Holy shit they're going all out now
>The stars had some choice words for male Ghostbusters fans whining that the new flick is ruining their childhood. "[This] movie is not for them anyway," Jones said. "They need to probably go to therapy," Wiig added. McCarthy's feeling on the handwringing misogynists is this: "I think their childhood was pretty much ruined already. If this broke it, it was pretty fragile to begin with... Normal, healthy people don’t stand outside, saying, 'You’re ruining my childhood!'"
http://www.refinery29.com/2016/06/114718/ghostbusters-all-female-cast-sexist-backlash
>>71163855
what newspaper is this from???
oh just a random blog.
super cool story broil.
>>71163855
Literally in the quote you posted it's saying that the ones whining it ruins their childhood are the ones who should go to therapy.
Before anyone bitches, it was Wiig that said we need therapy, my mistake. McCarthy just said we're "not normal and unhealthy"
WE NEVER CARED ABOUT THE ORIGINAL GHOSTBUSTERS BEFORE THIS STOP BEING A FUCKING POSER.
>>71163855
all bullshit aside, does anyone else not see how fucking insane it is to actually try and shame an audience into seeing a movie?
I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S A RACE THING OR A LADY THING, BUT I'M MAD AS HELL AT YOU WHITE BOYS
They're starting to get desperate.
>>71163902
Quotes pulled from the New York Times interview. It says so in like the first sentence retard
>bullying people into buying media
This is exactly where I wanted society to go. I'm supporting the flick for this.
did they appear on ellen yet?
>>71163962
about what?
you not seeing their movie?
>>71163930
... unless you were born in the 80s.
man when I was a kid EVERY FUCKING KID LOVED GHOST BUSTER
Best toys, shitty cartoon, ectoplasm drink, slimer horn.
you have NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT
but it's funny so continue. tell me more about how terrible the ghostbuster movie was.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPoILjs6BYI
seriously check this out, it's reason beyond the childhood love, and discusses why the movie is actually really against the tropes.
>>71163942
>I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S A RACE THING OR A LADY THING,
sidenote: it was a race thing
>>71164002
For what possible reason would I?
>>71163855
>They need to probably go to therapy
I agree the whole "ruined my childhood" thing is always stupid. But she's stupid for disregarding the fact that there were plenty of Ghostbuster fans waiting for a 3rd Ghostbusters movie starring the original cast members since 1989, and the only thing they're getting is a cynical cash grab with a gimmick slapped on and they're angry about it.
I'd say they're acting in a completely normal and natural manner compared to these nimrods advertising the movie.
>>71163942
UGH I fucking hate this nigger bitch
I dont like it because it looks like shit and is unfunny, leslie jones is a disgusting looking gorilla beast and melissa mccarthy is a disgusting unfunny slob
>jews promoting a male/female war
For what purpose?
>Wiig is my waifu
well this is soul crushing
:(
>>71164156
To further encourage diminishing birth rates among whites.
>>71164060
it was actually a weight thing, Melissa's like 5 feet tall and leslie is 6'1 and 300+, who the fuck was gonna catch her?
A better joke would have been pointing out the danger of letting the proton pack take a shock like that.
"See this thing on my back? REAL volatile. Maybe next time, catch a sista if you don't want another 3 mile island up yo ass."
i was under the impression that this movie just had a cheesy and utterly retarded script and covered it up with casting all women and playing the internet misogyny hate machine card. but i guess im just a psychopath white male who hates women, shame im not an actor too, i could be a guard on orange is the new black too.
>>71163942
DUDE IM BLACK AND ANGRY LMAO
>>71163942
its both
being black and being a woman are bad enough by themselves but being both is just shit luck
My sides
>>71164217
>Tfw random anons on /tv/ can produce better comedic writing than this movie will bring to the table.
>>71164217
I assume this line by a random anon is better than anything in the movie
>>71164229
>psychopath white male who hates women
you probably are, /pol9v/
>>71163962
Oh they have been desperate.
I don't like Paul frogs work. The director, a man.
