7>6>5>4>3>1>2
1991
3>4>1>2>5>7>6
1989
5 > 4 > 6 > who cares, the rest are trash
'96
>>71577800
Jesus Christ you're wrong.
5>4>6>7>3>1>2
1984
>>71577739
>>71577800
These are awful
>>71577844
This is objectively correct
If you were born post 1993ish and rank all three prequels in the bottom three you are worse than a pleb.
You literally have either no ability to think for yourself or no backbone. If you were 7 when episode one came out, the only way you would rank it below episode four was if your daddy brainwashed you to hate fun.
5>4=3>6>7=1>2
1995
>>71577844
this is OK
>>71577810
this is not
1903
The Empire Strikes Back > Star Wars > Return of the Jedi
>>71577739
4>5>6>3>7>1>2 1989
5>7>3>4>6>1>>>>2
This order goes from film I had the most fun watching to film I had the least fun watching. It's not an objective best to worst ranking. 3 is objectively a terrible film but holy fuck it's a blast to watch. I wish Lucas would make more off the walls delusional films like that.
>>71577923
could you fill me in on what happened in RotJ, mate? My family came down with a deathly plague and we used all the newspaper as bedding so I wasn't able to read the final installment.
4 > 5 > 6 > 3 > 1 > 7 > 2
1990
>>71578024
This but 1989
>tfw people who don't remember 9/11 are getting laid right now
>>71577881
edgy/10
>>71577974
semi-acceptable
>>71578024
bait/10
>>71577844
This is the only correct one.
1987
4>5>6>3>1>7>2
>>71577992
Oh and1996
V > IV > VI > Clone Wars series > III > Clone Wars movie > VII > Rebels > I > II
1984
5>4>6>7>3>1>2
1994
6 and 7 are hard to rank though
You guys can't be serious putting VII so low. It at least deserves to be in the top three. I acknowledge that the unoriginal story and the character of Rey are glaring flaws, but it gets so much else right. People really overestimate how good the original trilogy is.
>>71578056
none of your responses make sense. Are you sure you quoted the right people
>>71578115
I honestly have no idea why people like 7 so much.
It is technically a btter acted and made movie than the prequels, but outside of that, 7 is completely fucking vapid.
>>71577881
>Lack of personal bias can lead to opinions that many consider to be shit.
5=3>4>6=1>2>>>>>>>>71994
>>71578115
It deserves its place as 4th. It's not better than the originals in any other way than technically and it's not as insulting as the prequels.
>>71578170
>person born the same year as me has this shit of an opinion
jesus christ
1995
5 3 4 6 7 1 2
1994
only right answer
3>6>2>4>1>5
2004
>>71577881
meh, i agree in part.
If you want to rate them as films on the merit of artistic value I think it would be
5>4>6>1>3>2>7
but in that case you may also want to move to a more serious film oriented forum
If you're a human being who was raised with the prequels i think the rating may be more like
3>6>5>1=7>2>4
of course being as impressionable as a child while seeing the prequels for the first time would lead you to like them more than someone who was born in the 60s (and that's not bad). I'd rather be honest and be called out for having the wrong opinions that change my perception to conform to the general consensus, when the general consensus was formed by people 30 years older than me
1989
5>4>6>3>2>7>1
1961
6>4>5>7>1>3>2
1996
>>71578242
>>71578170
Meh I was more interested in Star Wars' Universe rather than the movies themselves or it's characters. I thoroughly enjoyed most of the Star Wars spin off media as a kid and adolescent. I wouldn't consider myself a "hardcore" fan though, as I never had any personal attachment to any of the characters from the OT or even PT for that matter. They could have killed off Luke, Leia, or Han in the EU at any point and it wouldn't have phased me.(so long as they did it properly) I was more more interested in the stories and setting of star wars than anything else.
After watching TFW and seeing how they're trying to directly pander to the "MUH OT" crowd I can thoroughly say Star Wars is no longer for me.
Pic related pretty much sums up how I'll always remember Star Wars.
1997
Star wars a shit
1994
3 > 5 > 7 > 4 > 6 > 1 > 2
>>71577844
Same
Also 1984
Are people this easy to pattern?
