>Deservedly so. I mean it took £800 million, so the kicking didn’t matter but it was sort of overstuffed… It was very muddled. I think the next one will be simpler. The script is certainly a lot smaller, it’s more linear.
>I’m tied into The Batman at the minute, which is nice because it’s a bit of income… Not that I need a bit of income but it’s nice to keep ticking over.
http://screenrant.com/batman-v-superman-reviews-jeremy-irons/
DCucks on suicide watch
>>70185150
Is there really any other point being in dc flicks? It's definitely not for the quality work.
>>70185150
Well i didn't think he would join this thinking his character was so deep, but it's nice to hear him actually say it.
>>70185615
>Is there really any other point being in dc flicks?
To be a part of the death of the MCU, to watch it burn firsthand.
How is DC failing this bad? I don't understand how you can fuck up with such consistency.
"Finally this truly is DCucks BTFO indeed"
>>70186111
Trips confirm.
It's kind of impressive how bad every single DC film has been so far.And sad.
>>70185150
Hes merely an actor.
He doesn't understand the mind of the kino master himself, Snyder.
there is no such thing as bad publicity, everything is going according to the Snyders plan
>>70186198
but muh Nolan
>>70186111
It's probably a multitude of things. In general it seems DC/Warner Bros. think nothing but short term. But with films not directed by Snyder coming out, they may redeem themselves, maybe.
>>70186275
That was like 20 years ago. Let it go DCuck. We Marvel now.
>>70186280
the DCEU is literally Snyder: The Franchise, he's producer on everything DC
>>70186362
Still can't understand how they chose the man who did Sucker Punch, which was already a fucking disaster.
Sounds like they should've been more prepared.
>>70185150
Wheres 1.jpgfag when you need him?