71728553
2>3>6>1>8>7>5>4
>>71730264
kino is better in motion
>>71730267
holy shit nigger are you me? thats a pretty spot on ranking
>>71730267
>>71730295
>>71730312
>>71729916
See we have lots of different opinions thats always good to see
>>71728875
Unironically this. They're dogshit and the third one is the only one that tried to be something more. Plebs will tell you the first two are good, but its a tumblr meme by mongs trying to impress people on facebook.
>1
Despite clocking in at over two solid hours, the movie fails to properly set up and develop its characters and their back-stories, there is almost no build up and, even worse still, chemistry between the actors here. - 0/5
>2
Cramming in every "plot point" you can find in the book does not engaging storytelling make, and it's a wonder there ever was a third movie. - 0/5
>3
Splendid. An entirely enjoyable pop fantasy adventure that never for a moment insults the intelligence. By very very very very far the best of the Potter movies, the only one that manages to capture the funky mad energy of J.K. Rowling's hogwash. - 2/5
>4
Easy come, easy go. - 0/5
>5,6,7,8
Didn't see them
This series is genuinely worse than Star Wars 1-6 (I've seen episode 7 now and its more of a superhero movie than Star Wars)
>>71728553
Nah m8, it's 4>3>1>2>7>8>6>5.
4 is pure Kino.
The entire film is the Potter equivalent of Bravo Nolan's plane scene.
In time, you will all acknowledge this.
>>71730376
>posting this pasta again
>havent seen the half of it
If its you, you should kys mr its worse than star wars but in havent seen four films
>>71730379
Youre proving yourself wrong you idiot. Look at how many people rank 4 the worst ITT. You'd have to be a memeing meister to think its kino, which you are
>>71730421
*pure kino
>>71730421
Nah, my patrician tastes are just too ahead of the game. Don't worry about it though, you'll come around. Give 4 another watch, it's comfy and funny as fuck.
>mouth breathing troglodyte thinks he can post directly at me whilst using Twitter meme slang
>>71730454
they are all comfy i just prefer better filmmaking and acting, the directing was suspect DIDYA PUTYA is the prive evidence, although emma and rupert did a very good job. british humor is always funny to me i thought some others were just as funny.
>>71730454
>>71730495
evidence no. 2 of Newells bad directing is David Tennants tonguing.
>>71730379
>>71730454
You have some pure kino too low on your list like 6 and 7.
as far as soundtracks go
1 - 9/10
2 - 10/10
3 - 10/10
4 - 10/10
5 - 10/10
6 - 10/10
7 - 9
8 - 8
>>71728702
>too much focus on luna
That's the dumbest thing I've heard all day
>>71728829
he also offered his interest to come back for deathly hallows
del toro wanted to do hbp lmao fuck del toro hbp was fantastic
>>71730495
>DIDYA PUTYA
That's one of the thing that makes it great. The absolutely bizarre acting and directing! Dumbleroar, Barty Crouch's voice, Barty Crouch Jr's tongue, plots being introduced and dropped at random and the weirdly camp Lord Voldemort's "don'tyouturnyourbackonmeharrypotter!". Shit I'm sure there's many more that I'm forgetting right now.
>>71730551
Perhaps. I haven't watched them in years. Maybe I need to reappraise them too.
>>71730732
Did you miss all the posts where plebs were calling these low iq flicks "film" and "kīno"?
>>71730766
no its kind of cringe. but i still enjoy it i mean it works as a whole because its directed like that the entire time, the shining third task pissed me off but i admit it works good in the movie. gambon was much better in 3 and 6.
you should watch them in order
>>71730784
Nice shitposting keep it up (You)
OOTP was the best because pic related
Vid about 3 if anyone's interested
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3hZ_ZyzCO24
>>71730766
There nuances like that in the others that doesnt make it great but it could make it good
>>71730817
You too, kinosabe.
Make sure you keep forcing more reddit meme culture on a board you just joined.
>>71730863
Nice projecting
>>71730784
Don't you ever fucking call me a pleb again.
>>71730845
It okay hes just at the bare bones. I like how the novikov self consistency principle plays into the plot of Buckbeak never dying in any timeline and the patronus being so strong because Harry's point of view in the time travel/time loop.
Yates can be analyzed like this as well. Idk about Colombus and Newell
>>71730879
Ditto
>>71730784
fuck you
>>71730876
>dude 15 years and 7 is puree kino lmao
>y-youre projecting:((
>>71730879
Don't you ever reply to me again if your going to use such vulgar language. ever.
