Top Gear was good. FACT
check these. FACT!
>>70256405
Dubs
FACT
Why does he go out of his way to look like a dweeby cunt?
ayo check em senpai tho FACT
>>70256405
Yes, it was.
It isn't any more.
>>70256405
The Telegraph conducted a poll regarding the new Top Gear's popularity.
The results: 89% "hated" it.
>>70258088
the telegraph, huh
I saw exactly the same on the Metro
Hes an ACTUAL asshole instead of a "bantz" asshole, he missed the entirety of what Clarkson did and just came across as a dickhead.
>>70258088
based toff broadsheet
evans on suicide watch
>>70256405
>>70256405
You really thought so?
Did you ever watch the old show?
>>70258979
>It's is
>>70259150
I enjoyed it fine. It is almost exactly the same as the old show, all it needs is a news banter section another studio presenter to be added to fill in the dead air space when they switch presenters in the studio (Jordan or Sabine would be fine or why not both).
If the old show was 10/10 the new one was a solid 8/10 which is still a great show and will only get better as it finds its feet.
>>70260880
>another studio presenter to be added to fill in the dead air space
wont happen with Evans. I guarantee he wanted to host the show himself until bbc execs stepped in pushing for something that would perk up interest
>>70258248
Clarkson is an actual asshole too though
>>70258248
>punch someone over a steak
>not an ACTUAL asshole
>>70256405
They should have given it a rest for a few years as it's not like the BBC needs the money. Chris Evans is a terrible choice to front the show. Though people forget the 2002 reboot took a while to find its feet.
>>70258088
>Survey produces findings in line with editorial policy & against rivals.
Well I never
>>70260880
>It is almost exactly the same as the old show
Exactly. It should have done its own thing or at least tweaked certain aspects. Instead it just came off weird and forced.
>>70260996
if they bin chris evans, let joey get involved when he wants and make it with chris harris, other guy, and sabine. Im sure it'd be pretty good then
>>70260921
You've never heard any of Chris Evans' radio shows have you? It is unusual if he doesn't bring in co-presenters. He was doing the banter with your mates thing from the early 90s.
>>70260962
>punch someone over a steak
>not banter
TG needs steeve coogan
>>70261068
Im well aware of his crap. Im just going off his previous television shows where he is, as usual, all 'ME ME ME ME!'
>>70260962
>Mother dies.
>Failing relationship with wife.
>Had prior arguments with producer.
>Escalated conflict.
If I were in that emotional state, and there was a cunt standing before me I'd deck him as well.
>>70260996
In 2002 nobody was watching it and it was about to be cancelled, it had Angella Rippon as a presenter ffs. It took a while for people to actually start watching again in great numbers by which time (about 2006) the presenters and format had bedded in nicely.
>>70261095
I imagine Top Gear with Coogan and and Rob Brydon together would be pretty good.
>>70261141
Which is nothing like Clarkson of course, he doesn't have an ego at all.
Dr Pavel, I'm CIA. FACT.
He wasn't alone. FACT.
Uh, you don't get to bring freinds. FACT.
They're not my friends. FACT.
>>70261284
Clarkson is actually likeable to most.
Chris Evans isn't. The evidence is there.
>>70261257
>>70258088
FACT
>>70261258
Or Ant and Dec!
I'm still holding out for Jim Davidson and Roy Chubby Brown though.
>>70261180
>Failing relationship with wife.
That's his own fucking fault
>>70261258
It would be non-stop Michael Caine impressions. Which would be better than what we got on Sunday.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFIQIpC5_wY
>>70261336
>Clarkson is actually likeable to most.
To some
I felt like it was the same writers as previous seasons still writing for clarkson, Hammond and May
So when Joey is talking like Richard Hammond and Chris Evans is talking like Clarkson, it sounded really weird
>>70261462
Congratulations on proving nothing
>>70261486
i proved your dumb, no offense.
>>70261363
Ant & Dec are colossal cunts. If you like them you're clearly watching ITV prole tier shite.
Just saying.
>>70261394
>Every week they blow the bloody doors off some kind of van, just to set up a series of Caine impressions
>>70261515
How so?
>mfw silly sissy brits thinks Clarkson are offending minorities when jolly foreigners actually love him and his nationalistic jokes
Anyway, it's probably for the better that the real Top Gear lads moved on. The format was getting old. The last few seasons survived by the chemistry between the hosts alone.
