RATE. DISCUSS. WATCH.
>>70742597
first for eli
>>70742597
Hi OP, what did you watch today?
![Mala.morska.vila.1976.720p.HDTV.x264-DON.mkv_snapshot_00.34.50_[2016.06.11_20.11.07].png](https://i.imgur.com/aH2ZjSv.jpg "Mala.morska.vila.1976.720p.HDTV.x264-DON.mkv_snapshot_00.34.50_[2016.06.11_20.11.07].png")
>>70742597
>mfw it's another meme profile in the op episodesaved
so is wingding refn's earlier stuff worth checking out? like the pusher series or valhalla rising
>>70743824
Valhalla Rising is a flawed film, but worth checking out anyway.
>there are people who actually believe Pusher 3 isn't Refn's best
>>70743060
today I watchedTHE OOGIELOVES IN THE BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE
http://letterboxd.com/steakbro/
>>70744513
>want to rewatch the Revenant
>Running time is 2hours 30+ minutes
just too much
fan edit when
>>70744180
Actually going to see Pusher 3 today
http://letterboxd.com/lozjudai/
>>70744968
Colorful is shit. Delete it from your watchlist this instant.
>>70745522
How do I know is it shit if I haven´t seen it?
>>70745553
>>70744934
>156 minutes is too long to rewatch
bruh
>>70745623
ignore the embryos
they will just infuriate you
>>70746208
t. embryo
http://letterboxd.com/synt/
What if The Black Cauldron had been a success?
Is this really him?
http://letterboxd.com/ggeecckkoo/
>>70747451
Obviously not, it's a meme man
>>70743060
today I watched THE OOGIELOVES IN THE BIG BALLOON ADVENTURE
http://letterboxd.com/steakbro/
>>70747406
>What if The Black Cauldron had been a success?
2D animation would have been slightly more relevant for slightly longer
There'd be a larger line up for the Disney princesses
There would have either been a shitty prequel or a shitty sequel featuring twice as many funny animal sidekicks
>>70748207
if the black cauldron were a success you probably wouldn't have been born as the circumstances in the world would have had a much different outcome.
http://letterboxd.com/Fightboat/
>>70747406
The Black Cauldron is amazing. It's actually the first movie I remember seeing in theaters and remember it being intense as hell. Shame Disney used it as an excuse not to try anything new for the forseeable future.
http://letterboxd.com/Unrequited/
The third installment of Sharpe wasn't too good despite seemingly having a bigger budget. Also whoever suggested I watch Once on here, thanks it was great.
chchdjdj
Daily reminder to watch more movies, you huge plebs.
https://letterboxd.com/cinebro/list/they-shoot-pictures-dont-they-top-1000-film/
>>70749221
I marathoned all of the Sharpes several years ago and they all blend together now. Gotta do it again some time this year, comfy shit.
letterboxd.com/pastafrola
Dean, Ali is probably showing on a big screen near you.
>>70750821
Holy shit I hate that character so much but actually really like the actor, I'm so conflicted. Harper best bro.
Based Brad made a Letterboxd?!
follow the v
>>70752014
You don't even log anything on LB anymore and RYM a shit.
>>70752547
Shut le f*ck
>>70752566
To heck!?
>>70752547
apologize
now
gimme your top5 of the 60´s
>>70752696
For what?
>>70751076
o damn
>mfw 47% of all the movies I've seen are from the 21st century
1920s - 22
1930s - 37
1940s - 78
1950s - 118
1960s - 135
1970s - 184
1980s - 309
1990s - 514
2000s - 834
2010s - 390
>>70753458
t. embryo
>>70742597
http://letterboxd.com/evolution_rex/
>>70752722
La Dolce Vita
Winter Light
High and Low
Funeral Parade of Roses
L'avventura
>>70753522
post stats
>>70752722
>>70753665
i will not expose my patrician stats to embryos like you
>>70754004
I believe you hear that a lot from women.
>>70754038
>talking to women
Reminder that anybody that has ever called you a pleb or an embryo or a cuck knows little about film themselves, and is most likely a teen without many friends. You can safely ignore every single person that posts in these threads/on this board, and just watch and enjoy films as you want.
>>70754087
I was alreaady determined that /lbg/ and /tv/ as a whole haven't seen many films.
see >>70750741
A couple of days ago all respondents had around 100-200 movies from those 1000. Pathetic. Those are the people calling you pleb.
