[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Can you read this Judd Apatow quote without feeling sick?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 103
Thread images: 20
File: cuckatow.png (656 KB, 971x940) Image search: [Google]
cuckatow.png
656 KB, 971x940
Can you read this Judd Apatow quote without feeling sick?
>>
>>70379558
This is getting out of control
>>
Literally everything he said is retarded. I fucking despise this faggot. Nobody else really gets to me, but this jerk off pisses me the fuck off for some reason.

I challenge any of you to make it through the video from some awards show last year where he presented Amy Schumer with a lifetime achievement award.
>>
>>70379558
probably, but I won't because this is a shitty thread.

fuck you.
>>
I'm not even that much of a "MGTOW" person or woman hater, the trailer is just not fucking funny. Unless they're the only film in history to save the good jokes for the movie and not the trailer, I'm not sold on it. Seriously: "I don't know if this a race thing or a sexist thing, but I'm pissed as hell!" That's not funny.
>>
>>70379558

>Can you read this Judd Apatow quote without feeling sick?

..No? He's a famous Jew in Hollywood.

I could read it and feel that something that hyperbolic would be absolutely expected from him, but I wouldn't feel "sick".
>>
What happened to Judd? First he makes this wildly sexist movie Knocked Up and then derided Katherine Heigl for speaking the truth, and then he turned into this?
>>
>>70379604
>Amy Schumer with a lifetime achievement award
What? She's 35
>>
>>70379653
that sickness going around called sjw
>>
Trump hater here. Paul Feig doesn't make funny movies.
>>
Fuck this faggot. He hasn't made a decent movie since Superbad
>>
>stars the funniest people on earth

holy fucking shit lol
>>
>Trump supporters don't have terrible taste
/pol/ btfo, I'm now #feelingtheJohnson
>>
Daily reminder that Liberals are completely and totally out of touch with reality.
>>
>>70379558
Is he implying theres anything wrong with those two things?
>>
>>70379785
yes he is
>>
>>70379769
"Reality tends to have a liberal bias."

How does it feel to be wrong?
>>
>$0.1 had been added to this literally whos account
He obviously has personal gains in this, no one can be this delusional
>>
>>70379873
"a witty saying proves nothing"

get fucked senpai
>>
>>70379873
"my dick tends to have a bias towards penetrating your mother"
>>
>>
>>70379653
from Wikipedia

>His family was Jewish
>>
>>70379934
shots fired
>>
>>70379558
Really makes you thin
>>
File: 1463452648460.png (575 KB, 555x571) Image search: [Google]
1463452648460.png
575 KB, 555x571
>>70379558
>Apatow
/pol/ is always right
>>
>>70379558
People ask why others are going through such great lengths to hate the movie when no other reboot has made people so angry. It's because these people are going through such great lengths to defend it. You'd probably see a similar reaction if everyone defended the Robocop and Total Recall remakes from crticism for absolutely no goddamn.
>>
>>70379618
"MGTOW" ????
Spell shit out. We obviously have time if we're on the site
>>
>>70380247
MGTOW is voluntary celibacy
>>
>Fig
>Great

Pick one, Apatow.
>>
File: image.jpg (23 KB, 500x280) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
23 KB, 500x280
>>70379558
I'm genuinely curious as to how people would react if the tables were turned.

For example: What is a franchise that women love? The first thing that comes to MY mind is "Sex in the City".
First, put out the news that they are making Sex in the City 3, get people interested and stir up hype.
Then months later put out the news that they are re-casting the parts to appeal to a younger crowd or some shit. Get people wondering "who will play Carrie?" or whatever.