I got pretty high hopes for their new show.Only Evans was horrible with the new Top Gear, the rest was alright but too overproduced
How can Bob be so based?
>According to the Sun, when the new Top Gear lineup was revealed earlier this month, Mortimer – who formed Pett Productions with Clark and Vic Reeves in 2001 – called new Top Gear host Chris Evans a “cunt” in a now-deleted tweet.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/mar/02/bob-mortimer-top-gear-timebomb-talent-abuse-power
>>70261456
Yeah, I only watched a bit of it buy it was especially obvious when joey was doing his dune buggy bit with the paparazzi
He was just saying clarksonesque lines with shit delivery
>>70261603
>http://www.theguardia
Stopped reading right there
>>70261645
>there
Stopped reading right there
![top.gear.extra.gear.s01e01.real.repack.720p.web.h264-heat.mkv_snapshot_01.56_[2016.05.31_22.05.55].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/AXBejI0.jpg "top.gear.extra.gear.s01e01.real.repack.720p.web.h264-heat.mkv_snapshot_01.56_[2016.05.31_22.05.55].jpg")
Oh shit there's even a spin off show now
>>70261603
>>70261693
10 mins in and I like the two main guys on Extra Gear better than Top Gear.
>>70261673
>7026167
Stopped reading right there
>>70261394
I love this.
>>70261918
The first series of The Trip (2010) is well worth watching.
>>70261394
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygxEPkufryI
>>70261365
No shit, he was notorious for having affairs.
But it helps to explain his mental state.
>>70261599
>I got pretty high hopes for their new show.
Why? it will be shit, the bubble has burst and they're just trying to make a lot of money and get free holidays out of the pop.
It'll last 2 series at best with a massive budget cut for series 2. How many people will actually pay money to see it? It might bet a lot of people watching it to see what an ego driven shitfest it is but 99.99% of those will be people just pirating it on the internet. Also as their writers are still working on BBC top gear it will seem awkward and just descend into clarkson reading off offensive things from a pre-prepared list of cultures/countries/races that his team of researchers have assured him won't be able to retaliate with violence if they don't understand bantah.
>>70261962
>>70261693
She used to be cute.
>>70262038
The BBC would need balls to try this, but I would love to see how it turns out. Maybe to a Top Gear show, but with movies instead of cars.
>>70262012
What bubble?
That new Top Gear showed what everyone already knows, that the trio carried the show.
>>70262038
cute birdo
>>70262176
>>70256405
>was
Couldn't agree more.
>>70262168
Everything that they said was scripted though and the scriptwriters are clearly still working on old top gear.
The BBC also owns a lot of the format copywrite too, so in the new show you won't get anything the stig does, you won't get the cool wall etc. Worst of all you won't get the races either.
The new show is just them driving around Europe to their next destination and showing highlight videos of the staged hijinx they got up to on the way. It's a bit of a lame idea and will wear thin quickly.
>>70262168
Yea this. It helps that theyre actually fucking friends in real life, new cast is a bunch of people plucked from different places and told to work, its not the same, especially when some of the people there dont want to work with eachother.
>>70262926
Do you like cover bands? If I want to see the Rolling Stones I don't want to see some ginger guy with framed glasses doing his best impression of Mick Jagger shuffling over the stage smacking his lips.
The true cringe I felt, was from the writing.
Its like they wrote the exact same show for Clarkson and Co but with a completely different cast of presenters.
Evans is suppose to be a new Clarkson but comes across too bubbly, not enough of that sarcastic defeating undertone that Clark had.
LeBlanc's introduction felt so hamfisted. Are we suppose to give a big shit he is American? Why give him a special intro, he should of been beside Evans at the opening.
I would pay to see Clarkson and team watch the first new episode in a Gogglebox format.
>>70262926
How the fuck do you know?
The show isn't out yet.
I felt the point the BBC missed is that it was a lads show. Sure you watched it because cars but also actually watched it for the dynamic between Clarkson, Hammond and May. The way they interacted was so naturally funny because they were actually mates instead of people trying to force chemistry.
Trying to copy the same format with new presenters will not work at all.
>>70263211
To be fair. Clarkson knows his own voice and how do to the delivery correctly. Also I'm sure they are at least modifying their lines here and there while having a dialogue with the writers.
