> The Neon Demon – R: The feel-good cannibal, necrophilia, lesbian model movie of the year! I absolutely hate-hate-hated this movie written and directed by Nicolas Winding Refn (who also directed the openly anti-Semitic and extremely violent and grisly 2011 movie, “Drive” (read my review)). There’s a reason his last name rhymes with effin’. This movie is effin’ terrible. High on style, low on story, and absolutely stupid and disgusting. Two wasted hours of my life I’ll never get back.
>The story: Elle Fanning plays a young, new model who has just arrived in Los Angeles and wants to make it big. Quickly, she does. And two other established models are jealous. All three of the women are blonde and gorgeous. A makeup artist who meets Fanning and is nice to her has a secret lesbian crush on her, but when she reveals her feelings to Fanning (and tries to rape her), Fanning rejects the makeup artist. So the makeup artist, who also works on cadavers at a funeral home, has sex with a dead body and fantasizes about Fanning. Soon enough, she and the two jealous models end up killing Fanning, and then, it turns out, the two models eat Fanning’s body. We learn this because one of them has Fanning’s eyeball pop out of her mouth at a photo shoot, then she vomits, and then, she kills herself by cutting out her stomach with a knife. Oh, and by the way, the blood-covered models have a lesbian shower scene to wash it all off (that’s before the aforementioned eyeball regurgitation and stomach-ectomy, or whatever you call it).
>Yup, I sit through sick, warped crap like this so you don’t have to. And on top of the absolutely disgusting “story,” this movie is a total bore. It’s long, slow, and incredibly uninteresting. It’s also very disjointed and focuses way too much on becoming the next, next, big thing in pretentious, artsy-fartsy movies. The women are perfectly beautiful. The makeup is very cool and stark. And the clothes and scenes are very fancy and bright. And everybody poses for the camera with pouts and poses so stupid they are comical.
>If only the movie were just as comical. But it isn’t. It’s just a warped, depraved bore made by a warped depraved bore whose goal is to shock you, steal your ten bucks, and then have you tell him how great and smart he is. He’s the primary demon here and it’s time to exorcise him from the movie biz. Long past time.
It’s trite but true–the old adage that a sucker is born every minute. That’s what the makers and distributors of this crap are banking on. And laughing at all the way to the bank.
>FOUR MARXES
been a while since I've seen a Debbie thread
>>71546663
>who also directed the openly anti-Semitic and extremely violent and grisly 2011 movie, “Drive” (read my review)
Stopped reading there.
Sounds like she's trying to be the kike Armond White.
Sage.
>>71546707
>Sage
>2016
She couldn't find a way to criticize Islam in this review, for once
>>71546719
Double sage.
>>71546663
wasn't this the dumb bitch who took her young children to see Watchmen because she did zero research and just thought it was typical capeshit and then complained about it?
>>71546707
Welcome to Debbie Schlussel, enjoy your stay:
>“District 9“: It’s rare that I enjoy a left-wing piece of pure propaganda. But I enjoyed District 9 because it’s well done, even if it has a nauseating, “Aliens are people, too” message. Sorry, they ain’t.
>We’ve seen this before: Robots are people, too; Animals are people, too; etc. It’s not a new theme in the movies.
>Think the Palestinians. That’s what I did throughout the movie.
>I viewed the alien prawns as Palestinians because they acted just like them (though Palestinians are far more scary). The aliens came from out of nowhere–the “Palestinian people” was invented out of nowhere (since they were basically Jordanians and other Arabs who wanted to get work and then land-squat). The good people of a Western country were nice to the aliens, and they took advantage. . . just like the Palestinians.
>The aliens who were a few hundred had a ton of kids, spawning to a number in the hundreds of thousands . . .just like the Palestinians (who became millions). They were a drain on resources and lived and acted like animals . . . just like our friends from the Religion of Peace of the Palestinian persuasion. They were violent–killing and maiming innocent civilians . . . just like you know who. The Palestinians. Human rights activists and lefties were all over the news as apologists and sympathetic advocates for the violent prawns . . . just like they do for the Palestinians (and every other ilk of violent Muslim).
