It has a few funny moments.

Not big on dude weed stoner movies but I am a big sucker for the buddy genre and thought H&K was excellent.

>>70585584
It was OK. Not a good movie, but I can't say its bad though. Maybe if I was a stoner I'd like it.

>>70585584
It's good but it doesn't quite scratch its way into classic-level. Almost but not quite.

I like the second film the most. So far I've found no one who likes it the best out of the three besides myself. I just found it better throughout and less lame.

JACKSON'S TRYING TO ESCAPE!

>>70585894
Didn't even know there was a third one, it's probably for the best

only thing I remember about the second one was having the DVD, and basically having access to porn as a young teenager

>>70585584
it was a movie that was big for a year and then the interest just dropped off just in time for a sequel that nobody gave a shit about.

>>70585894

first one was way more comfy.

>less lame

i dno the 2nd 1 has alot more lame bits in it imo. the whole alphabet thing at the end was completely lame and the rednecks house thing was kind of weak.

Weedkino

One of the few comedies to make me laugh

>>70585894
i agree with this, but i do also agree with >>70586252

first one was way more comfy, but the second one was all around more entertaining.

i never watched that weird christmas threequel they did. i remember it pandering arbitrary 3d really hard so i had no interest.