>>70262926
Who is this guy ???
>>70262926
>Everything that they said was scripted though and the scriptwriters are clearly still working on old top gear.
The weakest of memes
>>70261693
The guy to the left of her does not look fucking pleased.
>>70263352
A Mongoloid with no life except pushing his shitty bait
>>70263275
>Wanting a programme for males
Fuck you, it's current year.
It wasn't as bad as was expecting it to be, but Evans' damage control is embarrassing seeing as he was by far the worst thing in it.
BBC should have just reformatted it with new ideas and a new approach, try to find a new fanbase rather than rehashing and imitating the previous incarnation, which was never going to work.
>>70263656
It was never going to work purely because of the BBCs agenda pushing.
The banter was always going to be toned down and suitable for the pc fascists.
There was always going to be a cast full of token coloured and females.
It was doomed the second the originals left because anything not previously established would have to submit to the agenda.
Where to watch if not a britbong
>>70258979
>It's is
Fuck's sake Liz lrn2yourenglish
>>70263951
torrent it.
>>70260880
>If the old show was 10/10 the new one was a solid 8/10
That would probably be true. Unfortunately, the old show was 2/10 retarded shite for council house dickheads, so fuck knows what that makes the new shit.
>>70261068
>He was doing the banter with your mates thing from the early 90s
Chris Evans has never met my mates.
>>70263930
>purely because of the BBCs agenda pushing.
Blah, blah. What fucking agenda??
Fuck off back to /pol/, you tedious little shit.
>>70263951
We all watched it on a stream so there will probably be another one for the next episode but the first should be torrentable by now.
>>70264109
Kill yourself my man.
>>70264109
>What fucking agenda??
>BBC
American liberal, please go, you know nothing.
>>70264185
Danny Cohen left the BBC ages ago.
you just can't beat or even replicate shit like ''..In the world''
it's all so familiar and funny.
Even if the current cast did a good job it would still have gotten shit ratings.
>>70264109
>What fucking agenda?
The BBC have quite literally promised that their workforce is going to meet various diversity quotas, both behind and in front of the camera.
For example, 15% of their employees are going to be disabled. It's unclear at this time whether or not that means they'll be firing a certain number of able-bodied staff or just forcibly disabling them.
It's also unclear how they're going to meet the quota they set themselves for non-heterosexuals since it's actually illegal to discriminate against a prospective employee based on their sexual orientation, and you can be sued for even asking somebody which team they bat for in a job interview
>>70264002
Kek.
TG was the sort of show the DM reader fuckwits thought was a cutting edge rebuttal against le PC gone mad culture cos May said "Oh cock" and Clarkson made some casually racist comment once a year.
They held these three flaming fucking faggots up as some sort of icons of what it meant to be a white British male; a short-arsed, unfunny, boggle-eyed gimp going through a mid-life crisis, a camp autistic bachelor who wore floral shirts and a lanklet chain-smoking, balding, pot-bellied man child.
>>70264214
And? He was allowed to control it, he was allowed to enact his absurd ideology but most importantly, none of his agenda was reversed when he left.
>>70256405
He has a shit hair transplant, such an insecure twat Chris Evans is.
>>70264260
Because your picture is misleading by highlighting that he is the current controller of BBC1, when he isn't. Almost like you yourself has an agenda.
>>70261299
FACT?
What did he mean by this?
>>70261515
>i proved your dumb
FACT
>>70264109
This post is bait.
>>70263275
Exactly. Even non car guys used to watch top gear. Now the producers are trying to force a similar relationship between the new hosts and it feels just like that, forced.
>>70264187
>>70264185
Remarkable how neither of you can answer the question.
>>70264230
So what agenda are they pushing with Top Gear?
>For example, 15% of their employees are going to be disabled
So actually 5%
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10971930/BBC-to-quadruple-number-of-disabled-people-on-screen.html
>>70264260
The /pol/fucktards continually overstate the role Cohen played, primarily cos he was a Jew, and that fits your warped narrative about "hurr durr cultural marxism"
>>70264322
>i can't articulate myself in a coherent manner so i'll just call it bait
>>70261336
But.. anon Clarkson is a BIGOT and Chris Evans respects minorities... it's impossible for our diverse british public to hate Chris!
>>70264185
>No all-male panel shows
Explains why there are no new Mock The Week episodes in a while.