2.5k Club Card holder here
>>70754087
t. embryo
>>70754187
t. embryo
>>70754187
There has literally never been evidence of any user in this thread that knows enough about film that you should be intimidated/respect them
Even those that have seen more films either don't meme that much, or they're still not actually particularly knowledgable
>>70754246
t. teen without many friends
>>70754306
no, people love me :-) you embryo
>>70754306
>lashing out at someone because you're a pleb
typical embryo
>>70754278
>don't meme that much
kys
I watched Go and it turns out Todd Gaines named himself after a character from that movie so it pretty much ruined it for me.
>>70754360
>>70754396
>>70754429
I am unaffected by your mean words because of the earlier statement
>>70748207
You reckon it wouldn't have circumvented the whole Disney Princess thing entirely?
>>70748891
I was amazed about how well it held up. Animation is gorgeous and the story is a good bit of Hero's Journey.
Plus John Hurt as The Horned King is Disney's crowning achievement of a villain that mixes absolute horror, humanity and a weird streak of dark humour.
>>70744180
>>70744968
You lied to me. Pusher 3 is worst of the Pusher films but it´s still good. 2>1>3
Should I marathon it?
Okay lets pleb it out and confess some sins and prejudices we have towards film.
I for one really dislike black and white, no matter the director it drags my enjoyment down by a good margin
>>70755464
damn, that's really pleb, dude
>>70755464
>It's a French/Italian film release from the 60-70s with absolutely horrendous audio
I just don't know how they muck it up.
>>70755464
Long periods of nothing happening, peope just standing somewhere, shots of things for 10 minutes.
Long phylosophical monologues.
>>70755464
I hate if movie is over 3 hours long
>>70755408
absolutely. one of the best films ever made.
What do we think of Performance? Anyone seen it?
>>70755850
My favorite Roeg, co-director or not.
http://letterboxd.com/nosaj/
>>70748779
i like ur favs
Is there any site like LBXD where one could make a private profile
>>70753552
>the dusty blender of evolution_rex
>>70757304
are you okay?
>>70757754
been a bad year but i'm breathing so i suppose so :)
>>70755578
If you spent 1 minute on google you'd already know why.
http://letterboxd.com/machill54/
tfw when you start watching a movie but after 5 mins you can tell you really aren't in the mood to watch anything so turn it off
>>70758259
i hate that feeling
>>70758259
>watch 5 episodes of some shit series instead
>>70758610
watching shit tv I don't have to engage my brain or really even pay attention
holy shit i accidentally watched a godard film and liked it
what the fuck do i do now i want morr but i was supposed to watch them chronologically and now its all fucked up
wait..
WTF
>>70758992
get some autism pills
>>70758992
which one did you like?
and no, you don't need to watch them chronologically, but you really shouldn't go beyond 1967
>>70758992
>i accidentally watched a godard film and liked it
What are you implying? Better not be what it seems
>>70759125
i accidentally watched vivre sa vie and like it, second time i watch a film im not supposed to
think I'm getting Alzheimer's
>>70759168
How do you "accidentally" watch a film? Sounds like one of the excuses whores make when they cheat on their boyfriends - "it just happened".
>>70759240
earlier this year i accidentally bought a ticket for Zoolander 2 instead of Kung Fu Panda 3
not my proudest day
>>70759240
dude i was first going through films i have, opening them and clicking at random spots and picked the first film taht looked interesting so i put on VSV
and like hour earlier i had decided to not watch godard tonight because im tired
had no idea it was his film
last night i thought i was watching film named haywire when i was achtually watching midnight special
i dont know whats fucking happening
>>70759257
Yeah, well, it's not like your first choice was alright.
>>70759338
yeah, that's my point
>>70757978
i hope you can turn it around :)
>>70757978
Why was it a hard year?
>>70753458
>68%
1880s - 1
1890s - 1
1900s - 1
1910s - 3
1920s - 3
1930s - 5
1940s - 8
1950s - 13
1960s - 26
1970s - 42
1980s - 82
1990s - 172
2000s - 466
2010s - 312
>>70759695
>1930s - 5
>1940s - 8
>>70759749
good meme
>>70759695
how do you check this?
