>Thankssssssssssssssss
Why did the snake thank Harry here?
got him out of cage
>>70963060
why was it called niggerini or something? bit racist 2bh
because he freed it
never mind the fact that it got run over/killed by animal control the moment it stepped outside
>>70963079
It was different time
>>70963060
He used a (never to be seen again) power to make the glass disappear, freeing the snake
>>70963323
why didn't he make the door disappear when hermoine was being tortured?
>>70963079
Its Nagini and Nag comes from Naga which is Serpent. A fitting name for a snake.
>>70963348
Rowling is a hack
>>70963366
Wait wat
The snake Harry freed from the zoo just so coincidentally happened to be Voldemort's horcrux companion?
What's happening is part of a phenomenon I wrote about a couple of years ago when I was asked to comment on Rowling. I went to the Yale University bookstore and bought and read a copy of "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone." I suffered a great deal in the process. The writing was dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs." I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing.
But when I wrote that in a newspaper, I was denounced. I was told that children would now read only J.K. Rowling, and I was asked whether that wasn't, after all, better than reading nothing at all? If Rowling was what it took to make them pick up a book, wasn't that a good thing?
It is not. "Harry Potter" will not lead our children on to Kipling's "Just So Stories" or his "Jungle Book." It will not lead them to Thurber's "Thirteen Clocks" or Kenneth Grahame's "Wind in the Willows" or Lewis Carroll's "Alice."
Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
do ittt, draco... he took your points... kill himmm...
shit meme
>>70963485
FUCK YOU, GANDALF-MAN
GIVE ME MY FUCKING POINTS
>>70963060
Well done, Harry, well done
HOWEVER
why couldn't you just let us win... why did you have to say "however"...
>>70963461
I live by Yale too, nice bro
Ah yes, well done brexiters, well done brexiters
HOWEVER
>>70963461
Kipling's a fucking racist, would you let your kids read his shit?
>>70964543
Of course
>>70963461
>Catch 22
>Low tier
Explain.
>>70964543
better a racist than brain poison 2bh
>>70963461
>1984 above brave new world
>>70964681
>history book above fantasy
what ave you expected?
HOWEVER
>>70963549
>>70963645HOWEVER
>>70964825
>>70964906
woah what happened to my nigga Draco?
>>70963079
>>70964982
SECTUMSEMPRA
>>70963079
>>70964906
I've never seen the movies past 2 and looked that scene up on youtube, the movie version is wierd as fuck. What was the director on?
>>70963060
>The snake Harry rescued ended up becoming Nagina
>>70963406
It wasn't in the book
>>70963446
No, people thought this because they look similar but it's not Nagini
>>70963461
FUCK
OFF
BLOOM
>>70964592
>>70964681
I think you two missed the joke.
>>70963446
D E E P
E
E
P
>>70963446
No, the snake from PS was a boa constrictor, nagini was a viper
>>70963461
Based
>>70966031
>implying Voldemort can't transfigure snakes
>>70963461
>For whom the bell tolls
>high-tier
>>70964543
Kipling did nothing wrong, you fucking uncivilized barbarian
>>70968326
The Man Who Would be King was anti-colonialism you nignog
This meme is objectively lame but I am laughing so hard...
>>70965444
Watch the movies you dumb fuck 3 5 6 7 are the best
The director is one of the chillest guys around he did the last four
>>70964982
He got his points deducted.
