Don't mind me, just the best Harry Potter movie coming through
>>71257423
implying all of them aren't 6/10 mediocre shit movies
>>71257423
Really makes you think...huh.
>>71257515
>6/10
wayto high since they're more like 3-5/10s
also where did del taco go so wrong? hes the worst of the ""three amigos"" and i hate that hack fraud inarritu
>>71257423
This was the best book but I'm not sure about best movie. They all had some cut content in them.
>>71257423
and no one disagrees
Are you seriously telling me that the best Harry Potter film is the one claiming: THIS is a werewolf?
This ridiculous skeleton is supposed to be a motherfucking werewolf?
>>71258575
>not understanding artistic mexican vision
Hello pleb!!
Not even memeing I hardly remember anything about the movie series. I devoured the books as a kid but the films were always just meh for me
>>71257515
go back to watching spring breakers
>>71258533
>>71258575
He was supposed to be old, tired and emaciated. This was supposed to be a man with a terrible disease.
The most dangerous and badass supernatural creature! And we get this.
>>71257571
Says the butthurt fellow who will never direct a film
>>71258533
>>71258575
>>71258642
are you guys genuinely retarded?
>>71257746
This is how I feel too, I liked that the villain was someone close to his parents who betrayed them rather than the same big bad. The movie neutered a lot of the wrath that Harry felt about Sirius. I liked film Lupin though
I think Chamber of Secrets is my favourite movie. Sewer snake on the loose, giant spider, mudbloods being offed with the school turning against Harry, and they still fucking wore school robes
>>71258632
you should rewatch them because theyre better on rewatches
>>71258642
>15kb
>>71258632
They're all really bad save for 3
Don't bother no matter how memeish the samereder tells you
>>71258694
Stop being a retard they wear their robes a ton in 3 4 5 and 6.
>>71258733
Epic
>>71258733
Mom im shitting up the potter threads again!
3 > 7 > 6 > 5 > 2 > 8 > 1 > 4
>>71258779
http://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/text/Dcucks/filename/image/
>and he has the gall to say mobile posters aren't shit posters on /q/ 2.0
yikes
>>71257423
>rowling shills don't even pretend to be anything but marketers anymore
>>71258739
I thought they didn't wear robes at all in three?
>>71258835
>he's an archive ""detective""
>>71258671
The Revenant is simply the representation of the artistic bankruptcy plaguing the contemporary film industry.
Like Birdman, Inarritu's last endeavor in hackery, this latest attempt is to convince the masses that what they are viewing is something deep or meaningful, when all it has done is push forward shallow technicality and exaggeration to make the frame pulsate with vulgar loudness. Characters are mere veneers, the cinematography is pretty but so conspicuous as to be rendered aggravating and the thesis is about as overdone as DiCaprio's acting. The camera feels like it has been waiting all day for a climactic shot and the film's deliberately difficult production history is laid bare in the indulgent cinematography.
Thematic complexity and philosophical subtext take a back seat to what amounts to as basically an action movie with action stars wrapped up in the veil of arthouse. And much like Salome, what lies beneath is ultimately puerile, obscene and holding fascination only for adolescents.
Inarritu is guilty of something far greater than simply making a bad movie. He is guilty for the crime of gestating his pretense and self-importance, forcing many others to labor over it in a misguided attempt to create art and daring to call the afterbirth a film. Perhaps instead of taking his cast and crew to the ends of the Earth in search of a better shot, the Mexican counterfeit filmmaker should have taken his juvenile and crass sensibilities to the seedy San Fernando valley. There he could have at least made a profit of filming all the money shots he wanted.
>>71258779
>80%
>91%
>88%
>96%
I always thought the Harry Potter films were on par with the films of Jean-Luc Godard. This proves it.
>>71258835
>hes constantly policing the board
thats more yikes
Someone must have gotten some concept art mixed up and took a Ghoul for what should have been a Werewolf.
>>71258840
no they wear them a lot they dont wear in the deathly hallows
>>71258952
Holy fucking shit this is accurate as fuck, which critic wrote this?
Based.
>>71258952
>>71259011
it's pasta, so it's an invalid opinion.
>>71258952
whats with this post? why are you posting about innaritu in this thread? what are you thinking. i dont like him either or the revenant
>>71258896
>hes a console war capeshit meme poster
>>71258971
>letting plebs run around freely on an art board
yikes
>>71259038
No it's correct. Innaritu is a shitty director who makes shallow prenteious films designed to look like they have substance and arthouse.
>>71258963
>>71258963
as usual they overrated dh2 and vastly underrated the kino that is dh1
>>71258982
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgyP5IssJHY
How has such a unanimously agreed upon opinion turned into such a terrible thread?
