[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
CinemaSins just got wrecked by a turbo autist
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 25
File: vlcsnap-2013-10-07-05h04m59s15.png (389 KB, 592x336) Image search: [Google]
vlcsnap-2013-10-07-05h04m59s15.png
389 KB, 592x336
CinemaSins just got smashed by a turbo autist.

(Pic unrelated).
>>
I forgot the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ti3chBx2Pc&feature=youtu.be
>>
File: 1455749656996.jpg (149 KB, 800x820) Image search: [Google]
1455749656996.jpg
149 KB, 800x820
>>69913460
>purposely forgot link to self bump his shitpost
>>
>>69913809
>self bump

take your own advice newfriend
>>
>>69913460

>swedish accent

D R O P P E D
>>
>>69913854
he did the vid as his wife prepoped the bull
>>
>>69913809

I didn't purposefully forget, I fucked up and put the subject twice because I typed it in the wrong box first, by accident.

>>69913854

He's British.
>>
>>69913854
You really need to travel more, Clapper.
>>
>>69913460
This is probably you spamming your own shitty video, also MADMAX sucked.
>>
>>69914694
All the movies?
>>
>>69914694
The videogame was horrible indeed
>>
WHO CARES.

CINEMASINS IS MEH. USED TO BE GOOD. NOW IS BORING.

NO ONE NEEDS TO ANALYZE IT OR MAKE A VIDEOS ABOUT IT>
>>
oh wow, you weren't joking about the autism
>>
The director of Looper actually got really pissed and tweted to them, even though the cinema sins video for it is only 3 mins long.
>>
Please tell me Jeremy has seen this, hahaha. And he's done it for other cinema sins video hahahaa
>>
>>69913460
Kek that was pretty good. Cinema sins have definitely been declining in quality for a couple of years now
>>
>>69915018
cinemasins is awful
>>
File: image.jpg (25 KB, 500x299) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
25 KB, 500x299
>>69913460
>unfunny autist complains about satire
>>
>>69913809
thanks for bumping :^)
>>
>>69913460
>is it a joke that IM not getting? Is it their gimmick?

Yes you fucking autist. thats it
I dont even like cs, but it is pretty obvious that it is not supposed to be a serious movie analysis
>>
What a shit thread. CinemaSins, in and of itself, is satire. It's just for fun, bro.

Sage
>>
Cinemasins literally say at the start of the video "we loved this and these are gonna be extra nitpickey"
>>
>>69916102
you ever seen that video where a bunch of gayboys go into tha hood and pull pranks like pretending to steal guys phones. & then one of them gets beat up and he's like 'stop dude its a prank' ?..........................
>>
Not bad. Cinema Sins is cool but they do get shit wrong left annd right, even though they are just taking the piss.
>>
>>69916225
How do you pretend to steal a phone?
>>
>>69913460
>average /tv/ poster
>>
>>69916275
by stealing itthen i guess give it back.
u get my point thou?
>>
>>69916225
No, and I don't intend to.

Sage
>>
>>69916387
I'm go look for da vid
>>
>>69916405
dont be dumb anon. the guys acted like assholes and when they got aa reaction they were like 'its just a joke bro'

>>69916412
jus watch the h3h3 video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVaAv0cPRok
>>
>>69913460
>explaines shit that everybody already knows

wow, it is MoS defenders all over again
>>
>>69916511
>watching reaction videos
no thanks, Im not that normie yet
>>
>>69916605
lmao are you retarded?
>>
>>69916511
>the guys acted like assholes and when they got aa reaction they were like 'its just a joke bro'

Cinema Sins doesn't do this though?
Inn fact they have videos making fun of their own fucking videos.
>>
He did another one about another one of their videos.
>>
>>69916667
cinemasins dont act like assholes or they dont use the 'its just a joke' line?
>>
>>69916652
No, thats why Im not watching facebook-tier yt channel that make "reaction videos"
>>
>>69916883
lol yr like one of those hurricane katrina dogs
>>
>>69916717
well its sad that people need it pointed out to them that its just a joke
>>
>>69915826
>cinema sins
>satire
>>
>>69916935
but theyre still being assholes lmao
>>
>>69916717
>cinemasins dont act like assholes

Not really?