>>71730949
>>71731013
>Yes, yes Ralph Fiennes, congratulations are in order for your tremendous performance as Voldemort
>HOWEVER
>>71730963
Haha epic!
>>71730949
>he doesn't enjoy fine Wandkino on brisk evenings
Do you even try to live?
>>71731063
Five star post
>>71731065
>_kino
Hello dannyboytbh
>>71731110
i will not fight you shitposter
>>71728553
Why did EVERYONE say the 3rd is the best?
>>71731574
It was the only one directed by Alfonso
2 > 3 > 1 > 6 > 5 >7 >8
>>71731830
Le Colombus and studio director made the best film. i like chamber its underrated maybe but thats over the line, his are the worst reviewed for a reason
I'm thinking of marathoning them. no memes. Legit 1x marathon.
Shit=Harry potter
>>>/9gag/
>>71731960
Nice try shitskin
Wish they went into detail more about Grindelwald, could have been GOAT
3 > 6 > 7.1 > 2 > 5 > 1 > 7.2 > 4
>>71728553
>>71728569
>all these akzaban babbies
>putting 1 and 2 so far in the back
shit taste confirmed. fucking plebs
>>71732527
t. Colombus
Just leave it mate. The others are netter films theres nothing wrong with 1 2. I like 2 but its still not one of the best
>>71731830
this fucking nigger knows what's up although I would say the 6th one is the worst one
>>71732566
Nope. 6 is one of the best and a pleb filter, you didn't notice its brilliance its okay.
>>71732511
The focus made for really good films
>>71732559
the columbus movies had not only the best stories but also
>best acting
>best effects
>goddamn practical effects
>best atmosphere
after goblet of fire, it just goes grimdark. half-blood prince was a goddamn piece of SHIT movie which butchered the book completely. there's no way a non-retard person wouldn't put it in the last place
at least the last two movies were surprisingly good
>>71732582
>you didn't notice its brilliance
>it's okay
you don't even notice how stupid you are
>>71730825
Shame she grew up to look like a goblin.
>>71728553
Comfy tier
1>2>4>3>
Absolute teenager shit
567
>>71732635
calling someone else stupid when you're stating all that bullshit?
Columbus' didn't have the best acting or atmosphere or effects or directing. Sure they matched the novels which were lighthearted, they also were vanilla and able to go dot by dot. Not entirely great filmmaking. Stop being a sperg the others are different for a reason harry doesnt have a grand old time.
>best acting
>best atmosphere
>Columbus
top kek do you realize how stupid you sound the acting was the worst except for hermione because she was good in all of them
>>71732663
>teenager shit
>4 not teenager shit
found the retard
>>71732693
>best atmosphere
>not columbus
what the fuck? which one would you consider as having the best atmosphere? and don't come with that "muh azkaban" shit now
>>71732745
6 and 7.1 and 3 and 2. not in that order.
Listen using the "its not like the book" isnt critiquing the film like you should. "It butchered the book" i couldnt care less it got everything across from the book and moreso it had top atmosphere.
>>71728553
2 1 7 8 6 3 4 5
>>71732821
>>71732745
Also the grimdark isnt out of place. 5 deals with mindrape, orwellian bitches, sirius dying, 6 deals with curses and dark potions and horcruxes and dumbledore dying hogwarts ransacked and the deathly hallows deals with harry and everyone dying. If you liked deathly hallows which you said is surprisingly good, you should like Yates' other adaptations because I feel they were solid. It's an adaptation don't compare it to the book its either complementary or standalone
4>6>2>3>1>8>7>5
>>71732877
>8 better than 6
>8 better than 3
>1 2 better than 3 6 7 8
>>71728553
They're all shit
>>71732923
You're playing yourself having Goblet of Fire out in front
>>71732946
yet here's your post plebian
To me these are the top tier
3 2 6 7
And these are the still very good tier
1 5 4 8
If you want to talk HP you can go to Reddit.
>>71733111
they are plebs who dont even like the films Ryan
Should I rewatch them in chronological order or in the preferred order, ie. 3>4>7>8>5>6>2>1?
