Why do people pretend this wasn't the most smartest Sci-Fi film ever made?
>>71385299
le nolan is a bad director meme
>>71385299
>TARS, set intelligence to 10%
>DUDE FEEL THE BERN LMAO
people fear what they don't understand
interstellar is too advanced for plebs
>>71385367
I think it was the use of real science and the retarded plebs got BTFO
it was ok, a little too long though
>>71385299
>most smartest
trying to claim a movie is the smartest of its genre by typing retarded shit like this...your argument is null and void you dum dum
>LOVE TRANSCEND LE TIME SPACE MOM
wow such smart
I can't believe just how redditthis place hasbecome
Really well acted and directed movie.
Visuals and OST were top notch
My only problems were some corny lines and the pacing.
It went from slow scifi kino in the first half, to an action blockbuster shitfest in the second part.
Really no need for a villain, we already had the struggle of men against nature and themselves
>>71385299
>the most smartest
>>71385451
>>71385502
>literal plebs detected
if you were ever to take a film or science class you would understand the pure significance of this work
>>71385615
that's acceptable in the us
>TARS, convert the data from Dr Romily into Binary and read it to me so I can transfer it to Murphs watch using gravity
>Cooper. Dr Romily has 23 years of data, reading that out in binary and transferring into that watch with no mistakes would take decades. How are you going to do that?!
>LOVE TARS! LOVE!
>>71385686
you dumb fuck, im not criticizing the movie. im criticizing retard OP who tries to say a movie is the "smartest" smart by stating shit like "most smartest"..instead of taking your film or science class, take a basic english composition class instead first you dodo bird
>>71385754
>>71385299
>shitty pacing
>muh love deus ex machina
>>71385686
If you did highschool science you'd realise how dumbed down this film is. It also has exposition out the ass in classic Nolan fashion to explain to all the retards exactly what's happening
>>71385686
>le ebon babus first trole
The narrative scope and way it is incorporated to the film's story is top tier filmcrafting.
>>71385780
>you dodo bird
where did you learn to insult? who taught you?
![Interstellar.2014.720p.BluRay.x264.YIFY.mp4_snapshot_02.15.59_[2015.04.02_05.08.41].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/vbMKQOa.jpg "Interstellar.2014.720p.BluRay.x264.YIFY.mp4_snapshot_02.15.59_[2015.04.02_05.08.41].jpg")
>>71385338
>>71385887
see>>71385335
stop meming
>>71386186
Nolan isn't a bad director but he's a bad writer, at least in his recent films
>>71386245
The writing was good in Interstellar. I can't find a more suitable way to tie a narrative of something crossing spacetime in a better way, let alone the subtlest of 4th wall breaks.
>>71386289
Yeah Nolan always writes in some cyclical bullshit that ties into a small detail alluded to early in the film and retards like you take the bait in believing it's good writing. You're also ignoring the fucking awful dialogue this movie had.
>>71386343
>Yeah Nolan always writes in some cyclical bullshit
For you.
>>71386343
It doesn't tie to the small detail. Love is everywhere in the beginning within Coop's family you moron.
>>71385299
Please would you care to explain what was actually smart about this movie? Of course apart from failing literally every scientific model, like escaping earth gravity with a rocket and then a planet with 130% earth gravity with a lander etc.
The Matt Damon parts were good.
The tesseract/ayy lmao part was uninteresting and felt like a really stupid plot device to get a happy ending where humanity survives.
Sunshine, Moon and Martian were better.
>>71386503
>Edgerlord thinking a positive, optimistic ending is 'really stupid'.
aww
and Martian wishes it had the writing on level of Interstellar. That film deals within its themes in 18 minutes and rest of it is filler.
>>71385299
because "2001: A space odyssey" and "Metropolis" are the best Sci-Fi movies ever made???
Interstellar is mediocre...
>>71386452
hey buddy....OP never said it was smart, he said it was "the most smartest"... get it right guy
>>71385686
>if you were ever to take a film or science class
What science class teaches The Love Dimension?
>>71386548
I like positive and optimistic endings where they are warranted.
The movie goes from a harsh tale of desperate measures for survival to AYY LMAO DW THE ALIENS WILL FIX EVERYTHING in an instant. It's not satisfying.
None of the characters really accomplished anything, they were just magically gifted the solution to their otherwise impossible problems.
it was a great drama
kinda silly as a scifi though
it was surprising that nolan can do this after how meh inception was and the abonimation batman rises or whatever
>>71385299
>expect good sci fi
>its actually an overbudget, sappy, weepy melodramatic story about love
>normies still have to say its 11/10 best movie ever because its made by nolan
he overreached and it sucks
>>71386692
>inception and batman sucked
wut? despite inception stealing ideas its probably top 50 films all time easy
>>71386808
Nolan subverted himself while showing the love towards filmmaking, it's a fine film
>>71386808
inception was ok but I felt that the action scenes were forced and really fucking unncessary and brought down the movie for me
as for dark knight rises, the flaws of that movie were discussed to a great extent on this board
the script, the acting, the pacing, the stunts, the sound mixing
and so on
>>71385299
>smartest Sci-FI
>Climax is literally "the power of love defies science"
Find a hole.