>>70759781
http://letterboxd.com/films/decade/2010s/
Filter to show only watched and it will give you the numbers, then scroll through each decade
>>70759781
https://rateyourmusic.com/stats/filmstats?user=
>>70759781
profile drop down menu > films > sort by decade
>>70759662
because i was diagnosed with ocd and health anxiety and have spent the past 6 months obsessively panicking that i have a brain tumour to the point that i also became depressed :-Dbasically i'm becoming a literal autist
inb4 >becoming
wow what a genre
>>70759767
>meme
>>70759894
That category is just fucked beyond believe
>>70759867
I'm jelly of your autist status, put it to good use.
I have a hard time thinking many films will top Fire at Sea. impeccable filmmaking on so many levels. see it on as big a screen as you can.
>>70760147
So, my desktop. Thanks for the rec.
>>70760147
>Giving the Bear for political reasons
Now this literal who has won 2 of the big 3. Disgraceful. And for SJWistic reasons.
>>70760147
If it won that cuck award it must be pro-refugee propaganda so no thanks.
>It is the 'anon is unhappy that people are happy' posting time
kill urself retarded faggot
>>70760183
>PNG
you too, kill urself
>>70760335
>>70760363
is this bel?
>>70760407
Your post can't harm me.
>>70760301
you obviously haven't seen it. it will be acclaimed by critics, yes, but it won't find an audience. it's "about" the refugee crisis but actual refugees/discussions about the crisis occupies less than a quarter of the screen time. it's respectful towards the subject matter of refugees in the same way that I'd call Son of Saul respectful towards that of the Holocaust: neither show nor tell. sure, one can't argue that the urgency and relevancy of the film factored into the win, but it stands on its own rights. you could've stripped the footage of the refugees (i.e. everything that is "about" the refugees) and you'd still have a better film than most of the past few years, at least formalistically.
why are you posting this
just stop
I've heard people complain about how shitty the old VHS rip of tony conrad's The Flicker is because it fucks up the precise timing of the frames or something. is the new DVD rip from RE:VOIR ok in that regard?
>>70760049
I will try
>>70760556
Who's mans
So do you guys consider it cheating if I mark 20th century movies as seenobviously im not rating them
>>70760520
I haven't seen it, but I intend to. Hopefully you're right and it stands by its own filmic qualities. But I will be suspicious until there.
>>70760664
Are you high?
>>70760147
Where did you snatch Boi Neon? Missed at the festivals last year and havent found it since
>>70760664
why would it be cheating?
>>70760147
whats your profile want to follow u u seem patrician besides dazed and confused
>>70760249
no problem. if you are inherently opposed to immigrants then you'll have quarrels with the film, as a lot of people itt seem to. but then again, it would be foolish to consider oneself serious about film if one refuses to watch/appreciate films with strong contemporary political themes. aren't a whole lot -- if not the majority -- of the great modern films overtly political/cover progressive subject matters? Carol, Arabian Nights, Fury Road and Hateful Eight come to mind, and those are all from last year.
>>70760700
I guess the same could be reiterated here. I get that we might differ in terms of ideology, but I urge you to watch it nonetheless. its visuals are some of the best I've seen (a lot of it is obviously constructed, despite being labeled a documentary).
>>70760757
saw it in theatre this morning at a pre-screening. it's scheduled for theatrical release in August over here. not that I'd recommend you see it, it's just hollow provocation (or at least imo).
>>70760729
>>70760812
think he meant 19th century
>>70760847
http://letterboxd.com/worriedfire/
Dazed and Confused is listed primarily because if there's any film I could watch over and over again in eternity it's that one. I'm not someone who likes to rewatch films (why watch a film again if I could discover a potential favorite instead?) but D&C always get's me going.
>>70760907
D&C, while not like my school days, invokes the same feelings in me that I have when I remember those days. It is SO amazing.
>>70760907
>why watch a film again if I could discover a potential favorite instead?
enemy of cinema detected
>>70760849
to be fair cinema has always been about contemporary politics in some way
>>70760976
what
>>70760969
same here. but I think that's Linklater's trademark; regardless of what he tackles he is always nostalgic for something that never could have been as pleasurable as he illustrates it. take the Before trilogy, f.i., they are phenomenal films but you would never in a thousand years experience something close to the connection they have over a night. but as a film (trilogy)? oh boy are they good.
>>70761026
of their time*
>>70761026
I don't disagree, but that only enforces my point: I think it'd be difficult -- at least for me -- to consume and appreciate the same art as I do if I was conservative af.
