TROOOOOOOLLLLLLL IN THE DUNGEON!!!!
>>71004505
I bet you enjoy the films of Jonathan C. Butler.
How can I tell if a hogwarts person is circumcised
>>71004505
However?
>>71004592
BENlS?
![draco-malfoy-dumbledore-funny-harry-potter-Favim.com-2312306[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/XzkSEvz.jpg "draco-malfoy-dumbledore-funny-harry-potter-Favim.com-2312306[1].jpg")
>>71004505
>>71004592
They're the ones sleeping with women and getting laid.
>>71005715
>Circumcucks
>getting laid
Pick one
One of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but its certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>well at least the books rawkxD
Not at all.The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
>>71005715
Not really how it works outside of America. Women aren't conditioned to think circumcised peeners are normal, so they don't dislike natural ones.
>>71004592
Their magic tends not to be all that potent.
>>71005869
>implying anything matters outside of America
Our women are on another level than the rest of the irrelevant world, britbong. But ya'know. Enjoy your ugly slags with grills for teeth
>>71005658
what the fuck was dumbledore's problem?
>>71005935
I am circumcised, friendo. I can have any American woman I want.
>>71005935
Hogwarts in Britain, so there are Britain rules for cocks
>>71005859
"taste" in literature is literally just contrarianism
>>71005935
If by level you mean size then yeah they're certainly several "levels" above the rest of the world
