[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
All men are to blame now.
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 65
File: image.jpg (361 KB, 1242x1715) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
361 KB, 1242x1715
All men are to blame now.
>>
>>70920989
So what's new?
>>
>>70920989
>Thank, Narrative Setting Clickbait Merchants

FTFYMNYDEHTTM
>>
>the kikeington post
>feces straight from Bezos' asshole
Nope, not interested.
>>
>>70920989
How many people are getting shot to death in the theater on the opening night?
>>
>>70920989
It's time to purify humanity and put all men into concentration camps.
>>
It would be a political act if anyone was actually going to see it?

Who's going to watch it? Not anyone who's seen that trailer, cause the trailer sucked. Not ghostbusters fans, they hate it. Who's really going to sit through a movie just to spite people who don't care and aren't watching what you do?

Just lie and say you saw it if you want to spite people.
>>
>>70920989

YES

Consumption of a product is a political act!

Show the white men whos boss by preordering a ticket now on fandango!
>>
>>70920989
where's all the r34? you'd think we'd flooded with it even if it was just to spite the movie.
>>
File: Extreme-Ghostbusters-Cast-1.png (577 KB, 512x384) Image search: [Google]
Extreme-Ghostbusters-Cast-1.png
577 KB, 512x384
>>70920989
>The idea of an all-female "Ghostbusters" should have been no big deal
Well maybe they shouldn't have made it a big deal in the first place by constantly throwing it in our faces


If they wanted to be progressive, they should have just remade Extreme Ghostbusters.
>black guy
>hispanic guy
>girl girl
>crippled guy
SJW's would eat that shit up and you get that nostalgia bait going. I'm amazed that a kids show from the 90's is still less patronizing than the bullshit their making today
>>
>>70921007
Fixed that for you my nigger you don't even have to thank me? If I got that right I think it's time I give this site a break
>>
>>70920989
This pic reeks of backtracking.

>our movie is gonna be so gud, girlz rool, men drool.
>lol it was just a silly flick, men are responsible for blowing it out of proportion, not our fault
>>
>>70920989
ANOTHER THREAD ABOUT THIS
FUCK OFF /V/
>>
>>70921294
>If they wanted to be progressive, they should have just remade Extreme Ghostbusters.

Now there's an idea. I would actually be interested to see that.
>>
>>70921553
Go to bed Paul
>>
>>70921294
Fucking this.

Where is my EGB remake
>>
>>70920989
they're idiots
>All girl main cast with hunk side character - chick flick comedy
Not exactly a date movie unless youre a desperate male and let her choose the flick. Just a typical 'girls go in groups to watch it'
>Ghostbusters - action comedy
not exactly a date movie, demographic is male groups

so why join them together? youre not going to see groups of girls wanting to go watch it because its 'ghostbusters', same for groups of lads because its 'chick flick' tier similar to bridesmaids
>>
File: angry 54664.jpg (52 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]
angry 54664.jpg
52 KB, 640x480
>>70920989
>going to see a movie is now a political act
__YOU__ MADE IT A POLITICAL ACT BY ACCUSING ALL THE CRITICS SEXIST
>the idea of an all-female ghostbusters should have been no big deal
__YOU__ MADE IT A BIG DEAL BY ACCUSING ALL THE CRITICS SEXIST
>>
>>70920989
>Make a point of casting all-female Ghostbusters for the explicit purpose of shitting on the first movie and it's fans and proceed to aggressively promote the movie using the same tactic
>Wahhh, men are complaining about the fact that we knowingly and deliberately ruined something that they like; how dare they do that
>>
>>70920989

Honestly it feels like these people are just going to say ANYTHING to get people to watch the movie.
>>
>>70922528
I'd love to find a way to get the highest camrip possible and leak it online opening day
>>
>hey look we're making a ALL GIRLS ghostbusters
"I don't get why they're only focussing on it being all girls"
>why, is it because you have problems with the ghostbusters being ALL GIRLS
"Not really it just feels pandering"
>why? because you're conditioned not to except an ALL FEMALE MAIN CAST
"No, it just doesn't feel like your main focus is making a good Ghostbusters film"
>how can you say that you haven't even seen a trailer
--TRAILER COMES OUT--
"This looks awful"
>you haven't even seen the movie it's just a trailer
"This doesn't show any respect to the source material"
>quit living in the past grandpa this is the new Ghostbusters for the new generation
"There's nothing new or innovative about it"
>ugh didn't you notice the ALL FEMALE cast?
"Having an all female cast doesn't make it a good movie"
>that is so mysognistic
"It's not that there's a problem with-"
>all this mansplaining
"But you haven't-"
>sexist
"What I'm trying to say is-"
>patriarchy
>>
File: image.jpg (100 KB, 900x506) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
100 KB, 900x506
>>70922663
Find me one other film in the history of cinema that has a photo like this. It was their intention all along to cause some shit.
>>
>>70922663
Why do autists post these kind of posts?
>>
File: 1463520672303.gif (480 KB, 434x444) Image search: [Google]
1463520672303.gif
480 KB, 434x444
>>70922663
this is too real it pisses me off
>>
>>70921042
Hopefully everyone
>>
File: 1462788671358.gif (267 KB, 400x310) Image search: [Google]
1462788671358.gif
267 KB, 400x310
>>70922693
>want to see progressive
>women only
>whites only
but hey at least they kept the black dude
>>
File: 1466101966650.gif (1 MB, 756x351) Image search: [Google]
1466101966650.gif
1 MB, 756x351
GRRRR MEN MAKE POLITICAL STATEMENT! I SHOOT YOU IN THE DICK!
>>
File: 1463984535744.gif (47 KB, 250x194) Image search: [Google]
1463984535744.gif
47 KB, 250x194
Is the Sony marketing department that fucking desperate now? Jesus christ.
>>
this isn't edgy or controversial anymore it's just boring
>>
>>70922753
Why is that ball of lard shooting Oogie Boogie in the dick?
>>
>>70922693
That look in her eyes, you just know...
>>
File: 1461639712526.jpg (143 KB, 1024x512) Image search: [Google]
1461639712526.jpg
143 KB, 1024x512
>>
What's all the fuss ? If you want to see it go see. Don't like it, don't watch it. Why all this drama ? People will forget about this movie in a couple of years anyway.