Am I still a sexist, who needs therapy?
>>71163855
>If you don't want to see the new Ghostbusters you "Need therapy" according to Melissa McCarthy
That's not even remotely what she said. Great projection though.
>all these buttmad fa/tv/irgins who are too weak willed to drink the kool aid
My need for therapy is separate for why I think this movie sucks.
Also, isn't this a micro aggression against those people suffering mental illness who need therapy?
Aren't a majority of people having therapy over various issues?
Why is she demonizing people who need therapy?
>OP making bigger clickbait than the actual article
The article is saying that anyone saying "their childhood is ruined" needs to go to therapy.
>>71164447
Who cares. When in history has a cast and crew of a film acted like this? Never. They're being insane.
>>71164411
>too weak willed to drink the kool aid
That's...not how it works.
>>71163930
>lol nobody cares about one of the most popular film franchises in history
Sony shill pls
Please let it fail, it wont though will it
>>71163855
>new ghost busters movie isn't for ghostbusters fan
okay
>>71164411
>too weak willed to drink the kool aid
>>71164447
People who use hyperbole need to go to therapy?
>>71164638
That pic is making me lel (loving every laugh)
>>71164546
>>71164638
If you think your integrity is more important than being accepted into culture and society, you're pathetic.
>>71163930
>we
don't count me in your fag brigade
I've loved ghostbusters since I was a kid.
>>71163930
>>71164716
but only autistic faggots and social outcast want to see this piece of shit
>>71163965
>citation form respectable newspaper
>makes internet blog on par with "THE NEW YORK TIMES"
>>71164716
It's a good thing not everyone thinks like you do, anon, or today's culture and society wouldn't exist.
>>71163942
>Leslie Jones is 48 years old
>>71164716
>Choosing not to see a shitty summer flick means not being accepted into culture and society.
Kek.
Now, i realize that this might not be a popular opinion on /tv/, but i'm all for gender equality, but this movie also makes me vomit.
Pushing for gender equality is one thing, but this, this is feminism for the sake of feminism, and that shit is too much.
>>71163855
The only people who need therapy are the ones allowing unfunny people to be called comedians.
If even one of these women could get me to laugh I might go, but that's not happening.
You have to hand it to Sony's marketing team. If you pay to see it, it's prime virtue signalling, if you don't pay to see it, you're a manchild with issues.
>>71164945
>>Leslie Jones is 48 years old
shes also childless and not married
>>71164961
Gender equality is a fucking meme and only retards buy into it.you're retarded.
>>71165032
and if that is surprising to you, time to an hero
>>71164716
Here's a beta male who doesn't value integrity.
You probably also considers honour, respect and camaraderie to be outdated.
Basically, you'd be a worthless friend.
>>71163855
Meh, I just hate it because it looks like shit and their PR is fucking terrible with trying to guilt trip people into watching it.
>>71165211
>You probably also considers honour, respect and camaraderie to be outdated.
My profit > all.
>>71164961
Men and women in the West already have equal rights.
Physiologically and even mentally-speaking, the genders will never be equal--and I don't mean that one is inferior and the other superior, just that they're innately different. We're a sexually dimorphic species, that's just how it works. I mean, I'm sure eventually that could be changed via chemical cocktails, genetic engineering or what-have-you, but at that point we probably wouldn't really be "human" anymore.
>>71165249
You're so edgy. You will surely have a happy, fulfilling life.
>>71165249
Oh shit, anon is a objectivist!
>>71165341
I don't actually believe in it, but I'll probably live that life if everything continues to be so fucking awful.
>Did you hold auditions?
>FEIG I didn’t audition anybody. I met with you guys separately, for drinks.
Jesus Christ this whole thing is so orchestrated
If this movie was all men I'd still not want to see it. It's not because they're woman it's because they're making a shitty remake of one of my favorite things.
I guess at this point there's no sense in holding back, they've already proven there isn't an angle that's too low for them.
How the fuck did movies become this important?
>>71165332
Rights, yeah, but culture is still heavily swayed towards the male side.
