Oh I get it.The twist is she's the Beast.
I want to smash a feminist, do feminist like dick?
>>70120067
>its a "Emma Watson hurt my feeling so I'm going to pretend she's not hot" thread
>>70120172
shes average
no, the twist is that it's the memory from his childhood
Shes pretty and all but shes no "bell"
Not the bell of the ball.
Ph its fake pic. Maybe she looks older in real pics.
Who guston?
>this tale teaches you that looks don't matter
>if you're rich, live in a bigass villa and satisfy every one of your lady needs
Shit tale desu, any change Disney will make will be for the better
>>70120660
teaches you that women respond to alpha behaviour despite what they say
they want a dominant aggressive large masculine mate
the problem with a live action beauty and the beast movie is the beast is gonna look like a fucking retard no matter what they do
you cant make a half animal half man look cool, its gonna look stupid/funny/jarring
>>70120820
>they want a dominant aggressive large masculine mate
How the fuck is the beast dominant or aggressive? He's as beta and desperate as it gets.
>>70120911
he screams at her and breaks shit
thats not manlet passive behaviour, thats dark triad, girls love that
>>70120067
I was really hoping that they would stop doing these live-action remakes.
It's just so fucking pointless.
>>70121346
Jungle book was good desu,ending aside
Anastasia > Belle
>>70120911
Nah
LeFou is beta
Gaston is the clear alpha
Beast is an autistic omega sperg
![large[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/OJkDe7d.jpg "large[1].jpg")
>>70121564
what a stupid whore
I hope she gets enriched
>>70121564
>bongistani rich kid is a worthless liberal
Is anyone surprised?
>>70120610
Luke Evans
>>70120941
That sounds like literally autistic behavior.
If they made Beast a black guy, who would get upset the most?
>>70121742
WHAT IF BASED BIG GUY LMAO DUDE WEED TRIPLE JUMP CORN FLAKES WOOP DE DOO?!?! XD
fuck off!
>>70120941
>women love psychopaths
How's highschool treating you?
>>70121485
What was the point of it? It was just the 1967 film without the charm and beauty of the hand drawn animation
>>70121844
back to bebbit with you
>>70121852
might wanna open up some scientific journals, homo
>>70121844
are you alright anon? need someone to call you an ambulance?
i think you should lay off the memes for a while
>>70121884
If people thought they were anything more than subhuman trash the majority of them wouldn't be luterall locked up in the prison system where they can rot and be forgotten.
>>70121960
literally*
>>70121886
>le calm reply
Fuck you and your mother's cunt.
>>70121865
Go crawl up >>70121886's ass and hibernate for the winter
>>70121960
>he doesnt read
>he talks based on emotion
>he thinks psychos are in prison and not in ceo offices, courts, hospitals
haha
>>70121997
>>le calm reply
more memes? you are in serious danger on meme overload
maybe go outside for a bit, talk to someone
>>70122001
>I'm a cold, emotionless, uber-logical machine
>le superior psychopath meme
A truly fedorable post that was, my good sir.
Don't worry, I was an angsty teen too, and you'll drop the pseudo-psychopath act once you realize the only women you can get are the ones that have codependency issues.
>>70122131
whats with the ad hominems though? maybe actually read before you talk shit
you know theres words in books that confirm what im saying and make you look like a dumbcunt who sucks his dads cock ?
>>70120172
But she's not, though. I don't understand her appeal, honestly. She looks like a 7 year old boy...Oh, wait. I'm on /tv/. Now I understand why you like her.
>>70122001
its like im reading the manifesto of a school shooter, please go on
>>70122001
There are successful psychopaths, but don't even try to act as if the people in those roles make up the majority of them. Most of them are either trying to live normally or end up in prison at some point.
>>70122159
I know you're a pathetic idiot, but even you must understand:
You're talking about fantasy (books, etc)
Try leaving the basement and observe human interactions, sperg.
