Who is the best ?
>>71669167
Interstellar>martian>>>>gravity.
>>71669238
this
>>71669238
THIS
H
I
S
>>71669167
martianr>lnterstellar>>>>gravity.
>>71669167
Dante 01
Gravity>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>meme>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>memest
>>71669167
They're both good, but gravity was... Sandra Fucking Bullock. I could not hate her anymore. I didn't mind her in Speed.
>>71669167
i really liked interstellar
despite that fucking third act
interstellar doesn't fit in with these two. martian and gravity at least try to be realistic. interstellar is just pure science fiction with some realistic elements. might just as well add a space odyssey and star trek
gravity was propably the worst film l saw in cinema
>>71669167
Martian>Gravity>Interstellar
interstellar >>> gravity > martian
Sunshine>Moon>Martian>Interstellar>Europa Report
Sunshine
>>71669167
Gravity>Interstellar>>>The Martian
>>71669396
>i do not understand suspension of disbelief
Gravity = flick
The Martian = movie
Interstellar = film.
>>71669396
yeah but that's not what I meant
>>71669238
this tbqhs
>>71669417
>>71669420
Noice
>>71669167
you posted 3 terrible sci fi movies op
>>71669417
Good taste Anon
>>71669429
apparently you don't
suspension of disbelief doesn't mean ignoring obviously bad scenes and writing
>>71669167
The Martian > Gravity >>>>>>>>> Interstellar
>unironically thinking martian was a good movie
>le epic young black nonchalant nasa genius
>>71669454
Yes, they are
What is some spacekino comming soon anons? I love space and IMAX
>>71669432
Jupiter Ascending = Kino
>>71669515
True.
>>71669417
Best
>Interstellar>Moon>Sunshine>Martian>Europa Report
Most enjoyable
Moon>Martian>Sunshine>Interstellar>Europa Report
Honorable mention
>Pandorum
>>71669493
KEK
E
K
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcyfDRYKDJM
>>71669167
Why isn't Solaris on this list...oh right...you've only seen movies in the last 5 years cause you're 13. Right.
You can't compare them. It's not because it's in space that it's the same kind of movies.
Interstellar is a bit like 2001 but worse. And since 2001 was (and still is btw) absolute trash, that speak volumes about interstellar.
The Martian is a 9fag meme and Gravity is Speed in space.
>>71669560
I'm not even a /pol/ retard but that literally took me out of the movie.
>>71669508
The new Malick doc: Voyage of Time
>>71669515
I liked the lizard guy
>>71669238
Yeah this.
>>71669238
This.
Gravity was pretentious garbage.
The Martian was a solid Disney-like plot driven story added with reddit humor elements to make it accessible to everyone, literally made by a comittee, a problem with most movies today. Enjoyable but forgettable.
Interstellar was the best, despite some flaws. It actually tried to push the boundaries and DO SOMETHING, there was a sense of wonder and the visuals were done well, the characters you cared for somewhat. It had it's flaws with clunky dialogue and a third act on autopilot but it actually tried to be original and different.
>>71669556
>Honorable mention
>>Pandorum
I was gonna mention that, but I thought it was hypocritical to mention it since I couldn't finish it.
SMEE, ANALYZE BANE'S SIZE
>>71669590
Dude, these were 3 hits. Solaris wasn't even a hit when it came out. That says nothing about quality. Just saying it's a totally understandable comparison.
>>71669515
>I CREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEATE LIIIIIIIIIIIIIFE
>Kino
What?
>>71669662
This 100%
>>71669665
Ironically the ending saved that movie for me.
>>71669662
Is this the next phase of APOLOGIZE
>>71669594
>Interstellar is a bit like 2001 but worse.
How? 2001 was the "Space philisophy """""""DEEEEEP SHIT"""""" while Interstellar was "Space action movie #264284", I don't see the resemblance except for the aesthetic.
