Daily reminder
>>70989861
The next Star Trek film is being directed by a guy who was in the Fast & Furious franchise.
That discredits this bait post.
>I'm smart because I'm a Trekkie
>Here's a picture of a blatant strawman
Hmm
Star Trek is cheesy schlock
Star Wars is action for the masses
I actually wish there was a Sopranos tier sci fi show.
>>70989861
Lol not bad.
>>70989861
>>70989959
>Sopranos tier sci fi show.
You mean like the 2 first seasons of BSG?
>>70989908
>nu trek
>actual star trek
lmao
I don't get how you can be a racist and a sexist (a conservative, basically) and like Star Trek, it goes against the entire ethos of the show.
>>70989908
the new show is being done by the guy who made dead like me,who is a farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr better writer then jj egghams and johnson will ever be
>>70989861
You've seen like two episodes of Star Trek, haven't you? Next Generation is filled with meme shit comparable to the prequels.
>>70989861
I'll allow this.
>>70993307
"no"
>>70993307
t. starbores fan
>>70989959
The show youre looking for is Babylon 5
>>70989861
Kirk and Spock were both played by jews, and Roddenberry prioritized diversity.
>>70993342
She's kinda hot in a Marcia Gay Harden kinda way, by which I mean crazed housewife kinda way.
Star Trek has been grade A merchant propaganda since TOS. And technobabble != science.
wouldve been better if the star wars one wasnt racist pol shit
>>70993521
i find her crazy personality in 12 monkeys hot
>>70993497
>TOS
>Good
i get why they made kirk into a womanizer now
>>70989959
But DS9 already exists, and it's Star Trek.
>>70993622
>TOS
>not good
Spot the redditor
>>70993821
whatever you have to tell yourself,oldfag.
>>70993061
You can be racist against niggers but not Japs.
Daily reminder
>>70993898
fuck off weeb
>>70993911
>an inbred britbong and to two jew-nosed goblins on the villain side
>>70994089
easily applied to the top row
>>70993960
Sorry but that's most of the world.
>>70994196
most of the world should be ashamed.
>>70993061
>you have to apply your political views to everything you watch or do
that's the problem with you hardcore libtards and why you love propaganda so much
>>70989861
Not to mention Trek's waifu game blows Star Wars out of the water
>>70994196
Considering most of the world's population is located in India and China I really fucking doubt it, they have a pretty bad relationship
The OP image is hilarious. The right side is like some ridiculous /pol/ neonazi bullshit but somehow the alt-righter who made the image forgets that Star Trek is an utopian, cosmopolitan vision of humanity's future? Please.
>>70993911
Sydow wasn't a villain
![1920px-Synagoge,_Enschede,_Mozaiek[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/wfF65CO.jpg "1920px-Synagoge,_Enschede,_Mozaiek[1].jpg")
lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulcan_salute
>>70995746
Multicultural society, no less
>>70993497
Classical diversity is fine, letting everyone have someone to look up to is fine.
Modern diverity tries too hard.
>finn is the only black guy in the entire not-empire
>>70995746
>taking /pol/ out of an obvious flame war instigating image about which fucking fruity sci-fi shit is the more intelligent and cultured
Jesus christ you fucking people
>>70993898
The fuck does this even mean? So do racist Trekkies just think Uhura a shit? What's your fucking problem? How do you rationalise the doublethink?
>>70995368
I'm not applying my political views to Trek, Trek is an inherently politicised show, and it's not at all a conservative one. I guess you've answered my question though, you're wilfully ignorant, you absent you separate themes and messages and story content from what it says about the real world. You basically don't appreciate fiction on any meaningful level.
Explains how you manage to be so illogical.
>>70997427
>Classical diversity is fine
Yeah, keep those non-white people marginalised!
>>70997281
kekkest tops
>>70989908
Plus JJ already made it Fast ans Furuous in Space
>>70989861
I guess you aren't counting the Star Trek revival started in 2009, right?
Didn't JJ direct both reboots?
What a stupid fucking image.
>>70997888
Correct, that is not Star Trek. That is Generic Sci-Fi Action Movie #7537 with the Star Trek brand slapped on.
>doesn't count new star trek
>counts new star wars
Nice double standards, OP.
Sort of apples and oranges. Star Trek is intended to be Science Fiction, while Star Wars is Science Fantasy.
>>70998720
There is no difference between star wars and star trek. Both have starships, evil empires, light weapons, telepathy and other mind-based magic powers, mysterious artifacts, adventure and heroism