But seriously, doing stuff like "all-female ghostbusters/ocean's 11/expendables" or whatever is bullshit. You know what would be actually progressive? Mixed teams. Two women and two men in Ghostbuster seeing each other as peers, without any kind of "lol girl be weak" jokes or "I'll prove I can be as good as a man" themes peppered in the script. Have them work together, smooth out differences based on PERSONALITY or skills, as opposed to gender. That's how you do feminism, not by rule 63'ing shit from the 80s.
>>71163855
You know what's the worst part about this? That the MUH CHILDHOOD retards are a small minority but sjws are acting like they are anyone who disagrees with this movie and they are never gonna stop clinging to that.
>>71165583
We're on the internet which for decades now has been a place for people to trade porn and bitch about movies
>>71165379
Sucks that your life sucks, that it do,
but that don't mean you should go around spreading poo.
>>71165625
That doesn't make controversy. Studios need controversy for money, ACTUAL good equality promotion doesn't cause controversy, so it doesn't make money.
>>71165637
They know the movie is shit and they're just blowing shit out of proportion hoping that it will make the film seem controversial so people will see it.
>>71165625
Girls being weak isn't a joke, it's a scientific fact.
they got time for ANYONE that will throw a little matinee cash at them
at first i was ignoring this film, now im definitely not going to see it and going to actively recommend others to do the same
>>71165668
name one movie that made money in theaters for being controversially bad? and let's be clear now, this movie isn't the room level bad, it's just mediocre which is even less of a reason for people to see it.
>>71163855
Goddamn this movie cannot come out fast enough, be an utter failure, and immediately forgotten except a few people who will always remember it as the ultimate woman's movie that everyone hated because they're a bunch of misogynistic manchildren.
>>71165625
>You know what would be actually progressive? Mixed teams
bible belters are still going to beat their wives even if you put a gun to their heads, and thus full progressiveness is never going to actually happen
Sony is very very desperate at the moment and it's making EVERYONE look bad in the process. Sony is the problem here, they know the film is going to be a disaster, and they've known it from the time they had the cast do that terrible PR stunt with sick children in the hospital. Marvel didn't have Chris Pratt and the cast of the Guardians of the Galaxy show up for sick kids before the movie was established as a popular blockbuster hit, no one would want or ask for that shit otherwise. There is no logic or class in that.
And going forward, there were no test screenings, not even for that first trailer, which people were questioning anyway why Sony was waiting so long to release a trailer in the first place.We all know what happened after that
Once the film is released and it fails, and it will fail, the cast and crew will turn their backs on Sony and come back to the fans, or even non-fans in this case. Sony will still play their childish games and continue to be the laughing stock of the whole industry.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
>>71165832
>Sony is very very desperate at the moment
They would've flopped out of the movie industry if retarded kids didn't make Angry Birds a hit.
>>71165868
I'VE WARNED YOU BEFORE, STOP POSTING THIS!
>>71164093
>cynical cash grab with a gimmick slapped on and they're angry about it.
This. It's like the gamergate bullshit again. There's legit reason to be upset about the state of gaming journalism. People dump a lot of money into that shit and there should be ethical standards, but to shut down any legitimate conversation, sexism gets thrown up pulling crazies from both sides in which drowns out all of the legitimate criticism.
If they'd thought for even a moment about what made the original popular and tried to capture some of that instead of taking the tack of "GENDERSWAP JUST BECAUSE IN YOUR FACE HATERS" (like Thor did) this would be a nonissue.
The problem is everything about this movie appears to be a shitty movie. Everything. Casting 4 females is an extremely minor complaint (if it's a complaint at all).
This movie will probably suck but people said the same thing with Spy
>>71163942
>NIGGA I'M WEARING A NUKE ON MY BACK! YOU BETTER CATCH A NIGGA WITH A NUKE ON THEIR BACK!
>>71163855
i think if you actually pay money to see something with Melissa McCarthy in it you need therapy
>>71165649
>bitch about movies
That line should of been "bitch about everything".