>>71732635
The books go grimdark after goblet of fire too
>films:
3>4>7.1>1>6>7.2>2>5
>books:
4>7>3>6>1>5>2
>>71728829
Cuaron>Newell>Yates>Columbus
Props to Columbus for being the first and setting the tone but holy fuck are a lot of the scenes in his movies already dated
>>71730379
>Chinese Fireball, oooohh
so many times I've heard that fucking voice in my head when I'm about to fall asleep and it wakes me up
3>2>1>4>7.1>5>6>7.2
i actually don't remember much of 5 and 6
>>71730688
Fucking hell the soundtrack to the last movie was boring as shit, save for Reunion of Friends being used at the end.
>>71730919
Yates is weird because he mixes in some beautiful shots with random handheld shakeycam closeups and they don't compliment each other at all. The opening of OOTP with Harry and Duddley is so bizzarly shot it's almost comedic
>>71731051
did they just drop the house points shit after Chamber of Secrets? It would have been fucking hilarious for Slytherin to win at the end of Deathly Hallows because Snape rigged it for them
>>71728553
1>2 power gap: the rest.
Columbus had the best casting and tone and overall charm
Cuaron had the best acting and directing
Newell was pretty much a combination of the first two
Yates had the best cinematography I guess
books >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> movies
>>71728553
all of em are 6/10 and so bland and boring
>>71734886
This right here. The HP movies were bland and boring and full of plotholes. I didn't like them at all.
3>>>>>>>the rest
>>71728553
3>7>2<1<8<5<6<4
>>71734940
the buildup is always weird, the climax is weird or non-existing, sometimes at the end of a hp movie I'm just sat there going wtf did i just watch, what was the fucking point of half this shit
guess i was just too old, but still, they're pretty bad
>>71728875
>>71730376
>>71735544
What did you mean by this?
3>2>1>4>5>6>7>8
The harry and hermione scene after ron left made DH1 easily the best.
Whichever one that this scene is from.
>>71735837
fake
>>71735910
It's real though.
3>2>6>1>5>7>4
Which Hogwarts House does /tv/ belong to?
>>71736717
I was sorted into Slytherin, as per pottermore.
>>71728553
Bait.
1>2>5>8>7>3>6>4
Having just watched them all again in a row a few weeks ago. They're all bad and stupid with extremely anti-climatic endings except 1, 2 and 8. And 8 was eh.
1 > 2 > shit > 8 > Everything else
there's a feeling that's comforting. and it goes right to my heart. that's what life is all about. knowing how to love. giving it a try. life after life. we all live together. in a loveable world. just hold my hand and dare to dream. what we dream becomes real. it is all so beautiful.
>>71739642
Damn dude how much mdma did you drop?
>watching harry potter
Faggot.
Why are you niggers rating 7? It's obviously the worst, tone and pacing are all over the place and very little actually happens.
>>71735780
What the actual fuck were Harry and the rest doing in 7? Instead of searching for horcruxes they just port randomly around the wilderness.
I'd loce to see an animated version of the books sometime. Maybe even in series form, with each season covering a book
Can someone explain to me why DH2 keeps getting rates so low on here. Critics and audiences loved it, and I haven't seen such trashing til I saw this thread.
>>71742858
anime when
>>71742858
>Maybe even in series form, with each season covering a book
Since Rowling seems to like the attention a bit too much to let HP die down, I give it 10 years and it's probably going to happen.
15 at most.
>>71743413
>overemphasis on humor
>no kreacher/house elves
>no burning sorting hat on neville
>king's cross scene being very...odd
the biggest disappointment was no aberforth telling dumbledore's backstory subplot. they even introduced aberforth, but for no fucking reason other than to show them the path to hogwarts.
the gringotts break-in and snape's memory were cool, though. voldemort and bellatrix's deaths were hialriously bad.
when will this prisoner of azkaban is best meme end?
>>71743613
it is the best
>ITS GONNA BE A BUMPPPY RIDE
>EXPECTO PATRONUMMMMMMMAAA!~
>YOUR RAT
>sirius being cool as shit and mysterious
>that music and bird changing seasons scenes
>the general comfy as fuck atmosphere with buckbeak, my nigga lupin, snape, marauders map, etc.