This decade has to be one of shittiest, makes me scared for the future. I think it's the lack of war that makes us white people want to find something to fight for.
>>
>>70922753
It's funny because she shot the ghost at the genital area, which leads us to believe that ghosts have a sexuality and that likely that one in particular is a male specimen.

That's so very original of them, you know? #GirlPower
>>
>>70922788
Does she really say the vagina and butt part? I can't even tell what shitty stuff they put in and what's made up at this point
>>
>>70922868

She says it got 'everywhere' in 'every crack' I believe. And women have two cracks. So you're left to imagine she's either got a slimy butthole or a slimy vagina.
>>
>>70921042
The film isn't even out yet? Jesus, from all the media attention on this site and the "it bombed!!!1!1!" posts i got a different idea.
>>
File: 1466091610200.jpg (191 KB, 640x1136) Image search: [Google]
1466091610200.jpg
191 KB, 640x1136
>>70922813

Well there's a Slimette in the movie. So they assume Slimer is a boy and needed a girlfriend.
>>
>>70920989

So if it fails then 3rd wave feminism has essentially failed


Got to love all these pseudo intellectuals dying on their swords for a shitty remake.
>>
>>70920989
I didn't do nothing.
>>
File: 1466109960725.jpg (234 KB, 570x815) Image search: [Google]
1466109960725.jpg
234 KB, 570x815
Even the fucking MOVIE POSTER has a dick joke.

Also sissy man who can't handle heavy equipment. lol men can't do shit oh wait can you open this jar for me honey?
>>
File: Ghostbuster-1-600x300[1].jpg (40 KB, 600x300) Image search: [Google]
Ghostbuster-1-600x300[1].jpg
40 KB, 600x300
>>70922868

It's a damn good edit.
>>
>>70922926
>vapor
>made of Ectoplasm

What, can that be a thing? Can a science nerd school me please
>>
File: 1457979024491.jpg (6 KB, 74x75) Image search: [Google]
1457979024491.jpg
6 KB, 74x75
>>70922663
>>
>>70922960
>tfw I can't open the jar
>>
File: med_1409377643_00025.jpg (42 KB, 640x417) Image search: [Google]
med_1409377643_00025.jpg
42 KB, 640x417
>>70922960

>Alpha males pretending to be worthless Beta's is apparently is a hilarious joke to women.

And the irony will still fly over modern beta nu-males heads lel
>>
>>70922978

ectoplasm (the non-biology kind) isn't real so it can be whatever the fuck they want.
>>
>>70921294
I remember I watched that but I seem to have forgotten almost all of it.
>>
>>70923038
As long as they are fuckable betas tho
>>
>>70921553
I've never seen this mentioned on /v/.
>>
>>70922960

had to put Thor on the chinky poster since they know chinkers want to see hot alpha males and not ugly women as they havnt been PC brainwashed yet

surprised they didnt take out the niggy
>>
>>70923078

Well it's a Jap poster, and I guess they figured "oh one of the monsters is fighting with them!"
>>
>>70920989
It would have been no big deal if they weren't so self aware of it. Like the trailers go out of their way to go "Hey remember that quirky receptionist they had in the original? Well she's a guy now! Isn't that funny? Doesn't it like totally remind you of the original?"
"Hey, we have one black one. Just like the original right guys?"

And on and on. Just has an "anything you can do I can do better" vibe to it and that's not interesting to me.
>>
>>70920989
I don't really have a problem with it in a vacuum but I think most SJW ideologies are a severe cancer so knowing this I would never go to see it.
Also it just looks awful.
Also I would be wary of anything supported by the Washington Post since they are an utterly biased propaganda machine of the worst order.

I hope people express their opinions with their wallets and hopefully it bombs in theaters.
>>
This could have went over fine if they didn't throw the "all female!!!" Shit out there from day 1 and then proceed to mock and deride the potential customers. But trying to play to sjws is suicide. They already got "das raycis" and rightfully so if they wanted to play politics
>>
>>70922753
ho hooo she she that male cis scum ghostie in his dick so funney looolz LE GRILL POWA 2016

fuck remakes
>>
YOU FUCKERS MADE IT INTO A POLITICAL ACT
JUST LIKE YOU MAKE EVERYTHING A POLITICAL ACT
EVERY TV SHOW MOVIE AND GAME HAS TO BE A FUCKING PLATFORM FOR YOUR POLITICS AND THE SECOND PEOPLE TREAT IT AS SUCH AND OPPOSE DREDGING UP AN OLD FRANCHISE TO USE AS A POLITICAL SOCK PUPPET, NOW YOU SEE IT AS A POLITICAL THING?
EVERYTHING YOU FAGGOTS DO IS A POLITICAL THING
BECAUSE YOU CAN'T GO FIVE SECONDS WITHOUT TALKING ABOUT WOMEN
EVERY FUCKING THING IS ABOUT WOMEN
WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN
FUCK
>>
It all could have been okay if they at least could have made it a sequel to the original, new characters in the same world, but no they had to go full remake mode, and they expect people to go for a quick cash grab, fuck them, I don't care for their movie, I don't care if it is an female or male cast, the whole idea is just stupid.
>>
>>70923360
GRRRR MEN MAKE POLITICAL STATEMENT! I ZAAP YOU IN THE DICK!

GRILL POWA
>>
Ha.

Today's demonstrations are done through twitter, if they wanna call it a political act, no one is going anyways. Just saying they did go, and since no one sees it, no one can call anyone on it.
>>
>>70922960
That Hemsworth is quite funny tho
>>
>>70920989

Hollywood film insdustry is dead, now is propaganda industry as it was during WW II.

Stop watching american films, hotheads
>>
>>70923360
You mad
>>
File: 1461109685409.jpg (27 KB, 343x343) Image search: [Google]
1461109685409.jpg
27 KB, 343x343
>>
>>70921046
wanted to post a link to Robert Merle's Virility Factor when I realized this is one of the rare cases when there is no English language page for it
>>
>>70922663
The feminists and SJWs all lost their shit after James did a video stating why he wasn't going to review the movie and he made of good points but....you know those people will find some non existent excuse to attack anything and anyone who disagrees with the popular opinion.
>>
>men force women to watch shitty movies
>MUHSOGYNY!!!
>>
Feminists and SJWs alike should be insulted and pissed being pandered some schlock that was meant for them to bandwagon on.