>or they dont use the 'its just a joke' line?

You haven't explained the problem with doing this. Their videos are very very clearly meant to be humorous and not a super in depth analysis of a movie.

Generally he gives sins just for opening credits. You think that's serious?
>>
>>69916984
ok yr still not getting what im saying
>>
>>69916972
Grow the fuck up
>>
>>69917071
You could explain it instead of typing like a retard
>>
>>69917077
ayyy mami
>>
>>69917103
watch yr mouth & i have explained it
>>
>>69916972
how?
>>
>>69917269
watch the video op posted bruh bruh
>>
>>69917141
Nah son. Y u lyin
>>
>>69917304
tb h dog im not feelin yr energy
>>
>>69917290
How are they assholes?
>>
>>69917423
Cuz said mean stuff
>>
File: tilting at windmills.png (11 KB, 377x89) Image search: [Google]
tilting at windmills.png
11 KB, 377x89
>>69917423
git gud
>>
Eh.

This guy did it better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnTZbZw1JPQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5YWVne9pDE

Cinemasins is trash.
>>
>>69917680
And so are you
>>
>>69916949
The default video for visiting their channel is the video calling out everything wrong with Cinema Sins. It's satire.
>>
>>69917759
good one
>>
>>69913427
Who is this beautiful woman?
>>
>>69917759
I am also did it better?

Thanks?
>>
>>69917504
>>69917506
yeah sure. But they are not real assholes
>>
>>69917680
Why would anyone watch cinema sins video before seeing the movie though. Oh man, what a savior this guy is though!

But yeah CS sucks.
>>
>>69917843
does it matter?
>>
>>69917506
tfw that's me
>>
>>69917890
lmao man u ugly
>>
>>69917680
This just inspires me to do a
Everything wrong with Everything wrong with [Cinema Sins]

this guy is too autistic for his own good
>>
>>69917924
yeah :(
>>
>>69917928
p sure hes married thou
>>
>>69917680
>nitpicks nitpicks

Wew..
>>
>>69913809
>He thinks that OP's can bump there own thread.

Nice try reddit, I like how you used your /pol/ Trump meme picture as well to try "fit in".
>>
>>69917680
>>69913460
This is honestly more annoying than just watching Cinema Sins
>>
>>69917680
How big of an autist do you have to be to do this?

CS is just for comedy.
>>
>>69917680
>are movie sins just observations?

>>69913460
>Is quick one liner jokes their gimmick?

Holy shit people are dense.
>>
>>69918163
https://youtu.be/tVaAv0cPRok?t=5m11s

>>69918279
yr smart i wish i were you
>>
>>69918345
>look how little i care

fuck off u goofball, no one cares.
>>
>>69918432
except you ;)
>>
>>69918345
I wish people were less pedantic. But you know how it be.
>>
>the city of this whole thread

:^|
>>
>>69918471
sometimes it do be like that
>>
File: 363634334.png (14 KB, 799x103) Image search: [Google]
363634334.png
14 KB, 799x103
>>69917928
Seems like it''s just a matter of time thing.
Personanlly I'd like someone to just to highlight the pointlesness of doing it in this first place
>>
>>69913460
He's wrong on some occasions too.
>furiosa being strong enough catch max is ok because she has a robotic arm
He doesn't understand that the robotic arm is only holding on to Max while she uses her real arm to hold on to the truck. She would still fall with him
>>
File: image.gif (45 KB, 515x320) Image search: [Google]
image.gif
45 KB, 515x320
>people legitimately hate cinemasins
>>
>>69919394
>there's people that don't hate that shit
It's literal garbage. But I guess their 'criticism' is right on the level of the average /tv/ poster
>>
>>69919499
see
>>69917506
>>
>>69913460
right off the bat the reason the audio is different is to avoid a copyright claim you fucking sperglord jesus h
>>
>>69917506
SJW assholes, btw
>>
>>69919735
lol really?
>>
>>69913460
>cuckold accent
>>
>>69919778
post accent or gtfo
>>
>>69918345
stop shilling reaction videos. this is not facebook
>>
>>69919394
you were in the Squatch thread and saved my pic
>>
>>69920039
o shit waddup
>>
Cinemasins lost all credibility with the Force Awakens Review where they purposely avoided some hot topics like the annoying Oranges terrible token nigger voice actress
>>
>>69920307
nope
>>
>>69920307
>lost all credibility
Well, good thing they didn't lose something big
>>
>>69920355
Yes

It was horrendous and they only hired her because JJ wanted more diversity and she was "hot shit" because of that white guilt movie of the year.