VI>V>VII>IV=III>II=I
1997
>>71577739
2>1>3>7>6>4>5
2001 xDDD
4>5>7>6>1>3>2
1990
I'm watching The Force Awakens on bluray right now.
1989 and I'm not ranking shit. Fuck off
>>71578987
i'm gonna rank your mum faggit
5>4>6(Original)>1>6(Special Edition)>3>7>2
1982
>>71577739
This pic makes no sense. The only reason Ben has the cross guard saber is cause he made it himself and it's a bit shitty. If he's had luke to train him his saber would have been more conventional and not needed the exhaust vents.
5>2>4>1>6>3>7, 1993
2 is underrated even though it had the best characterization of any of the movies
>Detective Obi Wan
>Autistic second coming sperg adult chosen one Anakin
>The courascant chase scene
>Wanna buy death sticks?
>Count Dracula as Count Dooku
>The futuristic/animayish ffx aesthetic of courascant
There's a lot more reasons why I prefer 2, but the only reason it gets flack is because of the poor cgi in some parts and the jar jar scenes. Other then that it's the best of the prequals and way more enjoyable then 4, which is boring, and 6, which is garbage aside from the duel between Vader and Luke
7 is comfy as fuck
It's not a "real" SW, it felt like something was missing, but it adds a lot of thing and it's a great way to restart the franchise into à new direction'
>>71579095
>GEORGE: Whatever we do we need more Jar Jar
I'd get fired just to tell him he was a retarded cunt if I was in that production team.
>>71579076
I think he only needed the vents because the crystal is cracked and he had to compensate the design to make it work.
But same point. Why would he have a cracked crystal again under Luke?
5 > 4 > 6 > 3 > 7 > 1 > 2
1995
>>71577739
1984
In chronological order (not the order they came out)
5 >>> 4 > 6 > 3 > 2 > 1 > 7
I just did not care for 7 at all to be honest.
>>71579095
2 gets flack for wooden acting and a poorly written romance plot that takes up way to much of the movie. It's frustrating because the stuff with Obi-Wan is actually pretty good but it keeps getting interipted by stupid bullshit. The geonosis scene is actually handled pretty well. Seeing all the Jedis fight is cool. But the Dooki fight immediately kills all the momentum the movie picks up after "this party's over". It's a terrible lightsaber duel. And even Christopher Lee couldn't make Dooku interesting. The idea of Dooku being a former Jedi with ties to the main cast is a pretty neat idea that they don't utilize at all. They just have Dooku hastily mention that fact to Obi-Wan in one scene. It doesn't really add anything. Dooku's never given a chance to be seen as all that threatening either. He kicks a little ass, but it's done so passively and flat. Whatever credit he has immediately goes out the window when he jobs to Yoda and runs away with his tail between his legs.
>>71578369
the most similar one to me
>>71579249
5>4>7>6>1>3>2
1987
>>71579152
7 is a really easy movie to watch. It doesn't feel like a movie, it feels like an extended Star Tours ride at Disney World, which makes it really fun to watch. I can't say it was a good movie, but it was certainly an enjoyable experience.
>>71579349
>"Spinning is a cool trick" is better than "It's treason, then."
yeah no
>>71579095
Empire Strikes Back is the best movie without dispute.
The conflict on Hoth was a fucking revelation to movie-goers at the time. The whole thing seemed incredibly desperate, as if the heroes might lose. Then with Return of the Jedi it was like seeing a true change in the protagonist.
The prequels are shit in the sense that you don't see any character progression. Making Darth Vader into a whiny fuck was some really strange shit. 2 was really weird in the sense that it seemed like he was plotting to buttrape Padme the whole movie.
4 > 6 > 7 > 5
'84
>>71579370
>it feels like an extended Star Tours ride at Disney World
That's because that is what this new movie pretty much is.
>>71579375
sorry man i'd rather see anything in TFA than a fucking ewok it's 2017. just like i'd rather watch the pod racing scene than anything in II or III. they're old movies. the meme scenes hold up better than the drama
>>71577739
4>5>6>7>1=3>2
![Star.Wars.Episode.III.2005.1080p.BluRay.X264-AMIABLE.mkv_snapshot_01.42.17_[2016.06.21_17.54.47].png](https://i.imgur.com/1yaTOCp.jpg "Star.Wars.Episode.III.2005.1080p.BluRay.X264-AMIABLE.mkv_snapshot_01.42.17_[2016.06.21_17.54.47].png")
3>4>5>2>1=6>7
1997
>>71579152
7 has better acting than the other Star Wars movies but that's about all it has going for it.