Sit in it.
Die in a fire.
>>71386548
It's stupid when you need a ridiculous plot device for it to happen
>>71385299
Most of them don't have the intellectual capacity to appreciate it. The rest don't think anything can live up to their standarts.
>Go to a planet so close to a black hole that millions of gallons of water are displaced
>Walk around fine
I watched that show with a bunch of non science normies, pissed me off.
>>71386808
>top 50 films all time
Jesus Christ are you serious?
>>71386950
Teenagers and people who watch capeshit absolutely loved interstellar. What does that say about the films fans and their intellectual capacity?
>>71386909
love is science bitch. Learn about neorobiology before you start talking about shit you don't understand.
>>71387010
Not all of them no. Also some of the casual folk only pretended to like it because it is a "Nolan film."
It is true that you don't need high intellectual capacity to watch/appreciate capeshit, but everyone who watches capeshit don't have low intellectual capacity. So your assertion is not correct.
>>71387020
Chemical reactions in your brain do not transcend spacetime in a plaid eternal bookshelf that only mirrors the thoughts of one crop duster so he can travel through time to set up his own stupid plot. Oxytocin does not affect time and space.
You know how I know youre a fucking freshman? Cause you just tried to tell me the equivalent of "go take a class like someone with a REAL major."
You think this way because all youve ever known is being in school.
Enjoy your faggy art degree and the look of people rolling their eyes when you walk into any room.
Newsflash. He dies at the end. And you're a fucking child.
>>71386610
>doesn't know that love is science
>>71387020
/sci/ reporting in
> love
> science
>>>>>>>>>>>>> love
/sci/ out
>I could swing around that neutron star
>>71387190
autism desu
>>71387190
so Nolan is correct?
>>71387020
Hello retard. It's not science in the way Interstellar presents it. That's superstition
>>71385741
All forms of stupidity are acceptable in the US
>>71387165
Don't kid yourself anon. The guy is probably still in highschool
>>71385299
Movies that had smarter science fiction themes than Interstellar.
>>71387165
You ever thought it is not meant to be taken literally? Fucking autistic niggers, Jesus Christ.
>>71387467
Fuck I hate summer.
>>71387508
>Love is science u retard
>No it's not
>It's ackshully a metaphor u dumass
this film was entirely more smarter than interstellar
>>71387020
>>71387165
>love is science bitch
>>71387486
This one goes without saying
>>71387570
Yet still retarded
Is /tv/ seriously that fucking lame and thoughtless that the only criticism we can reach after over 50 posts is 'muh science?' Are you faggots saying that if it weren't for the black hole time travel nonsense Interstellar would be a perfect movie?
How about the fucked pacing, almost total lack of thematic direction, nonsensical character motivations which are confusing due to poor presentation rather than complex ideas behind them. The whole movie feels like a confused and aimless imitation of what a technically competent autist thinks an epic film should look like with absolutely none of the heart or intelligence that truly makes the films which inspired Interstellar memorable.
Really, aside from shitposting on /tv/, which is what 50% of this thread is in case some of you newfaggot autists didn't realize, why does anybody care about Interstellar? Why should anybody care about Interstellar? Why won't people care about Interstellar? These are the lines we should be thinking along, not 'no muh pop-scientist disagrees with your pop-scientist.' It's a movie not a fucking textbook.
>>71387559
It's not a fucking metaphor either you fucking retard.
damn kid kys
>>71385576
i think that was awesome. i didn't like that love was the key to everything. Just seems like they couldn't come up with something that at least pretends to be scientific
>>71387595
you alright mate?
>>71387165
>>71387165
Which has nothing to do with I said.
The guy I quoted claimed that the premise of the film is that love defied science. I said love is not a concept that defies science.
>>71387595
Agreed, but the kind of person that loves interstellar is the kind that knows fuck all about dialogue, themes, metaphor or good character writing. Thus all they can argue is that the science in the film is too smart for the average viewer (it isn't) even though Nolan literally has his characters draw diagrams at multiple points in the film to explain it to the audience.
>>71387594
>i jus smokked a dooby an 2001 is the most greatestt movie eveer on the subject of tha space witht the images
how retarded are you?
>>71387659
The way in which it is presented in interstellar does exactly that, though. Unless I missed some massive discovery, and love doesn in fact transcend space and time?