This new Top Gear lineup is proof that the BBC Execs are liberals that demand that females and minorities have to be in every single fucking show they produce no matter how hamfisted it is.
Hell you could have a documentary about neo-nazi white supremacists and they'd still have a black woman in shot.
>>70264332
Found the kike.
>>70261693
Is that Sabine?
Jesus christ she looks like Merkels nan.
I swear she used to be fit.
>>70264360
>>70264332
legitimately thought this was bait but your actually trying to defend it, what are you even doing on this site?
>>>/reddit/
>>70264389
>Explains why there are no new Mock The Week episodes in a while.
No it doesn't. MTW does a series run once every spring/summer. There's a new one next week, you fucking idiot.
>>70264332
This bait is weak as shit.
>>70264407
Found the nigger.
They needed to be brave and take it in a completely new direction.
Now they're paying the price.
>>70264295
Oh I have an agenda, I'm not a lefty who tries to deny it.
The image was made while he was the current head so it probably does need updating, but my points about how he was allowed to unleash such vile propaganda and it hasn't been reversed still stand.
>>70264429
>>70264475
>i have no argument. i'll just call it bait because i cannot articulate a sound response
>>70264002
>>70264232
Found the pakis
>>70264535
>found the jew
>found the paki
Kek.
>>70264518
>unleash such vile propaganda
By introducing a policy that states at least one female be on a BBC produced panel show?
The horror. The horror
>>70256405
Looks like adam savage with no chin.
>>70264332
BBC shill on suicide watch.
There's a black person on-screen
>MUH WHITE GENOCIDE
There's a woman on-screen
>MUH WHITE GENOCIDE
There's a person with half an arm off on-screen
>MUH WHITE GENOCIDE
Why are millennials such insecure crybaby faggots?
>>70264332
The new cast of Top Gear pushes the same agenda, in the same subtle way as all their other shows now do.
It's really as simple as tokenism for the sake of preaching the strengths of multiculturalism, all part of the gradual process of making the people of the UK eventually accept the concept of the EU an agree to an immigrant wave.
Remember, the BBC is literally a government-owned corporation, and the director is an unelected minister in all but name.
Their job is, and always has been, to ensure that the British public are at least softened up on all the talking points that the government is pushing at any given time.
Right now, as much as it seems like a Dr Strangelove-inspired fever dream, their agenda is to undermine the idea that Britishness is tied to being born in Britain and to do whatever they can to prevent a strong male role model from emerging into the public eye.
The last thing the government needs right now is a strong leader who stands up to the City and the EU and gathers the support of disgruntled young men and the working class, so the BBC gets to work on normalising bourgeois ideals across all available platforms.
"Remember, there is nothing that a straight, able-bodied British male can do that a lesbian, disabled Syrian female can't, except have a family, live without welfare payments and fight in a war to defend Britain but none of those things matter anyway because the EU is here to protect us, citizen. Vote NO to Brexit."
>>70264360
Suck my willy.
>>70264426
She was never fit. she's hideous.
>>70264406
WE
>>70264685
>The new cast of Top Gear pushes the same agenda
The woman was on the screen for about five minutes.
The black lad, and the swarthy fella were pushed to BBC3, which is online.
The two main presenters who featured heavily are white, middle-aged heterosexual men.
>Remember, the BBC is literally a government-owned corporation
No, it "literally" isn't at all.
And how ironic is it that the best thing from the new Top Gear is Extra Gear with Reid and Harris, who apparently are only there to fulfil some quota.
>>70264578
Yes, the fucking horror of a vile sexist and racist agenda being forced upon what should be art.
Please walk in front of a bus, you vile creature.
>>70260962
Is the modern society so limp-dicked that a punch between men is considered some unspeakable horror? If that Tymon or whatever guy wasn't such a pussy he'd just punch Clarkson back, have a little fight then settle it all behind a glass of beer as friends.
>>70264951
>a vile sexist and racist agenda being forced
Kek.
>what should be art
>mock the week
>art
Double kek.
>>70264755
No matter whether or not Chris Evans and Joey from Friends insist that they aren't as gay as the obviously are, the point is not to eradicate heterosexuality anyway, it is to eradicate masculinity.
The concept of actually, physically fighting for the ideals you believe in must be erased from the minds of the British public, because if there's one thing that the government knows well it's that young males can be incited to violence if they aren't latte-sipping social studies graduates - that's why the Arab Spring and the Ukrainian civil war were such effective operations.
