>movie not even released yet
>/tv/ hates it as if it's the worst thing in the world
good job /tv/ you're literally worse than /v/
>>70956024
Why don't you go back there then
The SJW-media finally, finally stopped talking about it every second.
Please stop trying to start shit.
>>70956050
not an argument
>>70956024
Why not watch it then form an opinion on it?
>>70956024
Poor bait OP
>DAMAGE CONTROL
>>70956073
>i disagree with him
>i-it must be bait!!!
>>70956024
>/tv/ is only place who hates this.
>even normies are shitting on it you cuck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
OOGA BOOGA
>>70956024
only the brunette with bangs looks decent
the rest look like they belong in an asylum
>>70956132
Well, two of them look like they belong in an asylum. One of them belongs in a zoo.
>>70956024
You're aware of the function of a trailer, right?
This has had about 6.
The only time I laughed was during a Japanese trailer when an announcer said GOOSTUUBASTAAHS.
For a comedy trailer to not make you laugh is bad. For six to make you laugh due only to localisation is awful.
We're justified in feeling it looks crap, the trailers showed us.
>>70956071
Twice, preferably in order to properly develop a coherent, informed conclusion that would legitimate an opinion. Also bring a friend the second time to exercise dialogue. I mean you're not a basement-dwelling, virgin shitlord ARE YOU?
>>70956194
shit analogy
>>70956071
I'll watch it sooner or later, but I won't pay to see it.
>>70956216
LITERALLY
>>70956024
As a lifelong fan of the original all the bullshit surrounding this is truly annoying.
>sjws not accepting that the cast could be better (leslie jones has no range)
>sjws not accepting any criticism
>mras claiming this will ruin their childhoolds
>mras disliking the trailer when the truth is there are some cool moments there
>mras talking about harold ramis legacy when they dont know shit about him
Fuck all of this. I think this looks entertaining, I hope it does well and I hope they do a bunch of ghostbusters flicks after this. I want an animated ghostbusters. I want and Aykroyd written Ghostbusters. I want a proper sequel to the Ghostbusters videogame.
>>70956252
>I want Ghostbusters cartoon
We had two.
>I want Media set in Old Canon
Don't be silly. At best you'll get a crossover. In a Lego Game.
>>70956024
Why don't you go whine on normietube?
It gets just as much hate on there as here. Come to think of it the only emotions this movie raises are anger, ambivalence or anger at people for nothing liking because they must be misogynists to not like it.
>>70956132
This
I don't get why people have a boner for that creepy dyke.
Not saying brunette is great, but she is the best compared to the rest.
>>70956024
>the black girl doesnt have a phd and is only street smart
why are feminists such racist assholes
it wouldnt be so bad if the media would stop referring to it always as the "all female" ghostbusters. how about women ghostbusters or ladybusters or just ghostbusters? why do we need to use such a clinical term every goddamned time?
>>70956024
>Donald Trump hasn't even been elected yet
>Half the country hates him because they just know he is a racist sexist pig even tho he keeps his mouth shut about it
>>70956252
Fuck you and fuck everything you like.
>>70956163
Also buy expensive pop corn and soda, how are you going to form a fair opinion while feeling hungry all the way
>>70956146
xD epin this is gong straight to best of 4chan xD you sir are epic!
Predictions
>Mixed to favourable reviews by the critics
>Underperforms but still makes it money back
>No mainstream media realises that simply making all the leads female fails to make a powerful statement about feminism or equality and only serves as a cheap gimmick which completely misses the post-modern turn.
Ghostbusters was always mediocre at best.
>>70956146
See, if they kept teasing patty about being ugly as hell, made the whore exorcise a ghost with a blow job or something and figured some personality for the other two it could have been funny but then women would cry misogyny because humor is based on exaggerating flaws so humor can never be on a girls comedy, the only joke in the trailers that works is delivered by a man
>>70956252
When did mean and right wing become person who doesn't share my views and I don't like?
>>70956024
Fuck off then
We know a shit film when we see one
If they replaced that hideously ugly nigger with an attractive black woman I actually wouldn't mind it that much. It'd just be another chick flick, albeit built on the ashes of something I used to enjoy.
>>70956638
You forgot
We will start hearing people shill about it not being that bad and being the victims. Of getting grouped with other remakes and Sony still makes a sequel
>>70956638
>Underperforms but still makes it money back
I think it will do well (unfortunately).
I hate what I have seen so far of the movie. But reaction to this film has been so loud from fans of the original movie. People who weren't alive when the original was released are going to see this movie just to see what all the fuss is about.