It's following a false idol because it shared your merits and values. Only to find it was all a ruse just to suck you in and drain you from the inside
>>
>>70921553
How the fuck is this video games?

No seriously, I want to hear your line of reasoning
>>
>>70923891
Yah but will they ever realize that, probably not since most of them will March to any drum that's the loudest.
>>
File: 1428450976040.jpg (7 KB, 369x299) Image search: [Google]
1428450976040.jpg
7 KB, 369x299
>>
File: AVGN Ghostbusters.jpg (151 KB, 851x637) Image search: [Google]
AVGN Ghostbusters.jpg
151 KB, 851x637
Yeah, it should have been no big deal, but all the leftists declared if you didn't watch it you were a sexist bigot. I don't want to watch it because it looks like an unfunny piece of trash.
>>
File: 1410730366056.jpg (49 KB, 689x698) Image search: [Google]
1410730366056.jpg
49 KB, 689x698
>SONY marketing department
>"aight guys, bear with me now, cause i think I've come up with a new marketing strategy no one has ever tried before..."
>"go on.."
>"what if...bear with me now... what if...we try to market this move by literally insulting our target group and shaming them into watching it?"
>"...............wtf.....why didnt we think of that shit?......YES....Y E S.....go ahead and do it"
>mellisa mcarthy: Hey you literall fucking PIECES OF SHIT...DONT WANNA WATCH OUR MOVIE? THATS BECAUSE YOURE LITERAL TOES'S SCUM OF SOCIETY AND U HATE WOMEN LOL....WHAT NOW MISOGYNIST LIVING-WITH-PARENTS-IN-BASEMENT-VIRGINS??? WHAT NOW???
>lesllie jones: HAHAHHALOL THESE CRACKAZ DON WANNA WATCH OUR MOVIE?? F U C K THEM AND THE WHOLE WHITE CIS PATRIARCHY HAHAHHAHAHA LOOK HOW OUTRAGEOUS I AM YOU CHAUVINISTIC RACIST PIGS!!!
>>
>>70920989
>Kangz bash the Gods of Egypt movie because WHITE MEN
>Media tags along
>Men bash Ghostbusters because of muh feminism
>Media defends movie at all costs

Really makes you think. I dunno if I've ever thought so hard before
>>
>>70921063
i wanna see really degrading r34 posted all over the actors and sonys twitter and shit
>>
File: angry-old-woman.jpg (44 KB, 424x283) Image search: [Google]
angry-old-woman.jpg
44 KB, 424x283
>>70924454
And this is why you'll never get laid.
>>
>>70920989
>make blatant politically-motivated casting choices
>OMG THEY'RE CALLING IT A POLITICAL FILM FUCK MEN
Holy fucking shit feminists are blind to their own retardation
>>
File: BrCLQ.jpg (78 KB, 640x360) Image search: [Google]
BrCLQ.jpg
78 KB, 640x360
>ever taking the media seriously
>>
>>70922753
IN THE DIIIIICK
DICKSHOTS
>>
I kept seeing all these butt hurt liberals complaining that theres a movement to "down vote it to oblivion" and thought they were being ridiculous. Like, they couldn't accept that people didn't think it looked funny. But more and more I see threads that just go "New trailer, thumbs down guys lol!" And I wonder if they're right.
>>
>political act
I don't want to see it because the trailer looks terrible. Then doing all the commercials during the NBA finals with NBA Ghostbusters really turned me off because it seems like you're trying to lure in people who don't know about the movie by lying to them. You don't even show a single clip from the real movie in those ads.
>>
>>70922693
I can smell their cunts from here
>>
>>70922800
If you weren't alive the world would be better
>>
>>70925371
I guess they are trying to get a rise out of the gullible.
>>70925469
They might be getting desperate if they resorted to that.
>>70925675
GTFO
>>70925687
Really, that anons post seems like a typical response from SJW when confronting them with rational thought and it seems spot on.
>>
>>70920989
lmao I called it. I've been saying sony would turn this into a feminist/political statement just to watch the fucking movie. Thats the only way feminists will actually watch something. They wouldn't actually watch a movie like this any other way. They already alienated the only demographic that watches these types of movies, then they proceeded to insult and ridicule them. This is sad to watch but I knew what would happen.
>>
File: 1265216237.png (1 MB, 1312x1090) Image search: [Google]
1265216237.png
1 MB, 1312x1090
>>70922753
>SOMEBODY SAAAAVVVVEEEE MEEEE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2YIx1CTW10
>>
>>70924085
Why are people hailing the 1984 film like it was Jesus' return to Earth?

Yes it is a classic 10/10 film and you are all pissed there never will be a Ghostbusters 3 with Murray - but then: who doesn't wanna watch this reboot just for the laughs?
>>
>>70921056
I am going to watch it because I want to see the trainwreck on a massive screen.
>>
Did anybody actually want a remake of Ghostbusters? I mean, I don't mind them being unable to cross the streams, but you'd think they thought it out better. Could make a sequel to the 2009 videogame in movie form, or just make older gen "pass on" the tech and knowledge to younger ghostbusters.
>>
>>70920989
They were already trying to make it political anyway these dumb shits.
That's the thing to do now, pretend like your shit is important because every decision is a political statement. Fuckin sad.
>>
>>70922663

This is fairly accurate
>>
>>70925816
It's really bad and it's been playing the whole NBA finals. There are people out there who really think that there is an NBA Ghostbusters movie being made. Like Space Jam with Ghostbusters. They're lying to these people. It's fucked up. I've already had to tell people in real life that NBA ghostbusters is not a real thing.

https://youtu.be/Or6Ux4i9mXY
https://youtu.be/IpLDw7ZMmnE

Anybody really paying attention could easily tell by the production values that it's just a commercial, but for someone out of the loop about femGhostbusters being a thing, you really have no choice but to assume this is a commercial for NBA Ghostbusters.
And the really fucked up part is that this is the only movie getting these kinds of ads. Finding Dory doesn't have NBA players in its commercials.
>>
>>70925888
>who doesn't wanna watch this reboot
Ballpark? About 800.000 people.