Top Gear was one of the most popular shows amongst the target demographic, so any viewers who might potentially return to check out the gutted, shambling husk of Clarkson's anti-PC flagship may as well be treated to a bit of metrosexuality therapy.
>>70264797
I'll assume that was meant for me since you quoted my post, and I'll just respond by providing this link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_corporation
>In the United Kingdom, a statutory corporation is a corporate body created by statute. It typically has no shareholders and its powers are defined by the Act of Parliament which creates it, and may be modified by later legislation. Such bodies were often created to provide public services, examples including British Railways, the National Coal Board and the Post Office Corporation. Other examples include the county councils, the National Assembly for Wales,[1] The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), Channel Four Television Corporation and the Olympic Delivery Authority.[2] The phrase is not used to describe a company which operates as a conventional shareholder-owned company registered under the Companies Acts.
That is to say, much like BR and the Post Office, the BBC is a company that was created and is run by the government, is funded by the taxpayer, but is expected to return a profit like a regular business.
It is literally a government-owned corporation.
>>70261693
It's marginally better than the main one. Harris is actually good and the nigger while being overly clean and bland isn't offensive. Meanwhile Evans makes you want to shoot yourself while LeBlanc looks like he's more preoccupied with finding who to get his check from.
>>70265217
Modern society doesn't condone people assaulting colleagues in a place of work for reasons relating to not being able to eat a bit of meat.
>>70265256
Maybe you should get back to r*ddit, you seem lost.
>>70265260
>wasting his time with this shit bait no one will read
>how fucking obsessed is this mong?
>>70264685
>>70265260
>insist that they aren't as gay as the obviously are
How would you know exactly? Or have you just decided they are because it fits your narrative about BBC agenda-pushing?
Furthermore, if the BBC were deliberately intent on hiring homosexuals to front the new Top Gear, why not actually hire KNOWN gays, rather than two men who between them have been married five times, have five kids and present themselves as straight men?
>>70264370
Boy did they ham up this diversity quota. Right off the bat here's a bunch of Indians for absolutely no reason whatsoever.
>>70264727
WUZ
>It is literally a government-owned corporation.
Again; no, it "literally" isn't.
>>70265345
>on 4chan
>doesn't think he's wasting his time
You're either wasting your time or you're being paid to post here, wasting someone else's money.
Since time is money, that would mean you were wasting someone else's time.
And since that "someone else" would, in this case, be the British taxpayer, it makes me wonder:
Are you wasting your time, or your parents' time?
>>70265324
>g-g-go back to redddit, you're triggering me and i feel violated in my safe space
>>70265256
This is bait.
>>70265303
Yeah man, who eats meat anyways? Animal suffering is a serious issue, we have no right to kill innocent animals.
Vegan is the way nature intended.
>>70265381
What in the fuck was that even about? I couldn't even understand them with their paki accents.
>the only people who ever watched and enjoyed top gear were white male nationalists who enjoyed a once-in-a-blue-moon quip about lazy mexicans and fat americans
Wew.
>>70265434
>here's a cleverly edited graphic sampling a fraction of programs the bbc broadcast that trigger me and support my piss weak nonsensical argument
>the bbc should not be making programs about important historical movements such as the suffragettes or about topics such as domestic violence. they should make programs about white men and white male interests
>>70265432
I'm wasting your time, making you respond like an angry, crying mongoloid, while I sit, in the sun, having a nice coffee and enjoying life.
>>70258088
Doubt half of them watched it and just said they hated it cause "ugh change"
>>70265456
>What in the fuck was that even about?
It was really quite obvious. They were from Evans' local restaurant and represented a weight equivalent to the downforce applied by the wing on the Dodge Viper.
This was explained in the show, but you were seething at brown people on the screen and furiously smashing your keyboard you must have ignored it.
>>70265555
Maybe learn how to operate this website properly before you start offering opinions m8, people will probably take them more seriously that way.
>>70265555
Kill yourself, really.
>>70265436
This is bait
>>70265640
It's just a r*edditor lost on his first day here, getting all triggered like the bitch nigger he is.
>>70265640
>>70265650
>>70265680
>these delicious arse ravaged americunt tears
Keep them coming, neckbeards.
