has Hollywood ever filmed only using Go Pro's?
the barrel scene from the hobbit
>>71286531
Not hollywood but i did see a feature film shot on go pros at one of the film festivals I attended. It was about two LA cops I think. It was really good and made sense to use gopros.
Can't remember the name though
Do you mean an all-POV movie? If so, yes. Lady in the Lake. Grace: the Possession. Harcore Henry.
If you mean an actual Go Pro. No. Even found footage movies are done with better ewuipment than a shitty camcorder, so a Go Pro movie would never get financed. It belongs on youtube.
its a fucking fish eye lens it would look terrible
>>71286562
I was thinking that
what the fuck was jackson thinking?
>>71286531
The apostrophe is not used for pluralization.
>>71287056
Actually, it can, in some special cases, be used that way in some countries' version of the English language.
>>71286657
Are we getting a sequel to HH? It was great IMO. Cult classic tier
>>71287200
lol
you're a funny guy
>>71286657
Hardcore henry only used gopros.
How does it feel to be so wrong?
>>71287222
Pure Russian kino senpai
Not even kidding
>>71287241
Doesn't count.
>>71287314
Here, let me help you move them goal posts a bit more.
Watched Hardcore Henry last night. Shit was fun.
>>71286678
If you think that's bad, watch the deleted scenes where he inserted himself into the movie in Lake Town
It's even worse than the movie already was
>>71287497
oops I meant to quote >>71286771
>>71287167
WRONG. But please continue, Comma Bandit.
>>71286657
Tangerine got financing
>>71289163
Yeah, but it was shot entirely on an iPhone with an attached lens, not. GoPro.