The irony once again being that they probably could have found another token who would have done a much better job
>>
>>69920307
Nearly every big Youtuber lost their credibility with TFA.
>>
>>69920415
sure, nice tinfoil hat
>>
>>69920307
im sure they must be devastated by losing this segment of their audience lol

you're probably one of those people who started jerking off the prequels after tfa came out
>>
good

ive been waiting for someone to btfo of cinemasins for a while

especially that thing where sins just sort of states whats going on in an analytical way as if its supposed to be funny
>>
>>69920415
or maybe some people dont care as much about race as you
>>
>>69913427

Why do people watch this shit?

The videos are repetitive, unfunny, uninformative, non-criticisms that get churned out on an assembly line that for some reason normies take totally seriously.

I hate Youtube nitpick culture.
>>
Holy hell, the amount of shills in this thread lmao
>>
>>69919905
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1iHuIJA6EIc
>>
>>69915826
>blatantly misunderstanding a movie/ just stating what is on screen
>satire

im confused, is it satire of fucking idiots who dont watch movies all the way through?
>>
>>69920557
>all teh REEL ppl agree with ME, ebryon else is SHILLZ
>>
>>69920536
I liked them when they were 3 minutes long and pointed out shit that was genuinely retarded.
But now I have to agree with you
>>
>>69917764
What the fuck is wrong with your brain. You called cinema sins satire then said the default video for the channel in question is calling out cinema sins then you say this new channel is satire? Which is it? Did you have a fucking stroke?
>>
>>69917928
>This just inspires me to do a
>Everything wrong with Everything wrong with [Cinema Sins]

Go for it.
>>
>>69920563
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1OM4CZginAW
>>
>>69920534
niggers sure do when you look at the interracial rape stats
>>
>>69920574
>WTF, I'm totally not a shill, lol. CinemaSinsâ„¢ is great and fuck the haters
>>
>>69919394
>literally pulling shit out of their ass with that monotone voice
how can someone watch this shit
>>
>>69915826
>>69917764
>>69916102
As the second video in >>69917680 reveals, it's not satire, these are absolutely his real thoughts on the movies because the non-satire reviews he does contain the same gripes his "Everything Wrong With" videos contain.
>>
>>69920536
What? You point out you find cinemasins unfunny and shitty then complain when someone attempts to call them out? What the fuck is with this thread. Half of everyone posting in it is legitimately fucking retarded.
>>
>>69920699
>i'm so important that people must be payed to disagree with me! people are very invested in trying to sway my super important opinions y'know
lol sure
>>
>>69915679
It's because he went from pretty neutral to FULL BLOWN SJW LEFTIST FAGGOT.

His videos are unbearable now because he doesn't make racy jokes anymore and its all too safe.
>>
>>69920841
>WAAAAAAH WHY DIDNT EVERYTHING STAY RACIST
it's like this is /pol/'s entire metric for comedy lol
>>
>>69920778

Says the man who didn't even read my fucking post.

I don't once make a single reference to your precious autistic man, who's video I didn't even bother to watch, and now you've got your panties all up in a bunch about how stupid everyone else is despite blatantly failing to comprehend the post you're replying to.
>>
I already unsubscribed years ago. I don't why, if its the fame/views, but why do big channels always turn to instant shit when they get a bigger audience? Besides RLM, I can't think of a single channel that has managed to stay true to its roots and bring out quality videos.
>>
>>69920841
>Letting someones personal and political views judge your perception of their work when said work has little to do with the views