>>70760907
>I'm not someone who likes to rewatch films
>>70760849
I'm Brazilian and i was pretty much busy last year during screening time, so i'd thought i check that, doesnt seem great, but interested in seeing it, people told me the cinematography looks good.
I'd reccomend you to watch Neighboring Sounds and The History of Eternity, both movies were made in Brazil's northeast, the people there produce some great stuff.
>>70761071
Or left-wing as fuckand I think I lean a bit more to the left
>>70761081
that's the dumbest thing I've read in a while.
>>70761100
thanks for the recommendations! I'll try and get to them soon.
>>70761114
Riefenstahl is an anomaly though. generally speaking, most artists are leftist in their views.
>>70761071
it doesn't have anything to do with being conservative. it has to do with your ability to understand and empathize with differing viewpoints regardless of their origin.
![Dazed.and.Confused.1993.1080p.Criterion.Bluray.DTS.x264-GCJM.mkv_snapshot_01.29.41_[2016.03.16_03.33.08].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/vS0YQdQ.jpg "Dazed.and.Confused.1993.1080p.Criterion.Bluray.DTS.x264-GCJM.mkv_snapshot_01.29.41_[2016.03.16_03.33.08].jpg")
>>70761032
I don't think D&C has that same super amplified experience of Before trilogy, it really feels very much down to earth ime (and that's why I prefer it and Slacker to his other work).
There's that bittersweet touch to it, just something about it when you were young and didn't quite realize how amazing it was until retrospect when it was gone.
Just fuck my feelings up Richard
>>70761154
Vart såg du Love and Friendship? Trodde att den hade premiär i September
>>70761154
>most artists are leftist in their views.
That's only true for the fucks at the art/film schools, the majority of which will amount to nothing.
>>70761186
I guess so. Are there any notable conservative film makers or artists?
>>70761154
>that's the dumbest thing I've read in a while.
Care to elaborate?
t. different
>>70761234
The greatest of them all was.
>>70761254
You posted a picture of Ford, though
>>70761254
>I am a liberal democrat. And above all I am a rebel.
What did he mean by this?
>>70761254
While he became republican later in life he was notoriously progressive
>americucks turn the thread into muh conservative muh liberal shitstorm
>>70761393
The conversation is pretty civil actually
t. Europe
>>70761417
t. Alberto Barbosa
>>70761417
I know, but come on.
Everyone is talking about Muslims, Trump, the Putinshits and all that crap. Can we talk about movies and stuff for once.
>>70761451
lmao for a sec I thought that was the guy who gave everything 0 at Cannes
>>70761480
Blame the nigger shilling the refugee movie desu
>>70761488
>the guy who gave everything 0 at Cannes
wat
>>70761186
sure, and I'll admit to not being able to to empathize with people of opposing ideologies to the extent that one perhaps should. regardless, what you're proposing is completely different to what >>70760301 wrote (whom I can only assume isn't you).
>>70761220
Filmhuset, Stockholm. invite-only event for people who run theaters. and yeah, it doens't screen until September (same as Fuocoammare, and Neon Bull comes up in August).
>>70761241
if you have a general understanding of an art form (say film) then you'll most likely be able to evaluate a film you've only seen once. what that quote proposes is some idea that every piece of art must be experienced multiple times, but if I were to return to Paris I sure wouldn't seek out the fucking Mona Lisa again, but something else that I have yet to see in person. guidelines for how to experience art is never a good idea, at least not in my opinion (and, although it is another conversation, filmmakers are not the same as filmgoers).
>>70761393
I'm not a liberal.
>>70761507
I'm not a nigger.
Leftist filmmakers:
Buñuel
Marker
Godard
Lunch
Welles
Straub & Huillet
Robert Altman
Rightist filmmakers:
??
please add some for both sides
>>70761561
Neil Breen is more leftist than any of those poseur hacks.
>>70761558
Wasn't being literal when I called you a nigger
>>70761561
Leftist filmmakers:
Buñuel
Marker
Godard
Lunch
Welles
Straub & Huillet
Robert Altman
Rightist filmmakers:
Eastwood
John Ford
Hawks
Bigelow
Mel Gibson
Gilliam
>>70761561
Kobayashi and Kaurismäki are definitely left
>>70761561
>Rightist filmmakers:
Kubrick? His films have a strong anti-humanist current, with a pessimistic view of both human nature and attempts to change it. I don't know if that's "rightist" but it seems philosophically conservative.
