>>69991112
yeah

>>69991112
Not really. Cusack is good in it though.

It's fantastic.

>>69991132
Cusack might be good innit, but Dano is just...

CLASSIC

>>69991132
that's backwards

it's good, cusack isn't. john cusack's brian wilson was literally john cusack, he didn't even try.

>>69991140
Say that again...

I liked it a lot

>>69991214
it's a classic

Yes, especially if you're tired of typical bland "tortured genius" musician biopics, this one has a better, much more enjoyable structure

John Cusack's parts were 6/10.

Classic Paul Dano's parts were 10/10.

Old Brian should've been cut out entirely, his story was boring and cliched
I'm not Paul Dano btw

Cusack's portrayal was actually fairly true to Brian's behaviour/mannerisms around that time. Judging from interviews anyway

>>69991368
How was his story boring and cliched? Is there a lot of musicians that spend like a decade under an influence of a crazy psychologist?

I also thought that it was pretty nice that for once woman in a biopic is somebody who saves a main character instead of standing in his way. I guess it's easier because that shit really happened

I was actually expecting a meme thread, and someone posting "C". You dissapointed me, /tv/.

The 60s stuff was pretty amazing and the 80s stuff was pretty boring with a few good moments... just like Brian Wilson's music.

Excellent movie. Dano was great. Elizabeth Banks was surprisingly good.

it sucked like all biopics. Dano was too "Golly Gee I want to make great music". cliched as fuck.

NIGGER RUN