If not for the extreme blowback (dislikes on youtube), I think the movie would have been a dud. But the new GB is being talked about so much. I think it will probably get at least one sequel.
I don't have anything against the actors. I just hate the people who are responsible for this abortion of a movie being made. They knew exactly what would happen if they cast all women in this movie. And they are going to do the same thing in other remakes.
>>70956024
fuck off faggot piece of shit
>>70956572
Exactly, wouldn't it be UNFAIR to the cast who worked so hard to have an opinion influenced by hunger and low blood sugar?
>>70956800
>attractive
>black
>woman
pick 2, quadroons and mulattos need not apply
>>70958316
>attractive black
>>70956800
>attractive black woman
>>70956050
OP BTFO
>>70956024
>>70956216
heh
>>70956024
It doesn't look any better or worse than Pixels, really. In fact, if it wasn't called 'Ghostbusters', I'd swear it was a sequel to that film.
>>70956024
>>70956024
/v/ here. Fuck you, we hate this shitty movie, too.
>>70956024
shit movie
>>70960672
Everyone on the internet hates this movie. Except for the SJW crowd, of course. But they're a whiny minority.
>>70956024
I don't like the plot of this movie, it's completely undermining the original film as if it doesn't exist. If they had done an actually sequel and maybe gotten a new cast that isn't shit that gets trained by the old Ghostbusters, that would have been fine. Instead we are getting a like of dog shit. If I want to watch Ghostbusters, I'm going to watch the one and only Ghostbusters, not some cash grab imitation.
The style of humor is all wrong. It looks like a wacky film with lots of physical humor. The original played itself very straight and low key. Most of the humor comes from Bill Murray's quips, or Ergon or Venkman playing it very straight.
And it was never really an action movie. This one is saying how bad ass the girls are. The originals were kind of regular joes who were totally out of their league.
Villain is a real downgrade too. Lovecraftian elder god vs. "some fucking guy".
>>70960884
It looks like a Farrelly Brothers film.
>>70956638
second prediction:
>no sequels
This was supposed to start a new Extended Universe. Becuase all the studios are salivating over what Marvel has done. The idea would be first Ladybusters, male busters, a team up movie, movies set in the past, a Slimer movie, etc.
>>70960884
Yeah the threat doesn't even seem believable, when you watch the original trailer it looks like some serious shit is happening, this just looks like continuous slapstick and one-liners that fall flat.
Also, the movie's cinematography itself looks so fucking fake, people complain abut Marvel movies but this looks ten times worse.
No one you could pull off a scene like this from the original
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK6hI423gcw
It looks like any other bland modern comedy with lcd humor. I had mild interest in watching it just to check it out. That is, until people decided to act like a bunch of assholes and jumped all over James Rolfe about it. Now you couldn't pay me to see it.
>>70961058
>Also, the movie's cinematography itself looks so fucking fake,
Huge chunk of it is green screen for no reason. They replaced the dance number in the background of one shot, which suggests the original is a composite filmed on green screen.
>>70956559
Are you kidding? I'm voting for trump just based on the fact his wife said he has a 9 inch dick. Hillary probably only has a 5-6 inches, tops
>>70960963
Sony studios is probably going to be bankrupt this time next year.
>>70962817
>Sony studios is probably going to be bankrupt this time next year.
You say that every year!!
>>70956176
Now THAT I would pay to see.
the hate just increases its popularity, they already won
>>70962837
They have no blockbusters my mane
I find the NBA themed ads really funny. Absolutely no mention of an all female cast.
>>70956024
>literally worse
Go back to tumbler
Actually
theres a better chance the cancer that hates it is /v/eddit
>>70963663
For example you might have though it was /pol/ doing all the posting you consider "/pol/" but the reality is that its /v/ cancer doing it here
Picture related is an edited version of /pol/s own anti /v/ image
>>70963692
Heres the original
/v/ is so cancerous even /pol/ had to beg the mods to get them to save /pol/ when __ was happening
>>70963769
So remember redditer cross posters.
If someones calling you a cuck numale liberal sjw = /v/ cancer
If someone dumps statistics = actual /pol/ friends
>>70956132
>>70956366
Finally, some anons with actual taste.
>>70956176
The gorilla is better looking.
>>70956252
>cool moments in the trailer
Like what? Are you along about the second trailer or something, because everything in the trailer I saw was awful.
>>70960884
i bet they have in mind to do sequels. So they tried to start with a less endboss.
Beware the GB2 and 3 in the pipeline
