>Bryan Cranston was considered for the role of Lex Luthor before Eisenberg was cast.
>>70553666
source. i remember cranston saying eh was never approached
I'm ok with Jesse cause he has a good chin and looks alright bald
Why do we keep having this thread? Do people want good actors in bad movies?
>>70553666
Yeah but he turned out great anyways. Best villain in a long time.
>>70553806
>DC cuck crying.png
Nah. He was total shit desu.
>>70553697
>At that point, they had were still interviewing actors about the Luthor role – most of them older, more imposing figures, such as Breaking Bad star Bryan Cranston.
>“We talked about the usual suspects that you would imagine; any actor who has been bald, probably,” Synder says. “Bryan Cranston would have been great, right? And by the way, he’s an amazing actor. Can you imagine how different the movie would be?”
http://www.ew.com/article/2016/03/25/batman-v-superman-jimmy-olsen
>>70553982
>Can you imagine how different the movie would be?
It still would have been trash. They only wanted him because they've seen him without hair. It's exactly like casting threads on /tv/.
>>70553806
WTF? He was one of the worst parts of an already shit movie.
>>70553722
>putting looks before acting talent.
Would have brought down the movie
What a overrated clown, le serious man
>>70553666
>Eisenberg
>>70555285
>Cranston
>>70555792
>Eisenberg
>(((Berg)))
Cranston is overrated as fuck. He was great as Walter White, but everything he has after it has been exact the same.
But the poor Jew eisemberg would be without work
They could have stopped this
Eisenbergs Luthor is like a reskinned Joker, he does not do the character justice
>>70556299
Reported
Turns out that Bryan Cranston isn't that great of an actor though.
Why do you think they gave him such a shit role in the godzilla movie ?
He's type-casted to be the nice dad / freak out dad.
>>70556388
Yup
>>70556491
>filtered
