I work for Dick Jones! DICK JONES!
Why was the first Robocop so based but the rest ended really bad?
You are all under arrest.
>>69969229
It should be "I work for dick, Jones."
Its a hold over from the original script when robocops name was Jones Cranny. Or JC, to drive home the jesus analogy.
>>69970256
The first one was a fairly original idea with a not-quite-big-enough budget that they someone managed to pull off through conviction and talent, and then it was wildly successful. They tried to re-create that with sequels and it didn't work. It's not complicated, I'm sure if you sat down and thought about it for 5 minutes you would've realized this.
I fucking love Robocop, man. I might rewatch it tonight in fact.
Verhoeven can do no wrong.
Would it be pleb calling this my favorite film?
>>69971092
It's mine too.
I'm pretty sure I've seen objectively better films from an artistic and cultural standpoint (Tarkovsky, Pasolini, etc), but this is most definitely the one film I can just watch again and again. It's basically perfect in terms of structure, writing, visuals and accomplishing its aims.
Don't jerk me off!
>>69970341
Is this why Tim and Eric exists?
>>69970256
>>69970353
I loved Robocop 2. Obviously it wasn't as solid as the first one, but Kane was a great villain, a different sort of villain. All those drug lab shootouts. I mean who can really compare with Dick Jones and Clarence and the boys?
Robocop 3 was just flatout embarrassing though.
That and I don't think Verhoeven was involved with any of the sequels. So there's that.
>>69971253
>I want a car that goes really fast and gets really horrible gas mileage
Robocop 1 for the cheesy awesome, Robocop 2 for cheesy awesome laffs.
"You look a little out of breath, bitch!"