>“District 9” was entertaining, so long as you don’t buy the message. Aliens aren’t people, too. They must be destroyed. They should have been. But I liked the movie anyway. It’s a great statement on how you lose control of your country, your culture, your safety, when you feel bad for those who want to kill you.
>Violent, bloody, and full of swear-words, this is NOT for kids. It’s rated “R” for a reason.
>TWO-AND-A-HALF REAGANS
>>71546802
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/4896/the-watchmen-lie-hollywood-sends-more-depravity-your-kids-way-costumed-as-superhero-flick/
>>71546707
as dumb as this cunt is, at least she isn't this guy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqbckoIEJGo
>>71546804
This seems like a perfectly reasonable review
>>71546663
Drive is openly anti semetic? Why? Because the gangsters are Jewish? That's fucking retarded. Both of the actors who played those characters were also Jews. They would obviously object to being in a "openly anti semetic" movie.
Dumb fucking cunt
>>71546663
>There’s a reason his last name rhymes with effin’. This movie is effin’ terrible.
Someone send this thread back to 2012
>>71546663
>the openly anti-Semitic
>>71546663
>extremely violent and grisly 2011 movie, “Drive”
What?
There was the scene where Standard gets beat up, and the elevator scene which doesn't even show any gore.
>>71547070
That's why Drive was so popular.
>>71546947
Link?
DEBBIE (((SCHLUSSEL)))
({[FOX]}) NEWS
>>71547141
so jews can never be bad guys?
>>71547141
>even talking about jews is anti-semite
>>71547141
>>71547168
>Whites portrayed in negative light
>ok
>Blacks portrayed in negative light
>racist
>Hispanics portrayed in negative light
>racist
>Asians portrayed in negative light
>racist
>Jews portrayed in negative light
>antisemetic
Why do they get their own special word?
>>71546707
Armond White does not write drivel like that
>>71547188
My mom once told me antisemetic meant how something sounds underwater.
>>71547188
because jews aren't a race
>>71547199
Confirmed never to have read an Armond White review
>>71547188
Because Jews look White.
>>71546894
This is something Ben Shapiro would make.
>>71547336
Have you? He may seem contrarian but he knows how to write and actually supports what he says with information and doesn't just say OMG THIS BAD
>>71547283
>A member of Stanford University’s Student Senate argued that it is “not anti-Semitism” to claim Jews control “the media, economy, government and other social institutions.”
>Gabriel Knight, a junior, made the remark at a Student Senate meeting Tuesday addressing a proposed resolution on anti-Semitism, according to the Stanford Daily, the main campus newspaper. Knight also said, “Questioning these potential power dynamics, I think, is not anti-Semitism. I think it’s a very valid discussion.”
>He apologized later in the meeting after Jewish community leaders and a Jewish student accused him of anti-Semitism.
>>71547141
>MuslimsControlTheMedia
>>71547283
If an anti-semite perceives Jews as a race, then their anti-semitism is an expression of racism.
>>71546804
This is satire, right
>>71547188
It gets funnier when you realize that "semitic" is supposed to refer to basically native Middle Easterners while Jews are mostly mixed from all over Europe. Even the word for people who don't like Jews is one that gives Jews validity.
>>71547421
Poor guy.
>>71546663
>directed by Nicolas Winding Refn (who also directed the openly anti-Semitic and extremely violent and grisly 2011 movie, “Drive”
This woman must be some kind of crazy, she thinks every fucking thing is anti-Semetic.
Did she think Drive was anti-Semetic because Albert Brooks, a Jew, was the bad guy?
>>71547624
Well he played a jew mafia guy as well but yes.
Anti Semitism used to mean someone who hates Jews, now it means someone a Jew hates
>>71547421
You're simply not allowed to even suggest it.
People can claim that 'whites' run everything, but it actually isn't true. Jews run everything in the West. Whites are more like middle-management.