>for the laughs
u wot m8
>>
>>70920989
#notallmen
>>
>>70921553
>that feel when you're so in denial about your own cancerous capeshit, GoT, and celeb scandal infested board you blame videogames for threads about fucking Ghostbusters
>>
>>70926016

>Space Jam + Ghostbusters

Y'know at least it would have been something different.

It might even have been so awful it would come back around and be great.
>>
>>70922554
I would love to see the chaos that would result if someone leaked a bluray copy a week before opening in theaters.
>if only
>>
>>70926138
Space Jam Ghostbusters would be better than original Ghostbusters.
>>
>>70926057
>u wot m8
I meant to watch it due to how bad it is
>>
File: kobe_laughing.jpg (83 KB, 650x440) Image search: [Google]
kobe_laughing.jpg
83 KB, 650x440
>itt : women hating nerds
>>
>>70925371
>>But more and more I see threads that just go "New trailer, thumbs down guys lol!" And I wonder if they're right.

Those posts/threads are a reaction to the reaction to the genuine thumbs down, not a movement in and of itself.
>>
>>70925371
>And I wonder if they're right.

nah, your just a dumbass who can't recognize bait/trolling on a website centered around shitposting
>>
File: xin_4512012610395811708815.jpg (51 KB, 400x476) Image search: [Google]
xin_4512012610395811708815.jpg
51 KB, 400x476
>>70926304
Shutup Kobe.
Everyone knows Shaq carried your ass to 3 rings.
>>
>>70926241
That's what Sony's banking on as far as disgruntled fans go.
>they can bitch all they want they'll see it out of curiosity

No. Don't give those idiots money. Vote with your wallet. Make them understand that people are tired of rebootquels and gender poltics in movies. You can always rent that piece of shit later on.
>inb4 why not torrent
The movie blows, but piracy is theft.
>>
File: 1465309457403.jpg (46 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
1465309457403.jpg
46 KB, 480x360
>>70926180
It could be about Charles Barkley fighting a Martian ghost invasion on the surface while Jordan is playing the Basketball Game underground in Looney Toons land.
Basically the Danny DeVito Martian decided to steal the NBA all stars talent as a failsafe if he couldnt get Jordan. He gets a martian voodoo witchcraft lady to resurrect the dead spirits of past martian aliens who posses the bodies of the Golden State Warriors. They can now drop ghost powered 3 point shots on a whim.
So then Charles Barkley and the NBA Allstars must team up with the original ghostbusters to beat the Golden State Warriors in 7 days through 7 basketball games to properly extract the ghosts and save the world. It ends with Charles Barkley throwing a chaos dunk that creates an earthquake. Bill Murray falls through one of the cracks in the ground and winds up in Looney Toons land in time to help Michael Jordan.
>>
>>70922960
How awesome would it looked like if Chris Hemsworth was in his Thor costume shoting lighting with his hammer.
>>
>>70920989
I just want this fucking movie to come out and crash and burn.
>>
>Completely changing a movie for the sake of progressive brownie points should have been no big deal

When are these leftist shitstains ever going to learn?
>creating an all new all female franchise
Completely Kosher
>taking an old established franchise and replacing the characters with niggers or women because fuck white guys!
Eat shit freak.

I hope this movie is abysmal at the box office but it won't be because every thirsty beta and blue pilled faggot on the planet will buy 5 tickets each.
>>
>>70922960

I know the original GBs called their wands "their sticks" and "make them hard" as a dick joke, but they never held them to their crotches and humped the air like they were actual phallic replacements.

Is this where humor has landed now? Jesus.
>>
>>70926500
there's way, WAY too much controversy for it to fail now. too many people will pay full price "just to see how bad it is", plenty will see it just because they saw a bunch about it online, and some will actually go because row row fight the patriarchy

i despise the species i belong to
>>
>>70922960
Aren't posters supposed to make you want to watch the movie? This is having the opposite effect on me.
>>
>>70926771
If it helps, I'd sooner spend an hour collecting dog shit than see this movie, out of god damn principle.
>>
Is the media still harassing James?
>>
Can /pol/ stay on fucking /pol/?
>>
>>70926771

Are there any examples of that happening before? I can't think of any.
>>
>>70920989
>new ghostbusters announced
>eh it's going to be shit, the old cast is not in and it's directed by a hack
>REEE FUCK YOU MEN
>trailer comes out
>yeah looks shit alright
>REEEEEEE FUCKING MEN
>movie about to come out
>WELL THANKS A LOT NOW I'M GOING TO SEE IT AND ENJOY IT EVEN IF IT'S SHIT, FUCK YOU MEN

well okay then
still won't see it and it looks awful
>>
>>70926895
What does /pol/ have to do with this thread anon?
>>
>>70925888
Because the new one isn't faithful to its source material and looks on par to Scooby Doo monsters unleashed.
>>70925905 this anon has the right idea in fact it's probably what everyone was saying be faithful to the source material.
>>70926016
Ouch haven't seen them since I didn't watch the play offs.
>>
>>70926885
Yes. This time around it's the fucking NYT. Those people are shameless. They did their best to get a rise out of him but James stayed classy.
>we live in a time where the NYT will call you at your residence to question you about being sexist because you don't wanna waste money on a shit product, make an article about it and post it on the front page because this is what passes for "news" today

I want out.
>>
>>70921372
Kek
>>
>>70920989

So, just another in a long line of poor purchasing decisions on the female consumer's part that will then be turned around as men's fault somehow.