>>71743700
>>71743613
prisoner of kino
Sorry i dont watch flicks
>>71743613
>I hope he finds me, because when he does i'll be ready. when he does, i'm gonna kill him.
what did harry mean by this?
daily reminder that DH1 is true kino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM5WI4MTXzc
>ywn dance with hermione to nick cave
>>71742858
who the fuck is that guy standing on the walls in HBP? i don't remember that at all
>>71728553
3>2>4>1 the rest are garbage and get worse with each one
![Half.Blood.Prince.2009.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-ETRG.mkv_snapshot_02.09.04_[2016.07.07_13.44.26].png](https://i.imgur.com/9mQoBuq.png "Half.Blood.Prince.2009.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-ETRG.mkv_snapshot_02.09.04_[2016.07.07_13.44.26].png")
>>71743973
Not really sure, its a brief scene right before Malfoy lets the Death Eaters in
>>ITT people who judge movies based on plot
yawn. boring.
i admire these movies. i watched them all on back-to-back nights over the course of a week. they start off as a standard kiddie fantasy film with almost ABC-family tier cinematography and novelty effects moments. then all of a sudden you get to The Goblet of Fire and the whole movie's visual style suddenly got darker. literally more black in every scene than ever before. this trend continued with every next film getting literally darker than the last.
not only that when you make the hop from goblet of fire to The Order of The Phoenix you get such a HUGE boost in visual quality. so much sharper than any of the movies before. dumbledore vs voldemort in that movie has some gnarly cgi going on. go torrent it you faggots dont look up a shitty encoded youtube video
>>71743613
when it stops being the only good movie in the sea of pleb flicks
7>3>2>1>4>8>5>6
6 was absolute shit. I remember getting so pumped up for it since the book was amazing, and then the movie was just cheesy stupid love, barely any action, shitty unnecessary addition.
At least DH1 saved the day. DH2 was pretty stupid and had so many flaws though.
>>71745169
>7
>good
it's the lowest rated for a reason
fucking /tv/ contrarians
>>71745244
>popularity = quality
Stop being stupid.
2>1>7.1>3>4>7.2>5>6
also 2 is the most comfy
>>71734362
he doesnt use shaky cam that much i recall he uses it after siruis dies when harry is running after Bellatrix and slightly in dh1 because in that film he used handheld cameras a lot
>>71734242
Cuaron>Yates>Newell>Columbis
>>71745521
I didn't say it was the least popular one, I said it was the lowest rated one.
Because it's shit.
>>71745561
2 is by far the one with the worst script. Not sure if it's a flaw of the book as well but the amount of logical leaps and assumptions driving the plot is ridiculous.
>>71734940
Shit taste and 'boring' proves it. So much better than the books
>>71735357
the climaxes for 3 4 5 6 7 8 are very much existing
>>71734818
films>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>books
>>71739028
>anticlimactic
Kill yourself
>>71745561
you have fine taste.
>>71745627
2 is the best adaptation. Very loyal to the source material.
Also fuck you all 3 lovers I hope some wizards kill you while wearing muggle clothes. Fucking bullshit asswipes
>>71736717
Probably hufflepuff cause this board is full of fags and losers
>>71745244
It's not the lowest rated. Not him, its one of the best.
>>71745733
Harry has adidas and jeans on the cover of azkaban book. YOU fuck yourself. They wear their school clothes a TON in 3 4 5 6 stop being triggered that they sometimes didnt.
>>71745561
6 is one of the best and most comfy.
>>71745738
Yeah it is the lowest rated one along with Order of the Phoenix.
>>71745738
the only bad part about 7 was the rip-off of the locket being the one ring from LOTR. ministry break-in > gringotts break-in. 7 is one of the best because it fleshes out the world outside of hogwarts and does so in a great way. the ministry scenes were excellent and so were the camping scenes and the opening scene with voldemort.
>>71745823
>fleshes out the world
>all we see is remote wilderness (which didn't even make sense)
wew lad
>>71745818
You're acting like that matters at all. Can you analyze film for yourself. Look at some reviews theres more to talk about in 7 than 1 and 2 combined. Same with Order of the phoenix, audiences liked them more than the critics.
>>71745844
>>all we see is remote wilderness (which didn't even make sense)
>draco's home
>ministry of magic
>12 grimauld place
>luna's home
>azkaban
>>71745823
That wasnt a rip off, it made sense was literally happening in the half blood prince when harry touched the ring. he starts having nervous tick with neck like he did in ootp when voldemort is fucking with him
>>71745844
It followed the book. 7.1 was very well done and ending with dobbys death was pretty heaetbreaking
>>71745937
the ringing noise they hear in DH1 around the horcrux was used slightly in HBP
>>71745927
>ministry of magic
>12 grimauld place
>azkaban
we already saw those in previous movies and 7 didn't add anything substantial
>draco's home
we saw a random hall and a dungeon such flesh
>luna's home
ok
>>71728875
I watched the first one at the time when I just started going to school.
