Featuring Tom Hardy and Harry Styles
What do we expect?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5013056/
>>71557429
What do we expect?
Exposition, clunky dialogue, repetitive hans zimmer music, bad editing, poorly made action scenes to great cinematography with Michael Caine playing a wise old man.
So is this film finally going to say the truth about the Dunkirk offensive?
That a bunch of french soldeirs gave their life and fought the german while the british run away in fear
>>71557429
>What do we expect?
An Aidan Gillen cameo
Expect big guys
>>71557545
>French soldiers
I think you mean Americans coming to save there asses
>>71557584
But he's a gay manlet?
>>71557638
>mfw I'm still going to buy BF:1 =D
>>71557638
Americans had nothing to do with Dunkirk. They weren't even in the war at that point, and when they joined they did next to nothing
>>71557687
same tbhfam
>>71557638
>Someone thought this pic was clever
>>71557429
Jesus Christ is it really coming out in 2017? I need bravo Nolan now
>>71557429
Me looky forward. No random blacks like the Dunkirk scene in Atonement.
>>71557668
Hey no homo bro, there's nothing wrong with being gay. Manlets however should off themselves.
I still can't grasp what the story of this is going to be.
>>71557429
>What do we expect?
stupid doofy helmets, shitty webgear, not sexy looking weapons and the brits being torn to pieces like in most of their ww2 engagements and limping away a tattered mess.
>>71557638
>wonder why this decision was made
>remember that DICE is Swedish
God damn it.
>>71557809
Probably the battle of Dunkirk
>>71557687
You realize BF1 is literally going to just be a reskinned BF4 with WWI shit? None of the current battlefield games are very good shooters. Repackaging something isn't going to improve on already stale terribly unbalanced gameplay.
>>71557788
>Manlets however should off themselves.
This
>>71557869
Shut up COD fuckboi. You're literally describing Activision and Treyarch and what they've done to the COD franchise.
>>71557869
I like BF4 so yeah
>>71557905
>playing the same shooter because it's not CoD
>>71557429
Didn't they already make a movie about Dunkirk?
>>71557916
BF4 has the worst maps though. How that's possible I have no idea.
>>71557931
Battlefield will always be better than COD rehash shit.
>>71557874
>manlet AND out of shape AND hitting on a nigress
srsly you guy
>>71557944
Aye some of them are shit, but I prefer the gameplay of 4 to 3
>>71557874
Imagine actually saving this.
>>71557874
What's he saying to the sheboon?
>>71557990
Zavod=shit
Paracel Storm=big time shit
Caspian Border=shit
Outbreak=shit
Dragon Valley=shit
Rogue Transmission Goldeneye map=shit
Literally most of the maps are shit. I like the gameplay but they really blew it on level design.
>>71557905
>if you attack Battlefield you must play CoD
lmao
>>71558097
t. rehash fanboy
>>71558124
Don't ever, EVER respond to me ever again.
BF Hardline is more fun than BF4
>>71557874
He's a pretty big guy
BF was never good.
>>71558285
on a big guy that would be probably a big penis, but on a manlet that's probably bellow average
>>71558488
this, can we talk about cocks some more
>>71557971
isnt everyone complaining because CoD changed too much now? Bitches like you back during MW3 whined about how "every game was the same" so they added 3D movement and built a new engine. If you look at the comments on Infinite Warfare's trailer, it's nothing but people bitching that it's not classic enough and it's too different.
All I've seen battlefield add is "muh levolution" and niggers in WW1
But I get it, you're a contrarian trying to act like the big kids
>>71557429
Shit. Just like everything he did after Le Prestige. I need to see Interstellar, though. I hope it's an improvement.
>>71558488
That's easily above average as it is and it isn't even full mast
>no germans cast
This means we won't even see a nazi officer talking and no interactions with the germans. Fucking dropped.
>>71558520
The idiots are complaining. At least COD is trying to do something different with infinity warfare, a bit too late it seems though, the normal fanboys have finally realized they were being milked with the MW sequel shit.
>>71558575
No one fucking cares about Germans. The only people that care about them are Stormfags and /pol/.
How a country that is apparently so efficient is beaten back by the US so many times is completely beyond me, both in WWI and WWII.
>>71558644
Great bait, I'm sure you'll get someone :^)
>>71557638
that's exactly what's going to happen they only hired anglo actors for a reason: french soldiers wont do shit in that movie
>>71557545
>Dunkirk offensive
Uh, Dunkirk wasn't an offensive for the allies.
And all major counterattacks during the retreat were carried out primarily by British troops.
>>71558851
that's a lie they were wating their boat on the shore
http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=17928&start=300
Lots of set photos here
>>71559552
He has his own fan site
>>71558753
>french soldiers wont do shit in that movie
So accurate to history, then.
A non-fiction Nolan movie? I'm not that interested.
He's at his best when making fictional stuff like Batman, Interstellar, Inception, etc.
>>71557545
Hitler let them get away because he thought the anglos were his brothers. Then they turned out to be cunts as usual and he changed his opinion
>>71557504
and you'll still pay for your ticket and popcorn. nolancucks have it hard don't they?
>>71557545
>Dunkirk offensive
France got steamrolled, all of their """"""counterattacks""""""" were nothing to the glorious blitzkrieg
>>71560508
He let them get away because he was a poor commander, you fucking stupid naziboo. He was more than willing to bomb English cities a few months after.