>>71669758
Maybe I'll give it a shot again someday. It didn't seem bad or anything, just wasn't keeping me interested and I was kinda fed up with that type of movie.
>>71669932
I don't even see a resemblance in the aesthetic.
>>71669167
Interstellar is still the best film I've ever had the immense pleasure of experiencing in cinemas. Absolutely incredibly beautiful- beautiful cinematography, epic and vivid score, and wondrous performances by all members of the cast. My only regrets are not seeing the film in both Imax, as well as only seeing it in theaters once
>>71669988
There are a few shots exactly as 2001 (I think is more like a homage than to trying to copy it), some other moments I remember are when Cooper falls in the Dark Hole and he starts screaming, and when they are in some alley.
>>71669167
Interstellar and gravity top tier
Martian okay tier
Realistic ratings, I'm not even trolling:
Gravity 2/10
Interstellar 4/10
The Martian 1/10
Space shit.
>>71670423
I wonder how your rating works, I don't like any of these but they are solid 6 or 7 to me. IMO stuff like parody movies and Sharknado type movies those are the real 1/10
>people are actually defending the martian in this thread
>people are actually defending "fuck you neil armstrong!"
>people are actually defending "le space pirate XD"
>people are actually defending "I gotta science le shit out of this!"
>people are actually defending "I hate le disco music but I play it anyway to complain about it XD"
>people are actually defending "yo hol up, I am a magical negro and I'm here to explain basic physics to the director of NASA"
>>71671002
>"yo hol up, I am a magical negro and I'm here to explain basic physics to the director of NASA"
kekty keko
>>71669279
Maybe if you include the book, but the Martian movie is a hollow shell of it's original source material. Interstellar is the best visually and scientifically.
>>71670829
>i don't like any of these
>but they are above average (5)
how can you dislike above average? adopt a proper rating system, anon.
inception
>>71670829
Gravity bored me to death and I give it 2 because of few nice shots.
Interstellar is Nolan's and I find Nolan terrible, but gave it 4 due to class acting performances.
The Martian is just one of the dullest space films ever, total abomination.
And I'm the guy who thinks 2001 is Top 5 kino, so don't call me out on some ADD shit, brother.
>>71671204
>a hollow shell of it's original source material
The source material:
>You know what? "Kilowatt-hour per sol" is a pain in the ass to say. I'm gonna invent a new scientific unit name. One kilowatt-hour per sol is... it can be anything... um... I suck at this... I'll call it a "pirate-ninja".
>>71669662
It was Nolanshit, which puts it in the same tier as Inception to me(I enjoyed both). The deeper meanings and philosophical ideas are wonderful, but the dialogue is cringey and it's needlessly "complicated". And before you say only retards don't get it or something, it isn't really that complex, but for some reason Nolan's pretentiousness(or more likely, his actual autism( comes into play and he ruins his own movies for the general public by doing this. I love the ideas, meaning, metaphor, symbolism etc in those movies, but a movie is supposed to be entertaining and enjoyable while having those deeper layers. Inception and Interstellar have the deeper layers, but they fail at the most important part, the actual storytelling, the characters, dialogue, pacing, etc.
>>71671303
now I see why the book became such a hit
GET REKT Nolan plebs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9Mf5UBFvH4
>>71669167
They all suck and you know it!
>>71669238
Snowpiercer>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Interstellar=martian=gravity=trash
>>71671452
BTFO
>>71669167
>>71669238
Event Horizon>>>>>>all that shit. Fight me.
>>71671452
>overanalyzing the science behind while missing everything else
yep, it's autism
>>71671699
He clearly said he didn't like the plot, you faggot.
>>71671400
>but a movie is supposed to be entertaining and enjoyable while having those deeper layers.
Which it was and did have.
It had a very good story and mostly good characters. The dialogue was an issue at times, because Nolan sometimes writes unnatural dialogue, but it was a good fucking story and film overall.
