>>70078775

Just because it wasn't historically accurate doesn't mean it was bad on paper. I mean the baron of Ibelin actually existed but he was nothing like in that movie.

It's like with The Last Samurai where it was very loosely based on a true story. Like how he was actually dutch, it happened (I think) a hundred years earlier and he fought for the shogunate and not the rebellion.

>>70078775
Why does /tv/ keep bringing up this movie. It was pleb-tier to the max, an utterly forgettable movie.

File: 1463442288675.png (763 KB, 714x696) Image search: [Google]

763 KB, 714x696

>>70078905

If it's so forgettable then why do you remember it?

undeniably flawed but underrated

>>70078775
The only bad part was Orlando Bloom. I hope everyone here watched the directors cut.

>>70078775
>movies with a shitty script but well-directed.

BACK

>>70078775
Director's Cut is actually pretty good.

i was bored desu
i think it was orlando bloom

>>70078775
>>70079035
It's almost as if a film is an entirely different thing from a script.

Also speaking of the director's cut, I watched and just trying to imagine what was cut from the theatrical version confuses me since every scene had a purpose.

>>70078775
I actually liked X3. I hated Apocolypse but I don't understand the hate for X-Men 3.

File: What+is+Jerusalem+worth[1].jpg (33 KB, 344x648) Image search: [Google]

33 KB, 344x648

watch directors cut