Women paying more for pink products when they could buy the standard version, then complaining that they were dumb enough to be "forced" to pay more for the pink version.
>>
File: 800,000 dislikes.png (66 KB, 649x729) Image search: [Google]
800,000 dislikes.png
66 KB, 649x729
I mean, is there any question that these articles are just paid for? Calling the backlash to this movie a minority doesnt even make any sense.
>>
>>70922960

i wont even pirate/seed this movie.

a real boycot
>>
>>70925905
That is what was supposed to happen if a GB3 would have been made. The new team would have featured at least one woman. Reitman fought hard for that and to keep creative control.
After the death of Ramis Reitman agreed to let the execs have a say in GB3 and Amy Pascal turned it into her wetdream (an all female ''super hero'' team, she's the same woman who wanted ScarJo to plau Zoe Quinn) and shut down Reitman completly.
>>
>>70920989
And after all this time they still think this whole shitstorm is solely based on the fact that men are triggered that all four ghostbusters are women...
>>
>>70927582
>Male critics
>Mostly men
>Source ? My ass

Fucking disgusting.

>They are complaining but the movies is not even out !
Holy fucking shit, the mental gymnastic these people can do is astonishing, really it is.

>I...It's good ! Sony Executives said so !

Fucking libtards and self proclaimed activist working willingly for the big corporation, how blind can you be ?
>>
>>70927604
It was triggered by a shitty remake.
I personally don't care if there are women as the leads I care if it suck or not.
>>
>>70922693
Only one black woman
When are white woman gonna check their privilage?
>>
>>70922800
>couple of years

Try a couple of months.

Seriously though people are upset because of how "in your face" as another anon put it people involed with the movie have been about it. When blanket statements are said that amount to "fuck men" or even some of the more nastier stuff like calling people who dislike the movie basement dwellers and/or manchildren well that makes people here upset.

There's a difference on this website and on the internet in general but saying this stuff to reporters or on live television would be fighten' words if it was to my face. What makes it worse is that it was part of their plan both to stir up controversy and have a defense if/when the movie comes out. This was part of their plan.
>>
So this movie is definitely getting DKR'd isn't it?
>>
>>70928796
Divide and conquer huh ?
>>
>>70923122
underrated
>>
>>70922663
i agree with you but that post dragged on and was gay
>>
File: cuckold.gif (2 MB, 392x281) Image search: [Google]
cuckold.gif
2 MB, 392x281
>>70922663
>>
Hi white male here,

I wasn't going to see this movie, but after all this public shaming I now am definitely going to see it and love it.

in fact, it would be my privilege to see it
>>
Are they trying to guilt me into seeing a shitty movie?
>>
>>70929659

Obviously you need to put away your childish love of the old movie so you can better appreciate the childish dick and vagina jokes of this movie.
>>
>>70920989
>Thanks, guys
Trump did the right thing by banning this "newspaper".
>>
>>70921294
now i want to watch this
>>
File: image.jpg (42 KB, 499x430) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
42 KB, 499x430
Don't they realize that their the ones who made this a political act, not the fans? We just wanted a movie that was faithful to the original, now it's became a fuckfest. Ramis is rolling in his grave right now
>>
File: 1458599892655.jpg (92 KB, 400x489) Image search: [Google]
1458599892655.jpg
92 KB, 400x489
>new Ghostbosters u guys
>but with an ALL female CAST??!
>that is like, sooo refreshing
>huh, you dont like it? huh? HUH??
>please stop judging this movie because it has women in it, its a Ghostbister moovie nothing else
>ok so i may have made it all about the female cast but its YOU who say thats bad = SEXIST MISOGYNIST
>its your fault that I have to go see this shitty movie now even though i dont want to, ghostbusters is lame only dorks like that but have to go now cos MUH FEMINISM
>>
>>70921042
>feminist viewers go to watch the new Ghostbusters
>shooting in the cinema
>20 casualties
>fuels the feminist fire because "misogyny is real"
>the movie becomes more famous than the original, being considered a landmark in the feminist fight
>critics literally can't say anything because of the "tragedy"

No fucking thank you
>>
>>70920989
So rascism is ok?

>You are good at science, but i know New York"

What?
Why isnt one scientist Ghostbuster black or chinese?
And even in the trailer its about 80% the white lead women.
>>
>The idea of an all-female "Ghostbusters" should have been no big deal

Of course not. They made it a big deal because they knew if they didn't hype the shit up with marketing and played the feminism angle the movie would have been a huge flop.
>>
>>70931639
>Why isnt one scientist Ghostbuster black or chinese?

Black people aren't smart, and thankfully they operate out of a Chinese restaurant so that's the Chinese market satisfied
>>
Not all men.

Just the same basement dwellers that complained about star wars VII having a black guy and female lead.

>hurr this movie sucks because I can't connect with the main character cause its not a white male like me!

Why anyone takes what these people say into any consideration or seriousness is beyond me.
>>
>>70922663
Well said.
>>
File: 1439821485226.jpg (33 KB, 453x500) Image search: [Google]
1439821485226.jpg
33 KB, 453x500
>>70922800
>makes us white people
>>
>>70931768
>#NotAllMen
OUT OUT OUUUUTTTTT
>>
>>70923727
well, good to know people on /v/ get their cancer from /tv/ and vice versa...
>>
>>70930441
Trump created yet another manufactured controversy for the news to report on instead of actual news.
>>
>>70926016
the soccer version is superior.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuriL7CneQ0
>>
#1984Matters
>>
Who cares really? Even the first one was shit
>>
>>70922960
Am I the only one that sees a pussy in that screen above stay puff on the right?
>>
>>70920989
Actually I agree with the sub-headline "the idea of an all-female Ghostbusts should have been no big deal". Think about it. If you disagree with this statement you're probably a true /pol/ack.

I was disgusted by the advertising because they went out of their way with the garbage 'girl power' narrative, only hiring women for all jobs including behind the scenes (e.g.: grips, writers, etc.) publicity shots with Hillary, etc etc -- the studio was selling this as a feminist fantasy from the very beginning.

But really, I have nothing against a film with a vastly-female cast if it's good. I just didn't like the message that was being shoved down my throat by the studio and its advertising partners.

Men - or the internet, your choice - didn't make Ghostbusters a political act. Advertisers did.
>>
>>70920989
It amazes me how clueless these sjw people are.
We wanted a sequel with whats left of the original cast. If they took these 4 women and put then in any other movie and didnt name it Ghostbusters, no one would care, watch it, or make it.

Because its all SNL people, and the whiny sjws, its become a hot topic.