There is more to humor than "niggers niggers niggers lol"
>>
File: image.jpg (31 KB, 306x306) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
31 KB, 306x306
>there are people on /tv/ who don't understand satire
>these are the same people that like Civil War
>>
>>69920676
this has nothing to do with movies
>>
>>69921037
>satire
See >>69920742
>>
>>69920997
>RLM
>famous

Just because some people liked the Plinkett revews doesn't mean that the entire world creams itself when a new Best of the Bag comes out
>>
>>69920742
>not exaggerating your opinions for comedic effect
>>
>>69921094
Even as far as Youtube goes, Redlettermedia isn't very famous.
>>
>>69917506
This is what people say to avoid criticism of their work. It's the Jon Leibowitz excuse. "I'm not a real news program, I'm a comedy show host." They try to avoid criticism by saying they're actually something else despite what they're doing.
>>
>>69921135
exaggerated inaccuracies are still inaccuracies
>>
>>69921084
yes. this post shows a lack of understanding what satire is. thanks for the example
>>
>>69913460
Yeah, mate. Most jokes go over your head when you don't know CS.
And I don't even like this particular video. He removed sins for way too petty reasons and not even got every sin.
Compared to other CS videos this was a dick sucking,
>>
>>69921215
FINALLY
THIS IS WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING THE WHOLE TIME
>>
>>69921215
>self irony is avoiding criticism
how? you can criticise them perfectly fine
>>
>>69921272
how is someone being a fucking idiot satire? If blatantly star spouting nonsense and inaccuracies, will you call it satire?

This is no different than an acclaimed artist releasing something shitty then all the fanboys jump to their defense going "i-its supposed to be bad! its satire of bad music!"
>>
>>69921135
But the base opinion itself is inaccurate.

>>69921272
How so? Genuinely curious as to why you'd think this.
>>
anyone on this website is too old for cinemasins
>>
>>69921331
There is self irony in saying "I'm not a good reviewer, I'm an asshole" or "I'm just an asshole who pretends to offer valid criticism for movies on the internet." Saying "I'm not X, I'm Y." means you're deflecting any potential criticism of your work onto the idea that you're just a parody and that your ideas do not have influence beyond parody, which is false in the case of Jon Leibowitz and CinemaSins.
>>
GOD DAMN I FUCKING HATE CINEMASINS. I DISLIKE AND COMMENT ON ALL OF THEIR VIDEOS BECAUSE OTHER PEOPLE LIKE THEM AND I DON'T.
>>
>>69921346
because it implies that you cant express your "real thoughts" with satire
>>
>>69913460
What a faggy voice
>>
File: 1462933028939.jpg (132 KB, 652x573) Image search: [Google]
1462933028939.jpg
132 KB, 652x573
>>69921011
>There is more to humor than "niggers niggers niggers lol"
Not for /pol/
>>
CinemaSins shills getting sweaty and bothered
>>
>>69921514
But the argument was "those aren't his real thoughts, they're just satire." No, they aren't just satire, they're his real thoughts, which is why he's wrong. The real thoughts he has behind his satire shield are complete bunk and he's stupid for having them.
>>
>>69921428
but he is not a reviewer. he isnt and he doestn claim to be one. whats your point? do you want him to pretend that he is a serious reviewer when he claerly only makes ""funny"" nitpick videos? I dont get this. You can criticise him for what he does
>>
>>69921334
woops fucked up

*If I blatantly start* spouting nonsense
>>
>>69921334
>i dont like it so it's not satire
essentially your whole argument
>>
>>69921591
>he is not a reviewer
The CinemaSins guy? No, he does movie reviews. That would make him a movie reviewer for whatever that's worth.
>>
>>69921589
>those aren't his real thoughts, they're just satire
I never said that
>>
>>69921708
Do you really think the "everything wrong with..." videos are movie reviews? what the fuck?
>>
>>69921703
Not that anon but it really doesn't matter if it is/isn't satire because they are also his real observations (as evident by the reviews he does apart from the Everything Wrong With videos) and those real observations are just wrong.
>>
>>69913427
CinemaSins is pretty much the worst thing to ever happen to the internet.
>>
>>69921731
You're not the only anon discussing this.
>>
>>69921804
>and those real observations are just wrong
such as? i assume you're talking about before and after reviews on his other channel, so what in those videos was so wrong?
>>
>>69921821
It's terrible, but very far from twttehtti
>>
>>69921845
exactly
>>
File: 1439260098386.gif (4 MB, 200x200) Image search: [Google]
1439260098386.gif
4 MB, 200x200
>>69921135
>>69921084
>>69921215
>>69921331
>>69921346
>>69921591