>>71671452
a decrepit old """professor'''' whining about scifi story being not exact.
other news, water wetinb4 "b-but water isn't wet" remark from science-major neets
Gravity > Interstellar > Martian
Moon > Apollo 13 > The Martian >>> Interstellar >>>>>>>>>>>Grabity
>>71669407
this is the only correct answer
>>71671002
fucking this. Le space potato man was reddit trash of the highest caliber
Martian >= Gravity >>>>>> trash >>> interstellar
I un ironically liked tdk, inception and the prestige but interstellar was hot trash
>>71671002
>Harrison Ford reaction
You'd think someone with such particular taste would bother to have their reaction folder feature people who have made at the very least a single good movie.
>>71669167
The Martian was the best.
Interstellar was too heavy handed about it's message of love (stupid)
Gravoty was just zero g porn with no substance (but she looked like a fetus!!)
>>71671932
>a decrepit old """professor''''
one of the best Physicist on our generation
BRAVO PLEB
R
A
V
O
>>71671204
I actually thought the movie was better and less tryhard xd randumb.
>>71669238
>>71669279
>>71669327
Interstellar >>>>> martian >>>> gravity
WHERE THE FUCK IS MOON?
>>71669167
Gravity is our generation's Space Balls
>>71669238
Martian was way more boring compared to Gravity
everyone who says interstellar is good has shit taste. But it's probably the best out of the three.
Still, I wonder why so many people like that garbage. half the movie are shitty character build up and the plot is shit. The visuals are the only good thing about it.
It's also so stupid and unrealistic. I mean seriously? They didn't think that the People they send to the planets wouldn't send fake signals so people rescue them?
>>71672424
nay no, brother.
You didn't think martian was boring compared to the other two?
Event Horizon
>>71672725
THIS
>>71672725
>>71672876
in the trash, where it belongs.
>>71672815
>Matt Damon dicking around on Mars interspersed with Sean Bean and Jeff Daniels bickering
>More boring than Sandra "No Personality" Bullocks talking to herself for an hour and a half to a CGI backdrop
>>71672831
>They didn't think that the People they send to the planets wouldn't send fake signals so people rescue them?
No, because they're supposed to be scientific and responsible. True, they had too much faith in Damon, but it wasn't unthinkable.
>>71672893
Oh get the fuck out of here with that kind of talk. Moon was awesome (not the best) but awesome
>>71672939
>No, because they're supposed to be scientific and responsible.
If you are scientific and responsible you would do it. Only a madman fanatic would take his own life.
>>71672934
But we were travelling through space with Gravity. There was actual action.
Instead of some dickbag making youtube videos about potoatoes covered in his shit - Interspersed with expensive and unnecessary cameos
>>71673038
They're on a mission to fucking save humanity. Fuck off.
>>71673038
Yeah. Damon turned into a madman in interstellar. What with the bomb and the hand combat with Mconahay
>>71671002
>MUH POTATOES
>MUH FECAL MATTER
>>71673102
yeah, sure a lot of people would take their own life for humanity. Especially the ones from their cushy ivy league schools.
retard.
>>71671002
/thread
>>71673070
>But we were travelling through space with Gravity. There was actual action
Should've made a movie about a space ship traveling in space then, not a movie about a space ship traveling with Sandra Bullock giving insufferable dialogue every minute with a George Clooney cameo.
>80 of the film's 91 minutes are CGI
>Overuse of CGI is OK when you're in space with an android for an actress
I'd watch 91 minutes of RDJ's face in the Iron Man suit because at least RDJ is charismatic and Paul Bettany's voice is sex. Casting Sandra Bullock in any period of time is a mistake, it ruined whatever Gravity had going for it.
May as well go watch Miss Congeniality. I hope ALFONSO casts Tom Green in his next cinematography jerk off.
>>71671002
>people are actually defending "yo hol up, I am a magical negro and I'm here to explain basic physics to the director of NASA"
yeah that was fucking ridiculous
>>71673197
>a lot of people would take their own life for humanity
No but brave people would. Eg those who volunteered for the mission.