>>70265380
It's perfectly possible for gay men to have wives (in fact, quite a few wives over the course of a lifetime), and have kids.
It's also not relevant whether or not they are actually gay, as I already stated. The point is that they are as non-threatening as possible, as unmasculine as possible, as unlike Clarkson and his dangerously conservative ideals as possible.
The BBC cannot be associated with men who don't like vegetarians, like burning petrol for the fun, and punch anyone for any reason, let alone over a steak. It's [current year], for goodness' sake! The Twittersphere would never stand for it!
It's also pretty important that the the new hosts are cheap and desperate enough to accept a chalice as poisoned as Top Gear without the original trio, but that's by-the-by.
>>70265408
Dude, if you're going to shill here, at least learn how the interface works.
Type "@" before the post number of the post you're quoting to link the post.
>>70265698
Didn't read any of this.
>>70265698
Holy shit you do know how to post properly where you just too butthurt before to remember how? It's alright we all get upset sometimes snookums.
>>70265703
So what evidence is it you have to support the argument that they gay then?
>>70265576
>implying I'm not enjoying this too
I don't think you really understand the purpose of this site, which might go a long way to explaining why you don't understand what Top Gear has lost.
>>70265735
>>70265741
>yet more tasty yankspaz tears
Lovely, lads.
>British TV is good
>>70265780
IT'S OKAY SNOOKUMS.
>he thinks i'm actually going to give him (you)s
Kek. Stupid cunt gets BTFO over "le bbc is gubmint owned" and turns on the waterworks.
>>70265823
>into the jar they go
Cheers, triggered fatlad.
>>70265754
Now you are making no sense whatsover.
I'm pro Clarkson and would have helped him kick that irish poof in the face.
>>70265746
Well, obviously I have candid photos of them having intimate moments with their respective boyfriends and each other, and I have chosen not to release said photos because I'm currently blackmailing them both for huge amounts of money, which is why they were willing to host the new Tog Gear for such a pittance of a paycheque.
In the meantime, the facts that Evans has a voice like Jedward's long-lost triplet and that LeBlanc is an actor will have to suffice.
>>70265843
So the BBC isn't government owned?
>>70265812
It is. We produce some terrific drama like Wolf Hall, The Night Manager, Peaky Blinders. Great factual, history, science and nature programming like Wonders of the Solar System, Planet Earth, David Starkey/Simon Schama. Our sports coverage is great, hence why the world was begging for BBC streams from the last Olympics.
Granted we don't produce big budget stuff like Lost and GoT, but no UK channel can afford to take those sorts of risks.
>>70265843
Kek. Stupid cunt gets BTFO over "le bbc isn't gubmint owned" and tries to act smug.
>>70265907
I'm sure you would, sunshine.
Let me guess, your nice coffee is mostly foam?
>>70265780
>spaz
You revealed yourself to be a yank with this one.
>>70265915
So absolutely nothing to substantiate your claims at all? It's just spurious nonsense designed purely to fit your narrative.
Fucking Hell
>>70266047
>n-n-no ur le yankee doodle
Keep crying, TyRone.
>call a yank a name
>can't handle the bantz XD
>call a brit a name
>why do americans get so mad?
>he still thinks i'm going to give him (you)s
ellohell.
>bbc
>government owned
Pahahahahahhahhahhahahaha!
>>70258979
holy shit even the queen hates it
....
hold up the queen has twitter?
>>70266097
>the yank can't handle the meta bantz
Just Walk Away From The Screen Nigga
>>70266055
So far I've stated twice that the idea is to eradicate masculinity, not heterosexuality, and now it's three times.
But yeah, whatever, I clearly only think this because I'm a homophobic racist bogeyman like those seminars at school told you I would be.
>>70266108
>he still thinks the "i'm not giving that (you)s" meme isn't retarded
ellohell.
>bbc
>not government owned
Pahahahahahhahhahhahahaha!
>>70266123
>yankposting
>>70266168
>may
>hammond
>clarkson
>masculine
>>70266168
>the idea is to eradicate masculinity
Still a retarded idea.
>>70266271
In comparison to Evan they seem like Royal Marine Commandos.
>>70266168
>No matter whether or not Chris Evans and Joey from Friends insist that they aren't as gay as the obviously are
Why are Americans so fucking retarded? And why do they get so upset at a British TV show?