>>70122258
>>70122238
>>70122213
http://thehustle.co/your-ceo-is-probably-a-psychopath
http://www.alternet.org/culture/10-careers-most-psychopaths
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=FzB4qUdhjxwC&pg=PA65&lpg=PA65&dq=psychopaths+in+ceo+hospitals+lawyers&source=bl&ots=1riDDp9emR&sig=j37nlYzsasKKawCNBluA5jb2iTw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjciqLiz_zMAhXKn5QKHdBXAY0Q6AEIMzAD#v=onepage&q=psychopaths%20in%20ceo%20hospitals%20lawyers&f=false
http://www.digitalspy.com/fun/news/a437450/professions-with-most-psychopaths-revealed-lawyers-journalists/
http://www.medindia.net/news/ceos-and-lawyers-most-likely-to-be-psychopaths-in-profession-133663-1.htm
http://www.hare.org/links/saturday.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3420708/Do-work-psychopath-Experts-reveal-traits-tell-tale-signs-successful-ambitious-people.html
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/the-ten-jobs-that-attract-psychopaths-and-why/story-fndo48ca-1226512127799?nk=7637625959edd75224fd607839cf3a73-1464433524
>>70122159
Are you really going to complain about ad hominems when you used one every time you responded to him? Or is it okay because he did it first?
If you're going to make big claims backed by evidence, post that evidence.
>I don't want to speenfood you
If you can't even post the basic info, your point might as well be void.
>>70120067
>FACT: 4% of CEOs are psychopaths
>About 1% of the human population are psychopaths.
>But CEOs are four times more likely to be psychopaths than the average person, according to journalist Jon Ronson. He spent two years researching this, and published a book titled “The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry.”
>>70122159
>y u use ad hom? ;_;
>uses ad hominem
WEW LAD
E
W
L
A
D
Seriously though, if you've actually had any life experience you'd know that it's bullshit the media pushes to twist the minds of young western men into a deluded, apathetic mess.
Ask any woman who got out of a relationship with a psycho if she enjoyed it, go on.
>>70122299
You seriously expect to be taken seriously by linking sites like dailymail, heraldsun/thehustle?
You need to be 18 to post here, sperg.
>>70122299
ooooh someone got smacked down, not a single retort to this.
>>70122299
fuck, beat me by like 2 seconds...>>70122364
>>70122299
>>70122299
pretty sure trips and dubs have spoken
>>70122364
>Can't refute evidence
>Better attack a secondary source
>>70122374
you expect people to read through all of that in 3 minutes? maybe wait a while before you pat yourself on the back for posting dailymail links
>>70122364
>gets btfo
>n-nice s-sources
embarrassing
>>70122412
Riech, Kevin B. "Psycho lawyer, qu'est-ce que c'est: the high incidence of psychopaths in the legal profession and why they thrive." Law and Psychology Review Annual 2015: 287+. Academic OneFile. Web. 28 May 2016.
>>70122412
http://www.nowandfutures.com/large/ImplicationsOfCorporatePsychopaths(boddy).pdf
CONCLUSIONS
That Corporate Psychopaths exist is beyond question. The implications of this for
business and society are just beginning to be explored. However the existence of
Corporate Psychopaths has potentially major implications on understanding
some decisions on firm resource allocation, ethical decision making and overall
firm performance.
As one of the first papers on the subject of Corporate Psychopaths in the area of
business, this paper of necessity raises more questions than it answers. Above all
what sort of people do we want running our major institutions and organisations
and making decisions about how those institutions and organisations affect
business, the environment, society and the economy?
Academics involved in the areas of business and behavioural research should
arguably be much more heavily involved in research in this area as it has major
implications for the way in which business and society are managed. This paper
calls for much more research in this area.
>>70122416
>>70122405
You think I got btfo just because you quoted reputably dubious sources with no value?
You spergs truly are pathetic (and you can stop samefagging).
>>70122395
>muh dubs xDDDD
>>70120096
Why the fuck haven't you been called a nigger and told to fuck off yet
What's happening to /tv/
>>70122443
>whipping out the easybib citations
Wew. You guys are all taking this too seriously.
So what do some successful people being psychopaths have to do with the Beast not being beta again?
The original argument was that he wasn't because he screams and breaks shot, but neither of those have to do with being successful or alpha.
>>70121485
Disliked the music that but otherwise solid flick
>>70121564
#fucktaxes
>>70122473
Abstract
The paper defines Corporate Psychopaths as those people working in
corporations who are self-serving, opportunistic, ego-centric, ruthless and
shameless but who can be charming, manipulative and ambitious.
This is the definition of someone who needs their job. Not a psychopath. But writing a paper called "People sometimes do things they would not do otherwise to get money" is not as catchy as putting Psychopaths in the title.
>>70122635
>i'm going to change the definition of psychopath cause i'm special
Embarrassing
>>70121852
Then how do you explain niggers?
I am genuinely upset by the fact that emma watson is no longer attractive
I feel like this was something I needed, like if that isn't consistent then nothing is
>>70123006
Being a psychopath involves human level intelligence and specific social outlook.