>>71387674
>heh heh people r so dum they didn't even watch that yatub vidya when they already explained that stuff
>peh, they have to explain all det stuff to dem dum masses
>i is smart
>>71387674
If you keep hang up on some shit like 'scientific details' in a film about exploring love transcending spacetime you're probably a fucking retarded desu
>>71387656
NOOOOOOOO, I'M NOT ALL RIGHT AT ALL. I FEEL LIKE I'M THE ONLY POSTER LEFT ON /tv/ WHO ACTUALLY LIKES MOVIES, LET ALONE SCIENCE-FICTION.
>>71387674
YOU DUMB ASSHOLE, NOBODY LOVES INTERSTELLAR. IT'S ALL SHITPOSTING. LOOK AT >>71385686 AND TELL ME THAT'S NOT A FUCKING SHITPOST. STOP FEEDING (you)s TO SUCH LAZY SHITPOSTERS. YOU AREN'T SMART FOR POINTING OUT THAT A 'SCIENCE CLASS' IS A FUCKING STUPID AUTHORITY TO BACK UP YOUR POINT, YOU'RE FUCKING STUPID FOR EVER BELIEVING ANON WAS SERIOUS.
>>71387688
Thematically it is more intelligent than interstellar and a far better crafted film than anything Nolan has ever done. It's an obvious pick but valid nonetheless
>>71387508
Pic related is not meant to be taken literally.
Interstellar is selling us on the premise of a Science Fucking Fiction story where elements depend on technology and space travel.
Coopers relationship with his kid, goes from being character defining trait to LITERAL fucking deus ex machina of the whole mission and plot. And it "literally" is happening in the plot of its own movie.
If this element was kept in while Spielberg was still slated to make it- it would have been handled a lot cleaner and at least had the balls to admit it was cornball heartwarming fare.
All these fucking faggots keep trying to act like Interstellar is a sci-fi movie. It's not. Like Star Wars it has a futuristic and sci fi SETTING but it is not a sci fi film. You can't posit a scientific 'what if' story and round it off with THE POWER OF LOVE CONQUERS ALL horseshit.
Interstellar has some amazing PRODUCTION DESIGN. Too many fucking morons confuse the fact that Nathan Crowley decided to give the sets and ships a really grounded aesthetic so we as an audience could relate better. It dashed in some modern NASA designs with an homage to 2001. The film is a fallacy of science fiction. Merely using the genre as a backdrop to a heartwarming "maybe when you have kids you'll understand" kinda story.
Unless your "headcanon" is that Cooper is actually DYING once he goes into the black hole- and that the ending is him coming to terms with failing his mission and his kids and humanity-- he's just giving himself the happy ending he thinks he deserves, then even trying to defend this turd is a waste of time and brain cells.
You're not deep. Read more books. Watch more movies. Stop settling for this horseshit unless all you really want out of a movie is the Hallmark Special Of The Week on TV.
Nolan is a hacky writer. He sets up two (usually well paced) acts and then the last 30-45 minutes of all his movies take a hard left turn into a dumpsterfire.
71387730
Such shit bait desu
>>71387700
No, it's just terrible exposition and terrible writing in general. There are more creative and natural ways to explain things to your audience. Unfortunately Nolan is autistic
>>71386975
considering the huge impact it had on popular culture, yes
are you going to populate your top 50 with hipster black and white movies that only like 10 people actually watch?
it was a very solid, gripping movie made in hollywood without the capeshit sjw cancer
>>71387701
Read the post I replied to. Interstellar is shit for other reasons
>>71387710
Mate sit down and rewatch blade runner or something, you'll feel much better.
>>71387730
>You're not deep
don't challenge my notions bro
>>71387794
>blade runner
IF YOU'RE IMPLYING THAT THAT IS THE PEAK OF THE GENRE THEN FUUUUUUUUUCCCKKKK YOOUUU!
I MIGHT GO WATCH THE FURY
I MIGHT GO WATCH THE RED SPECTACLES
I MIGHT GO WATCH HARDWARE
I MIGHT GO WATCH THX1138
I WILL GO WATCH SOMETHING OTHER THAN THE SAME 3 FUCKING MOVIES /tv/ JERKS OFF EVERY TIME THE FUCKING GENRE IS BROUGHT UP. IF ALL YOU'VE SEEN IS 2001 AND BLADE RUNNER YOU DON'T FUCKING KNOW SCIENCE-FICTION. READ A FUCKING BOOK YOU APES.
>>71387696
i am a professor of love and time and i can confirm this
>>71387850
You should be challenging them yourself
>>71387659
No fucking shit. And in Interstellar it has nothing to do with science, it is literally Muh Feels in a contradictory way.
Even anne hathaway gives some cornball speech (even though shes a top notch scientist and fucking astronaut) about how she's on a non-sensical mission because she has caught feelings for some guy.
Just because our brains produce chemicals that allow us to "fall in love" and "protect our children" doesn't mean that-- love CAN'T be connected to science, what I'm saying is THIS IS A FUCKING SPACESHIP MOVIE ABOUT SAVING THE WORLD and it shoves its big knuckle-dragging fists up your ass.
