>>71230652
John c Reilly really knows how to pick em

>>71230652
How the hall is De Niro still so high?

>>71231003
Ridiculously strong early career.

>>71230652
>John C
Holy shit I had no idea

>>71230579
so are these only from metracritic?

Predator has a metacritic score of 36

>>71231457
Here are the metrics:

>Metacritic's methodology is pretty straightforward: It aggregates movie reviews from major newsoutlets, weights them based on a variety of factors (more on thathere), then gives them a composite score on a 0–100 scale (0 = terrible, 100 = resounding acclaim).

>This time we turned to Metacriticto determinethescores of actors and actresses based on the films they've been in. To limit our search to relatively well-known performers, we set a series of criteria:
>The actor/actress must have performedin at least 10 films (writing, directing, and producing credits were omitted).
>At least one of these films had to have grossed$30 million or moreat the box office, adjusted for inflation.
>At least one of these films had to be within thepast five years(we only wanted semi-active performers).

>A note toourcritics: This data isn't perfect or definitive. For one, our analysis is based onreviews of movie critics, whose opinions often differ greatly from the public's. The number of genuine reviews available for older films (pre-2000) is also somewhat limited on Metacritic.

http://www.vox.com/2016/4/11/11381206/worst-actors-hollywood