It was a magical experience I really lived the movie one of the most memorable movie experiences of my life.
>>71745844
did you even watch the movie? why are you even here
>>71745818
as if that means anything
>>71745811
6 is a disappointmen and felt really akward overall. One second its really dark and serious, next second its a cheesy pointless love scene. They shouldve kept it closer to the book
>>71745818
Deathly Hallows Part 1 has a 3.7 on letterboxd which us one of the highest in the series. Higher than 1 2 4 5 6
Someone please tell me why exactly they were just randomly walking/porting around the wilderness in 7 instead of actively searching for horcruxes (or hints of their whereabouts).
>>71746002
>they shouldve kept it closer to the book
I actually hate this talk. It doesnt represent the medium and what it is there for. The tones melded perfectly to me, and it gets better every-time i watch it it builds well. i think its a great adaptation ans captures the uneasy feeling. theres lots going on visually..dont compare the films to the books thats your problem they are standalone or complementary
Even buzzfeeds general analysis shows this
https://www.buzzfeed.com/andyneuenschwander/proof-that-harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-had-the-mo?utm_term=.slA1peEMa#.ivV4P3KrN
>>71745675
>films>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>books
They're movies you mouth breather
>>71746114
They were searching for the only horcrux they knew of, well actually by the time they are innawoods they have it and need to destroy it. same happens in the book. they dont know what to do, they dont know where the other horcurxes are immediately thats why ron throws a hissy fit and harry and hermione go to godrics hollow and try to learn something about dumbledore and the hallows.
the answer your question simply, they have the only horcrux they could get and are on the run from the secret wizard police controlled by voldemort and snatchers
>>71746159
How many times are you going to post the same thing? Sorry your books suck the films are films maybe you should pay attention.
>>71746225
>films
They are movies
>>71745988
Not that guy but the film follows the book pretty well
>>71746118
this. just watch this scene
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0mVNFCcMXQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfdaH5-xerA
6 may have "all hands on deck granger" but the humor is kept light and never feels forced, like those montages in OOTP. slughorn is a great comedic foil, and harry too with felix felicis, but these moments never overshadow the tense atmosphere of HBP. The music, the effects, the foreshadowing of dumbledore's death. The one thing i wish they kept frmo the books was snape teaching harry in DATDA, (especially because they actually mention it in the movie) because it had a nice parallel when hermione says it reminded her of harry teaching them in DA in year 5.
>>71746259
>hes still going on and being a complete and utter waste of space
They are films, they were made by professionals who know more about filmmaking than you do. Hur dur they made money so they arent films
>>71746196
But still it's stupid to do nothing. How about asking someone for help? Trying to contact the order? Researching stuff? ANYTHING?
They're literally doing nothing until Hermione conveniently remembers some shit about the sword thanks to plot power. And the sowrd conveniently appearing thanks to plot powers.
>PEOPLE LIKE THIS MOVIE
>>71746114
Because Dumbledore didn't tell Harry shit about where he might find the rest
>>71745627
>lowest-rated based on random people voting
>not least popular
>>71746286
I cant watch those clips because i dont like cutting the scenes and flow, id just watch the entire thing.
But the cave sequence and ransacking of hogwarts was stylistically perfect.
>>71746118
Pretty much. My only regrets about it are skipping the Voldemort job interview memory and not showing Snape going apeshit.
>>71728553
3>7>...
Yes, perfect!
>>71746118
Buzzfeed is retarded, this takes away credibility from your point. I don't think the movies should be exactly the same as the books, but in the case of hbp I think the movie wouldve been better if they'd followed the book more closely. Same goes for ootp. They took away important parts and put in stupid parts.
>>71746225
Just because you lack the attention span to finish a book over 200 pages doesn't mean they're bad. Anyone who's read the books knows they're better than the movies.
>>71746293
>How about asking someone for help? Trying to contact the order? Researching stuff? ANYTHING?
The entire point of the film is to focus on the trio and it follows the books idk what you want me to say. Them being on their own is the point. They are trying to figure it out but they are on the run, its safer for the, to be by themselves
>>71746288
They are movies no matter how upset it makes you. Stick to television and videogames if you refuse to understand art.
