Imagine...

>>71638849
I unironically enjoyed this movie

Fite me

>>71638849
It's a good example of strong female characters done right. They're basically good roles who happen to be women, not shit casts who's character revolve around their genitalia or sexualities or religion or whatever.

>>71638849

Is the sequel any good, I liked the first

>>71638849
this movie started of decent, the creepiness of when you see one in the distance and it runs away.

then it goes all mighty morphin power rangers at the end and everyone's a Muay Thai fighter..

>>71638954
you assume this movie is bad, which makes you pretty fucking dumb

>>71638849
how the fuck is there absolutely ZERO porn of this movie anywhere?

>>71639030
No, it's literally the same movie, but with shittier characters.

>>71639159
>No, it's literally the same movie,
Oh god why am i surrounded by these plebs

>>71639180
>Im superior than you because of my taste
xd

>>71639082
You're not looking hard enough.

>>71639223
Not hard being superior to shit-for-brains with these opinions >>71639159

Sorry if you're such moron.

>>71639303
I'm sorry too.

>>71639244
Help me.

>>71639030
no, don't ruin it - especially if you've seen the original UK version

it's a shame they got the original lead back for it (not a really well-known actress so she was probably just glad to have work and get paid), which gives it the appearance of merit, but it is beyond awful

>>71639607
It's not THAT bad. Just unnecessary
Like going form 28 Days later to 28 Weeks later change in tone..

>>71639690
no, it's that bad

>>71639081
No, I assume taking a stance like I did on this board will inspire something to accuse me of having pleb taste

U r dum