I don't even particularly care, except for the fact that 'whites' get all the blame for everything when it's not actually us with the real power.
But Jews have it so you can hardly even utter the word 'Jew'.
>>71547704
Most people just see jews as white now.
>>71546663
>Refn
>effin'
nope.
>>71546773
>>71546719
SAGE GOES IN ALL FIELDS
>>71546804
where is the logic? The reasoning is bananas!
>>71546707.
>Violent, bloody, and full of swear-words, this is NOT for kids. It’s rated “R” for a reason.
What is this bitch trying to tell me?
>>71546682
I haven't seen her since 4chan went full conservative. Do we still hate her?
>>71546663
>There’s a reason his last name rhymes with effin’
SHOTS FIRED
BASED DEBBIE
>>71546804
I love her world leader rating system. It's so fun :)
>>71550167
Nobody went conservative the world just changed.
>>71546804
Loved Artie ripping on her Stern calls in the early 00's
>>71546804
>Aliens aren’t people, too. They must be destroyed. They should have been. But I liked the movie anyway. It’s a great statement on how you lose control of your country, your culture, your safety, when you feel bad for those who want to kill you.
But this entire board agrees with this
>>71546707
At least Armond White can write on an adult level, about half the posts on 4chan are composed better than anything she has ever written.
>artsy-fartsy
kek
>>71546818
> At the same time, the Soviets are about to nuke America. It’s 1985 and Nixon is President. We’ve won in Vietnam. Oh, and Henry Kissinger has a Russian accent. And Ronald Reagan is thinking of running for President in 1988. Wow, isn’t that cool that they got it wrong on purpose? I’m so amazed at this “high-brow art” of deliberately getting dates and timelines wrong, you know, just to be “artistic,” and get the drooling of the critics. That issooooogenius. Like way totally cool.
> Maybe if I make a movie about how Eisenhower was President in 1972, we “lost” World War II, and Bin Laden was gonna bomb the World Trade Center then, I’ll be cool, too. . . so long as it’s “dark” and I include a bunch of rape, torture, explicit sex scenes, and extremely graphic killings, and oh, write a “graphic novel” a/k/a comic book about it, first.
DEBBIE RETURNS
do any other pictures of her exist
>>71554581
> Oh, and by the way, to all of you slacker Watchmen defenders and fanatics–who resemble the many respondents on “Jay Walking,” yet are suddenly the self-appointed intellectual lights of our world–grisly is grisly, and gratuitous, graphic violence serves no positive or useful purpose in our society, even if you read it first in a comic book. You’re a bunch of dummies with no moral compass, but liking this stupid comic book which pretends violence and the depraved is “edgy” or “sophisticated,” makes you feel smart. When you’re actually quite stupid. But now, with this movie, you’ve got pretentious stupidity. You don’t realize you’re still just as dumb, your IQ just as low and probably lower
>>71554711
forgot link to 2nd article
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/4897/watchmen-fanatic-derangement-syndrome-disease-of-the-pretentious-slacker-ignorami-watchmen-was-anti-reagan-rant-not-marketed-to-kids-on-american-idol/
>>71554745
> And you are no better than the lumpenproletariat lowlifes at the Coliseum who orgasmically watched and cheered when Christians were forced to fight animals. You are no different, and you are essentially chomping at the bit to go see the modern-day version, tonight. With people like you populating America and dominating pop culture offerings, I have no doubt that soon enough we will return to the days of the barbaric live human versus beast shows. You salivate at the chance to watch barbarism tonight. That’s who you are.
>>71546763
Islam should always be criticized
Well, deported, but criticism is a start.
>>71553190
we're only pretending to be contrarian dumbass, no one actually believes that shit
>>71553190
A broken clock is right, etc.
Deb might be a total Israel worshipping kikess but at least she's not full cuckservative
>>71554842
>Bottom line: If you’re a “Watchmen” fan, there’s something sick about you. You’re sick if you enjoy watching wanton rape, torture, and murder, no matter what the background for it is. I don’t care if it first appeared in a warped comic book paraded with a high-brow euphemism for comic book.
