Is Emily Bluntoperator?
>>70120287
If you saw the movie you wouldn't ask such a stupid questionno she wasn't
Not mentioning the movie/show in the OP or at least in the OP image is bad form.
People are neither telepaths nor has everyone seen everything in order to know what you are talking about.
You are gimping both the potential of your own thread and the quality of the board.
Operator? I 'ardly know 'er!
She ruined the movie with her whining
>>70120425
>can't recognize what movie it is from the obvious pic
Why are you here? Shouldn't you be on a site like reddit where you don't have to worry about being a confused moron?
>>70120543
How would a person that has not seen the movie recognize it from the pic?
Which requires more effort would you say: OP taking 1 sec to put the name in the conveniently placed subject line or a random anon searching imdb and guessing?
all she does throughout the movie is bitch and get physically dominated like a dog
>>70120616
The OP doesn't have to cater to mouth breathers like yourself though, you should honestly just leave the thread you're not helping your case
>>70120372
The whole point of the movie is that she was used to legitimize a black op. Amazing how people still don't get that.
>>70120287
Let me tell you something that might be a bit dangerous. I was raised in the south. I was trained in counter-narcotics. I was given the title of Reserve Deputy. They take a movie “Sicario.” They have a 5-foot-7-inch little girl, whether she was British or American, I don’t know. I don’t care. She had never been to south. She doesn’t speak in southern accent. She has never held an M1911. They make her the Sicario. We got 450,000 phone calls [laughs] from everybody in the world saying, “That role was perfect for you. How did that happen?” Most of the people I know didn’t like the film and didn’t go see it. It’s just a classic example of Hollywood and the politics.
>>70120425
Learn how to reverse image search you absolutely punted head-first into a rock at birth mongoloid dog.
>>70120616
Does the op question look like it's for people who haven't watched the movie?
>>70120616
You should know the movie.
Filtered.
>>70120287
>operator
Yes, she works on this couch
>>70120674
...
Well I'm sorry to hear that
>>70120658
>The OP doesn't have to cater to mouth breathers like yourself though
>>70120702
>Does the op question look like it's for people who haven't watched the movie?
>why would one put helpful movie/tv show information in the opening post of a movie and television board, especially when one desires to incite discussion?
>pic related
>>70120685
Which takes more effort do you figure - a single person taking 1 sec to type the relevant info or hundreds/thousands of people reverse searching the image? I wonder.
>>70120718
Besides the point, it is not about me.
>>70120828
Kill yourself retard.
>>70120828
REKT
>>70120685
>>70120702
hey redditfags, posting the fucking name is helpful and what you are supposed to do, blend the fuck in
stop giving the tripfag attention
>>70120287
I can't blame Emily Blunt, but that character was such a bitch. She never put any effort into being a team player yet expected all the answers upfront. Answers that she has no claim to because she's just there to be an anchor, which was known by her. All she had to do was shut up and participate, because she did have the option to join and the option to leave. But that cunt wanted to stay and be bitch. Benicio del Toro should've pulled the trigger
>>70120880
Not an argument, fameleon.
>>70120718
>wah I'm so butthurt I have to announce I filtered the namefag
You are worse than namefags. You are a said and pathetic neet.
>you should know the movie
Some people actually have lives. Just because you live with your parents, don't work and spend all day watching movies and shitposting on 4chan doesn't mean it's the same for other people.
what movie is this please? emily blunt is cute, CUTE!
>>70120940
>says this while typing on an anime imageboard
nice life bro xD
>>70120828
You literally answered your own question here. The OP wants to incite discussion with PEOPLE WHO HAVE SEEN THE MOVIE if you haven't seen it move along and stop making stupid posts
>>70120949
>claims emily blunt is cute
>doesn't even know about this movie that /tv/ talked about a lot for weeks before dwindling the threads down
Come on now
>>70120955
it is bad fucking form toward the other users of the board, just because you autist can't comprehend how other might feel doesn't mean you can't try to be helpful and blend in the culture of the board
you might want to discuss it with people who have seen it, but hundreds of other might have mjssed it before and might be interest to see it after they see the thread
it's a common courtesy for fucks sake
>>70120287
Nah ... She is supposed to be a one who lured into cartel's operation. I have no freakin idea why they had to sift POV so much (#￣3￣) The result would've been awesome if they simply stayed with hers whole time.