6>5>4>7>3>1>2
1989
>>71579466
I was talking about how you ranked 1 ahead of 3, by using commonly meme'd quotes from each.
but since you haven't seen the films enough to recognize this, your opinion isn't worth further comment imo
>>71577739
5 > 4 > 3 > 6 > 1 > 2 >>>>>>7
1992
>>71579466
>he likes the podracing scene more than anything from episode 3
jesus christ I didn't think people like you existed
>>71579466
What's hilarious is that Return was supposed to take place on the wookie planet and instead we got midgets in fur-suits. Should have done it anyways George. Nobody believed for a moment that a bunch of two-legged dogs destroyed an imperial army.
>>71577800
5>6>4>3>1>2
Didn't see 7
1991
>>71577739
5 > 4 > 6 > 3 > 1 > 7 > 2
92
>>71579370
Exactly, but it's still a good movie
>>71579482
It had better visuals, it's more entertaining (for everyone), and it has the best SW soundtrack
5>4>7>6>1>3>2
91
Tranny
>>71579604
Accurate, non contrarian ranking
>>71579541
my inner child likes to cheer for the little kid
i'm a zelda fan and i like young link. i liked anakin a lot when i was young
>>71577739
3>1>2>7
1988
>>71578048
Post 9/11 babies are in high school now.
>>71578749
This pic implies episode 7 was good and different, but it was neither and in fact was bad and exactly the same.
4>6>5>3>7>2>1
'95
>>71579743
...and high schoolers fuck like rabbits
4>5=6>3>7>>>1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2
1994
>>71577844
same ranking and year here as well
>>71579604
How many dicks have you taken in the rectum?
5>4>6>TCW>2>3>1
I couldn't find anywhere to place 7, it felt wrong no matter which side of the prequels I had it on.
1998
3>6>5>4>2>1 yet to see 7. '94
>>71579877
Just my dad's, thanks for reminding me
4>5>6>7=1>3>2
1995
3 > 5 > 4 >>> 2 > 6 = 1
7 isn't Star Wars.
1989
>>71577881
It's called growing up, man. I loved 1 and 2 when I was young. Now when I look at them I just see bad acting and CGI. Those movies have nothing of value and are pretty much unwatchable.
4=5>6>7
1997
>>71577739
6>5>4>3>2>1>7
1992
IV / V > VI > I > III > II
1991
No, tfa is not a real star wars movie.
>>71577739
get hype for Darth Rey vs. Jedi Kylo in 2019
>>71578452
Wow, you sure browse reddit
MODS, BAN THIS REDDITOR.
>>71577881
>Bitch about people putting the prequels in the bottom 3
>Your bottom two are prequels
Oh my
>>71577844
This desu.
1991
>>71580742
Well when I look at the OT I see nothing but bad acting and bad mattes/effects. Those movies have nothing of value and are pretty much unwatchable.
1990
5>4>6>3>7>2>1
>>71580840
The ot continues to hold up thanks to Lucas' edits. But few will ever admit it.
>>71580896
No one would complain if he didn't add meaningless shit in as well
>>71577739
5>4>6>3>1>2=7
94
>>71577739
4>5>6>7>3>2>1
1984
>>71579095
Definitely this, I love the prequels;
and 7 is always last
>>71577739
5>4>7>6>3>1>2
1988
>>71577844
4>5>6>7>3>1>2
`85
That's the right answer millennials.
>>71580805
In my mind I imagine her confrotion with snoke will go something like this
>Snoke: Now young Jedi, you will die.
>Rey: No no no no YOU WILL DIE!*proceeds to zap snoke with force lightning*imagine the pottery
>>71577739
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJgLa3eKMYs
>>71577739
5>4>6>7>1>2>3
87
>>71577739
I've only ever seen the original. It was entertaining enough. I'd give it a 6.5/10. I was born in 1980.