I don’t give a crap if it’s meant to show that “the world is dark” and that “superheroes have problems and are everyday people, too,” which have been among the insipid, vapid excuses I’ve received from empty-headed Watchmen fanatic who mindlessly repeat the phony talking points that make them feel smart.
> Guess what? We know there are bad people and that people are everyday people with problems. If you don’t know that, and you think a movie like this is necessary to make the point, you’re even more warped and stupid than I originally diagnosed.
> And maybe your sister should be fed to dogs and your mother raped and your brother should have his arms sawed off (as they do in this snuff/torture-porn movie). You know, just to make the point.
> But we’ll be sure to depict it in a comic book first, just to make it “high-brow.” And get the money of the mindless “Watchmen” fandom sheeple.
>>71554842
>>71554997
Holy shit, Zach Snyder BLOW THE ASBOLUTE FUCK OUT
>>71554859
Literally the shittiest religion
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/7280/movie-of-the-year-inglourious-basterds/
>>71547745
Except for jews
>>71555859
>I wish my brave, tough Holocaust survivor grandfather, Isaac, was alive to see “Inglourious Basterds.”
>He would love it even more than I did. So would my dad. And they would be cheering and laughing along with me.
>>71546663
>Plebs cab't into Refn
News at 11
Also, (((Schlussel)))
>>71556123
Funny, since it's plebs who into Refn the most.
>>71556028
>>71555859
That's incredible. That's probably the most "anti-semetic" movie in a while since it portrays cruel revenge as despicable, but capable of ANYONE, including the jews
>>71555859
>VIOLENCE IS TERRIBLE
>except when jews are doing it to nazis ;^)
>>71556164
Pleb spotted
>>71547188
Because white people are assholes.
Never heard about this bitch, but she's legit comedy gold mine
>>71547166
but isn't fox news the one with no jews in charge?
>>71546818
>take your kids to an R rated movie
>be offended when it isn't a lighthearted kiddy flick
Why so so many parents do this
>>71554711
How is she wrong? You people are pretentious and stupid.
>>71550167
>>71546682
This OP really took my back first thing in the morning. Felt like I time travelled
>>71547141
>muslims control the media
Kikes are literally a fucking plauge on this earth and need to be wiped clean.
How can one woman be so based?
>>71554711
This is actually a pretty good description of Zack Snyder's "fans"
>>71555859
>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/7280/movie-of-the-year-inglourious-basterds/
> Those two stories intertwine to an exciting and fitting conclusion that is almost as satisfying as the famous “Raiders of the Lost Ark” scene, in which Nazis melt after countenancing the spirit of G-d emerging from the Ark of the Covenant. And it’s very similar.
> Yes, this movie is somewhat bloody and graphic (a couple of Nazi scalpings are shown as is a scene of “The Bear Jew” (Eli Roth) wailing on a Nazi’s head with a baseball bat–though that’s only briefly shown). But the violence is for a reason: it’s good against evil.
Missing the point this hard.
>>71546804
Literally only a media kike could call Muslims subhuman and get away with it.
based debber
>>71547092
blanch getting her head blown to shit?
>>71546663
>There’s a reason his last name rhymes with effin’. This movie is effin’ terrible.
Damn
>>71550167
Of course this place still hates her, she's the female Ben Shapiro.
>* “Drive“: This movie was slow, boring, extremely violent and grisly, and just pointless. Ryan Gosling stars as a stunt car driver and mechanic who also drives getaway cars for robbers. He falls for the next door neighbor at his dumpy apartment complex, and when her husband gets out of jail, he feels guilty for liking her and agrees to drive him to a robbery. What could go wrong? Like I said, this was extremely graphic and bloody. Unless you enjoy a guy getting his head kicked in until bloody death and a hollow skull, stay away. Sickening. And stupid. Oh, and the dumb ’80s synthesizer music didn’t make it hip or campy, despite the obvious failed attempt.
