So this is based off the original fairly tale depiction of the Little Mermaid
I can actually buy her in this role due to her propensity for playing vulnerable, naive characters (Carrie, Hick)
Will she sing in the film though?
>>70455239
but its not disney's little mermaid
she wont even be called ariel
>>70455239
>not attractive
>linebacker body
>cant act
>box office poison
I remember emma watson was rumored for this years ago when they said sofia coppola was gonna do it. Funny how she got belle. Shed be really good as ariel too, better ththan moretz, emma has a nice singing voice
>>70456056
all true, which leaves me completely baffled on why there's so many fucking threads about this bitch, I seriously don't get the appeal
>>70456056
where does this box office poison meme come from?
literally 1 film she was the lead in failed to turn a profit for its investors
>>70456093
ITS NOT DISNEY'S - THE LITTLE MERMAID
she is not going to be called ariel. its not going to be a musical
>>70456189
these retards wont listen
this is the version you should be comparing to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLDp-E_aWR0
why would you cast her in a role that covers up her best asset?
>>70456333
she has no good assets
>>70455239
Doesn't the original Little Mermaid get cucked by the guy and end up dying and turning into sea foam?
>>70456431
kek
>>70456431
found the fish body that she is going to have
>>70456431
How many fucking lemons does she need in that water bottle?
>adapting The Little Mermaid again instead of the Marsh King's Daughter
I mean come the fuck on.
>>70456431
>>70456109
it's those dicksucker lips of hers, literally her only good quality
>>70456023
This.
This film is not being released by Disney and Disney owns the rights to the Ariel character.
Shes just playing a fat generic brand mermaid character.
>>70456431
MER-MAN!
>>70456333
>>70456368
her best asset is her lips, everyone knows this