>>71165917
But Spy did suck.
>>71165962
It was really funny to me.
>>71165952
Just for your fyi it's 'should have'
>>71165625
Open your eyes dipshit.
Its not about equality, its about dividing people as much as possible and keeping the masses squabbling over bullshit so they dont turn on the elite that are using them as slaves.
>>71166002
Go to bed.
>>71163855
>Normal, healthy people don’t stand outside, saying, 'You’re ruining my childhood!'"
You know there is a depressing amount of people for whom there is just one bright spot in their childhood. More than a handful would likely have ghostbusters be that bright spot. You're literally being proud of destroying the one good thing from these people's pathetic lives.
>>71166013
You're right. My grammar sucks, as usual. I'll at least thank you for not being a jerk about it.
>>71166054
>from these people's pathetic lives.
>"""""""""""""people"""""""""""""""
>>71163855
>Tfw legitimately only liked small parts of the first Ghostbusters
>Didn't like the second movie
>Didn't like any of the EU shit
>Think the movie looks like shit because of the "gotta-one-up-each-other!" catty feminist cast and cringe worthy "jokes"
Feminists can go suck a dick.
>>71166070
just go "shoulda" for both unless you're writing for a grade or something for work (basically a more formal purpose). Grammar nazi's tend to ignore purposefully slang terms
>>71166054
That's right. I was one of them. All I had as a child was my love of Ghostbusters and my dream to one day getting paid to be to be fat, stupid and fall down but Melissa McCarthy has taken both of those things away from me.
Wtf? I HATE white male culture now
Finna try watch Ghostbuster 2016
>>71163926
fair assessment
>LET'S PLAY THE PRICE IS RIGHT
20 MILLION OPENING WEEKEND DREW!
>>71164411
What's with these SJWs and feminists and their obsession with the cool-aid shit? All I ever see them do is reply to any argument with "OH BOY, SOMEBODY BETTER DRINK THE COOL AID!" or telling someone to kill themselves (because it isn't a death threat if you tell them to do it to themselves! :3).
Do you people actually consider yourselves intelligent and rational people, or have you just given up and pull these shitty quips from some social justice hand guide? Jesus christ, even brony faggots can hold a better debate than you fucks.
>>71166262
The bad thing is it's going to do good but not great. So it's going to be rubbed in our faces that girl power won even though it really didn't.
Time to buy a gun.
>>71164716
culture and society doesn't even know this movie is a thing
>>71164094
I once watched her first or second standup
>constantly complaining about being ugly
>jokes are shit and she knows it
>using strong agressive black female trope
>begins sweating profusely
>you can see the spaghetti spilling out of her pockets
>targets most attractive young nigress in the crowd
>spends 10 minutes berating her for being attractive, slim, and young
>goes back to berating her own gorilla biscuit face.
>crowd was understandably silent the whole time.
>no laughter, not even a cough
She's garbage. And let's not even talk about her being on SNL.
>>71165625
>Rights, yeah, but culture is still heavily swayed towards the male side.
Not at all, it just zigzags between either side depending on the issue. Get falsely accused for sexual assault, call out feminist for lying on social media or even try and physically defend yourself while being violently attacked by a woman, and that's just a few ways you'll see how much culture can sway against men.
>>71164013
Who the fuck can listen to Bob Chipman talking for 37 minutes? He sounds like he has autism
>>71164217
Already better than the movie
>>71166151
>CHAOSH
>>71166167
Nazis*
Come on brah
Desperate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIDnN34ZZaE&feature=youtu.be&t=4m21s
>>71165904
>Casting 4 females is an extremely minor complaint (if it's a complaint at all).
I'd like to complain that they got four very unfunny woman from the dregs of snl to cast this movie.
But that would be de facto sexist.
>>71163855
Reminder that if you have an Amex and you live near LA, it is your duty to crash the premiere.
I saw Ghostbusters for the very first time3 weeks agoand Ididn't really care for it that much.
But this new movie really looks like absolute shit regardless of any nostalgia factor one might have for the original.