>>70120801
*heavy breathing*
>>70120954
Weak comeback. Must be too frustrated to actually come up with something decent.
>>70121015
>this whole post
Why is it the OPs or hell anyone elses responsibility to spoon feed you? You are complaining that we aren't including you like there aren't a hundred other threads you could be participating in. Do you HAVE to be part of this thread? No, so stop acting like a fucking baby
>wow I dont know what movie this is
>should I cry and bitch about it in the thread
>or should I google emily blunt and find it
>>70121066
>missing the fucking point
the onus is on you as the OP.
next time you will be a poster and someone else will make a shitty thread instead of a proper one.
you are a cheeky cunt now, but when everyone makes little to no effort it turns into a shitfest.
>>70121076
>>or should I google emily blunt and find it
This would make sense if Emily Blunt starred in one movie. But she doesn't.
>>70121076
>it makes more sense for thousands of people to google emily blunt instead of one person typing the name of the movie when the created the thread
k
>>70121031
Cuz now imma have to snatch every motherfucker punani, Dey.
>>70121115
>the onus is on you as the OP.
Yes, indeed. Well said. An attitude of a more civilized age.
>>70121144
It does actually, because the question doesn't pertain to those that haven't watched the movie.
>>70121184
here, let me point it out, because you seem to have missed it the first time >>70121015
>>70121184
>what is common courtesy
>>70121184
My god, you are a retard. You post an image that's obviously intriguing and you can't even be a person and say what it is like a normal human being.
>>70121115
>I don't know what the thread is about.
>I either figure it out or figure out I have no place in the discussion to begin with and stay out
Sounds like the way it should be to me
>>70121115
Nobody cares if you want to participate in the discussion or have an interest in the movie, if you think it looks interesting then fucking lurk the thread or find out what it is on your own. It's completely asinine for you to demand that everyone cater to what you think we should do
>haven't seen Sicario and don't know what it is
You don't belong on this board.
>don't know the movie from the OP, yet you think you belong in a conversation about it
Kill yourself. You belong in the fucking thread
>is too inept to use Google to satisfy passing interest
unbelievable
>uses a trip code for no reason
of course you do
Looks like a couple autists have wandered out of a capeshit thread and want to discuss a movie they've never seen before.
>>70121203
>>70121219
>>70121220
>Courtesy fag shit
Where do you think we are?
>>70121242
*don't belong in the fucking thread
>>70121220
Because the only people who should be in the thread are those that know what the fuck is going on. If you haven't seen it/don't know what movie it is that's on you, and ONLY you. Don't come into these threads acting like a self entitled baby
>>70121232
>people cannot develop an interest into something they have not seen
>why bother providing them information (as the OP a.k.a. the content creator) thus elevating the quality of the board for everyone including myself
>>70121235
>Nobody cares if you want to participate in the discussion or have an interest in the movie
That is the exact opposite of what /tv/'s actual function is. Are you sure you are in the right place?
>>70121270
>Because the only people who should be in the thread are those that know what the fuck is going on.
You act like it's impossible to see the image when you're not in the fucking thread when you CAN. As if people can't fucking see it in the catalog. The image is intriguing. Of fucking course people are going to wonder what it is. If you don't want people wondering what the move is, then don't fucking use an intriguing image. Use a boring one.
>>70121232
>>70121235
>>70121264
is it THAT HARD not to be a dick? you realize if you are a dick as the OP of this thread someone else will be a dick as the OP of their thread and you will get the same treatment, right?
here's the best advice someone will ever give you - don't be a fucking dick, helps irl as well.