>>70266076
The insult is "Rasheed" my yank friend.
>>70266307
>>70266321
This isn't /brit/, TyRone.
>>70266097
Now is not the time for nationalistic arguments, that comes later.
Now we are laughing at shit gear.
>>70266271
Feel free to point out alternative examples that demonstrate masculinity, since you obviously understand the concept so well.
>>70266301
Feel free to provide an actual argument supporting that assertion.
>>70256405
>>70266352
More masculine than skinny jeans and a cardigan.
>>70266382
Fuck you, /brit/ rules all, you paki cunt.
>>70266352
Exactly.
>>70266168
>the idea is to eradicate masculinity,
Yes, let's employ a man best known for playing a lothario and have him aggressively drive cars in the desert. That will destroy any concept of masculinity in Top Gear.
>>70266423
>all those shit boards
>>70266449
It's called a beachhead.
>>70266313
No idea, try asking them instead of quoting my posts.
>>70266352
>likes trains and knows how they work
>likes cars and knows how they work
>likes planes and knows how they work
>likes history and knows how it works
>thinks masculinity is tied to physical appearance
One of these things is not like the other.
>>>/fit/
>>>/lgbt/
>>70266387
Here's an argument: only people averse to masculinity are little pissy pants constantly afraid they'll be bullied by anyone stronger than them.
>>70264679
>implying the majority of millenials are neonazis.
That'd be pretty sweet actually, but unfortunately not.
>>70266418
But it's not. Chris Evans may certainly not represent the ideal of what masculinity is, but let's not pretend the old bunch did either. They're weak faggoty middle-class public school boys who work in public broadcasting.
>>70263412
just to let you know, everyone in the top gear audience is a hired extra
>>70266485
Of course they aren't. They drippy pissants angry at the world for their failures in life.
Every bit as embarrassing as the SJWs they claim to despise.
>>70266464
>if i try and deny i'm a yank, i might be able to convince people my argument is legitimate.
>>70266433
>Yes, let's employ an American man best known for playing a vain idiot and have him drive cars fast.
If this is extent of your understanding of masculinity, it is clear that you are not a man. Are you sure you're not on the BBC's board?
>>70256405
Facts are facts. FACT
>>70266464
If masculinity is identified as having a knowledge and interest in cars, then why are you pissing on LeBlanc and Evans who are both well known petrol heads?
>>70256405
Series 24 won't happen. FACT.
>>70266500
To be honest they are a realistic representation of what masculinity is. They're no action heros but oddly enough they are role models.
>>70266593
Such petrolheads all they could do to an overheat reliant was call for AA.
>>70266573
You're the one claiming that the BBC are attempting to eradicate masculinity from Top Gear, when it's very fucking clear they aren't.
You have absolutely no fucking idea what masculinity is and are just angry because you're flowery shirt poofter and doe-eyed manlet have fucked off elsewhere with the petulant man child.
>>70266653
Just wondering, get car enthusiasts in Australia get called petrolheads as well or is it considered racism?
>>70261515
*you're
>>70266410
um, thank you anon
>>70266635
>they are a realistic representation of what masculinity is
Kek. If they represent your idea of what masculinity is, you truly are a faggoty little snowflake.
>>70266653
>i don't know what scripted tv is
>>70266653
And the previous three always had mechanics fix their cars when they broke down.
>b-b-b-but they're real men
>>70266500
This
>>70266635
They are a realistic representation of male, unwarranted arrogance is (Clarkson), for sure. But as the other guy said they're basically weak beta bitches
Surely if you're looking for a man's man to present Top Gear then Matt LeBlanc probably fills that role more. He looks like he works out, and I'm sure he's quite a bit tougher as a person than Clarkson and May (I don't mind Hammond so much but again you can't really say he's a macho man can you)
>>70266727
I'm not saying they are "alpha males" but they are secure in their own skin, they banter, they say what they think, and they earn a living while doing what they like. I bet you think you'll be looking like Sylvester Stallone in your 60s, wearing a red UFC hat backwards or something. Have fun getting those plugs from your ass mounted to your forehead.
>>70266717
What? Are you talking about Aborigines?
Might be local to Oz that. Every where I know, a petrolhead is someone with a keen interest in cars/vehicles.
>>70266772
Except May and Hammond would always fix cars by themselves, only Clarkson had no idea how to mend them. .