All we wanted since Ghostbusters 2 was a sequel with the original cast, it has nothing to do with the all women cast, fuck put 4 young SNL guys in there and it still gets shit on.

Shit writer, shit actresses with one trick ponies, and shit sequel idea.
>>
File: 1416595980930.jpg (104 KB, 406x364) Image search: [Google]
1416595980930.jpg
104 KB, 406x364
>>70920989

>wapo

Trashed.
>>
>>70920989
>"an all female "ghostbusters" should be no big deal."

But everyone has to watch it even though it's an unwanted reboot and guaranteed to be shit.

The damage control on this is amazing because the studio is afraid. People are going to not watch the movie because they know it's gonna suck, and that's cancer for the industry.
>>
File: 78578.png (52 KB, 280x150) Image search: [Google]
78578.png
52 KB, 280x150
>>70922753
>HEY GUYS

>HEY GUYS

>GUYS

>HOW ABOUT

>CHECK IT OUT RIGHT

>HOW ABOUT

>LOL

>HEY GUYS

>HOW ABOUT

>WE MAKE THE FINAL BOSS

>CHECK IT

>WE MAKE THE FINAL BOSS

>HEY GUYS SERIOUSLY

>FINAL BOSS

>WE MAKE IT

>HOLY SHIT CHECK THIS OUT

>GUYS

>WE MAKE IT A FIGHT

>HOLY SHIT

>A FIGHT WITH THE ~~LOGO GHOST~~

>HOLY SHIT GUYS CHECK IT

>AND THEN

>LOL HEY GUYS

>AND THEN

>THEY SHOOT IT

>GUYS CHECK THIS OUT

>THEN THEY SHOOT IT

>LOL THIS IS GONNA BE GOLD

>THEN THEY SHOOT IT

>OH SHIT GUYS

>THEN THEY SHOOT IT IN THE ~~DICK~~

>BIZZAAAOOOOOOOOWWWWWW

>WEWBALEW
>>
>>70920989
>bastardize a cultural classic by rebooting it with the only distinguishing feature being the cast is all female

Of course they wouldn't accept responsibility for their horrible decisions. One of the reasons half of them are obese
>>
>>70934051
Obese is an incredibly problematic word. We'd prefer it if you used the word full-bodied instead.
>>
>>70931634
BUT AT LEAST 20 SLUTS DIED AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHA
>>
I find no reason not to also hate that the Ghostbusters are all female, you don't have to just say "Well we just didn't want a reboot or remake". There's nothing wrong with a female Ghostbuster, but fact they inject this feminist gimmick for reason this film exists is fucking sad, and sexist. Despite the Ghostbusters in this film are technically new characters, they're just based on the original by their race. No way does this film try to be diverse other than its own definition of the word.
>>
>>70922960
Did they try to make Melissa Mcfatstrom thinner on the waistline in this? Looks badly shopped.
>>
>>70934051
>cultural classic
Ok, back it up a bit.
>>
>something looks shitty
>sjws cry racism/sexism
>actual racists/sexists flock to the other side
>everything turns to shit
every time
>>
>>70921042
>>70931634
>turns out to be that Sony was behind the shooting.
>>
>>70934889
It's not the fact that they are female leads it's the fact that a good concept was hijacked by radical feminists and SJWS to shove propaganda down our throats and divide everyone further than we already are as well as spitting and saying fuck you to the source material and the original cast that's the problem .
>>
>>70927597
>she's the same woman who wanted ScarJo to plau Zoe Quinn
Gonna need a source on this

Also,
> #GG
You fags could at least pretend you aren't the same people
>>
>>70936321
>as well as spitting and saying fuck you to the source material and the original cast
And don't forget, the audience too.
>>
File: BugsBunnyDiarrhea.png (193 KB, 474x352) Image search: [Google]
BugsBunnyDiarrhea.png
193 KB, 474x352
>>70926885
>>70927108
>The guy who does shit like this still comes out looking classier than the people getting on his case

What a world we live in
>>
>>70922752

Because mainstream feminists don't give a shit about minorities at the end of the day. They want to replace white men with white women.
>>
>>70936570
Yes, yes that too. Thanks for mentioning that up.
>>
File: Poochie.gif (39 KB, 460x570) Image search: [Google]
Poochie.gif
39 KB, 460x570
>>70921294
>If they wanted to be progressive, they should have just remade Extreme Ghostbusters.

No idea why /tv/ suddenly seem to be gushing with praise for the XTREME '90S GHOSTBUSTERS cartoon. It was never anything more than a shameless attempt by uncaring suits trying to be hip and just tick every fucking minority box they could.

Let's not kid ourselves, just because the new all-female movie is going to be a cinematic car wreck.
>>
>>70937272
Let's hope that it fails spectacularly.
>>
>>70937272
>It was never anything more than a shameless attempt by uncaring suits trying to be hip and just tick every fucking minority box they could.

Because it did what this movie is trying to be and was less in your face about it
>>
>>70922711
Because they're autistic?
>>
File: 1370190081008.jpg (52 KB, 500x481) Image search: [Google]
1370190081008.jpg
52 KB, 500x481
>>70920989
Gotta set up the narrative to blame the patriarchy for when the movie fails.
>>
the ad agency for this movie are fucking geniuses
>>
>>70920989
Will China save this film too?
>>
>Movie was regarded as a bad idea from the start
>First trailer shows that it's going to be bad.
>Think there's no way Sony could fuck up more and make the movie look worse.
>They make the movie look worse.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yw-42ljSWk

Fart jokes? Dreamworks-tier slapstick gags? Really?
>>
>>70935954
Just bantz®
>>
I don't mind an all female cast, the movie is simply unwatchable garbage because the script is utter shit and the humor is as vapid and random as your next /tv/ meme.
>>
>>70937972

It will not get a release in China due to their restrictions regarding women in lead roles.
>>
>>70938027
>"I don't know if it's a lady thing, but I'm mad as WHEW."

