And now it begins.
>Free State of Jones at 0%
Must go higher
>>71118416
lmao
>>71118345
No, now it ends.
BRRRRRAAAAAPPPPPPPPP
>>71118345
This score means nothing.
>54%
Will he love it or hate it?
Time to start knocking out outfits.
>>71118416
>yfw Ghostbusters SJW edition gets a higher rating than ID:R
NOT DISNEY = SHIT
Could have been much worse. First one didn't get good reviews
Maybeeee Marvel payed off the critics because Ronald Emerich called superhero movies silly.
Critics thought the first one was mediocre too. Everyone will see it anyways.
Realistically, did anyone actually think this was gonna be good? Entertaining yes, but not good?
>>71118345
The neverending RT cycle
>>71118345
It looks like Roland was too busy organizing the movie for screenings and doing interviews that he forgot to pay the critics
>>71118362
>It's real
>>71118345
Confirmed to be spacekino
The trailers looked bad...but I doubt this film is all that bad if dumb action is all you're looking for. Should be a good film for fans of Disney's Marvel's Cinematic Flicks
>>71118449
STINKY STINKY
>>71119749
Unless the ticket comes with a bull to fuck my dumb wife there's not a chance I'm going to sit through this trash.
>>71118345
What the fuck only 1 star
>>71119438
>it ain't me literally in the trailer
>>71118534
Who cares what Denzel thinks
>>71118345
It just needs to match or get higher than the Original's score to be considered good.
>>71118345
The first one unleashed a new era of big dumb movies.
Not sure why anyone would expect this one to attain critical praise.
>>71121145
I was looking at the small thumb nail and thought it said 41% HAH phew
>>71118345
did anyone really expect this to do good?
>>71118345
Nawitenz
>>71118581
it probably will with how sjw the critics have become.
>>71118345
>mfw people are excited for a "popcorn" movie
>>71118534
Its the most mediocre score possible I think he'll hate it or tell true feelings.
>>71118345
It's only 7% bellow the original, and that was Schlokino.
No reason to worry.
NOT DISNEY-MARVEL
THROW IN THE BIN
No... nowitenz
>>71121145
This one is already better. You just know that movie got a 20% bump because of Will Smith.
It's actually going up
>>71118345
I'm relieved. I was worried it would get trashed
I expect it'll get about the same reception as the first one and be equally terrible while also being absurdly fun
this is the only kind of blockbuster trash that I allow myself to watch
>>71118345
So... now the current critics algorith goes like this:
if disney, then >80%
if not disney but its good, then >25%
if not disney and its not good then <25%
Am i correct?
>>71125482
*algorithm
>>71125482
>Alice Through The Looking Glass
>30%
>The Lone Ranger
>37%
>>71125482
I wonder why you picked 25 specifically
>Warcraft has 29
>BvS has 27
Ah, there you have it.
>>71125881
>T-They didn't think those would be successful!
SOME FOLKS ARE BORN
>>71120519
Maybe they're just upset Britain is leaving the EU.
>>71118416
what goes down must come up
>>71126394
Probably because 25 is 1 quarter and is a standard break point milestone on a 1-100 scale
>>71125881
Delete this.
>>71125346
This was before Will Smith was the go-to negro, for the most part.
>>71125260
>>71118625
>>71118741
>>71125260
>>71125482
>FUCKING DISNEY!
Or maybe its a typical Roland Emmerich flick?
You're still being influenced by RT scores like the people you criticize. You just assume that every film with a low tomato score is some underrated kino masterpiece that was critically panned by paid shills.
>>71126812
t. Disney Shill
lad...
>>71127720
Great counterargument. No different from Marveldrones who spam pics of glowing RT scores and Evans in response to criticism. I'm going to assume you know I'm right considering you didn't refute anything of what I said.
Why was this movie made?
Absolutely nobody wanted it. I hope it bombs so he can't fuck up Stargate too.
Entire reason for making this and the hook to reel people in was..
>"We have space fighters and alien tech now so its a even fight!"
>Humans space base on the moon gets destroyed in 30 seconds, the rest of the film is a repeat of the first after that
Jesus christ
>>71118362
>>71119103
http://whatculture.com/film/10-movies-from-2016-that-could-score-100-on-rotten-tomatoes?page=4
>every movie that gets negative RT is because of Marvel
I'm enjoying the anal devastation that BvS' failure has caused.
>>71128966
Its true tho.
Man of Steel was made before Marvel got serious with their Cinematic Universe and look at its score?
A reasonable 58%.
That is a perfect score for the movie I'd say. Isnt perfect (too much CGI near end) BUT the Clark story was brilliant, loved the opening scenes with Russel Crowe.
If Man of Steel was made right now then it would have gotten a 20% minumum no joke.
As for Batman V Superman - if it was made few years ago: it would have gotten a 50% or 60%.
But due to Marvel's Avengers - those movies being fun with quips every second; the critics immediately judge DC now over them.
>>71129183
Woops 55% I mean for MoS
>>71129183
So basically, you are blaming people for having a different opinion?