Niggers are just unevolved, lowlife, violent animals.
Would you call a rat a "psychopath?" no. It's just a fuckig rat being a rat.
>women are attracted to psychopaths
>want proof, just look at these figures showing ~4% of CEOs may be psychopaths
>kewie dee, my friends, kewie dee
kek
>>70120067
she isn't hot though. surprised they didn't just go full retard and pick a GOT reject.
>>70122659
they literally created their own term and added psychopath to it in order reel in people like you
>>70120067
LOOK AT THE TOP OF HER HEAD
She looks like a little girl. I am tired of this meme with actresses. It's the same with J-Law and a ton of others. They look like children and they're older than ME. Stop casting them as leads or as characters that should be older and more mature. Goddamn.
>>70123152
>women are attracted to psychopaths
http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2215&context=soss_research
http://ejournal.narotama.ac.id/files/Who%20is%20James%20Bond%20The%20Dark%20Triad%20as%20an%20agentic%20social%20style.pdf
>>70120067
Agreed
>>70123152
But women ARE psycopathic, so it makes sense.
>>70123293
First link:
>This survey (N=224) found that characteristics collectively known as the Dark Triad (i.e. narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism) were correlated with various dimensions of short-term mating but not long-term mating.
Wow so narcissism and manipulativeness are good for hookups, sometimes? kek
Second link:
> If the Dark Triad are costly traits for individuals to have and individuals are predisposed to avoid interacting with selfish individuals, how do those who have those traits extract resources from their environment? We contend that a specific set of personality traits will enable individuals to do so. We showed that those who are disagreeable, extraverted, open, and have high self-esteem along with low levels of neuroticism and conscientiousness score high on
the Dark Triad (Study 1: N= 216). Additionally, having a more individualistic and competitive approach to others and not a strongly altruistic orientation will also help those who are high on the Dark Triad (Study 2; N= 336). We contend that the Dark Triad may represent one social strategy that is characterized by an agentic social style.
Literally not even relevant.
>>70122488
>still btfo
>n-nice s-sources
>>70123855
>Wow so narcissism and manipulativeness are good for hookups, sometimes? kek
So you agree women are attracted to it but it's not an attraction that satisfies you so you dismiss it? haha what a cocksucking idiot
>>70122299
>that Dailymail article
Fucking wew, I was gonna link it and ask if that's where you got your bullshit from.
Top kek m8, you've made my morning.
>>70122405
>>70122416
>samefagging
>>70123855
>h-hookups a-and s-sex isn't a-attraction
>>70123921
>n-nice s-sources
>still hasn't refuted a single thing
>>70123898
>So you agree women are attracted to it
I agree some women are attracted to it sometimes. This isn't surprising and doesn't even begin to support "Women find psychopaths attractive", unless you're also prepared to say Benedict Cumberbatch proves "Women find men named Benedict attractive".
>>70123921
>I'm not a retard
>It must be samefagging
projection
>>70123929
>st-st-stuttering i-in greentexts masks my inability to follow conversations conducted in simple english
>masks it perfectly
>no one will ever know
>>70123877
you know that saying >n-nice s-sources doesnt add any credibility to your sources,right?
>>70123985
>claims women are not attracted to psychopaths
>guven evidence that women are demonstratably attracted to psychopaths
>starts crying that said evidence fails to meet his standards
>backtracks furiously when forced to admit that sex happens due to attraction
>expects respectful answers
Smell of roast beef coming off your posts
>>70123988
Refute them or fuck off Hitler dubs. Ad hominem against the publication of a source is not an argument
>>70124040
>claims women are not attracted to psychopaths
See? Completely unable to follow a conversation.
>>70124059
>btfo completely
>i was just pretending to be retarded
well done for agreeing with me anon in future don't struggle
>>70120172
I can honestly say Emma Watson is a continual mystery to me. There is literally nothing attractive objectively about her other than maybe her accent. Other famous women I don't find attractive I can see what people see in them. Emma Watson looks like Richard Dawkins, has no tits, no arse, mediocre legs and an OK stomach. She also seems like a complete arsehole so it's not even like she's cool like Emma Stone. The feminist, tax-dodging hypocrisy is just the icing on the cake of my confusion.
