Why would I want to see this if I've already seen the original?
>>70885586
Because you'd be sexist otherwise
>>70885586
Because if you don't you're a friendless loser instrument of the patriarchy. Even the original Ghostbusters said this film is better, none of them were threatened or bribed even. So go see it or you hate women.
>>70885586
Because it features the funniest women in today's Hollywood.
>>70885586
I'll watch it when there's a torrent where all of leslie jones dialog has been replaced with chimp noises, shouldn't take long
Why would I want to see this if I've already seen the original?
Why would I want to see this if I've already seen the original?
>>70885653
i dont get it
>>70885921
Because its a completely different movie with a different monster
>>70885586
There's literally no reason.
>>70885586
The chicks who really the comedy, may take crack at each other by any means ... (笑´・艸・)
>>70885586
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Imthgqqua0I
>>70885586
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=simxjM1l4VE
Because they'll shoot you in the dick if you don't.
>>70885586
Completely putting the fact that this movie by itself looks dumb as hell
That's a really stupid question, isn't it? You could say that about any remake or sequel. That's not a criticism.
>>70885586
Because you can see McCarthy getting slapped.
Oh wait, you can see that already in the trailer.
Mhhh
Maybe so you can see how a black woman has to serve 3 white female scientist. Because blacks will never be scientists.
>>70885586
You're a misogynist if you don't.
>>70887369
>completely unnecessary remake to cash on nostalgia
>not criticism
stop shilling this crap
>>70885586
If you've seen the original then this new one is not made for you
>>70885965
Because it's a sequel, fucktard
>>70890383
>Because it's a sequel, fucktard
It's not though, the events of GB 1 and 2 didn't happen in this movie and the original cast aren't even playing their original characters.
http://www.slashfilm.com/ghostbusters-reboot-trailer-confusion/
>Speaking on The John, Jay & Rich Show (via The Guardian), McCarthy clarified what the movie is by calling it a reboot and not a remake (though sometimes the differences between the two aren’t clear in Hollywood) and then talked about her perspective on the trailer:
>I know it’s weird that they say [in the trailer] ‘30 years ago’, but in this movie it’s like the first one didn’t happen. It’s a great story but it’s told totally differently. It’s four unlikely heroes, it’s in New York City, ghosts are taking over; it’s that same classic story but it’s not 30 years later … it’s not dependent on the first one.
>>70885989
because shes not funny
Post one funny thing that any of the lead cast has ever said.
>>70885586
For cameos of all the surviving actors at the end.
I'm gonna go just to see the piss mist when they save the day for the helpless womyn.
>>70890555
>For cameos of all the surviving actors at the end.
>I'm gonna go just to see the piss mist when they save the day for the helpless womyn.
You will be very disappointed.
It should be fun enough to pirate and watch for free.
Also, there will be a porn parody which will be nice.
>>70890586
>Also, there will be a porn parody which will be nice.
There's a porn parody now with Gianna Michaels.
>Jimmy: "Why was this idea appealing to you?"
>Bill: "It was only cos I knew these girls were funny".
What did he mean by this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ0YexsRCPc [Embed] [Embed]
1:45 mins
What did she mean by this?
>>70885586
because they're ladies
>>70885989
there's no joke . people equate ghetto speak and loudness with comedy now
>>70890555
>I'm gonna go just to see
>people will flock to watch it just to see how bad it is
>it will be a box office success due to the publicity
>rottenshills will give it 98% as it always does
>SWJs will declare it a stunning success in your face patriarchy hahaha shitlords
can we stop the "I'm just going to watch it to see how bad it is" meme
>>70891420
Seeking male approval.
>>70891237
>Imagine being Bill Murrey
>Trying to get Ghost Busters 3 made
>Trying since 1989
>Declined every single year
>You eventually give up and fall back on horrible Z-tier comedy movies to make the wheels go round.
>Years later
>Some faggot director picks up a script and gender swaps it
>You get turbo-pissed at the fact that they're rebooting the movie without you, only providing you with a cameo opertunity
>Sony gets on your ass and sue you into compliance and forces you to promote the abomination of a movie they've funded
>Sit at some god-awful talkshow with your old buddies from GB and 4 harpie comedians who don't possess any talent apart from having a vagina
>Reminisce about the things that could have been and use your finely tuned acting chops you've been honing for years hoping for a GB sequel-only now you're using it to promote a movie you're not even starring in
>Suddenly remember that all this can be remedied by a shot of whiskey and a shotgun blast to the face
>Smile, act and laugh at their jokes.
Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes. Smile, act and laugh at their jokes.
>>70891420
She knows the movie is shit.
Feig also miscast her completely. She's supposed to be the wacky one.
>>70885586
if you virtue signal hard enough a feminist might let you put your penis inside of zir
>>70886017
And it didn't kick off its promo campaign with
"THIRTY YEARS AGO . . ."
>>70892538
>She's supposed to be the wacky one.
her hysterical screaming in that diner scene was pretty wacky.
Whole movie is a mess, not one of them has any kind of personality, relatable or otherwise, it's like they just stand around waiting to say their lines than actually have conversations.
>>70892504
I always got the impression Murray was the one holding back any attempt at a sequel. I dont know whether he was waiting on the perfect script, had n interest in doing another Ghostbusters, or just being a cunt. In any case, Egon is dead and the window has closed.
>>70892638
That clip they showed on the talk show felt like it was intentionally chosen to showcase an utter lack of chemistry and timing.
Seriously, it feels to me like they weren't even in the same room together delivering those lines.
>>70892652
Yeah, if anything, it's Aykroyd who's hellbent on making a sequel.
>>70892504
>Imagine being Bill Murrey
>Trying to get Ghost Busters 3 made
But that was Aykroyd.
>>70891237
If he said anything negative about it, his legacy and good movies would become worthless and the last dying gasp of a long and varied carrer would go through a trail by media and would probably kill him.
>Mfw my goto halloween costume is Bill Murray Groundskeeper from Caddieshack.
>>70885586
because this is neo-Jewlywood's version of a troll if you liked the original.