I don't know. I'm a girl and I think the movie looks like shit. If I have to see that girl lick her photon pack blaster one more time, I'm going to slap someone's into the fifth dimension.
>>71166624
The problem with the casting isn't a problem with the casting, it's a problem with the characterization. There were four distinct, different characters in the original. At best, you have two different characters (straight man and zany humor played by three different people, arguably just four zany characters) THIS is the biggest problem (which did inform the casting, btw).
>>71166692
>Crash the premiere
With or without survivors?
>>71163926
The fat bitch wants to talk about being unhealthy?
>>71166726
It's one of those movies where you saw it as a kid and really enjoyed it or you didn't. It's like Jurassic Park in that regard.
>>71166813
But, same anon here, I saw Jurassic Park for the first timea year agoand I liked it a lot.I didn't see a lot of big movies as a kid and no I'm not underage
Now that all this PR pushing is happening does /tv/ think this movie will bomb or not?
>>71163855
Wiig was the only one I had respect forand the most attractive of the four
>>71163855
DUDE IF YOU DONT SEE OUR MOVIE YOURE A RACIST SEXIST BIGOT LMAO
>>71163930
I actually agree. I dont get Bill Murray's meme status either. He's great in a select few movies but overall pretty overrated
I first watched ghostbusters expecting a classic and I thought it was just ok
>>71163855
classic image.png
>>71163855
>Normal, healthy people don’t stand outside, saying, 'You’re ruining my childhood!'"
They seem to think it takes a lot of time to type "This sucks, fuck you." They're taking loads of time replying to it, but that's because they need the money. For us? Maybe a minute? Two?
>>71164156
a divided populous is easier to control
>>71163855
How would they respond to women who think it looks shit? My mother and sister both think it looks terrible and think these women are terribly unfunny
>>71166310
that's the general woman-scaler though. a man's good is a woman's great, like how a men's 9 is women's 10.5 (shoe sizes)
>>71163855
>Normal, healthy people don’t stand outside, saying, 'You’re ruining my childhood!'"
Well, she's not wrong.
>>71166950
I remember there being rumors posted here that during filming she got fed up with the direction the movie was going and just resigned herself to the fact that it would suck.
>>71163855
They literally just said ''This movies isn't for Ghostbusters fans.'' I get that Sony is playing up the sexism angle and knew it would happen from the moment the trailer first released, but this is taking it even further to alienate everyone who would actually pay to see this because of the name alone.
>>71167184
Probably something along the lines of your mom/sis being too conditioned/heavily influenced by the patriarchy to not appreciate this empowering masterpiece.
Nobody loved the original ghostbusters this much before the remake was announced. This has all gotten rather sad.
>>71167223
I'd imagine as an actor you have to just go with it when you get stuck in a piece of shit movie. If you come out criticizing the film the entertainment media will run with it and no one will want to work with you.
>>71167250
>"Let's alienate half of the world's population by acting like all men are butt-hurt crybabies. That should help sell tickets!"
What was Sony thinking?
>>71167250
>the moment the trailer first released
How'd you not know that from the moment they made a HUGE deal about casting 4 women?
>>71167326
Sure, but most people just shrug it off knowing that it's bad.
I think they're sexiste for saying no women hates this
>>71164411
I remember making kool aid without sugar. Shit was horrid.
>>71164547
>franchise
>two movies
Pls
>>71167439
>I think movies are all there is to a franchise
>I also show I was born after 1995 because I don't know just how widespread GB was
>>71165032
Oh, there's a big surprise! ... I think I'm gonna have a heart attack and die from that surprise!
>>71167439
>multiple tv shows
>a fuck ton of merchandise
>kids dressing up as Ghostbusters for Halloween well into the 90s.
>>71167531
>I also show I was born after 1995
>Underrated post.
Yeah man the original ghostbusters was like citizen kane to me. Gosh darn those sjw niggerloving something something jews.
>>71167531
Widespread =\= a few cartoon and a picture on your lunchbox, manchild.