>>70123944
http://pastebin.com/xcDLfXsX
good luck refuting this,lol
>>70124136
Not an argument. Refute or fuck off babby
>>70123855
>Second link:
>
>> If the Dark Triad are costly traits for individuals to have and individuals are predisposed to avoid interacting with selfish individuals, how do those who have those traits extract resources from their environment? We contend that a specific set of personality traits will enable individuals to do so. We showed that those who are disagreeable, extraverted, open, and have high self-esteem along with low levels of neuroticism and conscientiousness score high on
>the Dark Triad (Study 1: N= 216). Additionally, having a more individualistic and competitive approach to others and not a strongly altruistic orientation will also help those who are high on the Dark Triad (Study 2; N= 336). We contend that the Dark Triad may represent one social strategy that is characterized by an agentic social style.
>
>Literally not even relevant.
Therefore, as with mating strategies (e.g.,
Gangestad & Simpson, 2000), life strategies may also take pluralistic forms. Indeed, it is
possible that mating strategies are a subset of social strategies: a short-term mating
strategy may reflect a selfish, agentic social orientation, whereas a long-term mating style
is more in line with an altruistic, cooperative orientation.
>>70124099
>make absurdly broad universal claim
>hastily google studies weakly supporting other, narrower, more specific claim
Stupid people just aren't capable of parsing complex thoughts, so you shouldn't furrow your brows too much. All you need to know is HE REPLIED AGAIN and that means you get to call me a cuck or a roastie or whatever other little thing you enjoy screaming at people.
>>70124167
you are clearly having comprehension problems, maybe re-read the thread
>>70124119
>no arse
bruh
>feminist, tax-dodging hypocrisy
I'm not sure 'being a feminist' and 'dodging taxes' are hypocritical in any robust sense.
>>70122299
>worships his psychopath globalist masters
>a perfect slave
>no shame, no humility, will follow his master's example and bring everyone else down in an attempt to get ahead
>no passion, no creativity, nothing has value or meaning, human life is worthless to him
>no respect for culture or religion, no traditional values
How does it feel to be a footsoldier of the NWO?
>>70124217
>sweat dripping off her brow she tries to make herself look superior
>I can't lose face anonymously on the internet!
You admitted what I wanted to I'm done with you. Tell yourself whatever you need to heal your mental distress
>>70124287
Not an argument. Refute or fuck off
>>70123959
One of the key symptoms of actual psychopaths - and I'm talking real psychopathy, not "le corporate ebil man is a psycho" - is serial monogamous relationships.
Most psychopaths desire companionship due to a desire to control others, desire for sex, or most commonly to sponge off of (since most aren't very successful). These relationships don't last for too long because the women wise up and kick them out.
In other words, yes, women may find their attitude attractive at first or be taken in by their superficial charm, but they *do* catch on that the person is taking advantage of them.
Among wealthier psychopaths, the relationships last longer because of financial reasons - both because it's more complicated to divorce someone when lots of money is involved and because marrying for money isn't uncommon.
Long story short, women don't love psychopaths. They may get taken in by their act, like everyone else, but except in rare cases they don't like being used.
>>70124185
>draws comparison between social strategies and mating strategies as a class
>relevant
>you
>not literally retarded
But nah m8 nah it definitely contains the phrase 'mating strategies' and I can see that that means you have indeed done all the diligents on this one.
>>70124331
>gets refuted
>ignores it
keep it up
>>70121852
i d-didnt say women love psychopaths
>>70121960
>>70122635
i d-didnt say psycopaths are all locked up in the prison system
>>70122131
>>70122635
>>70123152
i d-didnt say psycopaths arent successful CEOs
>>70122238
i d-didnt say psycopaths arent all in jail, only some are CEOS and lawyers and other successful people
>>70122364
>>70122412
>>70122488
>>70122496
y-your evidence is primary and secondary and therefore w-wrong
>>70124119
>no arse
heh
>>70124303
>You admitted what I wanted to
No, I proved that you were talking complete bollocks and demonstrated irrefutably that your own sources - where they even had anything to do with the matter, as opposed to just happening to contain key words from your googling - did not support, and in fact explicitly contradicted, your claims. It's no skin off my arse if you're literally too stupid to understand that. Let the baby have his bottle, I say.
>>70124355
Do you need someone to draw you a picture? Be honest. Is that arts degree not cutting it?
You've got 2 sources, one says that women are attracted to dark triads, another saying dark triad traits are useful for mating strategies
But you can't understand what that means because your brain is literally inferior
>>70124432
>another saying dark triad traits are useful for mating strategies
No, it doesn't say that. You are copying and pasting words and sentences you literally do not understand. You're a living Chinese Room.