>FOUR MARXES
Jesus Christ, I've read /tv/ shitposts that are more intelligent than her reviews.
>>71546663
Thus woman sucks at watching movies.
>>71551642
Only that it doesn't. She just doesn't know how to pronounce his name.
>>71556634
The fuck? How did she miss the point?
The movie was clearly a postmodern retelling of the Dirty Dozen you fucking idiot. What wasn't there to get? Tarantino wasn't intending to subvery anything, its totally a pastiche of 70s "Where Eagles Dare" WW2 type movies. The Nazis, despite some being slightly humanised in one or two scenes, aren't sympathetic in the slightest. If you were rooting for the Nazis then you were likely some 90 IQ knuckle dragger.
>"YEAH DUDE, BRAD PITT'S BAD ASS CHARACTER CARVING A SWASTIKA ONTO AN SS CAPTAIN IS TOTALLY A SUBVERSIVE AND SUBTLE CONDEMNATION OF VIOLENCE SO DEEP"
So no, she's not "missing the point", fucking retard.
>>71559453
She basically gets paid to shut post. Living the dream.
>>71546663
Why do these cunts always have that "I want to speak to the manager" look about themselves?
>>71546663
for a conservative she looks a lot like a trans monster
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/81592/triple-9-among-most-anti-semitic-anti-israel-anti-cop-anti-military-movies-ever-violent-bloody-garbage/
>“Triple 9” Among Most Anti-Semitic, Anti-Israel, Anti-Cop, Anti-US Military Movies EVER (& Violent, Bloody Garbage)
>The movie, “Triple 9,” in theaters today, is one of the most blatantly anti-Semitic, anti-Israel movies I’ve seen in a very long time. And it’s also anti-police and anti-U.S. military. Plus it’s an incredibly violent, bloody movie whose message is that American military men and police officers are just as bad as ISIS. And so are Jews and Israelis. On top of that, the movie employs anti-Semitic terms, approvingly
OY VEY
>>71559713
Are you retarded or something
Tarantinos intention was to show how people think violence is okay when it's against the bad (here the Nazis)
So she is the perfect example for missing the point
>>71559713
You okay ? There's a difference between rooting for the nazis and saying that the violence doesn't just feel good because it's good vs evil. The bastards are clearly shown as slightly insane and certainly not as heroic and so is Shoshana. And maybe there's no objective point to get from the movie, but the final scene is still a climactic massacre occuring in a cinema in which people are watching a movie that depicts a massacre. There's no need to read very much into it to find a discourse on how people enjoy violence during a movie.
But yes the movie stands on its own wether you think it has a message or not, depends on how you enjoy your movie I guess.
>>71560158
>it's bad to be anti-police and anti-military
>violence is also bad
Usually these authoritarian types are the most bloodthirsty
>>71559713
The problem with people like you isn't that you're wrong, it's that you have absolute confidence in your wrong position.
You and her both very definitely missed the point. I'd suggest you watch it again and try to pick up on some of what you missed, but I'm betting you won't and will just continue to shitpost.
>>71560158
I know what i'm watching tonight
>>71560291
>Tarantinos intention was to show how people think violence is okay when it's against the bad
In a bubble this works, but what does it say about Kill Bill and Django and all his other glorifications of excessive violence?
I have absolutely no faith in Tarantino to have made something so subversive intentionally, it seems much more likely he just thought it was cool to kill Nazis the way he thinks it's cool to kill slaveowner or yakuza thugs.
>"Sucker Punch“: I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a more pretentious piece of tripe. So much style, so many cool special effects, and yet so little substance, all of it pure garbage. This is what you get when they make graphic novels–usually crappy–into even crappier movies. While this one wasn’t originally a graphic novel, it was written, supposedly, with a “graphic novel” sensibility, according to Zack Snyder, who wrote and directed it as well as several movies made from graphic novels. The story is ridiculous, but tries to pretend to have us in three different alternative universes . . . or something. Hey, make us wonder whether three ridiculous stories filled with stupidity are real or made up. Yeah, that’s the ticket. Three stories, all just horrid.