“A movie is made for an audience and a film is made for both the audience and the filmmakers. I think that The Game is a movie and I think Fight Club‘s a film. I think that Fight Club is more than the sum of its parts, whereas Panic Room is the sum of its parts. I didn’t look at Panic Room and think: Wow, this is gonna set the world on fire. These are footnote movies, guilty pleasure movies. Thrillers. Woman-trapped-in-a-house movies. They’re not particularly important.” - David Fincher
"My film is not a movie. My film is not about Vietnam. It is Vietnam. It's what it was really like. It was crazy. We were in the jungle, there were too many of us, we had access to too much money, too much equipment, and little by little we went insane." — Francis Ford Coppola
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film#Terminology_used
>By contrast, in the US "movie" is the predominant form. Although the words "film" and "movie" are sometimes used interchangeably, "film" is more often used when considering artistic, theoretical, or technical aspects, as studies in a university class and "movies" more often refers to entertainment or commercial aspects, as where to go for fun on a date. For example, a book titled "How to Read a Film" would be about the aesthetics or theory of film, while "Lets Go to the Movies" would be about the history of entertaining movies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMsp05iSk7s
movies are about economics.
cinema is about esthetics.
film is about politics.
-"How To Read A Film" by James Monaco
Also the separation is recognized in these texts
Bresson's Notes on the Cinematographer
Tarkovsky's Sculpting in Time
Delleuze's Cinema I&II
>>71746371
>Buzzfeed is retarded, this takes away credibility from your point.
that takes away your credibility i said it was bare bones analysis yet its better than most people can notice
Also nice assuming I read Half blood prince in less than a day. i loved the book but i like the films more they have more to offer and emotionally work better. sue me i can find more in them
>>71746393
What a great direction. They really felt haunted with all the sitting around doing nothing and never being in any perceivable danger.
>people like this movie
>>71746371
>Anyone who's read the books knows they're better than the movies.
PoA movie is better than the books.
>>71746371
OotP only really removed extra scenes of Umbridge being a cunt.
But that, Harry being angry and the DA is nearly all of the book.
>>71746286
the humour and love feels really forced though. It's cringey.
>>71746288
shut up retard, they're movies
>>71746293
they were researching and looking for help, that's why they went to godrics hollow you tard. The ministry is infiltrated by voldemort and the order is fucked. What were they supposed to do?
>>71746455
You might be an autist. Stop coming to these threads and posting your drivel then, I'm sorry you cant handle directing harry potter films. Also I didn't read because I've seem you post that before. You're doing yourself no good
>>71746502
Its not cringey. Goblet was cringey. And no they are in fact considered films and cinema stay triggered.
>>71746482
so were the last 4.
post your favorite scenes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKxk9-z-dwY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URbvT_pkAjI
>>71746482
>1 movie
ok
>>71746457
I think you're a female.
>>71746493
Apparently they cut 40 mins from the original cut. They cut a lot of stuff out from the book, not just Umbridge stuff.
>>71746455
>fincher makes films
TOP KEK the HP films have more going on than Fincher
>>71746515
You clearly read the beginning. Go home now
anti art scum like you are not welcome on this art board
>>71746599
Okay well I'm a guy. Still havent proven me wrong that HBP is good either
>>71746564
I don't care what some idiot on /tv thinks their called, you're objectively wrong. And it was cringey as fuck, way more than gof
>>71746588
HBP has got an amazing score
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Se4Qo4-yyQ
>>71746638
I told you I've read it before because you've posted it before. Your inferiority is showing by your need to flaunt your bs
>>71746660
>objectively wrong
Not really lots of people like it as evidence of the thread
>>71746662
It fits the film perfectly as well. Hooper did a great job.
>>71746710
>I told you I've read it before because you've posted it before. Your inferiority is showing by your need to flaunt your bs
>actors, directors, artists, scholars
>its real and heres why
>mouth breathing /t/v/ drone
>nah its bs
Loving every laugh.
>kino spamming reddit memers get upset when the reality of film vs movie vs cinema gets posted
always a good chuckle
>>71746642
There's no proof, it's just opinion. Things that made hbp bad:
forced cringey love scenes
autistic harry on felix felicis
inconsistency in mood
anti-climactic
sex jokes
ignoring snape
Haven;t seen it for a while, but that's off the top of my head
>>71746785
>sex jokes
What sex jokes?
