so what were you saying, /tv/?
>>70889190
>critics
>disney movie
yawn
>just find out that this film exists from a Pixar thread
>next thing the first thread is about it
Baader-Meinhoff'd
>anon reads one negative review
>ignores the rest
>hurr durr the end of pixar i told ya xD
>his fw
>>70889190
>implying reviews matter
>implying rottentomatoes is ever in the right
I'll make my mind up as soon as I see it. don't give a shit about all the sjw bullshit as long as the story and characters are treated with respect
gotta say though, even though I loved finding nemo, this strikes me as a really unnecessary sequel
>>70889319
>yawn
this desu, these critic/disney threads are tiresome as fuck
Literally just saw it then. It was a quality film, I enjoyed it.
It's very good, creative, nostalgic, progressive, what's not to love?
>>70889667
>gotta say though, even though I loved finding nemo, this strikes me as a really unnecessary sequel
Agreed. I hope to enjoy it, but the first one was a perfect standalone. They should've made a spiritual successor if they wanted to go back underwater.
>>70889190
>anything above 70%
yeah, pleb friendly shite.
>>70890557
>Average movie critic is now a woman or nu-male
>Grew up during the Disney Renaissance period
Gee I wonder why they might give Disney flicks a pass...
>>70889190
When did this board start caring about RT scores?
You're above this, /tv/.