I don't get it. Why couldn't Jo get a job as an escort if she liked boning THAT much?
Because then it would just be a movie about some hooker
>>70068259
I don't think there was a point, I think the director was just obsessed with that actress and wanted to see her do as much sex shit as he could. Like the Brown Bunny.
Because then she wouldn't be a strong independent woman.
The movie was a way for von Trier to exercise his dark Romantic, aestheticist, anti-political outlook that people are fucked up, sexuality is what it is but isn't 'positive', and to expose our innate destructiveness/selfishness/hypocrisy
the fate of the thoughtful good progressive guy at the end was a fuck you to people who believe in human progress
>>70068432
nigga he just wanted to make a porno lol
>>70068259
Le read the name of the movie. It is plainly about a Nympho. there is to be no explaining away or discounting of that aspect (being a nymphomaniac) of her character.
Also, It's not a real life person. It's creating a character to tell a story written when drunk.
Lars Con Trier is the a pretentious hack. Not much else to it.
>>70068488
no. read up on Lars.
the movie even articulates his outlook quite directly, and Melancholia and Anti-Christ were all about this dark romantic, anti-progress outlook
Because that's not what his wife did
>>70068259
>liked boning
She doesn't like boning. Nymphos don't get satisfaction out of sex, anon. It's a compulsive act born out of mental illness.
she did, you plebs. think about it. she got a job as an 'extortionist'? she meant hooker, she just didn't want to admit it.
on the one occasion we get to see her at work she's finding out what a man's sexual kink is? then having found it she makes an extortionate amount, and recruits a young girl to work for her? also as an extortionist? they were both hookers.
she was also fucking the kid even though she had an std, her "wound"
>>70068585