Then months later reveal the casting as Seth Rogan, Jonnah Hill, Zachary Galifianakis and Tracy Morgan.
And then put out a teaser trailer of "Sex in the City 3 - We're bringing sexy back" which is just all fart jokes, dick jokes and weed jokes.
How well received would that movie be?
And then sit back and accuse anyone who doesn't like it of being sexist, misogynistic, worshiping Satan or whatever.
>>
File: grown_ups_ver2_xlg.jpg (134 KB, 210x185) Image search: [Google]
grown_ups_ver2_xlg.jpg
134 KB, 210x185
>stars the funniest people on earth
lol, if these people are the funniest people on earth, then the world of comedy is fucking dead.
>>
>>70379558
He's right that it does overlap at least on 4chan, but 1. A lot of people hate it for reasons that have nothing to do with Trump. 2. This is literally just
>If you don't like the movie, you're an evil Trump-supporting racist boogieman ;_:!
>>
>>70380283
>voluntary
Hahahahaha

No, MGTOW who actually chose it just don't have relationships, they aren't celibate and still hook up with chicks from time to time. Any guy who's "MGTOW" and celibate isn't by choice celibate, and that's the overwhelming majority of guys who are MGTOW
>>
I voted Bernie and will vote for Schillary and I hate this fucking remake and think Feig is an egotistical asshole.
>>
>>70380382
Thing is Sony was thinking of doing this with an all male Ghostbsters. What is this? A 4th grade dance?
>>
File: ghostbuster-1024.jpg (222 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
ghostbuster-1024.jpg
222 KB, 1024x768
>Make shitty cash grab unnecessary remake of beloved cult classic
>A classic by Harold Ramis, comedic genius, tastelessly made after his death
>Insert Liberal Agenda
>People see the trailer, looks cheap as fuck, not funny, doesn't even have any of the original cast
>They dislike it
>"GOD DAMN FASCISTS, RACISTS, ANTI-WOMEN, FAG HATERS, REEEEEEEEE"

why do liberals think they can get away with this shit?
>>
>>70381510
reminder that it's only a small fraction of liberals who does this shit
>>
>>70381510

>why do liberals think they can get away with this shit?

because they can and they are

we are currently experiencing the rapid collapse of the West, did you just get out of a coma or something?
>>
>>70379558
>people don't like the new cashgr- I mean ghostbusters movie
>must be because they like the big meanie I hate waaah
>>
File: fourty keks.png (347 KB, 600x528) Image search: [Google]
fourty keks.png
347 KB, 600x528
>>70379942
Best comment on that tweet: "No blacks?"
>>
>>70381536
And they happen to be the most loud and influential liberals? How curious.
>>
>>70379873
A great quote from the liberal philosopher Stephen Colbert!

You, sir, are a glorious bastard.
>>
>>70379873
That's literally saying most people build their view of reality based on what the liberal media is feeding them.
>>
>>70380382
They already did that it was called Entourage the movie and yes it was panned by critics who coincidentally loved Spy starring Melissa Mccarthy.
>>
Blaming Trump has become the new Nazi insult. Just a bland generic quote to say about things you don't like. Such a cop out. I don't like Trump but I am tired of people using it as crutch for arguments for which they have no substantial defense.

Look at this piece of shit article about how porn should be banned

>Well, no, and not just because of the long (and not entirely ignoble) history of censorship. Law bends to the contours of culture, and more or less liberty will be granted to activities – be they religious or pornographic – depending on how harmful they are perceived to be.
>Even the rise of Donald Trump provides evidence of pornography's social harm. How to understand the success of Trump's makeup-caked, misogynistic candidacy, except as an eruption onto the political stage of the pornographic subterrain?
>If you cringe at Trump's sneering misogyny, then join me in calling for a ban on the thing that made his crude appeal possible. Pornography's enjoyments may be private, but its harms are inescapably public.

http://www.theage.com.au/comment/the-case-for-banning-pornography-20160529-gp6vg7.html
>>
>>70381296
I would watch that Ghostbusters if those 4 were in it. Probably swap out zach for jay cause there needs to be a skinny guy, and maybe tracy for craig robinson
>>
File: Instagram-Peretti.jpg (183 KB, 1440x960) Image search: [Google]
Instagram-Peretti.jpg
183 KB, 1440x960
>>70379942
they're siblings
>>
>a person is named 'judd apatow'

I always disregard opinions whenever this happens
>>
>>70379558
>"and stars the funniest people on earth"
What a sad planet we are.
>>
>>70379873