>>70124475
HAHA
So you just ignore the first source completely? You deny it's evidence because the second source doesn't completely spell it out? HAHA WHAT A FUCKING RETARD
>>70124505
>So you just ignore the first source completely?
No, I pointed out that it supports a much more modest and limited claim than the one it was presented in support of. Stupid people, again, aren't neurologically capable of processing those sorts of subtleties.
>>70124367
did you honestly just ignore everything that was said in those posts?
>>70124548
>I made an argument
>It was proven wrong
>But luckily for me there's a source here that doesn't explicitly say I'm wrong, it only supports where I am wrong
hahaha
>>70124432
>become a sociopath and you'll get laid guize! :^)
Literal psyops in this thread.
>>70124594
>I made an argument
I actually didn't, I expressed skepticism towards an argument someone else made. Stupid people, again, have difficulty keeping track of these things. It's not your fault.
>It was proven wrong
No, the source in question actually refuted the argument it was posted to support. Stupid people, again, have difficulty keeping track of these things. It's not your fault.
>But luckily for me there's a source here that doesn't explicitly say I'm wrong, it only supports where I am wrong
That doesn't even make sense. Stupid people have difficulty articulating their 'views' (which in any case are really just emotional dispositions; stupid people don't have 'views' as such). It's not your fault.
>>70120067
>Beauty
>Hire ugly girl from England
Way to go, Disney
>>70124375
i was always too distracted by the booty, but wtf is she even doing in that scene? just showing off her ass?
>>70121564
mother of oxymoron
>>70124289
she argues about the wage gap yet moves all her money so she doesn't have to pay any tax, pretty hypocritical. And use a picture where she isn't wearing six inch heels. Her arse is OK, but it's not something to get particularly excited about.
>>70124375
That's a normal sized arse. Mine is bigger than that and I'm a skinny guy. It's people thinking that THAT'S a good arse just cause it's Emma Watson that confuses me so much.
>>70124853
>she argues about the wage gap yet moves all her money so she doesn't have to pay any tax, pretty hypocritical
No it's not. Imagine someone opposed to taxation in any form who also believes in and opposes the wage gap. There's no contradiction there.
>>70124888
>size is the sole criterion on which asses are judged
Go chase some chubbies Leroy.
>>70124853
yes, lets check how good of a career has the other co-star ron wisel boy has had? and this bitch has the audacity to compare herself to harry potter
>>70124888
nigger
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/psychology-uncovers-sex-appeal-dark-personalities/
>Recent research has found that people with so-called “dark” personality traits are more physically attractive than others. What is it about dark personalities that make them so appealing? The answer may help us understand what makes people with these personality traits so successful at exploiting others.
>The findings reinforce previous research showing that narcissists are more popular than others, literally at first sight. Mitja Back and Boris Egloff of Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz along with Stefan Schmukle at Westfalische Wilhelms-University of Muenster conducted a study in 2010 where they collected information on students’ personalities and then had them briefly introduce themselves to one another.
MAKE IT STOP
MAKE HIM WRONG
http://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/The-Dark-Triad-Personality.pdf
abstract
It has been suggested that the Dark Triad (DT) personality constellation is an evolved facilitator of men’s
short-term mating strategies. However, previous studies have relied on self-report data to consider the
sexual success of DT men. To explore the attractiveness of the DT personality to the other sex, 128 women
rated created (male) characters designed to capture high DT facets of personality or a control personality.
Physicality was held constant. Women rated the high DT character as significantly more attractive. Moreover,
this greater attractiveness was not explained by correlated perceptions of Big 5 traits. These findings
are considered in light of mating strategies, the evolutionary ‘arms race’ and individual differences.
>Women rated the high DT character as significantly more attractive
>>70124941
>argue that your wage, and the wage of all women, isn't fair
>move money so you don't pay tax and hence get more money than your male counterparts and pay less tax than the average working woman or man
How is that not hypocritical? If she was all for fair wages she'd pay all her tax she fucking owed.
>Ctrl + F forehead
>0 results
Just came by to say her forehead looks like a landing pad
>>70124366
Not an argument. Refute or fuck off
>>70124966
My original comment was "no arse" as in the size of her arse, but we're judging on quality then? Because that's just what a normal arse looks like in leggings. Lmao you see that on the street every day.
>>70124416
>i don't care!
>massive wall of text
>>70125022
>How is that not hypocritical?