>>70761558
måste fan flytta till stockholm. de skall dra ner på cinemateket här också ;;
>>70761701
Kubrick wasn't human. He cares not for these petty affairs.
>>70761697
why Hawks?
>>70761697
damn all the leftist ones are shit, cant be a coincidence
>>70761697
>>70761768
Wasn`t there a rumor the Hawks was a bisexual
>>70761697
>Bigelow
ahahaha what
>>70761558
>>70761241
my response was pretty brief, but I hope you get what I'm trying to say. stipulating guidelines for art is foolish, as is the idea that art even *can* be experienced several times. yes, film is often easier to get ahold of than theatre, but seldom in the format that it "should" be experienced in (projection, obviously, and Kubrick would likely agree). now, I don't think you can understand a film completely after a single viewing -- that's not at all what I'm saying -- but if film is a genuine interest then you'll likely be more interested in gaining an understanding of the art form that you simply cannot gain by just rewatching Citizen Kane (or whatever film) into oblivion.
>>70761701
You fucking wot, mate? Did you actually see Paths of Glory or 2001?
>>70761697
Would add Spielberg I think
Hard to come up with non american rightist directors
>>70761897
>jew
>>70761876
PoG is Kubrick at his most fatalistic and pessimistic
>>70761876
or Barry Lyndon.
or Dr. Strangelove, which is pretty far from rightist filmmaking.
>>70761749
jo, jag hörde det. Cinemateket är fan fint, och Filmvetenskap på Filmhuset likaså. att se 35mm-kopior varje morgon är inte helt fel.
>>70761186
>it has to do with your ability to understand and empathize with differing viewpoints regardless of their origin.
There's a difference in all this. Fellini's 'E la nave va' has a scene you can choose to interpret as being 'pro-human' in the liberal sense. A bunch of snooty aristocrats dance and sing with a shipful of Syrian refugees (I shit you not) and they all blend into one ambiguous crowd – does this invalidate the rest of the film? It's simply a footnote you can brush off as a bit misguided. Vidor's 'Our Daily Bread' has the characters form what is essentially a kolkhoz. Most all Stalinist and Maoist propaganda has this hysterical radiant joy being transmitted with absolute sincerity – cinema of ideologues who genuinely believe in what they're making art about. It's this aestheticism and ideological purity I can empathise with, even as someone who's very far right. The same qualities that make any film good.
That being said, Ferrara and Straub-Huillet are most often shit because their ideas are shit, which is directly linked to their liberalism.
>>70761824
Are you retarded?
>>70761800
Being conservative has nothing to do with sexuality.
>>70761897
I guess all the koreans are right wing.
>>70761876
Everybody has exceptions.
But Paths of Glory is mainly an indictment of bad leadership and pointless slaughter, while 2001 has humanity's potential and achievements the result of divine intervention. So even those films could fit into a conservative view.
>>70762060
>Paths of Glory is mainly an indictment of bad leadership and pointless slaughter, while 2001 has humanity's potential and achievements the result of divine intervention
Jesus fucking Christ, anon. I think you need to give those films another viewing because they are not at all about what you think they are.
>>70762060
not any divine intervention: aliens. existence of intelligent life not of Earth is far from the conservative view.
Also, it's science fiction.
>>70761962
låter som att du lever livet. själv går jag på chalmers, vill du byta?
>>70762176
>mfw Finn
>mfw all of the great Finnish filmmakers are Finnish Swede
>mfw all of our culture is thanks to swedes
>>70762246
ni är ju bättre på allt annat dock
>>70762246
>Rauni Mollberg.
>Aki Kaurismäki
>Edvin Laine
>Suomenruotsalaisia
ei saatana mitä propagandaa taas
>>70762310
tack så mycket
>>70762108
So what's your take on them?
>>70761962
Barry Lyndon is about a man with no scruples, who never reforms, and who comes to a sorry end as a result of his actions. His one moment of compassion toward an enemy leads directly to his ruin. All of this is exactly counter to the Enlightenment liberal view.
I'll grant you that Dr. Strangelove isn't really conservative in any way, but I think it's a mistake to try to pigeonhole people, especially artists, as exclusively "leftist" or "rightist" or whatever anyway. Anon upthread was looking for examples of rightist filmmakers and Kubrick struck me as someone who generally followed a conservative perspective of sorts.