And just because you want to give it a shot or "dissect" it further cannot save the movie from being what its always been this whole time:
Fucking stupid and made for stupid people.
>>71387850
You're right. I was out of line.. My bad.
>>71387892
Ah yes, the catch all /b/tard response for when you're too retarded to think of anything else
>>71387730
>uses the word "literally"
pleb detected, opinion discarded.
>>71387866
I like Alien too.
>>71387956
>>71387953
Used it in quotes because I'm not a teenager at the mall who means to say "figuratively".
Good luck dismissing more details in your life.
One day you might have to explain some things about life to your wife's son.
>>71387946
>being this autistic and butt hurt
>>71387981
No all caps m8y? You can watch The Thing if you want.
All right i'll stop. But before I do i must mention I unironically enjoy Lynch's Dune.
>>71385299
Because it wasn't. Also its greatly anti-scientific and religious in its core. Main message: "you just need to believe , even if it contradicts your knowledge, just close the eyes and jump, there will be Heaven on the other side not bottom of pit". This is not sci-fy, this is subversion result of religion, blind faith. Really makes you think that this is now face of sci-fi, blind faith.
>>71388116
>Lynch's Dune
Aesthetically awesome but doesn't really have much going on. The plot was simply too big for a 3 hour movie. Scenes that should have been powerful come are spoiled by the shaky buildup, even in the extended cut. Paul offering his life to Thufir is in my opinion the most powerful scene in the story, and it's presented well in the movie, but the first time I saw it I hadn't read the book and was just confused more than anything. It's still a good movie but as it came out it was a waste of an interesting story.
>>71388107
>>71388196
Did he tell you shit your opinions all over him? jesus christ
>>71388245
If we aren't going to shit our opinions all over each other what the hell else are we going to do on /tv/?
>>71388258
shitpost
>>71388258
Wallow in shitty opinions. Thread related
>>71388273
I know, but I can always aim higher. And what passes for shitposting now on /tv/ can't even really be called that. It's more just saying things which are wrong at each other until threads 404.
>>71388196
The plot's scope is too vast for film agreed. Theoretically it could make for a decent tv series, but I doubt the trundling political drama would hold audience's attention long enough to convey the underlying theme of comparative religion and social control in any depth.
>>71388313
don't take 4chan too seriously m8
>>71385299
Because it just pretends to be smart for Walmart average movie folks.
>>71385502
I actually kek'ed. You are right, sir.
>>71388358
any attempt at recreating the plot wouldn't be able to match the aesthetic achievement of the movie and most likely still wouldn't even capture the full depth of the novel's plot either, so it would be pointless. I have the book for my rise of islam in space story and the movie for floating fish-men psychic demi-gods. Anything in between would just be dull and redundant. Dune isn't even that amazing desu onii-senpai.
>>71388374
I want to have a good time here. Shitposting is cool but /tv/ shitposting isn't clever or even funny. It's just shrill mental noise for the sake of attention.
>>71386134
This is brilliant.
>>71388191
>religious in its core
where was space jesus at then retard lol?
>>71385502
damn, you changed my opinion
I agree with this anon >>71388421
kek
meh. Nolan lost me after TDKR and Inception to be frank
>>71388483
in your anus
>>71388430
>I want to have a good time here. Shitposting is cool but /tv/ shitposting isn't clever or even funny. It's just shrill mental noise for the sake of attention
>>71385299
>Most smartest
The irony
>>71388430
Read through to chapter house? Dune's main appeal for me was the detail in which the psyche of an authoritarian ruler was explored.
>>71388394
nice contrarianism. good luck trying to enjoy things.
>>71388526
>after Nolan made his best films ever I decided he wasn't any good
this is a board for people who appreciate film and television.
>>71388651
Haven't actually gone past the second one yet. I do hear that they go to some interesting places but I find Herbert's dry prose hard to get through at times. Book of the New Sun is much more pleasant reading.
>>71388678
Those movies are garbage bro
>>71388678
HAHAHAHAHAH HOLY SHIT EVERYONE LOOK AT ANON'S POST LOOK HOW CLEVER AND FUNNY HE IS!
YOU THINK HE LIKES NOLAN, BUT BAZINGA! HE'S ACTUALLY JOKING! HE DOESN'T REALLY! ISN'T THAT AMAZING?
>>71388614
That's the face you're going to go with this episode? jesus
>>71388704
>le I'm so cynical and stuff
>I'm gonna doubt when people actually enjoy things
>yes... hmmm yes they must be meming if they enjoy things!!!
MOHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>anything that the general public considers good is the worst shit in cinematic/tv history
This is tv logic. I don't understand why people can't just enjoy this film. Does it have it's faults? Of course it does but that doesn't mean it's bad in fact it's probabily one of the most ambitious movies of the past decade. I wish people on here would stop trying to pretend they're film experts when none of them have ever writen directed or had any involvement in the film industry whatsoever. I'd take this board more seriously if there wasn't all these endless threads about superhero threads up all the time. Superhero movies will ironicly be the death of the film industry and nobody seems to give a shit about that on here
>>71387902
>Fucking stupid and made for stupid people.