>>70121308
>That is the exact opposite of what /tv/'s actual function is
Next time read the whole post and who I was replying to, there's this thing called "context" aka I was referring to someone who has not seen the movie yet still wants to participate. Christ are you always this dumb? Look man you tried to make your point, you failed (because it was really stupid) so just stop posting
>>70121270
>Don't come into these threads acting like a self entitled baby
lmao you are retarded. Go play in traffic you fucking dumbass
>>70121343
>DO UNTO OTHERS WHAT YOUD WANT DONE TO YOU
>LOVE THY NEIGHBOR
You can't make this shit up
>>70121357
>there's this thing called "context" aka I was referring to someone who has not seen the movie yet still wants to participate
So was I. Follow your own advice.
>>70121337
You must be new as fuck to not immediately recognise that movie on /tv/. Doesn't matter if you haven't seen it.
>based Eko and based anon bros slapping sense into newfags
never gets old, thanks m8s
>>70121337
Yes the image is intriguing I'm sure to someone who hasn't seen the film but guess what, this is a discussion thread not a "hey who has seen this?" thread. So stop being a fucking retard and figure out what the movie is BY YOURSELF so you can stop shitting up the thread with your idiotic questions and "guise we have to be nice to each other!" attitude
>>70121308
>/tv/ purpose is to advertise stuff to retards
no
>>70121337
>>70121343
If you don't know what it is, lurk more. Or not. Are you here for the capeshit threads or the GoT threads? Obviously actually films are a complete mystery to you. Get out
>>70121415
wut
did that make sense in your head?
>>70121427
>ip counter didn't go up
Lmao you're one of the anons and you're literally patting yourself on the back for thinking you made a point when really you're just annoying the not brain dead people
>>70121427
the only newfags are the ones who dont know what Sicario is
>>70121441
>If you don't know what it is, lurk more.
I literally come here every day and I have never seen this screenshot before
>>70121308
>tripfag being a stupid cunt
How surprised can I be? The movie is called Sicario, it is directed by Villeneuve who is also the director of Prisoners, Enemy, Incendies and the upcoming sequel of Blade Runner. He is not a big deal but pretty much everyone on this board knows him and his work.
>>70121343
The OP isn't being a dick though. Naturally he doesn't want to discuss the movie with people that haven't seen it. Almost everyone here has seen it or can at least identify it. You're in the minority.
>>70121441
/tv/'s purpose is discussion and the OP of a thread is responsible for providing the best info for said discussion
>>70121428
>"guise we have to be nice to each other!" attitude
yes, being an edgy 14 year old is much better! no worries you will grow up.
>>70121476
I haven't even seen the movie yet I knew what it was. Because I'm not a fucking idiot and put two and two together (emily blunt and operator, gee what movie did /tv/ talk a whole fuckton about where emily blunt was some kind of special forces lady?)
It's really not that hard, try using your brain
>>70121476
yeah every day for the last week since you started using /tv/
>>70121441
>If you don't know what it is, lurk more.
So how would I learn what it is? It is not in the opening post and by your logic the thread should be populated by people that know what it already is?
Why are you so edgy? Grow the fuck up.
>>70121455
It would make sense to anyone that's been here more than 2 months.
>>70121415
>You must be new as fuck to not immediately recognise that movie on /tv/
Or maybe I have just never acknowledged it because nothing before this moment that's been posted has intrigued me enough to give a shit about it
>>70121308
>muh board quality
>muh spoonfeeding
>proceeds to completely derail what could have been a decent thread
Spoonfeed babbies everyone!
>>70121488
>/tv/'s purpose is discussion and the OP of a thread is responsible for providing the best info for said discussion
Why would the OP want to talk about the movie with people who haven't seen it? You might as well figure out what it is, go watch it and then come back because at least those hours spent will allow you to actually contribute instead of going on an autistic rampage about how everyone needs to tell you everything
>>70121478
I know the movie very well. I made half the webms of it that you see spammed in the threads.
Like I said, it;s not about me, it's about the OP attitude and the quality of the board THAT WE ALL POPULATE.
>>70121527
>it's edgy to not want this board and thread polluted by actual morons
Keep believing it bro
>>70121478
see that's a nice description, but I would have been happy with only Sicario in the subject line. was that so fucking hard? be honest.
