Underrated? Discuss.
Redditcore
>>70899512
But really. What was the character's fucking name?
>>70899562
shit its been about 8 years since l've seen this film but l think in the credits he's credited as XXXX
not really an answer but meh
>>70899512
Wasn't there going to be a sequel?
was alright
rated perfectly, as a stylish yet fairly stupid and minor thriller
>>70899512
Under rated British gangster movie, it's up there with snatch and lock stock
>>70899512
There's a thread about this film being underrated every other day.
You, sir, are cancer.
>>70899512
maybe not underrated but more people should watch it, it's better than most of the shit that comes out
is it a cult classic?
>>70899512
I love the scene where the guy is getting his ass kicked to that super distorted duran duran song in the diner. Really well done moment.
>>70900076
literally the first time I've seen one and I spend all day here, every day
>>70900092
In the uk I think it is, totally grasps the style of the early 2000s
>>70900074
>From the producers of...
That will never not bother me.
>>70900095
>couldn't spare me 20 quid?
The dirt that the average Breaking Bad pleb is watching. Not recommended.
>>70900150
Pull that opinion straight from your bottom?
>>70899730
I think there's a sequel book.
XXXX survived because he was shot by a small caliber handgun and it pretty much ringed around his skull.
>>70899512
The "Layer Cake" speech was stupid but XXXX came out on top in the end.
>>70901065
The film ended in the classic gangster way, the gangster never wins and dies on the steps, it's a 1930s homage
>>70899512
It bored me. Matthew Vaughn can't hold a candle to Guy Ritchie. I've seen interviews with them together, Ritchie is the fun guy, Vaughn is the boring aspie.
When Gambon goes "welcome to the layer cake" I knew this was some weak shit
>>70900150
Incoherent drivel from a shitposter. Great criticism and points to drive your argument.
rules of attraction
>>70899532
>buzzwords