What went wrong guise?
The answer is on the left
>>71450308
You mean Emilia?
Not enough dragons
>>71450270
Sadly nothing..
>>71450421
Not money-wise
>>71450421
Women don't let something as trivial as quality get in the way of a movie
>>71450556
Elaborate please
>>71450501
>Not money-wise
it more than doubled its budget Magoo, and the marketing seemed to be limpdick as hell so that ain't an issue, plus there's the overseas market.
it's not a flop by any measure.
>>71450421
loooool what a flop
>not even close to BvS gross
>>71450270
chick flick
>>71450270
She put herself before him.
>>71450754
Bros, I love Emilia Clarke.
How do I stop? Somebody please help
>>71450754
Terrifying.
>>71450610
They're fucking plebs who fall for mediocre tearjerkers every time.
>>71450754
Wonder if she BROWses /tv/ haha
get it?
>>71450754
jesus christ those eyebrows
>>71450842
look at her eyebrows dude
>>71450754
Damn you Jim Henson, what a good job
>>71450904
THAT DOESN'T HELP
>>71450842
She has stinky periods and sharts her pants after curry nights
>>71450610
Romcoms like daytime television tend to be the lowest form of entertainment yet remain popular because of their audiences questionable commitment to quality
>>71451207
I would argue capeshit is just as bad. The only difference is the target demographic (middle-aged women vs children & man-children).
>>71451392
It's not though. Yes capeshit isn't high quality, but if you make a movie like fan4stick or the new Ghostbusters or something like that, the movie will get absolutely wrecked. There's a lot of bad things you can say about capeshit fans, but they do care about quality. The romcom demo? Not so much.
>>71451635
It may be hard to see this if you're not within the romcom demo, but the fans are just critical about very different things. There's no point sinking 200 million dollars into a romcom, because that audience cares about as much for CGI and explosions as capeshitters do for character development and authentic dialogue.
It is also, in general, a smaller market. You don't see the "bad" rom-coms because they're released directly to television.
Me Before You benefits from Emilia Clarke and Sam Claflin's alluring chemistry, although it isn't enough to compensate for its clumsy treatment of a sensitive subject.
>>71451635
>>71452195
Also, to clarify, as this may be at the heart of the disagreement, when I mentioned quality above I was using it as a synonym for artistic merit, rather than budget/man-hours invested. They're both pleb genres that intentionally avoid artistic value, therefore they're about as good as each other.
>>71452195
The "bad" romcoms are on lifetime and oxygen and they are a massive success. Women care about muh feels and that's about it. It's not a bad thing necessarily, but it's undeniable they have the lowest standard for quality of any demo. This isn't a defense of capeshit bc I wish those were less popular too, but they are objectively better movies.
>>71452371
Fair play.
>>71450270
>dude disabled people should just kill themselves lmao
>>71451635
>There's a lot of bad things you can say about capeshit fans, but they do care about quality
At first I thought that statement was laughable, but I guess this is actually true. Only shows that people have wildly different thoughts about what constitutes quality. The same goes for people that like romcoms by the way.
>>71452426
>but they are objectively better movies
They are both shit. Different people like different shit though, and in this case there happens to be a major devide between men and women.
>>71452646
I don't really want to get into semantics but there has never been a Watchmen equivalent in the romcom department and their never will be.
>>71450754
If that's not fake, its scary.
>>71450270
Emilia Clarke's face looks like one of those fake faces they put on robots, it's just really uncanny.
>>71450556
yeah us men really select only quality at the box office
