>According to the film's director John Lasseter, the sequel to the hit film Zootopia (2016) will be shot in 70mm Panavision.
Thoughts?
Stop making un-needed sequels.
>>70319987
CGI is filmed on film?
>>70320057
Yes
>Thoughts?
Yeah, how about a source
>>70320064
what a fucking waste. What's the point?
>>70320097
Disney has tons of high tech. They will pull it off without breaking a sweat
>>70319987
It's a digital movie, how the fuck do they think this works?
this board is full of fucking gullible morons
>>70319987
PANNED
>>70319987
> will be shot in 70mm Panavision.
> will be shot
> shot
fuck off retard
>CGI
>shot
Huh?
>>70320057
>>70320064
>tfw we can officially refer to Disneykino as a "film"
you don't "shoot in Panavision", you screen it in Panavision. you don't shoot it in 70mm either, you use 65mm.
goddamn moron.
>>70320159
Find e a more correct term without sounding like an autist or using 15 words.
You have 10 seconds.
>>70320260
You shoot it on 70mm, aspect ratio and sound recording force it to 65mm. Still shot on 70mm
>>70320308
formatted
>>70320335
no it's literally 65mm negative film. then printed on 70mm for screening.
>>70320308
Made
>>70320308
Produced
>>70319987
Source.
main character will be a panda and they will promote it as pandavision.
>Zootopia II will be Rated M
>"We will be going down a different road in the sequel", says director John Lasseter. "I have received some interesting fan art the last few months, from people all over the world, and I've taken a lot of inspiration from it."
>>70319987
Think about it. If films are "shot" on film and then edited for extra CGI, how do they show the movie in the cinema through actual film?
They don't. The beamer they project it through is fed images from a hard drive.
>>70320741
>Porn
>In THAT quality
one day...
>Shot in 70mm
W-what??
>>70320828
Wait is that the club from that Caravan Palace video?
>>70321091yes
>>70320057
>>70319987
Well not filmed, since the camera is in a computer and the movie will be entirely completed before it is on film.
It's being printed on 70mm film after the fact which actually isn't all that new.
>>70320828
>>70321091
shit, it is as well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbQgXeY_zi4
that's brilliant
>>70320308
blacked
>>70320828
i don't get it
why bunny sad?
>>70320828
>>70321091
i dont understand how lone digger is so popular. its shit. most of their songs plain arent that good. or they could be good, but they wussed out on putting some power into the music. like the difference between muttering some lyrics when you could sing with all your heart. its actually kind of annoying. their only good song is the remix of pack up the louie they did
that aside. good picture. good reference
>>70321255
watch the music video and it'll make sense
>>70321177
>>70320308
Distributed on
>>70319987
For the pleb:
This means it will be displayed as 2.76:1 aspect ratio, correct?
>>70321473
No it means you got trolled.
>>70321511
Yeah, I got trolled real good. As a general question then something filmed in this fashion would have an aspect ratio of 2.76:1?
>>70321598
they could have an aspect ration of whatever they wanted, but they would most likely be in that one yes.
>>70321672
What reason would there be to film in this fashion if not for the wider aspect ratio?
>>70319987
zootopia was shit so who cares.
>>70322537