>>70762176
stopp skriving svenska du är homosexuels :d 6-1
>>70762176
stopp skriving svenska du är homosexuels :d 6-1
>>70762375
arto, tapa ittes
>>70762121
What's the difference between unknowable, inscrutable aliens that have the power to jump-start human evolution and transcend time and space -- and God?
>>70762396
>Barry Lyndon is about a man with no scruples, who never reforms, and who comes to a sorry end as a result of his actions.
I have no intention of sitting here and typing out a list of Kubrick analyses for someone who is autistic enough to interpret films in a purely literal fashion. The fact alone that you can sit here and type this shit out proves that you know absolutely nothing about film. You're the type of person who would watch 'Turin Horse' and write 'The Turin Horse is a harrowing tale of a man and his daughter whose horse refuses to move'
>>70762523
Kill yourself swiftly
>>70762523
The Bible. 2001 presumes evolution (of life and of consciousness) is real and progressive. Catholicism presumes man was created as-is like some IKEA flat-pack furniture God assembled.
>>70762176
nä, jag tror jag klarar mig bra här. men tack för erbjudandet!
>>70762396
I can agree with Barry Lyndon strictly in terms of plot, but I do think it's a very, very humane film in how it portrays his character, and I'd personally categorize it as farther to the left than what you would. that being said, regardless of whether you'd label him liberal or conservative, he's still not political in the sense that leftist filmmakers are (Godard, et al.) and few conservative/rightist filmmakers are as overtly political in their filmmaking as the leftist are (though that isn't to say that the Godardian leftist filmmaking is superior by virtue of having a more visible ideology).
>>70762552
>You're the type of person who would watch 'Turin Horse' and write 'The Turin Horse is a harrowing tale of a man and his daughter whose horse refuses to move'
this is the funniest thing I've read today. thanks.
I'm done for tonight. good night!
Fucking nu-males
>>70762705
what was that a review of
>>70762728
Does it matter?
>>70762705
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IknswT779p8
>>70762029
>all the koreans are right wing.
Are you retarded?
>>70762757
Yes
>>70762757
not really. looked up the guy's profile anyway. what a tool.
>>70762552
You're an idiot who has nothing to say. Feel free to stop posting any time.
>>70762787
Tony Awards soon senpai.
>>70762705
Ben Brewer brews a cup-o Ben
>>70761291
not him but massive Fordfag here. Ignoring the fact that Democrats and Republicans had a massive demographic switch during the Civil Rights Movement, Ford was a filmmaker less interested in making overtly political statements (Pappy made Stagecoach and Grapes of Wrath only one year apart) then he was in a set of themes: the individualism vs. collectivism, examination of masculinity, and the evolution of the American Dream, pertaining particularly to the frontier. This is why he can make films ranging from How Green Was My Valley to The Sun Shines Bright and still have a filmography that has a consistent and cohesive persona.
>>70761328
I wouldn't necessarily say his later films were progressive as much as they were reflective and inclusive. Ford did recognize that he made some generalizations in his early films, but he never attempted to revise or correct it, just to tell a story from a different point of view.
here is one of my favorite pappy videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25b5TJFLHwE
>>70760849
>Carol, Arabian Nights, Fury Road and Hateful Eight
>great modern films
this general is so fucked
>>70762681
I can see Barry Lyndon as fairly humane in its treatment of the character, yeah. But still not sympathetic to his ethos or actions. I guess I should say that when I characterize Kubrick's movies as conservative, I'm thinking of the term more as a philosophy of humanity than a political position. So maybe I'm straying from >>70761561's question.
>>70762890
2 out of 4 is okay
>>70762890
scrap Hateful Eight. the other three are truly fantastic.
>>70762995
Carol is god-awful
>>70762995
>Carol
>fantastic
yeah nah what a shit flick
and Fury Road was awful too
>>70763069
how was fury road awful?
>>70763026
sorry, didn't know that!
>>70763069
>Fury Road was awful
explain this without using the words "reddit", "video game", or "kiddie".