>>71673259
>Should've made a movie about a space ship traveling in space then,
You obviously have it figured out. Go make it
>>71673340
You can talk a lot about bravery, but when you are alone and have a choice, you sure as fucking hell wouldn't do it.
That's basic human psychology.
>>71673259
I wasn't arguing whether who should be cast where. I was arguing that there is more action in Gravity than in the Martian.
Also, Clooney wasn't a cameo, he had a supporting role. That's what they're called in movies
>>71673197
No but they really went to go save humanity as a species which is confused with individualism.
They crew thinks they're going to save everyone they know. Mann knows they got the fetus containers and the world is going to die
>>71671452
I watched this guy shit on Interstellar while it was in theaters and actually believed him.
When I actually watched it I was enraged because I enjoyed the shit out of it and felt cheated by this fucking piece of shit. I shouldn't have listened and now I will never get to experience it in IMAX.
Scientists don't know shit about movies and fuck this guy for being a pretentious douchnozzle.
>>71671002
>>71673318
You guys realize the Administrator of NASA isn't necessarily an Aerospace Engineer, right? Usually they are engineers in some field, sometimes they're not engineers at all.
Theodore Sanders is never described as an engineer, more of a CEO. You'd think the caricature would've given that away, but I guess not.
If the movie (or book, for that matter) expressed even the slightest hint at Sander's capabilities as a former or practicing engineer of literally any field, I'd get the point you're trying to make, but it doesn't, so it's moot.
>pic unrelated
>>71673697
>Fuck this guy for swaying me with his words
You're the only one at fault. Everybody is entitled to their opinion, you're not entitled to complain about being corrupted by them.
Anon, go gas the jews.
>>71671452
This is the kind of guy who shits on star wars because physics
>>71673852
that's exactly what le black science man does
>>71673924
i hate that motherfucker
>>71671452
This guy went in there wanting to hate it.
Bill Nye is the only scientist i can trust. but lately that bow tie is losing me.
>>71671302
Stuck in the past
Mission to mars >>>> all of the shit listed above
pic unrelated
>>71671452
What an autistic pleb. There's a reason why he will never discover anything like Einstein or Newton did. He has knowledge, but not creative ability.
>>71669167
they all sucked
>>71671919
While I personally love the movie as I did Inception if I'm being objective it really didn't have that great of characters, the dialogue is shitty, the story is decent, but badly told. He should have someone else write his scripts.
>no one has got it right yet
Interstellar > Gravity > The Martian
Apollo 13
>>71669238
/thread
>>71674979
No, Nolan is a good storyteller, his characters are just tools to advance the plot, so it hurts his films' potential.
Of all the films that ripped off 2001 on the white futuristic clean minimalistic look, Moon is by far the most interesting.
For costume design and decors alone, oblivion was also a worthy watch.
When do we get more futuristic films with a gritty, darker more cynical aesthetic like dredd or Blade runner? Or something different altogether.
>>71669712
>a hit
>Kino
Pick one only.
Solaris (1972) is more Kino than the OP's gay choices could ever hope to be.
>>71673758
I'm a failed artist living on welfare and even I knew enough about physics to get that
>>71676881
>Space Kino
-2OO1
-Appolo 13
-Interstellar
>Spacesuit
-Gravity
-The Martian
>>71669327
this indeed
>>71669167
Humor my autistic sensibilities for a moment
i know they're all fiction
but if you had to watch these in a chronological order as if they followed the same continuity universe, what order would that be?
and would it be the same order as you would tell the story from a narrative perspective?
>>71669167
Those movies are all pretty shit, even for space opera films.
>Simpsons episode
>Deepak Chopra explains the universe
>"I'm going to science the shit out of this!"
I bet you cucks have never seen a good science fiction movie.
>>71677503
Chron: Gravity> The Martian > Interstellar
Yes
Only plebs would 'hate' any of them.