>>70121540
but surely you would have noticed the many Sicario threads if you had been here in late 2015
>>70121566
So you've seen the movie yet you literally only came into the thread to tell OP that he needs to cater to your rules of /tv/ posting? Just because you gave yourself a trip doesn't mean you have any actual authority here buddy
>>70121507
>I haven't even seen the movie yet I knew what it was.
maybe that's because you're autistic and have no life. God forbid I'm actually out living my life when you people are posting about this movie. I've never seen this screenshot before in my life and have been coming to this site for years.
>>70120425
If you're serious about film, and not just some marble-headed, pasty-white, cuntnozzle shitposter like I suspect you are (you fucking tripshit), then you would have IMMEDIATELY recognized it as a scene from the film Sicario.
Now hurry up and fucking DIE.
>>70121483
>Naturally he doesn't want to discuss the movie with people that haven't seen it.
Fuck the thousands of people that have not seen it, but might be interested.
Who cares that a simple word in the OP might get them into it thus enhancing the overall board quality and thread participation in future Sicario threads.
amirite?
>>70120372
this, retards
>>70121594
>but surely you would have noticed the many Sicario threads if you had been here in late 2015
that doesn't mean I been in them. And that doesn't mean I'd know this screenshot was from that especially since I've never seen this screenshot before.
>>70121588
Nice fagpost. I would have been happy if you just plugged Emily blunt operator in Google. Was that so fucking hard? Be honest
>>70121607
>I don't know what movie that pic is from and because you do that makes me angry so I'm going to call you a no lifer!
>i come here everyday and have been doing so for years
I don't get it, you're mad because even though we both apparently visit /tv/ every day I'm not as stupid as you?
>>70121146
yew steel sowh bout dat punani snatch vik?
>>70121622
You're right fuck em. It's been half a year since the movie came out and there's little reason to have not watched it by now if you're interested.
>muh board quality
Good job helping fuck up a sicario thread. Kys
Holy fucking shit the autism in this thread.
If you don't know what Sicario is, you're a moron and should fuck off. If you actually gave a fuck about knowing what it was, you would have asked or better yet, looked it up like a mature adult with some agency. You people don't belong in this board, let alone this thread.
Shes a fucking lamb in a land of wolves.
Women will always be.
>>70121642
>because you do that makes me angry so I'm going to call you a no life
You do have no life and are incredibly autistic. You expect me to know this screenshot is from a movie I've never gave a shit about before, and the first time I ever notice the screenshot, I'm suppose to automatically know it's from that movie? This is fucking Sicario, not the Wizard Of Oz.
>>70121599
>to your rules of /tv/ posting
They are not my rules, they are the general /tv/ rules that have organically appeared due to the collaboration of tens of thousands of people in the span of a decade. Who are YOU to come and shit up the place yet demanding respect? Adapt to the board culture and try to enhance everyone;'s experience, including yours.
I like what that anon said "common courtesy".
Add up those two.
>authority
Don't project.
>>70121710
>If you don't know what Sicario is, you're a moron and should fuck off.
>WAHHH HE HASN'T SEEN A MOVIE I LIKE! WAHHHHHHH!!
>>70121630
much harder when you add up hundreds of people while the OP is one dude and it takes him two seconds
it's not a hard concept to grasp
>>70121731
So I have no life and am autistic because I recognize an actress being in a well-recieved film that was heavily discussed on /tv/ around it's release? I'm honestly failing to see the correlation
>>70121686
>no one ever watches movies more than half a year past release date
wut
OP did this on purpose
and OP is actually Mr. Eko without his trip
shitstorm insues
genius
>>70121779
Too bad you're not hundreds of people. Nice try though
>>70121746
You started this shit because OP didn't state the title of the film and that apparently you think this is an actual community where we follow unspoken rules. Yet there are tooonns of threads on /tv/ every hour with no movie/show title, and I don't see you bitching in those threads about it. It's very clear you didn't know what movie this was and got upset
>>70121746
based Eko
>board culture
that's what these fucking redditor tourists and the fucking mods dont get
>>70121799
Did i say no one watches movies after half a year?