What has Sigourney said about this shit? It'd be nice to hear from a non-meme 'strong womyn'
>>71167787
>underage
>>71167809
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/video-news/video-sigourney-weaver-on-new-ghostbusters-film-34782450.html
>>71167787
Yup, definitely born after the Saturday Morning/after school cartoon age.
>>71164411
>too weak willed to drink the kool aid
>>71167877
can't video right now, what's she saying?
the movie has a fart joke in it. the movie will fail on its own merits not because of actresses.
I fully believe this could have been a great movie but they wanted to make an edgy comedy instead of playing it seriously. its not based in real world people , they're cartoon characters.
and even the cartoon was better.
>>71165832
>blablablabla sony sony blablabla sony
get a life, loser
Sony does not know how to market at all anymore.
>>71167906
>Saturday Morning/after school cartoon age
literally the best time to have been a kid.
>>71164809
underrated OC
>>71165032
you say that as if it's something surprising
She thinks it'll be just what the fans want and the cast is "phenomenally talented"
>>71167940
She loves and thinks the women in it are phenomenal and that the movie is empowering by having women in it and thinks we should do it more often
Words directly from her but not all of it
>>71168023
She also has an obligatory "white single men aren't the only ones to pick up movies" yadda yadda yadda
Can't wait to hear what's said about it when it tanks
>>71167970
Yeah here's my upvote too.
What will be their excuse when this movie bombs at the box office?
>>71168074
you forgot your (you)
>>71168023
>>71168060
so basically the "company line" nonanswer answer?
>>71168106
pretty much
>>71168101
Are you serious? You're seeing it. Moreover, it's going to be used as an excuse to do this same thing to other franchises.
>>71168101
white men.
>>71168146
I'll be watching the bootleg maybe.
maybe.
>mfw there are people ITT that will literally pay to see this movie
>>71166793
>>71166793
They'll be expecting one of us in the wreckage, anon.
Walk into Bass Pro to buy some 9mm ammunition
Girl at checkout asks me if I saw the new Ghostbusters movie
Tell her I haven't seen it
Suddenly three security guards tackle me and throw me out of the store
Find out I'm now on the new no fly list and can never buy guns or ammo again.
>>71167906
>>71167869
Oh I'm sorry? What more did your precious franchise have other than that?
>>71168324
>>71168385
everything you can think of.
>>71168385
Ghostbusters de breakfast cereal, Ghostbusters, de sticker book, Ghostbusters de ceiling fan! The kids love this one.
>>71167439
Franchise is anything that's used to create several products of. In this case the sequel, videogames, tv shows and the gazillion toys.
>>71168514
Not an answer.
>taking their words out of context
They're right since they're talking about people who are absurdly obsessed with wanting this movie to fail instead of just ignoring it like most people would.
>>71168644
yes it is. not my fault you can't think for yourself.
>>71168644
your answer is right here >>71168566
>>71165249
>>71168667
Why does everyone on this board debate like a total retard now?
>>71168644
There is literally a wikipedia article about it
>>71168754
It's literally not a point of contention for anyone remotely familiar with actual facts that Ghostbusters was MASSIVE in the 80s and 90s.
>>71168700
dubs, replying to dubs, referring to dubs
>>71168644
kys
>>71168754
because there is no reason to debate things with people that should be completely obvious, even with a simple google search.
it isn't worth trying to convince you of shit since you're being extremely condescending from the onset.
I've never seen this tactic before, insulting your fans so they see your shitty movie.
>>71168754
>now
What will be their excuse when critics and audiences both hate the movie?
ITT; no one reads past OP's editorialized title
>>71168754
Trolls/shills
>>71164093
It's not the 'raping of my childhood' that gets to me. I'd be all butthurt about the new Ninja Turtles if that was all it was.
Am I furious about Hollywood putting out a remake to shameless cash-in on nostalgia? No. That's just their nature. It's like when a cougar mauls your pet or something; you're upset and probably want the wildcat put down, but you don't blame it for being a predator, or protest against it on social media.