>>71259011
The old guard of patrician /tv/
>>71259140
trouble trouble
>>71259150
whoever wrote it should be a critic. I thought it was Armond who wrote that.
>>71259074
yes but he was talking about innaritu and del taco.....why exactly? to prove cuaron is better? he didnt need to
>>71259205
Maybe he got innaritu confused with Cuaron, I often do. Spics look like spics.
>>71259140
Because he brings out the worst in people. Thats how much of a fraud he is
>>71259047
Making it worse by responding to randoms and throwing out buzzwords
>>71259140
letterboxd children and their "patrician" opinions on how Harry Potter is somehow bad despite having no knowledge of filmmaking.
>>71259140
I'm sorry, I just have a vision of what a werewolf should look like and even after 12 years I'm still disappointed about that piece of shit.
>>71259233
I dont think he could confuse the directing though, since his post is accurate
>>71259173
You should have been here for Biutiful. Even the "plebs" knew what a mongrel he was.
>>71259299
Probably this. I've seen some really good reviews of Cuarons and Yates on letterboxd before though, some people actually get them and theres some good stuff written
>>71259285
it can't get any worse than it already is. trying the other way doesn't work anymore now that this board moves s quickly.
>>71259431
maybe you should leave.
that would help.
>>71259431
Yea but youre calling out people
for example
>>71259047
>>71258896
this anon as a capeshit meme poster when whether he is or not isnt contributing to the conversation
>>71259314
>>71259521
lewd
>>71259299
>>71259368
I'm surprised that more people don't realize how letterboxd kiddies and their contrarian opinions are ruining this board. Not the site itself, but the people that use the generals are tryhard cancer and they're really easy to spot because they throw their opinion on others and expect it to be respected and obeyed as if it's law.
how large is the wizard community?
>>71259466
next month my friend. hiro confirmed /film/ is still coming and with /lit/+/mu/s backing its going to be great.
>>71259488
and? if you do not shame mobile posters they will never learn. just look at the frog posters
>>71259562
Yea I used letterboxd for a minute but then I became just as annoyed with it
>>71259609
the potterkino will follow see you on film for some quality discussion.
>>71257423
D R O P P E D
>>71259609
>shaming mobile posters
top kek, you people are seen as autistic /qa/ posters.
Your "shaming" just makes everyone else laugh at your autism.
>>71259609
>/film/
lmao
this is how it would go down: most users will be people in their late teens, insecure morons who seriously believe they can be "patricians". people who build their weak self-esteems around their supposed superior taste in film.
of course they don't know how to argue that, because it's a retarded notion and it can't be even argued, so they will instead shit on the tastes and opinions of the rest to validate themselves. they're unaware of how ridiculous they are.
any board where the majority unironically believes in the pleb vs patrician false dichotomy (/mu/, /a/, /lit/) is shit. /tv/ isn't like that, and that's why /tv/ is great, despite the ever growing /v/ cancer.
>>71259686
>kino
see what I mean? another thing caused by letting these memester run freely.
>>71259720
the films are actually all really low on the jewish scale on jdar...and even then jdar lists alan rickman as a jew and hes not. i think considering the main character is jewish having 11-20% jewish films isnt bad. lotr has an average of 24
>>71257515
fpbp
>>71259768
You cant kill an idea. You cant kill kino either, its a movement.
>>71259756
>/tv/ isn't like that
You just know this guy started browsing /tv/ after he heard about bane in 2014 or even worse he is straight out of the game of thrones/dr who generals.
And the fact that he adds "despite the ever growing /v/ cancer" to pretend he isn't part of the problem is adorable.
>>71259562
heres one of those tryhard dumbshits you were talking about>>71259811
>>71259720
>>71259785
>>71257423
D R O P P E D
>>71259874
look up the numbers on jdar and then realize they should be lower because rickman actually isnt jewish
>>71259832
the "kino" movement is already dead because of you cross posters from /v/, /sp/, /int/, the list could go on. you made sure of that when you spammed that batman and superman was kino.
>>71257423
>never explained the Marauders
>jarringly weird humor throughout
>nobody ever wears their goddamn robes, when they do it's shabby and half-assed
>pompous wizard obsessed with pure blood dressed as a Muggle in the Wizarding town of Hogsmeade
>no heartwarming-in-hindsight Grim in the Quidditch Stands scene, just a cloud dog
>no Malfoy & Co. getting pwned when they masquerade as Dementors
>Firebolt stuck at the ending, no tearing it apart to check for jinxes, rift between Ron and Hermione is minimalized
>Werewolf!Lupin looks stupid, should look like a proper wolf with a shorter snout
>idiotic freeze frame ending
>still no Peeves
And let's not forget the problem with the books
>No You-Know-Who, just a fucking rat
>>71258779
>philosophers stone 80%
>hallows part 2 96%
errr wtf???