>>70762375
http://letterboxd.com/r2_d2/
lol apua
>>70763069
embarrassingly bad taste
>>70763337
>>70763197
oh wow the sjw brigade is here
>>70763366
>/r9k/ poster didn't like what is unarguably one of the best-directed action films ever made because of "muh women"
don't have to be an SJW (and i'm certainly not) to know that's stupid
>>70763366
>le shitpost
Fuck off
>>70762060
>2001 has humanity's potential and achievements the result of divine intervention
this is fucking comical, I should frame it on, my wall
also lmao @ people thinking kubrick was a """"leftist"""" or that leftists have a monopoly on great art. there's something sinister about a bunch of millennials who stare at a screen all day pretending like Altman, Buñuel, and Godard (lmao) are examples of """"leftists"""" making good art, whatever the fuck that even means
this thread is a good example of why the majority of people are supremely unqualified to talk about art. I can only hope people won't say such stupid shit about things I make when I'm no longer there to tell them they're objectively wrong
>>70763366
I voted for bernie. what are you gonna do about it? :)
>>70763417
yeah it has nicely filmed action
that's about it too bad rest of it is garbage
>>70763320
ketkä kaikki suomalaiset täällä oikein lurkkaa?
>Carol is a shit flick
>>70763503
It has much more than some 'nicely film action'
>>70763429
you almost had me until:
>Godard (lmao) are examples of """"leftists"""" making good art, whatever the fuck that even means
nice bait
>>70763417
>Fury Road
>unarguably one of the best-directed action films ever
watch more film
>>70763503
wrong
>>70763558
kill self
>>70763554
not bait, get better taste
>>70763618
get better taste
>>70763554
(u)
>>70763558
It is, though
>>70763618
oh le symbolism
auwiii camera goes high to show dominance in start
poor are at the bottom WOWO cinematography
*insert the searchers* nod for 'cinematography'
'add le substance by throwing some shit sjw idelogies and 'world was destroyed by evil men' shit
How can u watch that trash with a straight faace
let alone how shit everyone but Joe is acting
>>70763678
>How can u watch that trash with a straight faace
because I'm not brainwashed into thinking everything everything is a "SJW" buzzword
>>70763665
get better taste
>>70763716
get better taste
>>70763678
>This is what /pol/tards look like when trying to give 'film criticism'
>>70763678
>How can u watch that trash with a straight faace
i'm not an autism-fueled memelord
>>70763813
>everyone who disagrees with me is a /pol/tard
embarrassing
>>70763849
Okay, be a classic retard then
>>70763837
how much time do you spend on the internet projecting your autism onto strangers
>>70763917
none, why
>>70763917
the same amount of time you spend trying to force your right wing retardedness onto other strangers.
>>70763929
>none
so you just lack self awareness then, gotcha
>people are having genuinely good discussion about politics and film
>one shitposter ruins everything
>>70763996
i blame myself by attempting to engage
>>70763952
bernie lost, get over it and get back to your $15 an hour McJob where you don't actually work and instead post your uncultured views about art on the internet
>>70763529
fedora?
AAHAHAHA WHAT?
for not enjoying that carol film?
it's generic as fuck.
it's astronomically overrated
fuckin google-search 'film-expert' shithead
>>70763996
I Am Become Death, Destroyer of Worlds
>>70764067
>>70764094
>>70763716
you didn't even understand the film you watched? social justice for the poor in the film and for female actresses in action films by hiring one burnout hag to play main lead and fail at it
>>70764132
More desperate shitposting, huh?
>>70763429
>it's a pleb pretends to be patrician post
>>70764389
>it's a "it's a ____ post" post
>>70764549
>it's an atempt at being witty in a post-modern way post
hahah it's meta! comedy gold! upvote!
>>70764612
jean reddit godard would be proud
Praise for FR and Carol goes hand in hand with Letterboxd tumblr-demographic, all three shallow, preachy and judgemental.
>>70764642
You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post! Amazingly, you've neglected to provide any substantial criticism of either film while disparaging their fanbases. Sad!
did know where else to post this.
what film should i watch tonight? I'm trying to catch up on 2016 films i haven't seen yet.
>Mountains May Depart
>Diablo
>Approaching the Uknown
>13 hours: The Secret Soldiers
>Eye in the Sky
>Warcraft
>Creative Control
>>70764612
>"it's a X post"
>not inherently meta
WEW
E
W
lads, I think schmuck poster might actually be a minor muslim celeb
https://www.blackpoolgrand.co.uk/event/omid-djalili-schmuck-for-a-night/