No, what grinds my gears is that the entire movie is a socio-political vehicle. That's its sole purpose. Ghostbusters is just the poor bastard they murdered and skinned, because they needed a flesh suit.
Even then, they could have written these 4 women in as the daughters of the original cast taking over the business, and still kept all the girl power rah rah rah. That would have made it no more banal than anything else Tinseltown whores out.
But Social Justice Warriors ruin everything. They HAVE to ruin everything. That's THEIR nature. It wouldn't be enough to make Ghostbusters 3: Ghoul Power. No, they had to destroy the orignal male cast. The wholesale rewriting of history for the purposes of modern virtue signaling is a reoccurring theme for them. The cultural appropriation of male spaces and heroes, dare I say?
Alone, this wouldn't be worth getting bent out of shape about. In the broader cultural context though, it IS important. Even if you didn't like the film or merely enjoyed it for the popcorn entertainment of its time as I did.
>>71163855
Jesus, how fucking catty are these bitches. They will never work again after this flop and everyone realises they are vile human garbage.
>>71168972
no one would have cared about any of this if it looked like an actual good movie.
but you're right. they weren't caring about that. it was about agendas and they hired the only director that was willing to go along with it.
>>71168837
Here's the problem though: it gives licence for others to berate friends and family too. It would be another thing if there was union between the audience and they were all against the movie but no, a portion of them will virtue signal and shame those that care about them.
Sony can burn for their incompetence.
I've yet to see a reboot of any "classic" movie that can hold its own against the original it's based on, not fucking one.
This one will be no different and that's why I don't give a fuck about seeing it. Don't give a fuck that 4 bitches got cast in the main roles, that's not relevant. Don't care that Bill Murphy caved in for cash and left his principles on the curb either.
I care that Hollywood can't do anything new and creative and just keeps rehashing the same shit over and over again with reboots and remakes of stuff that was just fine the way it was and remains.
FUCK HOLLYWOOD YOU NO TALENT NO CREATIVITY COCKSMOKERS
>>71168972
Damn dude, it's a corny 80s movie. There is nothing sacred about it.
>>71169455
>I've yet to see a reboot of any "classic" movie that can hold its own against the original it's based on, not fucking one.
Remakes of classics:
Fistful of Dollars / started its own franchise
The Magnificent Seven
The Thing
The Fly
Scarface
Ocean's 11
True Grit
Reboots of franchises:
Burton's Batman, Nolan's Batman
>>71169637
do The Thing and The Fly count? it not like the original campy versions were masterpieces.
Where are the people defending the conan, robocop, ben hurr, total recall remakes? Why are people so intent on defending a shitty ghostbusters remake?
Oh, right. The marketing centered around virtue signalling.
>>71169637
>Fistful of Dollars / started its own franchise
>The Magnificent Seven
>The Thing
>The Fly
>Scarface
>Ocean's 11
>True Grit
Nope.
>Reboots of franchises:
>Burton's Batman, Nolan's Batman
I said movies, you idiot, and nope.
>>71169740
>Nope.
What do you mean nope? Get outta here
>>71164060
It was actually a species thing.
>>71163855
Stop shilling your clickbait here.
>>71169739
>Where are the people defending the conan, robocop, ben hurr, total recall remakes? Why are people so intent on defending a shitty ghostbusters remake?
>Oh, right. The marketing centered around virtue signalling.
That's what fucking kills me. Everyone but a select few decision makers knew beforehand that doing this franchise like this especially now that we are in a backlash against these reboots wouldn't work out for them and likely will be financially damaging, but they insist on continuing to do it.
>>71169843
>>71169637
The Magnificent Seven is no where near the quality of Seven Samurai
>>71169511
He literally just said that you idiot.
>>71168249
Make friends with someone who works at a movie theater and get in for free.
The only way to live your life.
>>71163855
this is beyond satire, the left became corporation's PR think tanks that work for free
>buy it or you're sexist
>buy it or you're fascistic
>buy it or you have mental problems of an authoritarian personality
Doesn't this get boring?
>>71163855
Is this what counts for marketing these days?
