>he fell for the blu ray jew
>>71437448
>he enjoys watching shitty yifi rips on his iphone
bdrips are better than dvdrips. so why not
>mfw laserdisc makes a comeback
>mfw cucks didn't realize i was in this for the long haul
>>71437543
>hurr it's either one or the other
Still trying to pretend that DVD isn't more successful, huh blu ray shill?
>>71438329
There actually seems to be a weird little laserdisc cult forming these days. I could see it being the vinyl of film.
>>71437448
Dumb frogposter
>>71438793
Nigga I like my lossless audio and my high bitrates so I can enjoy my movies as they were meant to be seen, not on a monitor or TV but on a projector and screen. I thought a projector setup would be expensive as fuck but I got a nice BenQ + 120 inch screen and blackout curtains for a total of $700.
>>71437448
Not as bad as the 4k jew
>it's a high quality meme thread
Literally who cares if you watch a shitty camrip you torrented or a 4k bluray, the movie is still the same.
>>71438793
Grow a pair and buy a blu-ray already faggot
>>71439592
>as they were meant to be seen
Kek blu rays weren't around when most movies came out, so your statement is fraudulent and homosexual.
>>71440217
From what I've read, film's approximate resolution is greater than 2k, and if given access to the original negatives, a remaster of an old film can look great and certainly better than DVD - just look at any Criterion release.
>>71437448
I damn sure did, I've got my blu-rays of the running man and basket case coming in from amazon this friday.
>>71439741
You missed the part where I have to fork out for a player as well.
What's the point? there's barely a difference, CGI still looks like CGI, and the format will be completely dead within the next couple years.
>>71440342
I was watching my predator 2 blu ray the other day and was actually really suprised at how crisp and HD they were able to make the film look.
>>71440217
Also
>implying that films weren't shown on large screens prior to digital so quality was poor
>>71440342
I don't give a shit m8 so long as it's good enough, and that's why blu ray never took off.
>>71440402
While the Predator discs look really good, from what I've heard they butchered the original grainy look of the movie in trying to make it look HD. At least, that was the case with the original Predator, pic related.
>he watches films that look like someone coloured over them in crayola and thinks he's hot shit because of it
wew bluraycucks are the worst
>>71440513
>>71440609
Predatormind
>>71440513
>>71440609
Ayo Senpai..
>>71440386
>I have to fork out for a player as well.
I don't know what your personal financial situation is but upgrading isn't too much when you could get a nice Sony for 70$ and they go as low as 30$ for off brands
>there's barely a difference
a) Completely wrong from a technical standpoint
b) How the hell would you know
>>71440609
Predator (Ultimate edition or whatever the fuck it was called, there's an original release that preserves the grain) is the biggest cherry-picking 'WAHHHH BLU-RAY SUCKS' example, and it's entirely due to studio dickery and digital noise reduction, not the format itself. DNR can happen on DVDs too, I remember Terminator 2 got fucked by it on both DVD and Blu-Ray, eventually they released a blu-ray without it.
>>71440952
>upgrade
Why would I lock myself down in a dying format?
>>71441302
I am so glad I am no longer at a point in my life where buying a 40$ purchase to enhance a hobby I enjoy would be considered "locking myself down"
>>71441596
>just have fun dude, turn your brain off! xD
>>71440609
This
>>71439715
blurayfags BTFO
>>71439715
>>71442563
>turn off your eyes xD
I buy blu ray when I can't find a high quality download or when it's a foreign film and i need good subtitles (not to mention it's hard to find proper downloads for those).
I make exceptions for movies i know i'll watch many times because i love them.
Seriously though, having a few blu ray is cool. i like my little collection.
>>71442839
I love having a collection of the movies I really love. Feels nice to be able to watch them in flawless quality whenever I want.
>>71438793
>mfw upscaled dvd already looks as good as bluray on anything made before 1995
>mfw there is nothing worth watching after 95 anyway
>>71439715
>yiffys lawrence of arabia rip is fucking unwatchable
>annomyxous rip is amazing
>>71442971
Neither statement is true, but you're shitposting anyways
>Blu Ray puts the subs on some fuckoff channel like 4
WHY
H
Y
>>71443052
bluray shill pls go
>>71443094
But blu-ray is the best format available. Why are you shitposting against it?
>>71441981
No I just enjoy film and blu ray offers the best picture quality and a host of commentary and making of features I personally find interesting and enjoyable so since I have the disposable income I see no issue with using to to peruse a hobby I enjoy.
>>71443166
Laser Disc is the best medium
you can hang it on your walls
>>71443094
Blu-Ray is a niche thing these days, no need to shill it. It has its audience.
>>71437448
what about HD-DVD's?
>>71443163
>dead format available
FTFY
>>71443301
Porn chose blu ray so HD DVD died
>>71443301
It's best function was flipping it over and having the discs also work in regular DVD players.
It could of been a worthy medium if the player wasn't regulated to being an add-on.
Blu-Ray was technically superior from the start however.
>>71442839
This. I never blind buy, I only buy ones I know I'll watch lots.
>>71443248
There are literally blu ray shills on /tv/, I shit you not.
They're still trying to expand because they're still putting their shitty ad on the beginnings of movies.
>YEEEEEEAAAAAAHHH I WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG
Holy fuck, fuck off with that shit.
>>71443491
I hope you're baiting, not that stupid
>>71443491
But streaming already won and will continue to win, why bother shilling Blu-Ray?
If anything, torrent sites shill here.
>>71443491
So is shill just /tv/ meme lingo for somebody who likes something? Or do people actually believe that massive multinational companies pay workers to post positive feedback of their products on a single board of a long irrelevant website that gets less than 400k visitors a month and is known for its contrarian attitude and refusal to enjoy anything anyone else likes?
>>71443373
>could of
>>71443767
He's a namefag after all
>>71443667
Haven't you heard? the internet is where it's at.
ITT: poor people
>>71443767
shit, did I fuck up?
>>71443954
'Could have been' would fit there
>>71444001
my bad, it seems I might actually be retarded.
Thanks anon.
>He watches shitty cam rips on his 24" tube TV , grovelling on about how "the joos" won't get his sheckles
>He still buys movies.
>>71444280
What's wrong with buying a copy of a movie you know you love?
After pirating it first to see if you like it, of course.