CinemaSins is a problem, not because what they do is satire or serious. But because their fanbase takes it seriously and preaches their shit like they know about film. They are doing a disservice by spreading that shit. The average person sees his videos and they get a misguided sense of how films are structured and made, then there is also the impressionable bunch that waits till a video about a movie comes out to form their opinion about the film. Its film intellectual poison, that's why Cinema Sins is so fucking awful.

Can you all goatfuckers at least agree on that?
>>
>>69921774
You misunderstand me: he has other videos where he does real movie reviews (where he winds up saying many of the same things he says in the EWW videos, hence why it's hard to defend a lot of the stupid stuff he says as "just satire" when they're also in the non-satirical reviews and thus genuinely his opinions).
>>
>>69921887
Well, all that's obvious.
>>
File: 1433065550427.jpg (27 KB, 500x375) Image search: [Google]
1433065550427.jpg
27 KB, 500x375
>>69921514
not in the way you mean though

the only way you can real thoughts with satire is if you stance intelligently and strongly enough to convince people believe you think you think believe in, and that the opposite
>>
>>69921887
Yeah, I can agree to that.
>>
>>69921887
Im sure retards like this exist, yes. But I dont think they are a problem. A mild annoyance at worst. Where do you even encounter those fags?
>>
>>69921887
>their fanbase takes it seriously

It is not their fault that people are fucking morons.
>>
>>69921887
There is little difference between the people who claim to have deep knowledge of movies from watching his videos and people who claim deep knowledge of current events from watching Jon Leibowitz.
>>
>>69921887
you're probably the same type of idiot who gets mad about "degeneracy" in the media arent you?
>>
>>69921960
This thread has lots of them
>>
>>69915493

I love it when you faggots talk about YouTube 'celebrities' like a bunch of sexually frustrated middle age women.
>>
>>69921703
but since you're making the claim you need to prove cinemasins does not hold these views regularly or point to and display a sense of tongue in cheek.

I know its subjective, but at least to me, he shows no signs of his "points" being mockery of any stance. You can't just have someone saying points in standard tone of voice and somehow claim its satire.

Once again, if I just start claiming inaccurate things about a concept, what will make you immediately believe its satire?


Say I started a youtube channel calling cookingsins
and I commentate over videos of people cooking and go out of my way to misname every piece of equipment they use and every dish they make while criticizing them. The only thing this would be satire of is a cinemasins, but if i was essentially the first of my kind, I'd be some person just saying half truth abouts a video. How is any of this satire?
>>
>>69922031
what?
>>
>>69922103
>i don't like his opinions and nitpicking so it's not satire
you keep repeating yourself
>>
>there are people on this board that legitimately defend CinemaSins

/tv/ was a mistake.
>>
>>69922103
what half truths
>>
>>69922267
And it will only get worse
>>
>>69913427
I'm not gonna waste 15 minutes of my life watching that nonsense. But it amazes me that so many people watch CS. That Mad Max video has nearly 4 million views and their channel has nearly 6 million subscribers. It's amazing people actually find those videos entertaining.
>>
>>69922267
No, it just goes to show that /tv/ is the reddit containment board.
>>
>>69922267
look at the people who don't like cinemasins, you've even got one of those chucklefucks who says "jon leibowitz" lol
>>
If he never made videos making fun of popular/ well received movies no one would care.

But Mad Max and Star Wars and Sherlock Holmes, OH FUCK THIS GUY, EVERYTHING WRONG WITH EVERYTHING WRONG WITH EHGSGAGSHD!
>>
File: kekcat.jpg (111 KB, 497x640) Image search: [Google]
kekcat.jpg
111 KB, 497x640
>>69920658
underrated post
>>
>>69922460
Most of /tv/ hates Mad Max, TFA, and Sherlock Holmes. His videos just fucking suck, dude.
>>
>>69920997
>managed to stay true to its roots and bring out quality videos.