>>70121867
>>70121746
>muh board culture
Only newfags come into 4chan thinking we're all in this together, just because you people have no actual friends doesn't mean you can project that onto other anons
>>70121862
>Yet there are tooonns of threads on /tv/ every hour with no movie/show title
about things that are easily recognizable. Sicario is isn't.
>>70121862
> and that apparently you think this is an actual community where we follow unspoken rules
It is and we do. I am sad for you, if you have not figured it out yet.
>and I don't see you bitching in those threads about it
I used to.
>>70121878
Yes
>>70121776
You're in a thread for that movie though. It's pretty fucking weird to post in a discussion thread of a movie you haven't seen and start autisticly demanding information. It's like turning up to a sporting event you've never been to before and harassing the rest of the crowd because you don't understand the sport. Even if the OP had labelled the thread SICARIO in all fields in block letters, you still wouldn't be able to contribute because you haven't seen it. Ergo, the thread wasn't for you in the first place.
>>70121903
>It is and we do. I am sad for you, if you have not figured it out yet.
Except it's not, the only people that keep trying to instill this sense of bond are idiots like you, the kind who want to be recognized and to feel like they're contributing to something real but at the end of the day this is just a board of shitty people like yourself so please, PLEASE stop talking like your fantasy of 4chan is real
>>70121922
No literally kys
>>70121895
>Only newfags come into 4chan thinking we're all in this together
/tv/ specifically =/= 4chan in general
>>70121903
So you used to go into threads complaining about not having titles, and you claim that /tv/ is a community with unspoken rules. It really sounds like you're autistic and need /tv/ to be your friend
>>70121924
but I would have been able to see what the movie us, maybe get interested and watch it thus enhancing every future Sicario thread
>what is the snowball effect
>>70121924
>It's pretty fucking weird to post in a discussion thread of a movie you haven't seen and start autisticly demanding information.
It's incredibly autistic to open a fucking thread about a movie with an image you know is going to peak the curiosity of those that haven't seen it.
>>70121899
You're wrong. Sicario is extremely distinct. The specific tint itself is extremely recognizable
>>70121903
>>70121867
>>70121746
>>70121953
>/tv/ is a community guise!
Lmao how deluded are you? Bro there are no fucking rules stop being a tight ass, it's fucking 4chan you are taking this place way too seriously
I like how Eko and the couple other anons won the actual argument handily and now the contrarian fags resort to ad hominem to save face
You might think you are clever, but I noticed it, we all did.
>>70121995
Eko don't be so obvious next time
>>70121988
>yuo should recognize movies by their tins
autism/10
>>70122018
tints*
>>70122018
In sicarios case yes because of how prominent and specific the tint is. That and Emily blunt and del Toros most prominent recent roles also as well as a myriad of other instantly recognizable things
>>70121895
>>70121990
I know what your problem is, I've seen it enough times. You are new and want to desperately fit in, but you don;t want to put the required effort, so you lash out when you get called out.
Here's some advice - try to contribute to the board and it will be way more satisfying than entry level trolling or pretend nonchalant behavior.
Is Rooney Maraoperator?
>>70121970
So take it upon yourself to search the pic or lurk the thread for 2 minutes? It's no ones job to make sure you know what every thread is about. Again, you'd have to be new as fuck to not recognise what the movie is immediately. I'm guessing you got spooked by a thread without a batman or ironman pic.
>>70122059
none of that is recognizable
>>70122084
>I'm contributing by derailing on topic threads!
>>70122100
I guess you're just retarded?