You are stupid if you think it is said in the literal sense.
>>71388685
The concepts get rundant personally after God Emperor - and Herbert's style is dessicated.
I'm not aware of it, forgive my plebian limitations senpai.
>>71388760
I enjoy things too. Just not shit movies.
>>71388191
That's whats amazingly hilarious to me.
>People discard their old faiths,
>Treat science as a "following" or way to live their lives
>Rather than being a METHOD for observing, understanding and experimenting.
People have taken the opposite of religion and made it into a religion, blissfully unaware that it's not a "cult" or "club", no matter how bad they want to be in one.
>>71387773
>considering the huge impact it had on popular culture, yes
American Pie, Scary Movie and Borat had even bigger impact on popular culture, I guess they must belong in top 50 movies of all time then.
>>71385741
Yeah retardation is very wide spread over there I've heard.
>>71388483
Holy spirit was black hole space Jesus was Cooper.
>>71388789
So they meme if they enjoy movies you don't like? it means they're pretending to enjoy just to shitpost? damn...
deep
![tumblr_static_8fh1bca5qfocgc8ckkskggw8o[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/65AldSg.png "tumblr_static_8fh1bca5qfocgc8ckkskggw8o[1].png")
>>71387773
>Interception
>Huge impact on popular culture
>>71388779
The hate for it is in response to the reaction from normies who called it the greatest sci fi film of all time, which it obviously isn't. It's average at best, but grossly overrated. /tv/ has a similar reaction to a lot of overrated films.
>>71388825
No, it means they genuinely enjoy shit films
>>71388704
>Being this mad
>>71388856
>No, it means they genuinely enjoy shit films
So he isn't meming as this post implied >>71388704
Oh
>>71388856
Disliking shitty movies is a meme
>>71387773
It's literally the dullest, most visually uninteresting "dream" movie I've ever seen. It's a fucking feat of autism that Nolan managed to make a film in which pretty much any dreamlike visual or event could likely occur so fucking boring and grey.
>>71388880
Yeah, probably not. That post isn't mine
>>71385299
It wasn't "smart" but rather ambitious
The story, even for interstellar scifi, is a bit of a stretch. Some of the acting was almost intentionally poor for some reason. It does look very good and it was entertaining but if you're even remotely familiar with any of its scientific elements it doesn't bring anything to really make you think. Plus there were some over the top corny moments
In short: it was aite
>>71388704
/tv/ really out autists itself sometimes
2001 is better
>>71388700
No they're not.
>>71388821
ah shit and matt damon was the jews
>>71388973
Agreed
>>71388779
Because Nolan is a fucking pretentious hack. The visuals are good, but the story, the dialogues, the plot overall is fucking ridiculous!
It's not because it's a big budget or whatever, it's just because it's not well done.
But nowadays, people think visual is everything. McConaughey could say litteraly whatever in this film, take off his pants in the middle of a serious scene and jerk off saying "science alright alright alright" and you would say "well...it's a little odd, but the movie is great! Come ooon"
>>71388785
There is nothing more literal in that movie than its retarded climax.
"The Fourth Dimension is LOVE!"
"Murrrrrph! Don't let me leave to set up the plot which ultimately saves everyone"
"Murrrrrherherherrrrrrph! God I miss my daughter even though I'm experiencing something humanity cannot fathom let alone has ever experienced! My daughter, damnit!!"
It's right up there with "The Fifth Element is LOVE!" Except no one has any delusions about Fifth Element. It knows it's shlocky fun in a sci fi WORLD. Even if it slaps scientific reasoning in the face. At least that movie is fun and stupid and not boring and stupid.
>>71389007
I don't understand why you are so triggered.
because ever since TDKR it's cool on /tv/ to be a revisionist retard and shit all over Nolan.
This was such a beatiful movie. The cinematography, the score, the highbrow concepts, the sense of imagination. It's the closest sci-fi has got to emulating 2001 in the last 20 years.
It genuinely saddens my that fa/tv/irgins prefer to watch and discuss dull, vacuous capeshit that talk about this masterpiece
tyb Nolan
>>71389007
lel
>>71388987
the shittiness of TDKR alone is a big meme here even
>>71389095
probably cos im not triggered you retarded faggot
>>71389141
>Implying I watch capeshit
It's even worse than Nolanshit. And no, Interstellar is not a masterpiece by any means. You need to watch more films.
>>71389084
Don't forget the whole dust moving in the bedroom meaning that McConaughey is pushing behind the bookshelves.
Aaah intercucks are all jerking off on the subtleness of that concept. Hm so meaningful oh yaaaah.
