[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Hard Reboots
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 50
Thread images: 8
File: image.gif (166 KB, 320x240) Image search: [Google]
image.gif
166 KB, 320x240
>Die Another Day was so bad that they were forced to reboot the Bond Franchise
>We ended up getting fantastic films like Casino Royale and Skyfall because of this and the franchise is saved

>Batman & Robin was so embarrassingly bad that it almost killed Comic book movies
>we ended up getting a fantastic trilogy of Batman films (Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, and The Dark Knight Rises) because of this

are there anymore examples of this?

Does Star Trek 09 count? I think it does
>>
Hello plebbit
>>
File: DaD surf.webm (3 MB, 720x480) Image search: [Google]
DaD surf.webm
3 MB, 720x480
>>70209984
thanks for adding to the discussion.
>>
>>70209969

First of all, all reboots are shit. And they weren't made because of the flops. They were made because hollywood is devoid of creative writers and relies on rehashes to keep da goyim coming back for muh nostalgia trip CG fests.

Modern movies suck shit. Fuck you.
>>
>>70209969
By 1984, Toho hadn't made a godzilla movie in 9 years because the film industry took a huge blow in the 70s in japan. In that year they rebooted the series with Godzilla 1984, and made it a direct sequel to the original
>>
>>70209969
>TFW op gets btfo
>>
>>70209969
>>Die Another Day was so bad that they were forced to reboot the Bond Franchise

But Die Another Day performed better at the box office than the 3 Bonds before it and has a higher RT score than TND and TWINE.
>>
>>70210082
>>70210129
never fucking post in my thread ever again.
>>
>>70210130
The producers and writers probably looked at it and felt fucking embarrassed on their own terms. Just goes to show sometimes box office a mediocre score doesn't mean shit against personal embarrassment
>>
File: image.jpg (249 KB, 1125x1125) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
249 KB, 1125x1125
>>70210130
you can't deny Casino Royale was the way it was because of that movie
>>
>>70209969
>ghostbusters 3 development hell was so bad and long the main producer died
>we end up getting a horrible reboot who's only notable trait is meme controversy
>>
>>70210233

it was the way it was because Austin Powers blew their asshole out, and that was an issue well before Brosnan
>>
>>70210306
that's a bad example of a reboot

I'm talking about reboots that aren't hot shit.
>>
>>70210082
This.
>>
File: DaD Surf 2.webm (2 MB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
DaD Surf 2.webm
2 MB, 1280x720
>>70210314
it was a culmination desu
>>
>>70210351
>tfw the bond movie was a bigger parody than the austin powers movie
>>
>>70210327
Name five great reboots, not including The Fly or The Thing.
>>
>>70210351
>>70210076

worst thing about these webms isn't the content it's the fucking borders, so goddamn amateur.
>>
>>70209969
ASM1 and 2 were so bad it killed a sony spiderman universe. In it's place we got a better acted spiderman and a hot aunt may and a potential for a better reboot
>>
>>70210082
dipshit, the reboots he mentioned have nothing to do with nostalgia

Casino Royale is so different from the older bonds it's activity hated by nostalgiafags

Batman Begins was completely different from Batman 89

Star Trek 09 was COMPLETELY different from classic Star Trek
>>
>>70210421
Casino Royale
Batman Begins
Star Trek 09
Dredd
X-Men First Class
>>
File: image.jpg (158 KB, 561x800) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
158 KB, 561x800
>>70209969
In 1980, daiei studios tried to kickstart the relaunch of the company by making a new gamera movie. It bombed so hard it killed the studio.

1995: under new formation, gamera GOTU becomes a success. It was such a hard reboot it barely resembled the original series mostly
>>
>>70210082
>Modern movies suck shit. Fuck you.
I'm a retarded pretentious hipster: the post
>>
>>70210733
sorry, I'm a pleb with this kaiju stuff but does Godzilla 98 to Godzilla 2014 count?
>>
>>70210956
Kind of. A bit but a more accurate measure for this case is Godzilla 2000.