>Bias

So even reality can be wrong?
>>
File: image.jpg (48 KB, 655x368) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
48 KB, 655x368
>unfunny hackneyed bullshit?
>no everyone is a shitlord
>>
File: Leslie-Jones_612x380_0.jpg (34 KB, 612x380) Image search: [Google]
Leslie-Jones_612x380_0.jpg
34 KB, 612x380
>the funniest people on earth
>>
isnt the american jewish population like 1%?
what are the odds that appatow,dunham,schumer owner off buzzfeed are all jewish?
>>
>>70379729
>Trump hater here

Don't worry, you will go back like the rest when the God Emperor wins
>>
>>70382751
honestly it's her hair

why is her hair so terrible
>>
>>70382878
She's trying to camouflage as pineapple
>>
>>70382878
whatchu want senpai?
you know toothbrushes?
SAY NO MORE
>>
>>70380832
well Bobcat Goldthwait is still alive though he is older than shit now
>>
>>70382468
Entourage and spy have nothing in common,'I dobut you have seen either film
>>
File: 1461630255744.gif (3 MB, 480x270) Image search: [Google]
1461630255744.gif
3 MB, 480x270
>>70379558
No
>>
>>70379558
Yes.

I just feel amused DESU SENPAI.
>>
>>70382949
Can you even read brah? Start here >>70380382 and follow the replies at your own pace.
>>
File: good ole fashioned.gif (2 MB, 400x236) Image search: [Google]
good ole fashioned.gif
2 MB, 400x236
I know part of it is Sony paying very well to clickbait sites to attempt to slut shame any criticism as sexism and another huge part of it is many of the actors and comedians doing this shit are either in binding contracts with Sony or butt buddies with one of the bigshits involved with said movie but its going to be interesting and hilarious to see many of the fuckers backtrack and retroactively shit on the movie like they knew it was terrible from the start.

The sadder thing will be those that'll go on for months after the movie has likely bombed going on and on about how sexism caused the movie to fail
>>
>>70382949
They released on the same weekend
>>
>>70382468
Entourage had nothing to do with sex and the city or any female show
>>
File: 1464477137226.jpg (54 KB, 848x860) Image search: [Google]
1464477137226.jpg
54 KB, 848x860
>>70379558
wow another producer shilling for the movie he's involved in, unbelievable

no really he is a jew who put money in this shit fest anything he says is irrelevant
>>
Jew Apatow needs to be ovened.
>>
>>70379942

I love how that Tweet on the left is celebrating lack of gender and racial diversity
>>
>>70379942
>notice anything in this meeting?
No stoves
>>
Amazing that this is the one remake/reboot/reimagining you cannot shit on.
Tmnt - shit
Transformers - shit
Robocop - shit
Jurassic World - shit
Fantastic Four - shit
Total Recall - shit

But Ghostbusters will be different, sure.

I almost wish a Back to the Future remake were announced it would eclipse this in rage in about two seconds.
>>
File: 1432145610207.jpg (511 KB, 1039x1547) Image search: [Google]
1432145610207.jpg
511 KB, 1039x1547
>>70382536
>>70379942
>>
>>70383518
>Total Recall - shit

I wouldn't really call the new Total Recall a remake. It's more of a new adaption of the same short story but for some reason took the same film name as the last adaption.

But yeah that doesn't detract from the fact it was indeed shit.
>>
>>70383739
Meant it in more of the cashgrab sense, all the movies listed attempted to ride the high of the past

Though the chicks in the new TR were Top Notch.
>>
>>70379558
Is this like the liberal version of "gaaaay"? As in labeling everything you don't like with "he must be a trump supporter"
>>
>>70379558
How long until they connect it to Gamergate? Or did they already.
>>
File: 1464111502397.gif (15 KB, 200x200) Image search: [Google]
1464111502397.gif
15 KB, 200x200
>>70382846
>>
>>70383831
Pretty sure gamergate was mentioned in a few of the many articles, the ones about James Rolfe specifically
>>
>>70379709
for women that's really old
>>
>>70383811
>Is this like the liberal version of "gaaaay"? As in labeling everything you don't like with "he must be a trump supporter"

