if "The past is already written. The ink is dry" crap is really true then what is the point of bran's greenseeing, to give us a bunch of flashbacks? how would that happen in the books?
The same way.
Narratives are actually already existent, btw. Reading them doesn't make things happen. Bran is just a window into plot details for the reader.
In the 'biz it's called "writing yourself into a corner"
>>70449986
You are thick as shit.
>everthing in GoT happened because of bran
dropped
It's just a way to present exposition. Most of which should have been done at the beginning of the series.
>>70450124
This
The Tower of Joy fight happened in book one.
They could just do typical flashbacks by having characters remember or something.
>>70450512
Wait a minute.
That card.
Character development, plotpleb..
Exactly, it's fucking nothing. Bran is nothing more than an exposition tool because GRRM was too lazy to come up with something else.