98 was pretty embarrassing for toho because of how heavily it was marketed in japan, so they decided to make a reboot a year later to sort of cleanse the whole thing.

From the standpoint of Americans, yeah you are probably right in that aspect.
>>
>>70209969
>are there anymore examples of this?

Star Wars (Prequels sucked)....Sequel (Force Awakens) is average, but considerably better than the prequels.
>>
>>70210560
>Star Trek 09

He didn't ask for five generally tolerable reboots
>>
>>70210421
>The Thing reboot
>great
>>
>>70211240
He doesn't know what a reboot is, the fly nor john carpenters the thing not even the shitty thing prequel/glib facsimile was a reboot
>>
>>70209969
I agree with you about casino royale, but skyfall was an abomination of a movie.

>lame faggy villain
>leet haxXor Q
>horrible third act reminiscent of home alone
>that retarded bond backstory
>>
File: Skyfall.jpg (385 KB, 2000x1389) Image search: [Google]
Skyfall.jpg
385 KB, 2000x1389
>>70211321
oh spare me, Skyfall was great.
>>
>>70210421
Those two aren't reboots, but remakes ya dingus
>>
>>70211240
John Carpenter made the reboot chucklefuck.

A reboot so good that folk like you don't even know the original exists.
>>
>>70211362
Extremely long tracking shots don't make a good movie.
>>
>>70211399
What's the difference?
A remake reboots, a reboot remakes.
Same shit.
>>
File: image.jpg (283 KB, 1125x1125) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
283 KB, 1125x1125
>>70211404
you're think of Spectre, Skyfall didn't have many tracking shots if I recall correctly.
>>
>>70211473
It did have. Posting rotten tomatoes score proves nothing. Skyfall was shit.
>>
>>70211596
prove it.
>>
File: image.jpg (93 KB, 640x890) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
93 KB, 640x890
>>70211596
>0 negative reviews
>shit
>>
>>70210076
I just keep watching and keep finding horrible things
>>
>>70211621
It was a bad movie.

>Tons of plotholes like the villain knowing exactly when and where the train was.
>Q was annoying as fuck. And really stupid.
>most of the plot ripped off of mission impossible
>third half was basically Home Alone
>weird gay villain
>badly choreographed fight scenes
>forgettable theme song
>rapist bond
>>
>>70211866
>Tons of plotholes like the villain knowing exactly when and where the train was.

This is a James Bond movie though.

>Q was annoying as fuck. And really stupid.

Agreed.

>most of the plot ripped off of mission impossible

I don't respect the X ripped off Y arguement.

>third half was basically Home Alone

This is the worst criticism I hear about this film. Home Alone did not invent the concept of digging your heels in and defending a fortress.

>weird gay villain

He was weird and unsettling on purpose.

>badly choreographed fight scenes

I don't agree, I found them to be serviceable.

>forgettable theme song

It's honestly one of my favorite themes but Music is completely subjective.

>rapist bond

?
>>
>>70211866
Hey buddy home alone is a classic fuck you.

Also it was better than quantum of solace at least
>>
>>70212320
it's the 3rd best film in the franchise behind GoldenEye and Casino.
>>
>>70210082
Above everything

Nothing exclaims greater film ignorance and disappreciation of art than hating reboots

You are literally from reddit
>>
>>70212737
this
>>
>>70212320

>Hey buddy home alone is a classic fuck you.
I know home alone is a classic. I was just pointing out that skyfall copied that premise

>Also it was better than quantum of solace at least
Slightly better.
>>
>>70211866
>rapist bond

Hello tumblr
>>
>>70209969

Too bad Marvel and Sony never followed suit and still produce shit.
>>
>>70209969
>does star trek 09 count
>into darkness
no, into darkness is literally the worst jj trek film, it's almost as bad as nemesis
Thread replies: 50
Thread images: 8

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.