Huh? I mean it's unfunny, but it's always been unfunny, but how can you say the quality of the videos is worse now?
>>
File: logo-large.png (3 KB, 284x115) Image search: [Google]
logo-large.png
3 KB, 284x115
>>69913460
>>
>>69922562
not him. but ealier CS video were at least decent. They were 2-4 minutes and brought up "sins" that had a point
>>
>>69913460
>fuh-joh-ree ro-deh
what the fuck
>>
One thing I hate about Cinemasins is the whole "in less than X seconds!" thing

Is it meant to be impressive? 15 minutes is a lot of time. Is the implication that there are so many mistakes it takes this long to show them? But it's clearly meant to be short because of "less" and the rapid pace

I would get it if it was the gimmick, like every episode took 14 minutes, but that's not the case, it's always random. Plus that would take effort
>>
>>69921094
>have had Tim Heidecker, Max Landis, Len Kabasinski, the director of that Star Wars documentary, and the Samurai Cop guy on their show
>Patton Oswalt, Damon Lindelof and Simon Pegg have praised them
>got Patton to be in their flick

They are the thinking man's review channel and quite famous.
>>
>>69922645
Like which one. You could pick through those ones too, as they also have a bunch of wrong shit in them. The longer ones just have, you know, more wrong things.
>>
>>69922678
what a totally reasonable thing to say. you're definitely not reaching in any way
>>
>>69922509
I'm not talking about /tv/, I'm specifically talking about the videos people posted of people taking the CS videos apart. And those 3 movies were used

Oh and Age of Ultron.

If he only did this for movies that were shit, no one would care. Like I said. If he only did it for lets say the new fantastic 4, any of the transformers movies, The Room and The Happening or some shit no one would give a shit.
>>
>>69922738
>Cinemasins reaches for his critique
>lol how could you reach for something lol
>>
>>69922689
A bunch of no names and fucks who like their stupid review because "GRR FUCK THE PREQUELS" does not equal fame you fucking moron
>>
>>69922689
How is having Max Landis something to be proud of?
>>
>>69922788
cinemasins reaches intentionally in a comedic way, you're just pissing and moaning
>>
>>69922703
what wrong shit?
>>
File: 1424215782135.jpg (20 KB, 258x245) Image search: [Google]
1424215782135.jpg
20 KB, 258x245
>>69922848
>reaches intentionally in a comedic way,
>>
>>69922703
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BWnTW4rL0U
>>
>>69922814
>they're only famous if I approve of the reason why these famous people like them
>being a prequel defender too

Moron.
>>
>>69917680
It's hard to watch because he sounds so fucking mad, like in a "bitter he doesn't have a ton of followers and views" sorta way

I know that's probably not why he's mad, and he's just more butthurt the guy gets so much wrong, but still.
>>
>>69922942
>what is nitpicking
thats their shtick. I dont find it entertaining either, but this is what they do
>>
>>69913854
He's from liverpool you cunt
>>
>>69922689
None of those are major names.

RLM has 300k subs.
Chris Stuckman has 600k subs.
Cinemassacre has 2,000k subs.
CinemaSins has 5,000k subs.
WatchMojo has 11,000k subs.

We can argue quality, but in terms of popularity, RLM aren't very popular.
>>
I don't understand. Don't CinemaSins turbo wreck themselves every time they release a video and the vast majority of the nit picks are grounded in them not having paid attention to the movie, excuses to use memes and flat out misconceptions?
>>
>>69923097
Amazing that they are the most shilled on /tv/
>>
>>69922650

HI WOOWEE
>>
>>69923133
it's almost as if they're a comedy channel and not actually trying to tell you everything that is wrong with a movie
>>
>>69923156
>shilled
that word doesnt mean what you think it means
>>
>>69922836
Max Landis is an immensely successful and respected screenwriter who only recently sold one of his scripts for a record amount of 3 million dollars.