I've literally just explained how: because nothing implied by doing the one conflicts with doing the other. Call it immoral if you like, calling it 'hypocritical' is just silly. It's not.
>>70125096
but it is.
>>70125067
No, it's the single greatest arse ever to exist. Convince me otherwise.
>>70125096
>The private sector isn't fair because I don't get paid enough, being fair is important, a fair society is important
>I am not obliged to pay my fair share in taxes, being fair is not important, a fair society is not important
>I'm not a hypocrite
>>70125110
Would it be hypocritical for her to use the last available discount coupon to buy something?
>>70125153
>equivocating on 'fair'
>>70120067
>the beast
>socially conscious philanthropist who contributes to numerous charities while living an ascetic and modest lifestyle in the home he inherited
>the beauty
>decadent western liberal who hides her funds in an offshore account to avoid taxation, attends ivy league institutions and dates royalty
>>70125175
The entire basis of the wage gap argument is about fairness you twat
>>70125189
>i don't know what 'equivocating' means and i'm certainly not about to find out
no john you are the twat
>>70125117
J Lo exists so she's already second best if they were the only two women in the world
>>70125244
I'm sorry, you have failed to convince me. Try again.
>>70125042
>if i just close my eyes and shout "Not an argument. Refute or fuck off" i will never get refuted
>>70125277
I'm not trying to convince anyone.
I believe Emma Watson is average in most regards and in some regards (face, tits) below average. I can't see anything about her that's biologically attractive and don't understand the appeal of her.
I'm not trying to convince people not to find her attractive. Just almost every other girl I meet I find more attractive than Emma Watson.
>>70125008
Meet: >>70120911
>>70121741
>>70121852
>>70121960
>>70122131
>>70122213
>>70122258
>>70122305
>>70122357
>>70122364
>>70122412
>>70122488
>>70122496
>>70122551
>>70122635
>>70123146
>>70123152
>>70123201
>>70123855
>>70123921
>>70123959
>>70123985
>>70123988
>>70124059
>>70124136
>>70124217
>>70124301
>>70124353
>>70124355
>>70124416
>>70124475
>>70124548
>>70124584
>>70124617
>>70124696
>>70124289
she looks like a gay Noel Gallacher impersonator in that pic.I'd still fuck her though.
>>70125319
I'm sorry, you have failed to convince me. Try again.
>>70120067
Since Disney has a horrible track record with these things, we can expect this to be another feminist flick - where she kills Gaston strictly because of his patriarchal views, and makes the beast a submissive slave as an example as to why men must prove their worthiness unto a woman and not the other way.
>>70125216
So reducing/removing the wage gap isn't about fairness? What is it about?
I'd say it's certainly totally about fairness in society to bring equality between men and women.
But somehow bringing equality in paying taxes between rich and poor is not about fairness?
What is the basis of the wage gap if not fairness? Non discrimination? Why is that important then, because it's fair, so again, the fundamental reason there's an issue with the wage gap is due to fairness.
>>70125329
Not an argument. Refute or fuck off, lol
>>70125351
Emma looking somewhat masculine? That's crazy talk.
>>70125402
The wage gap isn't real
>>70125435
she has quite a boyish face. Combined with short hair it does make her look fairly masculine. I like androgyny though, so I'm not complaining.
>>70125402
>>70125504
well,this thread has officially reached the point of no return
>>70125402
>equivocal
>having two or more possible meanings
The wage gap argument is that women are unfairly underpaid. The claim is that they are valued and considered less because of their gender. There is no parallel in the case of tax shelters: anyone can use tax shelters if they know how.
I'd again return to the hypothetical person who believes in and opposes the wage gap, while also believing that all taxation is theft. If that person isn't a hypocrite, and they are not, then neither is Watson here.
>>70125569
>anyone can use tax shelters if they know how.
The poor cannot use tax shelters.
There is hypocrisy when you are concerned with the economic and social fairness between men above women but not when you are concerned with the economic and social fairness between rich above poor.
>>70120067
I can fap to this.
mmmmPiss. Lengthy pissings! Drop that beautiful surrender cunt.
>>70125612
What?
I would quite like to see Emma pissing herself in a pair of jeans though.
>>70125008
>W-women H-HATE psychopaths like the beast who are pieces of s-shit
>>70125637
back at it with the reaction image and stuttering
please, friend, just stop. you are not impressing anyone
>>70125319
yeah, what is even attractive about this thing anyway?