>>71389066
>implying mcconaughey randomly jerking off in the middle of a scene woudn't have added an interesting touch to the movie
>>71389199
Granted. It would have been more entertaining.
>>71389195
>Ooooh yeah looove transcends all dimensions fuck yaaa i'm such a scientist! Beam me up Scotty!
>>71389141
>Nolan is above capeshit
>Nolan's rise to acclaim came from capeshit
Seriously. Pick one.
Also:
>highbrow
Get the fuck outta here man. Watch more things. Read more things. Graduate High School.
Interstellar is purely subjectively good TO YOU. It is not, nor will it ever be regarded as a masterpiece or master class objectively.
You are a child.
you telling me you faggots aren't even slightly hyped for this?
Minus the last 15 minutes or so and its a great movie. It should have ended with Cooper floating around Saturn and fade to black. The dumbass 'library' scene and what followed should not be there.
>>71389315
>Watch more things. Read more things. Graduate High School.
>>71387730
>Read more books. Watch more movies
Jesus m8 we get it, fuck off already. We will never be as deep as you.
>>71389410
Seriously though. Watch more movies
>>71389324
hyped for this?
>>71389361
>It's a great movie. The whole message of the movie should not be there.
Seriously, next time you try to defend a movie you love? Shut up.
>>71389441
>movies
I only watch films.
>>71389460
>Don't point out the flaws in an obviously flawed movie
Fuck off
>>71387212
i could swing around these doubles
>>71389410
Who says it's a competition. I'm telling you to actively better yourself and expand your own frame of reference.
Better yourself. You can be better than you are now.
>>71389460
I'm not defending it. Can you even read? I said it would be a great movie without the last 15 minutes.
Why do you get so offended because I like something you not? Go outside sometimes, you are seriously autistic.
>>71389455
Fags. Only fags are hyped for this.
And I love WW2 movies.
>>71389636
Yes you are mature, you are lord of light and illumination, you are merely trying to show us the way out of darkness, into the light
BEGIN
>You are a child.
>All these fucking faggots keep trying to act like Interstellar is a sci-fi movie.
>You're not deep.
> this turd is a waste of time and brain cells.
>Get the fuck outta here man.
>>71389676
I'd argue that the beginning, middle, AND end are all pretty terrible.
The end is the cherry on the top where I at least knew I wouldn't be able to ever take the movie seriously.
>>71389455
>PG-13 war movie
>TARS can you change helmet size to 30%
>confirmed
>>71389744
okay, that's you know... your opinion.
>>71389722
It's not exactly a revelation to say Interstellar is a mess of a film. Anyone who has a remote genuine interest in film knows this. The fact that you don't suggests you don't watch a lot of movies and you don't put much thought into the ones you do watch. So yeah, unless you're watching purely for entertainment, you should watch more films, preferably some that challenge your views.
Interstellar was amazing to me mostly because of the relationship between the father and the daughter
>>71389828
Yes masta
>>71389722
You keep posting replies. But you aren't watching more. You aren't reading more.
Interstellar is for teenagers and mouth breathers. The contempt I have for it is justified.
Who cares about me? My ego isn't at stake here. It's your intelligence. Or lack thereof. Go back to school. Finish school. Talk to other people. Find a way to explain in a non-subjective and insulting way why you might STILL like this movie after you've grown as a person. If you still like it- you have the ability to defend it.
Or just keep trying to act like I feel bad for shit slinging at this terrible movie that NO ONE will remember by the time your wife's kids are in high school.
>>71389750
Nolan will push that to the limit as per. For most other directors it would be 18+ but Nolan knows how to do it.
I don't understand the last part where the dad gets sucked into a blackhole but can still somehow talk to the robot via radio
>>71389455
TOM FUCKING HARDY
Seriously that guy is quickly becoming my favourite actor
>>71389455
No. I'm sure Nolan will say something pretentious like "I'm trying to completely renew the experience the audience has of a "war" film. This is not a war film. This is a redefinition of a certain period of history where people died. Incidently during a battle."
>>71389812
Thanks Reddit.
>>71389945
This guy will always sound like Bane now.
>>71389890
>Watching movies properly takes a lot of intelligence.
>You must grow as a person to understand film properly
You know why I'm giving you meme replies?
it's because you're fucking retarded and I need to go to bed soon
>>71389948
>im too retarded to understand clever people
its ok
I watched this movie while smoking weed lmao 420 xD and i have to say it was a 10/10 experience. Maybe that's why i can't understand all these cynical comments directed towards this piece of art. It's a pretty ok movie imo
>Me? Im into Carling and Becks. What about you Chris, what beer are you into?
>Stella
What did he mean by this?
>>71390025
I didn't say either of those things. This might come off as pretension but it's okay. You're defensive, I get it.
Lemme simplify so this isn't a pissing contest-
I enjoy some pretty dumb movies. Thing is, I know when they're dumb. I can admit liking something even if it isn't debated on this stupid site as being "patrician" or whatever buzzwords people wanna use here.
