why do wizards not carry guns? If I had a sniper rifle I am pretty confident I could kill voldemort. I could just hide in a grassy knoll 300 yards away and blow his head off.
>this is what americans believe
>>70919572
This is the liberal gun control world
>accio bullet
>>70919572
YES HOWEVER
They dont let you have guns in england because they still have a a feudal society.
>>70919572
Didn't Rowling basically say once humans with guns and other modern weaponry could easily BTFO of the Wizard world?
Should have hired this guy. Voldy plus the major death eaters dead in 1 month.
>>70919760
Anime isn't real you fag
>>70919838
Neither is Harry Potter.
Because Harry Potter is easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the seriesüf only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but itüfs certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books are g-g-good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
>>70919872
This is some tasty pasta
>>70919760
He wouldn't be able to get the Horcruxes by himself.
>guns
>in the Islamic Republic of Great Britain
>>70919572
First question: How would you find voldi??
>>70919572
>America
>has guns
>no voldemort
>Harry Potter
>no guns
>has voldemort
Limp wristed liberal faggots: 0
American Patriots: 1,776
>>70919872
>Kafka
>middle tier
Holy shit anon...I am triggered...
>>70919872
>gatsby and atlas shrugged in god tier
>oscar wilde not in god
>kafka in middle with kanye
>notes from under and BNW in low
>tolkien in shit
>no camus
you are a stupid one, aren't you?
>>70920729
do u usually get off calling others stupid?
>>70920650
Right? There's no way Kafka should be on the same tier as Clifford. Better move it down a notch
I feel like the whole thing would have made a lot more sense if witchhunters were entered into the equation but the writer was retarded and couldn't deal with it.
BUTTERBEER AND BUTTFUCKIN M8! LIVED ON THE STREET IN SPITE OF ALL THE BENEFITS!
>>70919572
This was my main problem with this series. Voldemort can't kill Harry because their wands are twins, but how fucking hard would it have been to just kill him LITERALLY ANY OTHER WAY?
Beat his brains in, stab him, shoot him. Voldemort was literally fucking retarded. He acted like he couldn't kill Harry if he couldn't use magic. All those death eaters could have just held Harry still while Voldemort raped him to death
Yes, yes, well done Voldemort, well done.
HOWEVER
this is why fantasy is absolute garbage
you can't have consistency with magic