5>4>6>2>1>3>7
1991
5 > 4 > 6 > 7 > 3 > 1 > 2
1982
>>71577739
1989
It's all complete garbage.
1986
The Empire Strikes Back > Star Wars > Return of the Jedi > Revenge of the Sith > Attack of the Clones > The Force Awakens > The Phantom Menace
3>5>6>4>2>1>7
1991
>>71577844
Ha, born the same year and my list would look exactly the same.
>>71577739
3>5>6>7>4>1>2
1993
I watched the 1-3 first and already had Vader spoiled for me. 3 had slightly more emotional impact compared to 5 when I was younger. Also 7 captures the spirit of adventure more than 4, even though it is a remake lol. Overall the original trilogy had better writing/direction, but the pacing just isn't that great, albeit better than 1-3 for sure.
>>71577739
5>6>4>7>3>1=2 1986
6>5>4>7>3>1>2
1986
A New Hope is the best Star Wars film. They never made a better one after it and never will.
>>71577739
4>5=6>7>1>2=3
1989
>>71578115
It's newer so it's popular to hate it.
>>71577739
5>4>6>3>1>7>2
1987
5>6>3>4>2>7=1
1996
>>71582148
edgie
5 > 4 > [6 = 7] > [1 = 3] > 2
This is truly the only right combination, plebs.
>>71577739
5>7>6>4>3>1>2
1986
>>71577739
5>4&7>6>3>1>2
1989
>>71577800
wtf dude
5>4>>>>3>6>1>2>>>>>7
1992
>>71577739
2>7>5>1>4>6>3
1998
5 > 4 > 7 > 6 > 3 > 1 > 2
1988
>>71582088
it's all just the music. The movie itself isn't that good
without John Williams the whole OT would've been pretty forgettable
>>71577739
5>4>6>1=7>3>2
1977 bitches.
5>4>7=6>>>>>>>>>>>>3>1>2
1993
>>71578373
>COMING THIS SUMMER
>TWO SHITPOSTING BOARDS
>FINALLY COME TOGETHER
>FOR ONE
>'''''''''''''''''''''''''EDUCATIONAL''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>INFOGRAPHIC
>COMING TO KINOS NEAR YOU
>MR. /pol/ AND MR. /tv/ WATCH STAR WARS
3>2>1>4>5>6>7
1990
>>71579743
>>71577739
'96
Best
4,5,7
OK
1,6,3
Terribad
2
2 > 5 > 3 > 4 > 6 > 7 > 1
5>4>6=7>3>1>2
1991
3>5>4>6>1>7>2
1991
5>4>6=7>3>>>>>>>1>2
1997
>inb4 young fag
2 > 3 > 5 > 1 > 4 > 6 > 7
Empire > Jedi > A New Hope > Force Awakens > Literally who cares?
1992
>>71577739
1992
5>4>6>3>7>1>1
4>5>6>7>3>1>2
1992
96
5 > 4 > 7 > 6 > 3 > 1 > 2
Anyone who likes to even accepts tfa, does not understand Star Wars at all. Or even art itself for that matter.
>>71581291
>>71583347
Correct.
5>4>7>6>3>1>2
1994
>>71578312
this
>>71577739
5>4>6>7>3>1>2
1972
4>3>7>5>6>1>2
1995
4 > 5 > 6 > 7 > 3 > 1 > 2
1998
6>5>4>3>7>1>2
1994
4 > 6 > 3 > 5 > 2 > 1 >>>> 7
1994
>>71577844
This '96
3 > 5 > 6 > 4 > 1 > 2 == 7
1993
Reminder: if you rank 7 anywhere above 3, you're what's wrong with this board
4>5>6>3>2>7>1 1990
>>71583667
Actually changing it to:
3 > 5 > 6 > 4 > 1 > 2 > 7
I forgot that 2 had some sweet Obi Wan scenes and everything with Jango Fett was pretty fly.
>>71577739
Why do people think 1 is better that 2? I legitimately don't understand?
>>71583733
they hate the padme/anakin love scenes so much they dont realize the otger 80% of the movie is good
>>71583733
Still shot on film, less cgi, and the podrace alone make it a cut above the rest. same applies to the duel of fates. Personally I prefer 2.