By that, I'm avoiding the work of quoting the lot of you plebs in this thread
Interstellar was boring crap. It was pretentious, riding on 2001's fame, without being imaginative and lacking depth. Also science was wrong. Only good thing was music.
The Martian was at least fun to some extent. Matt Daemon was annoying twat, but did a much better job than McConaughey, who gave impression of drunken hobo.
Europa Report is superior to both of them
>>71677569
Tfw marooned came out like 1-2 years after 2001 and it looks like CRAP compared.
I know the whole point was philosophy of life and not space per se, but still.
>>71678005
Europa report was dogshit. Even the premise of sending people instead of a probe was idiotic. The kite string budget didn't help matters.
>>71678042
>story
>less than
>looks
Hello millennial!
those three are all shit.
moon, sunshine and 2001 are the holy trinity of spacekino
>>71678086
Moon was mediocre.
>>71678086
Moon is an okay story but mining he3 on the moon is retarded. It takes 150 million tons of regolith to get 1 ton of helium 3, and then you lose 80% of its net energy getting it off the moon and down to earth.
>>71678047
Pleb detected.
>>71678148
You an expert or something?
Gravity is complete shit. It's just a reason to smash the audience with cuhraaaazy visual effects with boring characters and poor writing.
Interstellar is typical up-its-own-ass Nolan crap, but its filmed well and has a great score and acting.
Martian is alright, but the amount of humor really killed the tone of what is supposed to be a harrowing survival story. It's just non-stop quips throughout the whole thing.
I actually loved the main character from Martian, but in all other respects, Interstellar was a better movie.
Gravity is not even worth mentioning.
>>71678078
>Story
>AND
>Looks
Can you imagine that
>>71678246
>what is supposed to be a harrowing survival story
says who?
>>71678404
>Man is stranded on a another planet by himself with very limited supplies and no means to communicate with Earth.
Like holy hell how retarded are you?
>>71678682
did yoyu not read it?
1) Interstellar
2) The Martian (novel)
3) Gravity
4) The Martian (movie)
Firefly
Farscape
Stargate (not Universe)
The Expanse
Fuck you, the martian was fun.
>>71679262
Hello, Pleb
>>71679463
I give you five minutes to make it better.
Go.
>>71672867
This
>>71679503
Remove all reddit pandering and meme dialogue.
>>71679789
I gave you fucking five minutes, you're at 8 and this is the best you could come up with.
I think it's time to understand that your taste aren't facts.
>>71679822
Leftism being bad is a fact. This is a film that enables leftism through appealing to the reddit sensibilities. If you support the martian then you are ideologically incompatible with this board.
>>71669358
I get what you're saying but Interstellar is a fantastic hard science fiction film. It takes legitimate theories of physics and makes them a reality (with the exception of the ending). It's better than the other two because Gravity and The Martian weren't trying to do anything that isn't technically possible at this current moment, just unlikely. Interstellar does stuff that we won't even get close to in a hundred years.
>>71679896
Mate I'm from /pol/ and I don't even get where you're going with that.
Look at how they completly shat on Cooper's son in Interstellar in profit of MUUUUUUURMP
you're telling me that is better? Murph is such a shitty marry sue it ruined the whole movie for me. She did FUCK ALL and they name the fucking station after her. All she did was having an IQ above room temperature and glue the pieces together. Meanwhile his son becomes a plumber or whatever and that's it about it.
You do know they asked Zimmer to make a soundtrack about a father and his son right?
Anyway, if we go by that logic none of the three movies proposed here are good. Because it's all about niggers and strong women.
whats so bad about gravity
it was non stop action almost, and it was only like 90 minutes
>>71680098
redditors
sunshine is the superior spacekino 2bh
>>71680177
that movie nobody watched because it was basically the core in space
sure
>>71680056
I never even mentioned interstellar you retarded cuck. I said that anybody who enjoyed The Martian is too reddit sensibility to belong here. You claimed it was fun which makes you incompatible with this board. If memes and cuckoldry are "fun" to you then hang yourself.