What did they mean by this?
>>
File: nightmare-vision.jpg (47 KB, 722x349) Image search: [Google]
nightmare-vision.jpg
47 KB, 722x349
>>70931634
>>
File: flight-poster-US.jpg (152 KB, 600x888) Image search: [Google]
flight-poster-US.jpg
152 KB, 600x888
>>70931768

Are you even fucking listening to yourself?

I personally don't give a fuck if there are black protagonists, I LIKE movies with black protagonists. Flight (2012) for instance. That's a great movie. I loved it, I related to the main character, and to be honest I never fucking thought about the fact that he was black

Star Wars VII was bad because they DELIBERATELY CROWBARRED IN MINORITIES. J.J. ABRAMS EVEN FUCKING ADMITTED TO IT, SAYING "HURR DURR THE ROOM IS OVERWHELMINGLY WHITE, I HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CRAM THIS MOVIE WITH MINORITIES SO I'M GOING TO DO SO"

Grow a fucking brain you cunt
>>
>Lots of stories about this movie recently
>Figure it must be coming out in a week or too, so at least we're close to the end of hearing about it
>check the release date
>doesn't come out for another fucking month
>>
>>70931768
Nice try goyim but you are fucking retarded.
>>
>>70938413
>Star Wars VII was bad because they DELIBERATELY CROWBARRED IN MINORITIES

There were minorities in the prequels. You are a screaming baby, and Flight was shit.

Grow up.
>>
>>70937972
>>70938139
wasnt there a ghost and dead persons restriction for cinema?
>>
>>70922960

all these ugly women must've been soaking their panties daily working along side chris.
>>
>>70921294
Probably would have watched

Even if they cast that annoying twerp from Glee as the cripple
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-06-17-23-47-40.png (534 KB, 1440x2560) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-06-17-23-47-40.png
534 KB, 1440x2560
>>70936569
I don't want to give these sites any clicks but just google '' Amy Pascal Zoe Quinn '' and you'll find tons of sources

I don't care about GG (anymore) but it's just to prove a point : Amy Pascal is an agenda pushing nutjob
>>
File: abrams.jpg (41 KB, 594x404) Image search: [Google]
abrams.jpg
41 KB, 594x404
>>70938443

You are a C.U.C.K.

>There were minorities in the prequels.

THEY WERE CROWBARRED IN, SEE PIC RELATED YOU C.U.C.K

>Flight was shit.

First of all, no. It's a fucking great movie

Secondly, THAT'S IRRELEVANT TO THE POINT. The point is that you can have a great movie with minorities, but CROWBARRING THEM IN is completely different. To be honest it wouldn't have been so bad if they hadn't completely overegged the idea of "Rey is such a strong independent womyn xDxDxDxDxD"

Please go back to >>>/lgbt/ because you are clearly, CLEARLY, a fan of being PEGGED IN THE ARSE BY YOUR BOYFRIEND. Fucking c.u.c.kold faggot
>>
There's no need to lie, guys. We're on an anonymous board. Unlike most of you, I'm not afraid that this movie is shit and it's because of the all female cast. Even if it was an all male cast or 50/50, it would probably still be shit because Sony is out of touch with its audience.
>>
>>70938893
>Even if it was an all male cast or 50/50, it would probably still be shit because Sony is out of touch with its audience.

You're right it probably would. Turning it into a chick flick just makes it even worse.
>>
>image.jpg
>>
It is gonna be hilarious when every paper is panning this godawful movie and then retroactively says "t-told you so! !"

It has no hope. No "comedy" movie of this formula has been good. I'm not even talking about the feminist shit - clearly imo that's liberal narrative and some sort of brute force marketing. The movie will be trash because the director is shit, CGi ghosts doing stupid shit isn't funny, and I doubt the script will be either.
>>
>>70937860
The diversity in EGB is about as subtle as the Burger King Kid's Club familia
>>
>>70922693

>Female cast
>their stunt doubles
>their make-up and hair artists
>their assistants

Wow. Way to strike a blow against male dominated cinema girls.
>>
>>70939013
it's gonna be shill reviews up the wazoo
>>
>>70939013
>It is gonna be hilarious when every paper is panning this godawful movie and then retroactively says "t-told you so! !"

They won't do that though. They will write it rave reviews and praise "strong womyn xD" because that sells papers to dribbling liberal morons

>It has no hope. No "comedy" movie of this formula has been good. I'm not even talking about the feminist shit - clearly imo that's liberal narrative and some sort of brute force marketing. The movie will be trash because the director is shit, CGi ghosts doing stupid shit isn't funny, and I doubt the script will be either.

Yeah it looks shit but the feminism thing is the biggest problem for me. If it was all men then (depending on the cast) I might see it, but turning this movie into a fucking POLITICAL STUNT is the most obnoxious piece of steaming shit I have ever seen

Was the original Ghostbusters political? NO. IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A POLITICAL FUCKING FILM THEN JUST MAKE A POLITICAL FUCKING FILM
>>
>>70939224
I don't believe it honestly man. I am not too versed with /TV/s opinion on reviews, as I am a stupid fuck from /V/ - but movie reviewers always seemed less shill like to me. Like, there are plenty movies that could be defended by liberals in a similar vein, but they still get awful scores.
>>
>>70938413

Whats this movie about?
It actually looks interesting, is it worth watching?
>>
>>70939120
Ok, it wasn't subtle, but it was far less obnoxious
>>
>>70925900

Anon I will give you money to never watch this in a paid cinema, just stream it.

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, JUST DONT GO!

This film needs busting of its own, fuck it
>>
>>70939433
No don't fuck it. It's unfuck worthy.
>>
>>70939366

Denzel Washington is a pilot who does a backflip with a plane full of people while blitzed out of his fucking mind and the movie spends the next 90 minutes talking about it.
>>
>>70939366
>Whats this movie about?
A pilot who's also a drunk. While he's flying, his plane messes up, but he saves everyones' lives with a hugely talented crash landing. The rest of the movie is him having to cover up the fact that he was still drunk when he saved everyone's lives.

>is it worth watching?
Yeah I loved it personally. Directed by Robert Zemeckis who did Back to the Future.