What I'm saying is, there isn't some SET LIST you NEED to watch to graduate with honors in the High Taste Club.
What I'm saying is you sound like a person with a narrow frame of reference. I didn't tell you WHAT to watch. Just that you should broaden the pool which you draw from.
Interstellar might be amazing to you because its mainstream popularity drew you into it- it flashed some snazzy visuals and "interesting" concepts. But that's because you don't have much to juxtapose it against. Youre just nitpicking my vitriol.
You don't have to listen to anyone on this site. You're not gonna impress anyone here. But maybe, just maybe you might have your own interests and decide that if your candy ass REALLY loves interstellar that much then you might watch more similar things for comparison. You might even read a book, God willing.
You might implore some critical thinking rather than just going with the flow because some studio knows that Nolan's name is a bankable asset- so they'll let him make anything.
He's not that deep. He's not that clever. He's not even as "visual" as his production designer. You might just think that NOW because it's all you know.
You're probably not even stupid. I don't know. I also don't care.
>>71390501
Your standard for judging a film is shit-tier is what I'm getting at. Even if a film fails plot-wise or even technically in some niche areas, there is a certain limit to the mistakes it can make before it actually takes away from the aesthetic experience itself. Was Interstellar so shitty as to take away from that aesthetic experience? no. Some might argue it was corny or treacly in some areas, but that doesn't take away from the pith of the movie itself, that is, its metaphysical message. Has metaphysics ever been not corny though? see Malick and his films. His films, even though serious pieces of art, still garner the same criticisms most of the people in this thread have been making against Interstellar, even though Malicks films are done copacetically, hell, maybe with some pretension or aesthetic grandiloquence, but nevertheless it still is ok for what he's doing. Same with Nolan. He isn't as skilled as Malick in terms of autear-ship, not as original, but his films make people think and question their existence, even if done in a ham-fisted way, is still in and of itself commendable. Your criticisms are mostly "non-subjective" as you yourself have said. But when has film ever been preponderately a non-subjective experience? it's not fucking science, nor does it require as much intelligence as you're exhorting for. It's an aesthetic experience in the main, and critiquing the film and calling it terrible because it is trite in a few areas, or some plot threads don't get autistically tied up for your enlightened mind is unfair.
Anyway seriously, I'm off to bed. People should give you more meme replies in the future.
>>71385299
>TARS, put Murph's feet on the screen
>critizising a good movie makes it sound like i have a profound understanding of cinema
Don't get me wrong it has it's flaws but it certainly doesn't deserve the harsh critisism it's getting in this thread
>>71391242
its shit
>>71391242
There's nothing profound about seeing the blatant problems with Nolans writing. Interstellar is grossly overrated.
>>71389948
besides that 'silent era' quote, has he ever said anything like this?
>>71391408
>mfw I thought this quote was cleverly made up to mock Nolans pretensiousness
>mfw I just found out he actually said it
>>71391408
>>71391636
what did he actually say?
it's like a space movie that was written by a woman
>muh love conquers all!
>>71391745
Regarding The Dark Knight:
>This is the biggest one I've done. The biggest one anyone's done since the silent era, in truth.
Shit like this is why people call Nolan a pretentious hack. I can't blame them tbqh
>>71385299
Cringy over exposition at the end.
I didnt even have a problem with the 'love' thing.
>>71387730
Compare the motivations of Coop and Dr Mann. Consider the 'love' concept in this sense, and you might have an idea now of why Interstellar is more important that you believe it is. Also consider the choice between looking out for the people important to you vs. your entire race.
These aren't themes foreign to science fiction.
You're right, the script is hardly outstanding stuff, and there's not much for character development, but as you've said, the production design, as well as the music, and creative choices (robots - not just the marines) deliver a unique experience that is both refreshingly earnest and a much-needed sensory hit, that you don't get to see often (inb4 since the silent era).
because 2001 exists
>>71391920
>still believing this debunked meme
your good at remembering opinions aren't you?
>>71391745
>>71391849
He said this about TDKR, regarding the amount of extras brought in for the movie.
“This is the biggest one I've done. The biggest one anyone's done since the silent era, in technical terms ... It's not what you're used to seeing. I don't know when someone last did a film with 11,000 extras in a real environment. It is an escalation."
It sounds much less repulsive in context.
>>71391849
he has a point tbfth
>>71385299
>most smartest
>>71391920
>still comparing these films jutst because they share some visual similarities, and almost no thematic links
2001 is a much bigger film philosophically, but 2014 is stronger entertainment
>>71387730
>You can't posit a scientific 'what if' story and round it off with THE POWER OF LOVE CONQUERS ALL horseshit.
Why are so many of the people who criticize this movie so dumb? The whole POWER OF LOVE thing was just a vague idea that Cooper mentioned, the movie wasn't arguing that the "power of love" was some kind of literal physical force.
