[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>Be Sony >Ghostbusters 3 reception is going poorly >Pay
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 41
Thread images: 8
>Be Sony
>Ghostbusters 3 reception is going poorly
>Pay people to call critics sexist for critiquing my movie
>Force Dan Aykroyd to praise the movie

This is some next level damage control.
>>
Is there any point in damage control at this stage?
>>
There is a lot of sexism directed towards the movie though.
>>
Poor, poor man.
>>
File: theabysscalls.jpg (54 KB, 744x792) Image search: [Google]
theabysscalls.jpg
54 KB, 744x792
>>70309602
Yeah and why do you think that is?

Its all for good reason
>>
You guys give way too much of a shit about this movie.

It isn't healthy.
>>
>>70309632
Because you're so used to male dominance in Hollywood, the idea of women taking leading roles in a sci fi buddy comedy is threatening to you?
>>
>>70309634
Have you been saying the same shot in every BvS thread for the past 8 months?
>>
File: b8m8.jpg (25 KB, 419x141) Image search: [Google]
b8m8.jpg
25 KB, 419x141
>>70309672

Try harder m80
>>
>>70309632
Meh, to me it's not really that it's women. It's that the whole movie looks like the typical bland ""funny"" comedy from Hollywood with shit effects and stereotypical characters.
>>
>>70309602
No. Not liking it doesn't make the people sexist. Lots of people hated the other male-lead reboots. It's not new.

For example, remember how people hated on Robocop before it came out (one of the reason was the lack of based Female Lewis btw)?
>>
>>70309634
>OMG WHY DO YOU CIS SHITLORDS CARE SO MUCH ABOUT A MOVIE ON A MOVIE BOARD
>>
File: 2222222.jpg (72 KB, 1206x323) Image search: [Google]
2222222.jpg
72 KB, 1206x323
>>70309554
>Not posting the whole thing.
>>
>>70309733

thanks for proving why you fucking hate this movie

it really is shit but noooo you fucking hate it because muh wominz
>>
>>70309733
This isn't a movie board. It's a meme graveyard.
>>
>>70309672
Movie looks like shit. Dialogue we heard was cringe as fuck. The characters have become stereotypes and are too over the top.

But sure, it's because women. Whatever you say.
>>
>>70309713
The ONLY thing this movie has "going for it" is that it has a gender swapped cast. Therefore making gender the biggest aspect of marketing. Otherwise, its just a shitty reboot - of which we've already had too many of.

We say it looks like shit, and just because women are on the forefront it "must" be sexism. Nobody wants to be sexist, so either you like the movie or you must hate women. See how this works?
>>
File: feminist logic.png (823 KB, 926x755) Image search: [Google]
feminist logic.png
823 KB, 926x755
There’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other.

go see Ghostbusters.
>>
File: 1442083750960s.jpg (3 KB, 115x125) Image search: [Google]
1442083750960s.jpg
3 KB, 115x125
>>70309738
uh,
>>
>>70309554
JimCameronEndorsingGenysis.webm
>>
>>70309738
>I'm paying to see that and bringing all my friends!
Holy shit how desperate are they?
>>
>>70309782
Dont reply to bait posts mang
>>
>>70309738
Anon...I
>>
>>70309807
Feminists are atheists though.
>>
>>70309713
are you talking about the original ghostbusters?
>>
>>70309807
This is next level shilling. Either these publications are being bribed by Sony or feminists are the most easy to manipulate retards on the planet.
>>
>>70309738
>plus Bill Murray is in it!
hahahaha
>>
>>70309895

just fuck my legacy up senpai
>>
So when this comes out and is a massive hit with critics and audiences alike is that gonna be a SJW conspiracy as well?

Or will all the talk just instantly die and /tv/ will slink back to thehole and find a new target for your booty blasted bitter rage just like AUDIENCE WON'T ACCEPT A GURL HERO! AUDIENCE WILL REJECT THE INTERRACIAL AGENDA! shittposting that dominated the board for 8 months before TFA came out?
>>
>>70309872
Burn. Or at least the non-union canadian equivalent. Blistering?
>>
>>70309818
kek, didn't Jimbo endorse Terminator 3 and then years later say the movie was a pile of shit?
>>
>>70309883
i'm afraid it's the later, feminists are easy to manipulate.

good thing they don't follow through, if they did women's soccer would be a success.
>>
>>70309554
I feel bad for Dan, he signed a contract that likely had a "PR tour" clause, and now has to defend this piece of shit or get sued for millions.

This is the corporate equivalent of marrying your high school sweetheart, and then watching her get fucked just to pay the bills.
>>
>>70309738
>man-fans

siiiiigggghhhhhhhhhhh
>>
>>70309738
poor he really think he could make Ghostbusters 3

>Getting a new “Ghostbusters” film in production is something that Dan Aykroyd has been working for years to make happen.
>He talked about potential for more Ghostbuster films, including possible sequels to the original franchise.
>He said, “Oh I’ve written… well, we have…I’ve written, well, there’s three drafts of the old concept that exists.
>And we’re going to be able to salvage some of it and use it. Yeah, we’re gonna be able to use it some day.
>Let’s get this one made and that will reinvigorate the franchise and then we’ll go on to maybe doing a more conventional third sequel as we were planning and another idea I have for it.”

http://theinterrobang.com/dan-aykroyd-gives-clues-new-ghostbusters-reveals-plans-another-sequel-already-works/
>>
>>70309925
I know it's easier to think that places like /tv/ have a deep hatred of women and that's what's fuelling the overwhelming disapproval of this movie, but it's not. It's sociopolitical agendas surrounding female characters and female driven movies that piss people off. A tiny minority had a problem with a female lead in Star Wars. People didn't dislike Rey because she's a woman BUT being a woman is a big part of the reason why she is the way she is. In the current social and cultural landscape, JJ and Kennedy were so afraid of being accused of creating a 'weak' female character that they went too far the other way and created a protagonist without vulnerability or humanity. If you pointed this out, you were labelled. The same thing is happening here. The Total Recall and Poltergeist remakes were called out as being shit before fans of the originals had even seen them, and they were proven right because it only takes a little intuition to know that there's not a lot of artistry in cynically retreading a classic for money. But those remakes didn't hide behind ad hominem attacks when moviegoers pointed out the obvious. In this case, people (guys) are being labelled sexists and mysoginists for calling a spade a spade. They are trying to shame people into seeing their movie.

made me reply
>>
File: image.jpg (83 KB, 1024x610) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
83 KB, 1024x610
>>70309602
>>
>>70310364

Jesus christ anon go have sex.

This board actually used to be fun at one point
>>
>"forcing" an executive producer to shill his own movie
Why do people believe akroyd is a good guy?
>>
File: 1401242636600.jpg (21 KB, 200x200) Image search: [Google]
1401242636600.jpg
21 KB, 200x200
>as originator of the original
>>
When do the actual movie reviews start coming in? The leak tells me how bad this already is, I just want to start hearing the screams of a thousand vaginas as their hopes are dashed.
Thread replies: 41
Thread images: 8

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.