>Avada...
Did he really mean to kill Harry over losing Dobby?
Maybe he saw a bug.
>>70401801
Isn't it weird that if you had a "biggest asshole in the world" contest Voldemort wouldn't even get first place?
>Lucius Malfoy
>Dolores Umbridge
>Albus Dumbledore
>>70402662
doublus meaningum!
He was saying "ah va da fuck" about Harry being such a devious little fucker.
Didnt they overreact at Lincoln too?
>>70401801
Why no Harry Potter book where Muslims try to kill wizards for being haram?
>>70402724
accio doubles
Why didn't Harry just buy a fucking gun?
>>70404373
Because it's for children not paedo manchildren from /v/
>>70404555
>>70404555
Fug r u a wizard
>>70401801
I also think there was a point where Draco tried to cast sectumsempra on him, which is basically like slashing at him with a big knife.
>>70404555
> accios doubles
> gets trips
>>70404555
Wouldst thou like to dub deliciously
>>70401801
Shittus postingulus!
>>70404555
Thanks, but we need to realize how bad this industry is now. For example, Harry Potter was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the seriesüf only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but itüfs certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books are g-g-good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
>>70404589
Bullets could most likely be blocked with a basic shield charm.