>A 20-something girl’s wealthy mother dies, as does her sister, when she accidentally tries to save her from their evil stepfather, who either did or tried to rape the younger sister. Then, the stepfather takes her to a creepy, corrupt insane asylum, which is either really a brothel or it’s just in her imagination. We’re not told either way, not that I cared. The girl, Baby Doll, is scheduled for a lobotomy. While she waits for that–or while she’s getting it (that isn’t clear either)–we see her being trained to dance as all the girls in the whorehouse are trained to do. But when she dances–which we never see–everyone is hypnotized, and suddenly all of the girls are in some warrior futuristic world training to kill the enemy and blow up stuff and she-warriors. That world is supposed to show the girl Baby Doll how to escape the asylum. We go back and forth between these three stories. And it’s pointless.
>Both leads in this awful movie are Australian because I guess there is a shortage of American actors in Hollywood, these days. Not that this would be the flick in which they’d desperately want to act. Co-stars Abbie Cornish, who is not Baby Doll (that’s Emily Browning), but some other character, called Sweet Pea. Yes, the names are stupid, just like the movie. Also, it’s amazing this isn’t rated “R,” but only PG-13. If you let your 14-year-old go to this, you’re an idiot.
>Definitely not for kids. And, for that matter, definitely not for adults either. Only for morons wanting to feel unduly smart while wasting ten bucks and two hours of life.
>THREE MARXES
>>71546804
>not understanding that every Blomkamp film is anti-immigration and anti-nigger because Blomkamp's family had to flee South Africa to Canada because of niggers chimping out
wew lad
>>71560931
>is an immigrant
>is a white south african
>anti-immigration
>>71546663
based debbie
>taking a film at face value which isn't meant to be taken at face value
and this is like half of the reviewers that appear on RT as well. how do these retards get paid to simply describe the plot of films? it doesn't even matter whether the film is good or not, it could very well be shit, but at least try to use some critical thinking skills rather than knee jerk reactions (le so violent omg!!)
>>71561996
I'd say Debbie is a fraction of a step above most useless critics. At least she has some political and moral edge to her, there is """"""some""""" """""""""thinking"""""""""""" going on
>>71559713
you're so unbelievably stupid that it hurts.
>>71562155
Expalin how it wasn't a cathartic Nazi slaying homage but instead some deep critique of violence in cinema. Right fucking now. That doesn't even remotely sound like something Tarantino would do. This is the same autist who regularly gets on prime time news to pick fights with people to defend the role of mindless violence in film.
Why? Because of the propaganda film at the end? That's it? What about all the constant violence through out the fucking film that was played cheekily throughout?
Explain to me the significance then of the, very intentionally humorous, scene of Hugo Stiglitz stabbing overweight Nazis in the fucking face
The truth is you won't because even you don't know what you meant by the post and instead it is just easier to respond calling me retarded or a pleb than to defend some pretentious bullshit pseudo-philosophical opinion.
>>71546804
>It’s a great statement on how you lose control of your country, your culture, your safety, when you feel bad for those who want to kill you
Why is this statement only acceptable when expressed by Jews?
>>71562458
No one is going to trip over themselves to spoonfeed you. Especially when there's no reason to believe that you're even capable of understanding why you're wrong.
There's two possibilities here. Either you continue to assume you're right and ignore the people who say you're wrong, in which case people will keep calling you stupid when you say shit like this... or you for a moment at least seriously consider that there is a possibility that a viewpoint that is different than yours may have merit, and watch the movie again with that in mind to see if it's the case or not.
It's on you either way.
>>71563501
>I'm right because have you ever considered that maybe I'm right
>>71546804
This is a perfectly reasonable viewpoint. Jews control Israel = it stays relatively westernised, sophisticated and peaceful. Muslims control Israel = it becomes a shithole like the rest of the Middle East.