>>70266802
>it's a yank getting upset episode again
>>70266772
This is why they should just hand the whole show over to Chris Harris who actually knows what he's doing with a car
Although then again he's not a mechanic. Okay so you could bring in Edd China for that. Problem solved.
>>70266813
No they wouldn't. There was always mechanics on hand to do repairs.
>Have fun getting those plugs from your ass mounted to your forehead.
What does this even mean???
Is this supposed to be an insult?
is this what Americunts think is "banter"?
>>70266868
Do you have any factual knowledge on the matter or is it just your wishful thinking?
>>70266802
They are not, nor ever have been "a realistic representation of what masculinity is"
Gordon Ramsey and Marco Pierre White are more masculine than they are and they cook food for a fucking living.
>>70266792
>Surely if you're looking for a man's man to present Top Gear then Matt LeBlanc probably fills that role more. He looks like he works out, and I'm sure he's quite a bit tougher as a person than Clarkson and May (I don't mind Hammond so much but again you can't really say he's a macho man can you)
He might as well could be gay. Gay guys work out too. He's a rich cunt from hollywood who probably got like 20 facelifts already. Being overly focused on appearance isn't the same as manliness.
>>70266892
It is facts, lad.
>>70266970
And as every other fact I'm sure there's an abundance of proof to it?
>>70266964
We've established you have no idea what masculinity is, and you continue toe move the goalposts every time your argument gets BTFO
>>70266889
>>70261741
The BBC is probably hedging their bet, and will parachute them into the main show if needed.
>>70267029
>>70267012
If I had to show some alien an average male I would rather show James May than Matt LeBlanc.
This is manliness, you're describing overcompensation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giZgEI626Kw
What do they even do on Extra Gear? I didn't watch it because the iplayer is shit and I would rather torrent it than stream it, is it worth a watch?
>>70267103
Yeah, it's better, at least one guy on it actually knows his cars.
>>70267099
>If I had to show some alien an average male I would rather show James May than Matt LeBlanc.
Because you're a sensitive millennial faggot is why.
>>70267178
I bet you were raised by a single mother.
>>70267219
Nope.
If James May is your perception of what an average male is, then clearly you were.
>>70267156
Yeah but what is it exactly, purely car reviews like Fifth gear? Banter like classic Top Gear or what?
>>70267103
It's not as shit as Evans' cringecoaster. They pretty much just did news section and two little bits on new rally track and Sabine. Presented by Chris Harris who out of the whole bunch closest person to old TG trio and a pretty bland but inoffensive nigger. They also got some northern comedian and talked to him about his car history to compensate for the shitty star in original concept do not steal segment of the main show.
>>70267253
I'm not saying he's an average male but that he comes closer to being average than Matt LeBlanc. If you think Matt LeBlanc is average you probably think Friends was a realistic as well, or you spend too much time in the Chippendale Club. Maybe both.
Is James May autistic or just weird?
>>70267099
I wish there was an infinite backlog of these to watch.
>>70267332
Neither he's just a old guy that's enjoys cultured shit.
>>70267307
It's more of the same just with not as terrible presenters. A bit of car reviews, a bit of bantz, although batnz was pretty weak, they just showed a new G-wiz then one of the guys said that it's terrible and he hates it, while other tried to make a case that it's a way the car industry needs to take nowadays because environment bullshit.
>>70267320
How long is an episode of extra gear? Is it a ten minute little web extra or a full hour long programme?
I might give it a watch.
>>70267389
I remember it was about 20-30 minutes.
>>70267332
He's sophisticated. Though I guess in modern times that's considered autistic and weird.
>>70267408
Yeah go on then I'll give it a chance.
>>70256490
Believe it or not, he looks a lot better with the glasses on. He looks old as fuck when he's not wearing them.
>>70267332
He has no reason to be bitter, contract was up, left, got paid shitloads more
>mfw he can be smug as fuck and is still loved just as much as before
>>70256405
/o/ thought it was intolerable, unbearable shitFACT
I think I'll accept their opinion over /tv/'s.
>mfw new top gear backlash has already begun
>soon it will be cool to like it
>>70267512
I thought /o/ always hated Top gear because it's too casual.
>>70267512
/tv/ hate it as well though, the OP is bait.
>>70265404
>Arthur and a black Guinevere
D E L E T E T H I S