>>71170522
>friends
Aren't you late for football practice Chad?
>>71163855
Wow these bitches sound hateful.
And I was going to see this shit just out of curiosity. These people need to mellow the fuck out. People aren't misogynists just because they don't want to see a movie that genuinely looks like crap.
ADAM SANDLER: People don't want to watch my moopy mooby boobie movie? Have you considered making a star of david stamp on their hands that make people know they're not nazis when they're watch it orelse they're antisemites if they don't buy the stamp?
>>71164203
And the end game is?
>>71163942
So much time for haters that they wrote it into their movie before anybody even had time to be outraged.
>>71163855
I don't care that its an all female ghostbuster team. I won't be seeing it because it looks like crap, and they need to stop rehashing old shit and expecting us to fall for it based on nostalgia.
>>71166692
$500???? who is going to pay that much to see a shart of a reboot for 2 hours
>>71168947
Misogyny
>>71164013
>tfw I still have ecto cooler in my cupboard
citrus n shiet
>>71170749
Small cabals of Jews running western nations with a massive underclass of the millions of refugees the bring in as cheap labor
Classic Jewish tactic-many American slave-ships were jew-owned
>thinly veiled personal army request: the marketing campaign
>>71168947
There is no way critics won't give this at least a 7.5 average
>>71163926
Yes, yes that is all probably true
HOWEVER
>>71163855
>People still think it being an all-women Ghostbusters is the problem.
Did these people actually watch the trailers?
>>71163930
Totally agreed. I don't get Bill Murray. While we're at it, Alien 3 and Fargo (both the movie and the series) suck. I'm
>>71163855
honestly lets cut the bullshit everyone. the only reason were actually upset is because these chicks are all fat dikes. if it was 4 smokin hot chicks we'd be all for it.
>>71172045
>f it was 4 smokin hot chicks we'd be all for it.
Nope.
>>71163855
>YOU LOSERS
>WE ARE GHOSTBUSTERS WITH VAGINAS
>V A G I N A S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
YO GURLS YALL REAL GANGSTERED YO GANGSTA
>>71163942
YO MAN WATS A PARLAY SOME KINDA RAP WORD?
>>71164013
Bob, nobody wants to watch your videos. Stop.
>>71172045
>if it was 4 smokin hot chicks we'd be all for it
not for a second. how pathetic would a person have to be today to pay for a terrible movie just because it has hot actresses in the era of near limitless free internet porn?
>>71172371
I know what she's saying but I'm pissed that she doesn't know what she's saying.
>>71172868
My friend dragged me to see some terrible movie, (the girl next door or something) because the possibility that the girl will be topless in it.
>>71163855 (OP)
This may be the most inept promotion of a film I've ever seen. I mean, truly.
Baby Man needs to learn some manners
>>71168947
>critics
Yeah, right.
It will get a Certified Bribed no sweat.
We'll see what the audience score is.
Why do these Ghostbusters threads always get so many replies?
>>71168972
Why would you be butthurt about the Ninja Turtles? The newest film is Fan Pandering: The Movie. Krang as the main villain, Bebop and Rocksteady, Baxter Stockman - everything you remember from the cartoon. It also has a nice soundtrack and a lot of energy, making it actually watchable, unlike the first one.
>>71172958
>Elisha Cuthbert
good answer. good answer BUT even back then had she shown tits it would have been on the internet for free soon enough.
>>71164013
Thanks Bob
>>71173154
why do you post with a trip?
I don't know why people even bother with American media anymore.
>>71163962
>starting to
>>71164217
That was actually pretty good.
>>71164869
>THE NEW YORK TIMES
Things change anon.
>>71165625
>Rights, yeah, but culture is still heavily swayed towards the male side.
Wow, you've really eaten up all the shit that's in the MSM. Good for you, anon.
And people wonder why the world is turning into shit.
>>71172455
I'm not racist but... Jesus
>>71172868
>how pathetic would a person have to be
Welcome to 4chan
>>71166534
brother*
We're going deeper, my friend.
