Why didn't they ever make a terminator movie where the main villain was a T-600? Y'know the kind with cheap rubbery skin.
Cos I mean after the T-1000 they were constantly trying to amp it up.
>Oh yeah this is the T-X it has liquid metal and a metal skeleton for some reason that means it's more advanced than the T-1000
>*hits bong* Ok guys what if John Connor was a terminator all along? And he's like a super advanced one with nano machines and shit
I mean yeah a T-600 is less advanced than the main terminator, but that could be to the movie's advantage. He'd be bigger and stronger with built in weapons and shit, and he'd look creepy as fuck from the get go instead of needing to peel half his face off. Plus looking like a creepy mother would mean he could only come out at night.
That's a pretty great idea actually
>he'd be bigger and stronger
Except he wouldn't be
that aside, T600kino when?
>>71046402
>main villain
stopped reading here because you're obviously a dumb-shit summer-fag.the word you're looking for is "antagonist" by the way
>>71048491
>Except he wouldn't be
T-600 on the left
>>71048633
Sorry but Terminator is a blockbuster. It's not high cinema.
Fucking casual.
The organic she'll is needed for time travel, if he doesn't have that biological component, he won't be able to travel back.
Children know this.
>>71048763
Explain the T-1000 then?
They originally planned for him to arrive in a flesh cocoon to explain how he could travel back in time, so they could do the same for the T-600.
>>71048812
organic liquid or something
>>71046402
>what if John Connor was a terminator all along?
But he wasn't. He got turned into a terminator after he sent kyle back.
John being a terminator was the original idea for salvation.
>>71048633
antgonist and main villain mean the same thing in this context, why would you try to nitpick that?
>>71048720
>Sorry but Terminator is a blockbuster. It's not high cinema.
No. Terminator 2 was. The Terminator was not.
>>71049382
Other way around. The sequel is great but nowhere near as good as the original.
>>71049382
Man a movie about a metal skeleton from the future is hardly high cinema
This is now a James Cameron general thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDQtrSKGOUU
>>71049408
If it was directed by Stanley Kubrick you wouldn't be saying that.
>>71048678
Bigger then. but definitely not stronger
>>71049425
I watched the Abyss for the first time yesterday. Was pretty good.
>>71046402
I travelled to the past and googled this just for you, OP.
>>71049493
A short appearance shooting at someone is hardly what I meant.
I'm talking about an entire movie about one of these fuckers hunting someone.
>>71049493
that terminator was fucking terrifying, they need more like this
>>71049535
Because the whole point was that they were shit, and defeated relatively easily.
>>71049350
>why would you try to nitpick that?
>>71049588
They were shit at infiltration, not combat.
>>71046402
is this the /Fantomas/ general?
>>71049493
DEEPEST LORE
>>71046402
we would have, if they ever got around to make a terminator movie set in james cameron's future war:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTq74Ae94T4
but that's probably never gonna happen.
>*hits bong*
maximum adolf
>>71049864
wrong thread.
>>71049959
did you even read the OP?
>>71050045
Did you?
>>71050065
>>*hits bong* Ok guys what if John Connor was a terminator all along? And he's like a super advanced one with nano machines and shit
OK you hooked me faggot, still bumping my shitty thread though.
>>71049610
If you see a slow noisy tank wearing a Don Post mask, it's not getting anywhere near your base, and you can lob a grenade at it. End credits.
>(You)