>>71257423
That's not Goblet of Fire.
>>71259917
No that was the meme going out of control as everyone should have foreseen. I'm not from those boards
>>71259955
my nigga
>>71259562
>the people that use the generals are tryhard cancer
Explain in detail. The first three profiles in the thread up right now are literally just IMDB posters on letterbox. Is it because they have more interest in movies than you or that the site doesn't include television shows?
>>71259955
>>71259985
Worst one get some respective taste, literally try to think while you watch
>>71259935
PS as good as it is, still is directed by Columbus. And is one of the worst films, if you know what youre talking about. I like Chamber more though.
DH2 is overrated? OOTp and DH1 underrated
>>71259955
Okay seriously, why was everyone's hair long in that movie?
I know Harry's hair was always magically shaggy but that was ridiculous.
And then it overcompensated by his hair being absurdly short in OotP. The '00s were truly the worst decade.
>>71260057
The director of 4 was the one over compensating he was a maniac
>>71260057
>00s worst decade
ummmmmmm anon those were the good ole times. this is worst decade
>>71259989
found one.
>more interest in movies than you
kek, nice superiority complex.
see what I mean?
>>71260005
Opinions man, this isn't Reddit, there is no consensus.
>>71260057
Because that was "in" at the time in bongistan and north america you underage.
>>71260057
>>71260129
it's also a nice way to tell them apart from movie to movie.
see a still and quickly know what film it's from.
>>71260057
I preferred them with longer hair because I remember it being like that in the book. desu I couldn't watch the 5th movie because of their short hair
>>71260127
There is a big consensus that the director fucked up the tone but because it kept throughout masks it and directed terribly. theres no debate cuarom and yates are better and their entries are better
I even like it and enjoy it but compares to the others it has little substance, plus they fucked up it has the best material thats why you like it
>>71260127
I'm still waiting for you to explain.
>http://letterboxd.com/Synt/
This is the next profile posted and it could be considered "try hard" but all of his favorites and RECENT ACTIVITY has been discussed here before those generals even showed up.
>>71260179
it goes along with the mood
>>71260180
4 is my personal favorite but I wouldn't call it the best. I love Voldemorts return and awkward adolescences.
3rd is the best.
None of them are them are downright bad. I'm happy we live in a world where we can even have this debate because they are all good in their own way.
Yates and the Mexican are better for sure.
>>71260290
Nice, agreed they are all liked and rightly so, I enjoyed the climax and even didnt have a problem with the shining maze task it fit the film well, even though consider it a terrible adaptation.
I thought the awkwardness was well dome in HBP too.
>>71260208
Why would I bothing reading some random faggot's opinions?
I don't care, I'd rather watch movies.
>>71260360
>>71260290
to add
>they are all good in their own way
I like how each one has an unique feel
>>71260404
>people that use the generals are tryhard cancer
You tell me.
Being the best in one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Wow really impressive! Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but itüfs certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books are good though
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Heres some eyewash
>>71260434
I love that the tone changes along with their age.
The childhood innocence (1, 2) to awkward teen years (3, 4, 5) to the mature young adult years (6, 7).
>>71260545
I think they did a very good job melding it with the films
>>71257423
the new Dumbledore was better imo
>>71260510
hory fuck, emma has no lips whatsoever
>>71260472
>Shitting on Hamlet, Brave New World, Catch 22, and Alice in Wonderland
>Thinking we should take him seriously
Anyway, yes Rowling writes in cliches. She also has a prose style that's, you know, very readable.
>>71260510
Fucking terrible. Why does Marcus have such terrible taste?
>>71260665
yea she does watch the movies anon. i cant find the best gif of her licking them in azkaban
>>71260645
i agree
>>71261003
>Ralph Finnes as Voldemort
was it a perfect casting choice?
>>71257423
Well, it's the only one directed by a real director, so no wonder really.
>>71260290
>>71260545
The soundtracks are all really really good. I like the hallows the least but williams doyle and hooper all did really outstanding jobs
>>71257423
Emma looked the hottest in this one. When it was filmed she was like 12/13, right at that age of transition from preteen to teen.
>>71261159
see
>>71260290
Theres a reason they kept Yates. Hes a much better director than Nolan lol and hes actually going to outgross Nolan very soon. Cuaron actually expressed interest directing Deathly Hallows but they already had Yates.
>>71261302
Wrong because she literally looked the same just older in the later ones. She was the best in 3 4 5 6 7 10/10
>>71261338
>she looked the same
>just older
>???
So she looked worse. Thanks for playing, idiot.
>>71261387
Try using your eyes
>>71261389
Theres millions of pictures of her online. She looked very much the same in her face when she was older as she did to then.
>>71259562
t. embryo
>>71262310
ah yes, replying in memes.