/tv/ would call it "normie shit" but I don't a fuck. It's an awesome movie. It's not meant to be some deep intellectual piece of pretentiousness, it's a thriller. Also John Goodman is in it playing a drug dealer.
>>
>>70939498
Yeah but it's the thrill of the chase man, it's a fucking great movie. And it's funny too.
>>
>>70920989
>Media have been pushing a shaming campaign to get people to go watch this piece of shit

To what end? Why all of this attention to a crappy movie?
>>
>>70939407
As a kid I loved the show and a lot of people did, well kids. But I didn't like ''girly'' stuff at all so I guess they did something right with there very obvious progressism.
>>
Awesome, I hope for even more LGBTQZP+ representation in the next one since this one has shown Sony that they have a much wider audience than they thought! :)
>>
>>70939606
It might be spontanious grassroot appreciation of SJW gimmick. Or it is a marketing move. Either way, they are way too committed now to back off.

When did remakes of beloved IP actually work last time?
>>
>>70921294
actually hipster ghostbusters would have been pretty popular
>>
>>70939606

Cuz we haz Baby Man Powers
>>
>>70922753
Unnecessary, this would be enough to get thrown out of a NBA game
>>
Why even remake the Ghostbusters?

It only worked when it did because it was Dan Akroid, Harold Ramis, and Bill Murray.

It's not like it's some amazing franchise to begin with, it was a comfy comedy movie using the best special effects of the 80's.
>>
>>70926917
Nothing, that guy is a moron
>>
>>70922693
are the effects and camera work made by women too?
>>
>>70921042
No ticket sales to single males policy will be strictly enforced for this one.
>>
>>70938662

That was just a politically correct way of saying Niggers and Faggots.
>>
>>70939606

SJWism is the new drug anon. People want to believe that their precious little special snowflake feelings won't get hurt. So they subscribe to SJWism.
>>
>>70922926

I actually feel bad for Slimer, what did he do to deserve this?
>>
>>70938821
Charge your phone, nigger.
>>
File: 1454671507402.gif (3 MB, 290x173) Image search: [Google]
1454671507402.gif
3 MB, 290x173
Thanks, guys.
>going to see the all-female ghostbusters is now a political act
>Casting an all-female ghostbusters reboot in the "gender crisis era" isn't a political act
>>
>>70921294
It's on Hulu, and way creepier than I remember.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO0FP_DJxNM

Ahahahahah. "Blind hatred" for the movie indeed.
>>
>>70920989
>we are going to remake your favourite movie
>except this time is made by us for us
>we are going to cast 4 of the most unfunny people in the world
>and fill it with girl comedy and girl power jokes
>what do you think about that?
Ok i wont watch it
>WHAT
>P-please watch our movie and buy the toys s-shitlord
no
>HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?
>MISOGINY
>BUZZFEED SAVE ME
>>
>>70940159
Where can i watch this semen demon get BTFO?
>>
>>70922960
kek at the only man now appearing at the poster
dont worry, he is totally main character, please watch the movie
>>
>>70923780
i loved the one feminist who said well, if you are going to judge the movie without seeing it im going to judge your video based on the fact that you are white and in a basement surrounded by old videogames
thats geat sweetheart but he is the one with two million viewers you want to convinze to watch your movie not the other way around
>>
>>70931634
fucking this.
>>
File: NewGB_Promo.jpg (554 KB, 583x886) Image search: [Google]
NewGB_Promo.jpg
554 KB, 583x886
>>70921294
Extreme was great.

Sony also had this material to work off too.

But Sony is terrible and throwing away another IP because of incompetence. (And trusting Feig.)
>>
File: WHAT IS THIS.jpg (6 KB, 193x225) Image search: [Google]
WHAT IS THIS.jpg
6 KB, 193x225
>>70933849
>TFW this is probably how it happened
>>
>>70940876
That's too funny.
You know should be a meme using the first part of the lyrics of his theme song to say people won't watch that movie.
>>
File: 1443628723419.gif (2 MB, 448x252) Image search: [Google]
1443628723419.gif
2 MB, 448x252
>>70920989
Can't those fucking drama queens understand that we're angry because they're butchering the Ghostbuster with shitty comedy?

It wouldn't matter if it was Ryan Goslin, Brad PItt, Michael Fassbender and Benedict Cuminurbach?

If the movie looks shit, then we're gonna have an issue with it.

Them being women is just a tiny tiny issue.
>>
>>70920989
Maybe they shouldn't have called everyone that said it looked like shit sexist if they didn't want to politicize it?

Oh wait

>waSHITon post
>>
Chris Hemsworth's bits look funny so I'm seeing it opening day. Sue me.

https://youtu.be/4cCqOZDu2-w
>>
>>70942273

You're part of the problem.
>>
>>70920989
Why are they standing masculinely?
>>
>>70942319
Like I said, sue me faggot
>>
>>70940976

MFW Sony forces IDW to make shit GG comics with muh girlpower
>>
File: image.png (79 KB, 2048x1536) Image search: [Google]
image.png
79 KB, 2048x1536
Anyone notice any glaring differences between how these reboots/remakes:

https://youtu.be/UuVphAuRo7Q

https://youtu.be/sWMhADqlPYg

were sold in their trailers and how Ghostbusters is? It must be very subtle, because I can't quite put my finger on it, but there's definitely something.
>>
>>70931634
The critics would already have their reviews out before premiere you dumb fuck.
>>
>>70942273

Have a Drano cocktail before you go, anon.
>>
>>70938829
>you are clearly, CLEARLY, a fan of being PEGGED IN THE ARSE BY YOUR BOYFRIEND. Fucking c.u.c.kold faggot
It seems most of the world loves it:^)
>>
>>70921042
honestly theater shootings are unpredictable nowadays. I completely expected there to be a Star Wars theater shooting simply due to the amount of people going and there wasn't.
>>
>>70942835
Based Jim saving us from remake garbage
>>
>>70942839
Too many Jedi.
>>
>>70920989
I can't wait for it to get a 5% on Rotten Tomatoes
>>
File: Roots - Rotten Tomatoes.jpg (102 KB, 759x282) Image search: [Google]
Roots - Rotten Tomatoes.jpg
102 KB, 759x282
>>70939266
>>
>>70942902
It'll get a 99% on RT because muh feminism

screencap this
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 65

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.