It's funny how people think the prequels suck, yet you can pick a single scene from many that is alone better than the entirety of tfa or anything disney will ever produce with star wars.
>>71583580
I like you.
>>71583733
1 at least brings the world-building into it, it sets the stage for the new trilogy. Entirely new races, religions, cultures.
II is a continuation of the same. Both have redeeming qualities, but the difference is that I is more original.
5 > 4 > 3 > 1 > 6 > 2 > 7
1982
>>71583861
But the podrace is the most useless thing in the movie, no purpose behind it, the whole "picking-up" Anakin segment should had lasted no more than 15 minutes.
>>71583669
3 is absolute garbage
>>71583904
Yeah. At least the donkey kong sequence in two served a purpose.
>>71583904
my bad, i forgot there are bitches and faggots in this world that don't like motorsports
>>71577844
This guy got it '97
>>71577739
5 > 4 > 6 > 7 > 3 > 2 > 1
1992
>>71577739
5>4>3>7>6>1>2
2016
5 > 4 > 3 > 6 > 7 > 2 > 1
1987
>>71577739
5>4>6 all despecialized
1993
1,2,3 and 7 are not starwars and all boring.
4 = 5 > 6 >> first half of 7 > 3 > second half of 7 >> the rest
1997
>>71577739
6>4>5>3>2>1
>>71584066
>despecialized
definitely this
I'm loving the obvious correlation with the young plebeians and those who use = and first/second halves in their ratings.
>>71584119
and power gaps. don't forger power gaps.
5>6=3>1=4>Ewok Movies>2>>>>>>>>>>7
1988
I consider the ewok films way more star wars than 7.
>>71577739
6>5>4>1>3>2>7
1982
5>4>6>7>3>1>2
1987
>>71577844
1994 and agree completely
i cant even consider 7 star wars. it was so filled with meta winks to the audience and sjw horse shit it was like a fanfic. it took me 5 tries to get through it
>all these fucking 90's kids on here
>>71577844
swap 3 and 7 and you have a deal
'85
>>71577739
5>4>6>7>>>>>eating dog faeces>>>>power gap>>>>>The Holiday Special>>>>>>another power gap>>>>The Prequels
Born 1978
5>4>6>7>3>2>1
>>71584055
Exactly the same as this, but 1988
5>4>7>6
86
4>5>6>7>3>1>2
97
5, 6, 4, 3, 7, 1, 2
1997
This isn't a ranking of which ones I think are the best made to worst made, but more my feelings toward them. Return of the Jedi will always be my favorite (not just Star Wars, but all movies). Is it flawed? Of course, but I love it despite all of its flaws.
6>4=5>7>3>2>1
1987
5-4-7-6-3-1-2
1989.
>>71577739
>>71578263
this guy knows it1997
>>71580085
>>71580775
No, the prequels aren't Star Wars, hell even the Dark Forces saga is more Star Wars than the prequels
4 > 7 > 5 > 6 > 3 > 1 > 2
1995
>>71581776
>3 had slightly more emotional impact compared to 5
4>5>3>6>1>7>2
1993
3 > 5 > 4 > 6 > 1 > 2 > 7
1997
7 > bad cgi era 3 > 2 > 1 > boring era 5 > 6 > 1
1998
>>71585237
>>71585239
>>71585239
>>71585237
>1997
>1998
I hope you are shitposting anons, if you don't well. GET THE FUCK OUT
6 > 5 > 4 >>> 3 >>> 7 = 1 > 2
1993
5>4>3>6>1>7>2
1997
>>71584089
>Splitting a film into parts to rank on a list.
Seriously? Rank the film on its merits, not parts of its merits
Classic Nostalgia Feels Era 5>4>6>
More Recent Nostalgia Feels for all that "super smart politics and stuffs" that's really impressive when you're youngun' who doesn't understand shit era:
3>2>1>>>>>>>>7
I really hated 7, but honestly I don't think I would have minded if it so much if it didn't feel so rabidly fast paced, or if I saw that film as cutscenes within a game, or just only saw the movie in 2 minute bites over several days.
Does anyone else feel the same way?