Refuse to watch Gravity. Martian is way better. At least it doesn't pretend to be something more, than it is.
>>71679960
This tbqh. Newton would fucking cry if he saw the representations of force in orbit around the Earth in Gravity.
The ending of Interstellar made me so angry. I have nothing but contempt for that shit movie.
>kino
Gravity
>film
Interstellar
>flick
Martian
>>71680381
>the pretentious meanie films are out to get me
>>71680423
He was a big autist, so would fit right into /tv/ level
>>71680424
I dare ask, why?
>>71680381
Gravity could have benefited from being more "pretentious". It wasn't that it was pretending to be more than it was outside of some hamfisted symbolism maybe, the reason it was so disappointing was that the script was D-great disaster movie schlock. The whole thing felt like a waste of resources. It was technically incredible but that was all in service of making what boiled down to a rollercoaster ride or IMAX showreel.
>>71680098
>force pulling two astronauts apart in micro-gravity somehow
>all of the space stations are a 1 hour jet-pack trip away from each other
>space debris in an exactly 90 minute orbit which hits them every time at orbital velocity
>space debris not tracked by NASA in the first place
>doesn't just change inclination or altitude of orbit when they know debris is coming
>>71680555
The first two thirds of the movie was nice predictable epic sci fi
Then it goes from
>vague general relativity slingshot the black hole lmao
to
>4D aliens use love to transmit ghost pokes through time to an arbitrary bookcase
>>71680098
it focused on a poorly interpreted character that indeed spent 90 minute heavy breathing, crying, yelling, making bad decision and talking non sense, her character made the film painfull to watch in my opinion, it could have been really great otherwise, she just ruined it, and the director for going with it
wouldnt it had been much better if the character had at least a litle bit of an idea of what to do and how to react ? instead of her yelling in her suit, pushing button and then magicaly land on earf
also moon is ok, sunshine is ok, interstellar is kind of shit, but it's ok i guess.
but all these movie are kind of bad or jsut above average at best.
you guys should check MISSION TO MARS, it's really good, at least for the scene when they have a O2 breach or when they try to reach a capsule by going extra vehicular, those scene are masterfully directed and really intense
>>71680746
>wouldnt it had been much better if the character had at least a litle bit of an idea of what to do and how to react ? instead of her yelling in her suit, pushing button and then magicaly land on earf
Not for normies. They'd rather have a surrogate for the facebook demographic.
>>71680746
>you guys should check MISSION TO MARS
Does it have little green aliens (or something lime that), that eat people? Can't remember how that movie is called.
>>71680738
>I don't understand gravitational slingshots and GR/SR so the moobie is bad ::DDDD
>>71680555
Oh noews, someone dislikes you favourite sweet film.
>>71680905
None of them are close to my 'favorite' film. I simply dislike shitposting and plebs
>>71669167
Its harsh for me to say this, but Martian was made scientifically the best. Yes, I know, its full of bullshit, but although Interstellar is audio-visually the most stunning, its science is far more bullshit unfortunatelly.
Gravity is beyond shit tier.
>>71680822
i remember watching with a normie friend and he was even more pissed about bulock than me, but yeah other than that the movie look stuning
>>71680848
no maybe you are talking about red planet with val kilmer, shit movie but mars movie, sooooo, it have some cool scene, like when they are all suffocating, or when they are chased by the nasa probe ahah
check out mission to mars imdb, it have an enio moricon score, and it's made by brian de palma !
What's this year's Winter space film then?
>>71681219
Only the very last sequence of Interstellar could be considered 'bullshit' and even then we don't actually know what the technology of 5th dimensional beings would be let-alone make a 'scientifically accurate' depiction of it.
>>71681369
Rogue One?
>>71669238
fpbp
>>71681474
Sure, but that's not all I mean by its bullshit..