>>71129183
>BvS got shit on
>that means every movie that gets shit on is because of Marvel
I bet Marvel caused Alice 2 to get critically panned too.
>>71118534
>le contrarian man
For real though, he was a good critic back in the day[read his white dog essay]
>>71129183
>a reasonable 58%
MoS was barely coherent, but, it had a small enough focus so it's incoherency was minimal.
BvS was all the problems of MoS compounded upon themselves with the one thing that kept it from being a complete cluster fuck (narrow focus) completely removed.
>>71129183
>the Clark story was brilliant
The only reason clark doesn't become a complete sociopath after that particular pa kent's upbringing is because of the historical superman character, who's influence is established as being present, somewhat, with that last shot of clark as a kid, running around with a cape, playing, for lack of a better description, "superman," with his dog.
To say, the movie establishes within itself that it's entire claim to a unique take on the superman character will ultimately amount to nothing but a pointless delay to superman becoming super.
> cashing in on nostalgia
when will hollywood stop doing this?
>>71129183
World of Warcraft got destroyed in RT just because it wasn't quippy or ADHD popcorn flick much like Mahvel. In other words it had a story that required a brain. Nowadays, if your movie isn't quippy enough you'll be panned by critics. Sad state of affair of movies really. Everyone would just be pushing safe movies for fear of not pandering to the general ADHD populace. Creativity and seriousness is disliked, quips and non-serous stories are hailed.
If LoTR was released it'll get bombed by critics as wel. You can't prove me wrong on this.
honestly with RT, as long as its not < 20% or > 90% (maybe even 95% these days), then I feel like its just a move made for a specific audience
>>71129956
What the fuck are you on about?
>implying capeshit has anything to do with a video game movies
>>71129956
The reason "quipping" causes people to overlook flaws in marvel movies is because it's self-deprecating. The movie admitting to the audience its bad and knows it and hams it up even more as a result.
Whereas warcraft was bad, but acted like it wasn't. Resulting in suffering.
>>71130060
What I'm saying is, all creativity has been destroyed with the "success" of Marvel / Disney movies. Your movie has to be safe, quippy, nothing serious or a popcorn flick for it to be accepted by the critics. Anything that is deemed serious is panned. This is the death of cinema, enjoy your popcorn flicks until Infinity movie 2 ends
>>71130133
Quipping is one of the lowest piece of shits that you can do in a movie. Its not self-deprecating, its an escape to a serious situation in a movie by adding one liners to lighten the mood and move on to the next ADHD action scene. Please stop defending quipping its pure trash.
Also I made a typo on this>>71129956
If LoTR was released today, it would get most likely BvS or Warcraft tier RT score as well. This is a fact
>>71130198
> an escape to a serious situation
I reiterate. Its used as an acknowledgement the audience knows damned good and well the situation is not serious. It is, in fact, quite ridiculous.
Conversely, real people release stress with jokes.
It's the movie admitting it has failed to create a sense of gravitas or a compelling narrative. But in that admission, the audience moves past that failing with the movie, to it's conclusion.
The alternative is to just lose the audience. See: warcraft
>>71130198
>if a faithful adaptation of a beloved work of fiction was released today, it'd be treated the same way as derivative garbage with delusions of novelty
I think you need to lie down.
>>71118345
They made a second one?
>>71130549
i'm talking about the movie you mong LoTR had great scores in RT but it existed before the MCU era, it will not get its high scores if it was released today
>>71125881
THIS. ISN'T. FAIR.
DELETE THIS!!!!
>>71128420
>tfw they will never show the mars or jupiter bases under attack
>>71130718
You're clearly so enraged you can barely read at this point. Lie down.
>>71128130
Same. I hope the score goes lower. I mean half of this stuff has an RT score of like 10-40% ffs
Are critics seriosuly THIS OUT O F Touch? What thE FUCK why Are thEy REVIWEING if they aren't INdependence Day FANS leave it To the FANS
>>71130970
>only people who agree with me should be able to speak
remember when the entire internet turned into a hugbox?
I can't. I'm done. I can't do this shit anymore. We wait 20 whole fucking years, and a passionate team of people work their asses off to create a wonderful film and out-of-touch critics who only like Oscar bait SHIT ALL OVER IT. This is fucking disgusting. I hope those assholes are happy, when I saw this I was so angry I punched a hole through my wall (the 4th this month) and threw my hot pocket across the room. Fuck all of you.
>>71131147
>the 4th this month
I'm guessing Warcraft was one, what was the other two? Snyders going even more full retard with JL?
>>71131147
Have you even seen the movie?
One critic said first have is good but other is a mess so who knows.
>>71118345
>This shit has a higher score than Warcraft.
Fuck critics are getting more and more irrelevant.
>>71118362
Nooooooo Keri Russell mai waifu
>>71125881
Disney sacrifices a film every so often that they expect to bomb anyway so people don't catch on to what they're doing.
>>71118345
Nauu nowit eeensss
You didn't actually think this was going to get good reviews, did you?
>>71133614
>le disney paid the critic meme
>>71118581
*ID4