It's because they are fucking obsessed with categorising and labeling people. They are ironically truely more authoratarian and fascist than the people they fight against for those very things.
>>
>>70380382
Isn't every Seth Rogen movie already the dude version of Sex and the City?
>>
File: 1439709351302.jpg (18 KB, 580x508) Image search: [Google]
1439709351302.jpg
18 KB, 580x508
>>70379558
>Implying he isn't a closeted conservative and evil be default
>Implying I don't hat Trump and Ghostbusters remake and all remakes the same way

Shame on anyone who makes liking or not liking a movie, a political issue.
>>
>>70379873
I've said it time and tie again.

That is by far one of THE most subversive sayings in political history, because reality very well does NOT have a fucking liberal bias, in fact it's very much so the opposite.
>>
>>70382740
kek
>>
>>70379558
He's the one that thinks Bill Crosby raped people without any evidence right?
>>
File: ....jpg (14 KB, 320x320) Image search: [Google]
....jpg
14 KB, 320x320
>>70381536

I don't align with any political side, even on a test it shows I am slap centre

for the past few years any one who calls them self a liberal has some pretty stupid opinions even in real life

I used to think people who were conservative were weird but they are more liberal that actual liberals
>>
Liberals think the movie looks shit too.
>>
>>70384567
Continue saying it

We don't care
>>
File: image.png (404 KB, 640x960) Image search: [Google]
image.png
404 KB, 640x960
>>70382846
Nepotism my friendo
>>
>I would assume there's a very large crossover of people who are doubtful Ghostbusters will be great and people excited about the Donald Trump candidacy.

I think he phrased that poorly and I don't agree with the statement "doubt that Ghostbusters will be great," but if you change that to "people who are upset that the film's cast was replaced by women" I think the statement is fairly accurate given my experience with this website.

t. someone who is ambivalent about both the presidential race and judd apatow.
>>
>>70379873
The quote is from a non-biased liberal right?
>>
File: 1434019056557.jpg (89 KB, 1204x982) Image search: [Google]
1434019056557.jpg
89 KB, 1204x982
>>70383617
I want to cup my mouth over it and huff back all her boogers.
>>
>>70383617
>Truly hate this - hope u and anyone who liked it dies?
???
>>
men are pussies nowadays no matter what generation. scared to death of being labeled women haters.
>>
> it's a /tv/ is retarded and takes the bait episode

What the fuck did you guys think the producer of the fucking movie thought about people trashing it?

I swear this board is full of under aged retarded faggots who haven't got a single fucking clue
>>
>>70387058
No, you're the retard for not seeing how idiotic and blatantly agenda-pushing it is to make a political statement out of people not liking your stupid movie.
>>
>>70379558
It's true tho...?
>>
>>70379653
Katherine Heigl didn't destroy her career only, she destroyed Apatow as well. That's based, I guess
>>
>>70381536
The problem is that the most rational liberals leave the small fraction of liberals to get away with their bullshit because they're too scared of being labeled as sexist, racist, homophobic, etc. and they end alienating the common people.
>>
>>70379739
this.

>yfw he would have no career without Seth Rogen
>yfw he has to put Seth Rogen in every film, movie, cinema, and flick
>>
>>70388128
What agenda, four cunts instead of four faggots? They were never going to replicate the original cast. They're milking a controversy for the big bucks. Can you please honest to god kill yourself?
>>
>>70379558
The first thing they said about this movie was literally GHOSBASTERZ WITH GIRLZ, and now all this disgusting backtracking.
>>
>>70390727
The SJW/anti-Trump agenda. He's been doing it forever. Maybe shill a little less hard next time and actually try to understand a post before you comment on it.
>>
Eh. So I'm not interested in Ghostbusters 3 at all and I thought the trailer looked dumb. So now if I don't go to watch it I'm a woman-hating mysognistic pig? What happened to the world? I just don't want to go see a shitmovie.
Thread replies: 103
Thread images: 20

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.