>>70125607
>The poor cannot use tax shelters.
Of course they can.
>A tax shelter is a legal method of minimizing or decreasing an investor's taxable income and, therefore, his or her tax liability. Tax shelters can range from investments or investment accounts that provide favorable tax treatment, to activities or transactions that lower taxable income. The most common type of tax shelter is an employer-sponsored 401(k) plan.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/taxshelter.asp?layout=infini&v=5C&orig=1&adtest=5C
Now, there are tax shelters that poor people can't afford to use. But there are all sorts of products and services that poor people can't afford. Nothing about this is 'unfair', especially considering that most of the relevant shelters deal exclusively with income of a sort that poor people by definition simply don't have, eg capital gains.
>There is hypocrisy when you are concerned with the economic and social fairness between men above women but not when you are concerned with the economic and social fairness between rich above poor.
Only if it's also hypocritical to oppose the wage gap while seeing no problem with poor people not being able to afford Porsches.
>>70125746
When you take on a number of fucking retards and win and they scatter away with their tail between their legs you get to boast, bitch
>>70125819
Wow it's like those fucking stupid poor people just don't even WANT to hide their assets, what are they doing? They totally can, because you said they can, they just don't
There's no reason for why they don't, it's purely because they're lazy and/or stupid
Thank you for showing them the light!
>>70125298
Not an argument. Refute or fuck off
>>70125788
She's boring, even as an actress she's average
>brown eyes
>boring lips
>decent nose
>hair is okay
>no tits or ass
She starred in the HP which is the only reason why anyone is even talking about her. Compare her to actual beauties and she gets ugly real fast.
>>70125746
>has no argument
>has no sources
>has refuted nothing
>thinks we can't tell she's an anally annihilated roastie
L M A O
>>70120067
>casting Richard Dawkins as Belle
What were they thinking?
>>70120172
>muh waifu
>>70120067
hollywood isn't allowed to have attractive women be in things any more, it upsets the ugly old chicks who run hollywood
>>70125390
Women find Gaston really fuckable though
So the modern feminist version of Beauty and the Beast should have Belle marrying Beast and making him her betabux, but fucking hot, masculine Gaston on the side (until she gets bored with him and accuses him of rape)
>>70125874
>Wow it's like those fucking stupid poor people just don't even WANT to hide their assets, what are they doing? They totally can, because you said they can, they just don't
No, they totally can, because is there is no legal or practical stricture preventing them from doing so that doesn't also apply to the rich. Poor people don't use tax shelters for a number of reasons, mainly that they don't know how and that the investment amortisation period is too long and requires too much of their seed capital for doing so to be rational.
I mean, I'm just picking nits, I agree structured investments to avoid tax exposure are a problem and I don't approve of doing them. It's just that doing so while agitating about the wage gap isn't 'hypocritical'. Getting a price break on a bulk purchase while agitating against the wage gap also isn't hypocritical, and that's certainly something poor people can't do.
>>70125788
>she was kind of cute as a 12 year old
lol
>>70125939
This. She seems so shrill and brittle too. I would hate to be stuck in a conversation with her.
>>70121564
Are they welcome in her mansion? Surely she has enough space for just a small fraction of those poor souls!
>>70120067
Why does she always squint? Does she have a personal little sun in her eyes in every movie she's in? Feels odd them making a live action of this though.
>>70120067
How are Disney going to pull off this? Shrek already subverted the B&B trope, and I don't see how they can still have the same ending pretending that there is such a thing as "better" looking. The Beast won't transform in the end.
I find all the young actors to be extremely boring.
>>70125939
>this place says emma watson is ugly and star wars xenomorph is cute
truly the most tasteless community there's ever been
>>70120096
They love and hate it. Their hate for it makes their desire stronger, which increases their shame and frustration due to their social and political agenda. At the same time it also increases the intensity of their orgasms and sexual energy. It's like a double-edged sword to them.
>>70125435
Sh-She...has a mustache.
>>70124119
Iawtc
And her acting is embarrassing desu
>>70120067
so it's Shrek?
>>70122659
You'll meet those people if you work in an office environment and not out of the back of a pickup truck with 3 other losers.
>>70120172
She's not hot. If you actually knew any girls in real life, you would notice immediately, you closet pedo.
>>70126392
you gay, bro?