Not only is he a brilliant screenwriter, but he is also an accomplished director and a profound presence on Twitter, where he has made a name for himself for his signature blend of deep, informed thoughts and witty observations.
>>
This is what you get for watching YouTube shit.
>>
>>69923223
hi max
>>
>>69923200
Comedy is not an excuse.
>>
>>69923200
Comedy is supposed to be funny.
>>
File: 3352626.png (319 KB, 846x474) Image search: [Google]
3352626.png
319 KB, 846x474
>>69922951
>nitpick nitpick, random 1 liner, random 1 liner

This is an example? There isn't even shit to prove wrong, it's just jokes like "THE SKY ISN'T BLUE HERE, *DING!*"

I mean yeah, this "sin" about the fucking rims on this vehicle is totally a sin that "has a point"

You know the videos that are 19 minutes long do the same thing right, it's just 16 minutes longer. Shit I mean are you really going to say these were any better?

If this is supposed to be their golden age, that's cool I guess...
>>
>>69923097
They don't have the most subs, but they're definitely one of the most respected and beloved film-related youtube channels. I mean the fact that they can get someone like Patton Oswalt to be in their shit schlock movie just by writing to him on Twitter speaks volumes.
>>
Cinemasins genuinely is really terrible. They shouldn't make videos anymore
>>
>>69917680
His other videos are fucking cringe worthy as shit. He should stick to dismantling CS videos, since, according to the comments, he's getting a lot of subs that way
>>
>>69923276
ah yes, the ol' ''Hi [insert name of person being discussed here]'' response!
>>
>>69923223
>Not only is he a brilliant screenwriter

American Ultra isn't brilliant.
>>
I'm not watching OP's shitty video, but I'm genuinely disappointed in CInemaSins. Used to be really entertaining and the last few I tried watching were just worthless.
>>
>>69923429
American Ultra is very good, the scripts at least. It's the casting and direction that made it not as good as it could've been.
>>
>>69923384
>gets more popular than CS by making fun of CS videos

I'd laugh. It will never happen but.

In anycase, I'm surprised CinemaSins got so popular. I think he started in late 2012? 2013?

It's amazing that no one else on the whole of the internet did videos like his before him. Or did he just get lucky somehow.

I wonder if his books are any good, that would be cool but then I'd have to admit I liked Jeremy.
>>
>>69923200
It's not funny in a satirical way either, unless the entire concept of the video is meant to be ironic satire making fun of themselves for making really poor criticisms of movies.
>>
>>69923331
>most respected and beloved
I guess that depends on who you ask. I think most people would say "who" or, if they recognized them, only by the prequel reviews.

Even the prequel reviews weren't super well-received. I remember talking with people about them elsewhere online, and they'd complain about his voice, the length of the video, and the serial killer side plot and other bad jokes. Plus, those prequel videos were a long time ago in Internet terms.

And Patton Oswalt isn't a very big name.
>>
Let's be honest people that watch this "Everything wrong with..." videos are just underaged kiddos and there is no humour to be seen in this shitty videos so how could anyone see anything slightly funny in one of them is beyond me.
>>
>>69923310
the "sins" arent a metric of the quality of the movie. this isnt a review. why cant you understand this. its meant to be funny. granted, it isnt. but you are autistic about it
>>
>It's okay for Cinemasins to be wrong and nitpicky when they criticize things, because they are assholes haha!

>But you are not allowed to criticize thrm because

CS openly calls movies shit right in the title, but they and their fans start crying when someone points out they are less than perfect
>>
>>69923200
I guess Doug Walker's Nostalgia Critic is a cinematic genius internet series, since it's meant to be stupid
>>
>>69919260
You can see some of the wives are helping.
>>
>>69923736
>But you are not allowed to criticize thrm because
nobody is saying this
>>
File: sipping_rapunzel.jpg (38 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
sipping_rapunzel.jpg
38 KB, 500x500
>>69913460
Lmao yuro autism.
>cinemasins: madmax is being a dick to a lizard
>retarded autist: he eats the lizard he's not being a dick to the lizard.

holy shit, I have never seen a cinemasins critic ever make fucking sense or show a modicum of intelligence.
>>
File: 1462983142615.jpg (78 KB, 481x481) Image search: [Google]
1462983142615.jpg
78 KB, 481x481
>>69913460
Brb, making a Youtube critique of this autist
>>
>>69923625
Well Patton is obviously not big in a George Clooney way, but in terms of Youtube content he most definitely is a big name.