>>71385299
Alright /pol/ tell me how its all Jewish liberal propaganda?
Oh oops wrong board, hard to tell sometimes.
>>71392189
because of the amount of kissless virgins here probably
>>71385754
You are retarded.
Time was basically stopped for Cooper there so he had all the time he wanted to do his thing. It would have been excruciatingly tedious to transfer all that shit through morse but after all the survival of humanity depended on it so.
>>71385754
what "Dr. Romily's data" are you talking about? Romily spent that 20+ years studying the black hole from his ship but he admitted he wasnt able to find anything useful.
The one Cooper sent to Murph is TARS own quantum data formula of the singularity. TARS wrote the formula since it was inside the black hole/singularity, TARS was able to study it closely. And nowhere it said that it has decades worth of data, TARS even probably simplified it to a more compact formula.
>>71392313
>>71385502
kek but this has nothing to do with the actual plot anyways
I put on interstellar last night to lull me to sleep. it's a very comfy film. I like it quite a lot. it has a good, simple message. feel bad for the poor nerds who expected hard sci-fi from Christopher Nolan. it's a good love/family story.
>>71392459
>Time was basically stopped for Cooper there so he had all the time he wanted to do his thing
how did he survive for decades then? didn't eat did he but yet still functioned. Are we to assume "they" inserted nutrients in the air (aswell as oxygen obviously)
>>71391118
Yeah well Malick also sucks so...
>>71393848
because time was stopped you utter spastic. didnt you ever see bernards watch? if not i suggest you do as its good starter level for understanding time travel.
>>71393923
so cooper just felt fine regardless of burning energy all because time had stopped? and you call me an utter spastic? lmao
>>71391408
He actually said that Interstellar was gonna completely change the very experience of a movie consumer itself. The pretention of this guy is not even a question.
You guys can argue all you want on his esthetics, that's fine...but just the way he talks about himself and his movies, don't tell me that this is a humble guy.
>>71392052
>It's a big movie. With lots of extras. Praise me, poor faggots!
>>71393774
I can understand that point of view.
But when i hear people tell me, "this is the best film i've ever seen" or "Kubrick tier" or "It's so accurate scientifically", i want to vomit.
>superpowerful future humans that trascended into other dimensions
>they can control gravity and time, punching holes into the universe and creating pocket dimensions is easy for them
>but the only way for them to warn us, is by taking some faggot and have him send messages in morse code to his daughter by remotely moving crap on a bookshelf
>''''''''''''''smart''''''''''''''
Seriously? At that level of power displayed in the movie, those future humans could write messages in the sky with stars.
But hey, Catwoman made a retarded speech about love being like gravity and shit, woooo!
>>71394000
>and you call me an utter spastic?
despite your trips yes.
TIME HAS STOPPED. NO NEED TO MUNCH.
>>71394189
well it is the 1st science movie to use real science
>>71394189
do you prefer martian?
people around me do and it makes me sad
interstellar isn't perfect but it's better isn't it?
pls give me hope anon
>>71394496
kek you guys are really hilarious.
>>71393923
>>71394000
>>71393848
time doesnt stop. Cooper was in the higher dimensional realm, there is no time there. Time becomes space for him. He can go anywhere in time, in this case the fifth dimensional beings made Murphs room the time landscape. And with love, Cooper can understand why the bulk beings put him there and what to do.
>>71394624
name another
>>71394620
I didn't really like Martian either. It's the same bullshit supposedly sci-fi movie that turns out to be just about a character that happens to be in space.
It could have been a rescue movie of him lost in Africa with no means of going back home for whatever reason, and it would have been the same movie.
>>71394620
Quite frankly I'd put them on the same level
>>71394496
Are you serious pal?
>>71394624
>>71394765
>who is Kip Thorne
seriously go educate yourselves if possible
>>71394796
you go first, pal.
>>71394796
>well it is the 1st science movie to use real science
Kip Thorne does not make this statement any less retarded
>>71394716
>>71394733
I wouldn't go so far as to say they're on-par but rather that Interstellar was a better watch in the sensory department, and at least qualifies as sci-fi by addressing social responsibility, whereas as you say The Martian could have been set anywhere else.
>>71394867
>>71394822
http://screenrant.com/interstellar-movie-science-neil-degrasse-tyson/
>>71385299
ITT: We discover that a bunch of faggots fell for /tv/ memes and actually think Interstellar was good.
>>71395059
Yeah, thanks. I'm well aware that they consulted scientists in making the film. That being said I wouldn't take le black science man as a voice of authority. Regardless
>well it is the 1st science movie to use real science
None of that makes this statement any less retarded
>>71394189
i agree. the comparisons to Kubrick and 2001 were floating around before the damn thing was even in production and I guess people actually believed that.
any fan of Kubrick who has seen a Nolan film knew that it was a preposterous claim. nonetheless, interstellar was a great, comfy film (for what it was).