>this is a 10/10 body on /tv/
>>70120096
fuck off nigger
>>70128285
well it is
ITT: paid shills promoting unhealthy, degenerate behaviour and citing bogus studies and tabloids
>>70128416
>muh waifu goggles
>>70120067
I really sympathise with the Watson-haters. She definitely doesn't look quite like most other women generally considered attractive, so I can understand people getting confused. Personally, when I see her, some instinctual part of me just starts saying "Get your dick inside that and ejaculate as many as times as possible". Just that simple, like everything about her is precision-engineered to make me want to fuck her. And people get weird about that, so I'd imagine it's baffling if you don't share the attraction. That's how I feel when people go ape over Eva Green; I just don't see it.
>>70120067
why does /tv/ hate emma watson? i thought 4chan and 9gag like her?
>Emma thread
>Barely any pics
Bunch of cunts. Typical /tv/ shit.
>>70120067
Am I the only one to notice she has a massive fucking pimple on her chin?
It's like a second head.
Watson hating redditors out in full force today I see.
>>70128703
do you see the little mouse?
I would like to pet that mouse
>>70128703
redditjanny deletes and bans anyone who posts pictures of actors (female actors, male actors are fine) on this acting board.
>>70128850
she has nice body
She's been singing and dancing for 20 years and has a quite pleasant voice. Emmas gonna kill it
>>70128850
she looks like shes never left her ghoulish manor and just discovered what a beach feels like
>its an emma triggers all the neckbeards episode
Truly the queen of tv
>>70126058
She's 16 there.
Emma is and has always been hot as fuck
>be 25
>look 17
Hnnng
>>70120172
>they dont like what i like
>im going to cry about it
She's always been too fucking preachy but like every celebrity she never really practices what she preaches.
>>70126679
Dumb ghettoposter
>>70120067
aging like milk
>>70124375
There's a reason women pay hundreds of dollars for those yoga pants, because they make something unfortunate into something desirable
>>70129419
Lol fuck off jlaw she's literally the least preachy and in your face. And she doesn't complain about bs like you do and run around like a self aware retard who needs attention
>>70129482
Tara Reid? Is that you?
>>70129524
>going in front of UN to preach
>least preachy
>>70129482
There's a reason there's google
Her ass is fucking nice
>>70121564
women in a nutshell
>>70129576
Lmao you triggered faggot. She was extremely nervous giving the speech if you couldn't tell bc you can't read human emotions and body labgauge. Literally said nothing wrong either youre conplaining exactly like a sjw youre no different
Keep showing your ignorance bc its shows.
>>70120096
only if you were a woman previouslyso in your case yes
>>70129550
no that's emma watson
Emma rattles the scum of the earth
>>70125298
Not an argument
Emma is 34-23-34 she fine as hell
>This pasty pancake assed feminazi is LITERALLY A GODDESS
You people are such betas im glad your line will not continue. Call yourself "End of the Line"
>>70130020
>going out of your way to try and hate on a model and a sex symbol
Sounds like you're a beta faggot
Meh, she's just sort of qt. That's about it. A solid 6-7/10 at most. Like a slightly more attractive version of Kristen Stewart.
>>70128285
Belle was a hot piece of ass in the cartoon, why did they cast Emma Watson?
>>70130120
>a model and a sex symbol
>>70130203
>>70120067
>bitch face
>beady eyes
>definitely Belle
She got cast for the same reason Kaloriesee got cast as Sarah Connor. A bunch of bean counting Hollywood faggots decided to cash in on the fanboy following.
>>70120067
>she
>>70130254
>animeshit
>living in reality
>>70120067
god she is so ugly.
>'she' has 5 years maximum before she is post wall and is playing the 'frazzled mother juggling kids, career, her silly husband'
'WOMEN' BTFO
THEY WILL NEVER RECOVER
ITS OVER
>>70130307
Emma was cast bc unlike you is talented and has been singing for 20 years
Why is she turning into a 40 year old jew?
>>70130403
Modeling might not require any fucking skills but it does require looks, Emma Watson is just advertising products because of her name, just like in this fucking movie. She's an ugly slag and wouldn't last a second in the modeling world.
>>70130460
>>70129715
>bc
>bc
why are you keep dropping the extra "c" from your "bc"? Does your cuckshed wifi charges you per letter?
>>70130568
>all this denial
This board is rich
As long as the 2 actors have chemistry and it's palpable on screen, then the rest is just detail. A nice score and beautiful sets would be a bonus and given the budget, almost a given.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0OsDSWDCIY
Can't wait for the OTP
>>70130814
Emma had a hell of a lot more chemistry than bruhl did in colonia