>Al Williamson and Archie Goodwin's Star Wars comics and newspaper strip
>power gap
>
>
>
>a piece of literal shit
>all the Star Wars movies
t. born 1979
3>5>7>6>1>4>2
94
The Phantom Menace is very high I know but it's because of nostalgia
>>71585868
Also 1994.
Sorry.
>>71577739
5>6>4>7>3>2=1
5 > 6 > 4 > 7 > 3 > 1 > 2
1977
>>71586069
1996 Here shiet
6>4>7>5>3>1>>>>>>>2
1981
>>71578048
>5 years old at the time
>come downstairs to see it on the news
>no idea what's going on
>"wow! Mum, what movie is this? It looks awesome"
>>71577739
If they actually develop his character and have him believably convert to the light side I might watch it.
>>71577739
3>7>>>>>2.
Haven't seen the others yet.
1999
>>71586256
>when you're still young enough to be unironically edgy
5>4>6>>7>>>1>3>>>>2
1994
7>5>3>6>4>1>2
1994
>>71577739
6>5>4>3>2>1>7
1990
5>6>4>3>7>1>2
94
5>6>4=3>7>2>1
1993
>>71583283
This.
1988.
>>71577844
I would switch the last two but this is about right
1987
>>71578115
I watched them all recently. VII feels like some cheap special effects spectacle/nostalgia cash-in. The original 3 do a much better job of telling an actual story.
>all these faggots who think 7>1 and 3
you guys are the lowest denominator that studios cater for
i preferred 3 to 7 that's about it though
>>71585565
i just had to split it because i think the first half was almost perfect for what it was and the second sucked extremely hard. Also it was bland as fuck
>>71577844
1992 agree
4>5>3>1>6>2>>>>7
1992
>>71586833
If it makes you happier there is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before 7 for me
>>71585868
pretty much. TFA was poorly editied and didn't give you any time to digest what was happening.
A lot of scenes like kanjiklub and the starkiller X wing run felt really weightless and boring too.
>>71577739
5>4>6>3>1>7>2
1996
IV>VII>V>VI>III>I>II
MCMXCVII
>>71577739
The best is 2. Then 7, then 1, then 6, then 3, then 4, and the worst is 5. I'm 18. I'm so funny.
7=3=5>1=4>6>2
all are shite though
1993
am i the only one who thinks episode 7 is highly overrated? it's pretty to look at but it barely felt like a star wars movie to me. and im not just saying this to be contrarian
>>71577739
If Rey and Kylo Ren switch and she goes Sith and he goes Jedi I'd watch the shit out of that.Because it'd be a much better story than whatever bland garbage Disney has planned.
1990 revised list without nostalgia glasses of I'd the most eager to rewatch
1 flick-tier, but at least there are robots and lasers and some cheesy choreography
4 5 6 these flicks are so ancient and dated I'm not ever gonna waste my time on them again, there's nothing entertaining about them visually, and the plot is so superficial it puts you to sleep
2 3 too slow paced and cheesy to ever care again
7 cheap cash in tier with horrible numale pandering characters and rehashed plot, literally worthless flick kino
Am I the only one thinks Empire Strikes Back is the best one?
They are all equally terrible. George Lucas' best film was American Graffiti, and everything he did afterwards was intellectual poison.
episode 3 is the best star wars movie.
prove me wrong
4>5>3>2>6>1
1995
>7
>star wars
>>71587359
objectively wrong because the opening aerial battle was cool
>>71587378
im wrong because the opening to the movie was good? i don't understand
>>71587423
objectively wrong
>>71587359
I literally cannot.
3>4>5>6>1>2>>>>>>>>>>7
4>5>1>6>7>>3>>>>2
1994
>>71587378
Aerial battle? It was in space you fucken retard.
6>5>4>3>2>dogbone
4 > 5 > 3 > 6 > 7 > 1 = 2
I a m e t e r n a l
3>6>5>2>7>4>1
1988
4>5>6>3>7>2=1
5>4>3>6=1=2=3=7
Star wars movies aren't good they're just a great childhood, save for ESB, that's a good movie
1968
>>71586313
mods?
1998
5>4>6>3>1>2>7
My rating is the correct one btw
>>71588175
Mods