>>70122090
Again, for the 10th time, 1 guy's effort (OP) vs. hundreds of people's
the OP is responsible for his threads, dont be a cunt
í fucking hate all of you :/
>>70120674
lmbo
>>70122144
same
>>70122084
I don't understand how you complaining that the OP didn't follow the rules in your head is contributing? You aren't doing any better than all the anons who argued, and I get what you're doing. You're going the "I see through you and will dissect what you say to look like I understand and am not a complete tool" route. Bro you tried to make a point, a bunch of anons called you out on it (sure you had the help of like what, 1 guy?) but it didn't work. That's fine, it happens. But take some advice from actual anonymous people, don't reply/take your trip off. That way you save yourself further embarrassment since you feel a need to have a name on /tv/ for some reason.
/tv/ is indeed a community. it got diluted with newcomers in the last few years, but the core principles still apply.
>>70122125
But there aren't hundreds of anons here that don't know Sicario. It's literally two. If I'm in a thread or a board I'm not familiar with, I lurk, like a normal person. I don't start autistic entitled rants about everyone catering to me.
>>70122175
>I don't understand how you complaining that the OP didn't follow the rules in your head is contributing?
>pointing out the negatives in parts of the machine, so it might get better, is not contribution by itself
the city of you
I don't know much about guns but In one of the last scenes she reassembles her gun pretty fast. Even under some heavy emotional stress no doubt. Fast enough topotentionally kill Toro. But that could have been an intentional power play.
Also,gas all tripfags
Here's what SHOULD have happened
Eko (who apparently knows what movie the op is discussing): Hey what movie is that?
Anon:ur dumb
Anon2: Sicario
See what happened there Eko? You were able to get the title of the movie out for other anons without looking like a douche! It's possible but I believe one day you'll figure out how to post like a normal person and not a pretentious ass!
>>70122205
>It's literally two
Do you know the unique poster count of /tv/? It's tens of thousands of people per day.
>>70122244
Here's what REALLY SHOULD have happened
OP: posts the movie name in the subject line
anons: discuss stuff in the thread
the end
>>70122278
>anons that don't know the movie discuss the movie
>>70122298
did I say it is for them? have you missed the arguments in the threads? hundreds of people not familiar with it, etc.?
>>70122278
Actually no, because the OP had no intention of getting people to watch the movie, he just had a question about it. The other anons wanted the title, therefore they ask the title instead of getting on a high horse about it. See that way OP makes the thread he wants, and the people who don't know the movie find out by simply asking. Everyone wins that way!
>>70120287
She used to think she was.
Now she's a sheep in a land of wolves.
>>70122314
>hundreds of people
Imaginary people. Two people ITT haven't seen it.
>>70122244
>>70122315
Now just imagine for one second that the OP actually takes 1 second to type the name of the movie in the subject field
- everyone that might be interested gets the info nice and quick
- future Sicario threads get more posters
- overall board quality is enhanced
1 second of contribution to properly posting can make so much difference.
>who are you to tell me what properly means tripfaggot?
I wonder why the subject field exists
>>70120674
What happen?
>>70122381
>who are you to tell me what properly means tripfaggot?
lel
at least you know your audience well
>>70121362
> looking the wrong way when entering the room
> taking ages to turn
> only dodging a full load of buckshot because the messican is a lousy shot
operatorcore
>>70122381
>overall board quality is enhanced
lmao who comes here to discuss movies i'm here for the shitposting and memes /tv/ is one of the top 5 worst boards here
ITT: newfags and fucking redditors
fuck off shitting up this board with your overwhelming laziness
>>70122381
Ugh you're pointless to discuss anything with. You expect this place to be like reddit or something where the user has to post every little fucking detail so that nobody gets left out. I'm done with you, consider yourself filtered (should have done that earlier but better late than never now I never have to see your posts ever again)
>>70120674
That actually sounds just like him, well done.
>>70122529
It's a real Seagal quote on Tom Cruise regarding Last Samurai that anon played around with.
>>70122502
I always say I filter tripfags (doesn't matter who is right) to annoy them, but I never do. I doubt anyone else does either.
>>70122420
how is that wrong
it was right, but she was just slow as fuck
>>70123497
>looking at the wrong direction
>>70120425
How do I downvote you?
>>70123588
every [you] is a downvote
This is now a Jenna thread
Now where is John?
why do I still go to this board why