And even then, Patton is still a well known guy who has no career or financial reason to mingle with RLM.

And of course there are people who have complained about aspects of the Plinkett reviews, but generally they are liked and praised, and when they were first released they were a big deal.

I also forgot to mention Roger Ebert talking about RLM several times.
>>
>>69923865
are you saying eating something is being a dick to it?
>>
>>69923726
>this isnt a review. why cant you understand this.

I'm not saying it is. I was responding to these points here:

>stay true to its roots and bring out quality videos.
>earlier CS video were at least decent. They were 2-4 minutes and brought up "sins" that had a point

What "has a point" any more than the more recent longer videos? What drop in "quality" is there? It's the same 1 liners and nitpicks

That post was a response to me saying "You could pick through those ones too, as they also have a bunch of wrong shit in them. The longer ones just have, you know, more wrong things." as if it was supposed to prove to me the shorter ones had sins that "had a point"

My only problem here is people like you and the other guy trying to say "oh it used to be pretty good back in the day lel!"
>>
>>69923869
>>69917928
>>69918633
Someone has to fucking do this, if only so I can laugh.

Maybe I should git gud at editing and do it myself.
>>
This movie has committed 124 Cinema Sins

Haha this doesnt mean the movie is bad haha or these are bad things haha no but seriously what a lazy movie haha thats a nebolous adjective not criticism haha
>>
File: wakko.jpg (55 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
wakko.jpg
55 KB, 500x500
>>69913460
This is like listening to Wakko Warner slowly explain to an autistic child, step by step, every part of Mad Max that the child didn't understand

This was better than I expected
>>
>>69922316
People have something called different tastes, you'd know that if you ever had any descent human interaction
>>
>>69924023
It would be some Kolo clawfish tier autism

>The tanker isnt full of gasoline, but milk
>Eugh like sigh like cmon its like you really pointing THAT out? facepalm
For 2 hours
>>
>>69923916
killing is pretty mean
>>
>>69923865
>vegan detected
>>
>>69924023
Well you kid of can't, because they actually did research and brought up legit counter points.
>>
>>69924124
>killing just to kill it = mean
>killing it to eat it = not mean
>>
>>69924045
Haha you're totally right.
>>
>>69923946
well the format worked better in a 3min video. even if you dont like his humor you have to see this
>>
>>69923865
>Bullets ricochet off this truck full of gas

>well it isn't full of gas, it's full of milk, as you can see in this scene right here [shows scene]

>YEAH BUT IT'S JUST A JOKE MAN LOL LIKE COME ON
>>
>>69924134
lol no. Thats why I said it inspired me to do a video pointing out his autism
>>
>>69924169
He could it kill to eat it, but then, after killing and before eating, face an impediment and have to get running immediately; so he would have killed for nothing.
>>
>>69924169
yeah, tell that to my lizard people
>>
>>69923865
kill yourself jeremy
>>
>>69924281
but he didn't so fuck you.
>>
>>69923665
>I don't think it's funny so only kids must watch it
Are you fucking serious?
>>
>>69924219
Yep. And the thing is, it isn't even funny as a joke because it's pretty clearly not what's going on. It's like if I showed a clip of a guy walking across the street, and I said "haha that clutz totally tripped" but the guy didn't trip at all. That's not a funny joke.
>>
>cinemasins watchers
nice, well adjusted people who can have a small chuckle and move on with their lives

>cinemasins haters
guys who post about da jewzzz and hate on anything remotely popular in a misguided attempt to be cool
>>
>>69924333
Yes, he didn't. That's was a hypothesis, nigger
>>
>>69917680
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnTZbZw1JPQ [Remove]
>dat intro
>dat baseless assumptions
>>
>>69923196
etsubatsu
>>
>>69924403
hypothesis doesn't matter faggot. He killed it to eat it.
>>
What happened to the Mad Max who got shot?
He got destroyed!

DUDE ITS JUST A JOKE CMON WHY ARE YOU CALLING IT SHIT ITS JUST A JOKE
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 25

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.